The women's heart health programme: a pilot trial of sex-specific cardiovascular management

Ting Ting Low, Siew Pang Chan, Shin Hnin Wai, Zhou Ang, Kyu Kyu, Kim Yee Lee, Anne Ching, Sarah Comer, Naomi Qiu Pin Tan, Elizabeth Grace Hui En Thong, Tracy Nang, Mohan Dutta, Carolyn S P Lam, Ting Ting Low, Siew Pang Chan, Shin Hnin Wai, Zhou Ang, Kyu Kyu, Kim Yee Lee, Anne Ching, Sarah Comer, Naomi Qiu Pin Tan, Elizabeth Grace Hui En Thong, Tracy Nang, Mohan Dutta, Carolyn S P Lam

Abstract

Background: There is increasing knowledge of sex-specific differences in cardiovascular disease and recognition of sex disparities in management. In our study, we investigated whether a cardiovascular programme tailored to the specific needs of women could lead to improved outcomes.

Methods: We randomised 100 female patients to receive cardiology follow-up with the conventional sex-neutral cardiac programme (control), or the sex-tailored Women's Heart Health Programme (intervention). The intervention group was managed by an all-women multidisciplinary team and received culture-centred health intervention workshops, designed through in-depth interviews with the participants. The primary outcome was cardiovascular risk factor improvement at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include cardiovascular event rates, quality of life scores, and self-reported improvement in knowledge, attitudes, intentions and practices. Generalised structural equation model analysis was used to determine if the intervention group had better outcomes at alpha level 0.1.

Results: The mean age was 67.3 ± 12.7 years, with an ethnic distribution of 70% Chinese, 18% Malays, and 12% Indians. The majority of these patients had no formal or primary level of education (63%), and were mostly unemployed (78%). Patients in intervention group had better control of diabetes mellitus (lower HbA1c of 0.63% [CI 0.21-1.04], p = 0.015) and lower body-mass-index (0.74 kg/m2 [CI 0.02-1.46], p = 0.092) at 1 year, but there was no significant difference in blood pressure or lipid control. Overall, there was a trend towards better risk factor control, 31.6% of intervention group versus 26.5% of control group achieved improvement in at least 1 CV risk factor control to target range. There was no significant difference in incidence of cardiovascular events, quality of life, or domains in knowledge, attitudes, intention and practices.

Conclusion: This pilot study is the first of its kind evaluating a new model of care for women with heart disease. The potential to improve outcomes needs to be studied in a larger trial with longer follow up.

Trial registration: This trial was prospectively registered clinicaltrials.gov on 6 May 2013. Trial Number: 2013/00088. Identifier: NCT02017470.

Keywords: Attitudes; Cardiovascular disease; Culturally competent care; Health knowledge; Healthcare disparities; Practice; Quality of life; Women’s health.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by National Healthcare Group Domain Specific Review Board in Singapore. Written consent was also obtained from the participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Wenger NK. Women and coronary heart disease: a century after Herrick. Circulation. 2012;126:604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.086892.
    1. Low TT, Lam CSP. Women and heart failure: an emerging Venus-Mars concept. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports. 2013;7(3):212–216. doi: 10.1007/s12170-013-0307-z.
    1. Spatz ES, Curry LA, Masoudi FA, Zhou S, et al. The variation in recovery: role of gender on outcomes of young AMI patients (VIRGO) classification system: a taxonomy for young women with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2015;132(18):1710–1718. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016502.
    1. Mieres JH, Gulati M, Bairey Merz N, et al. Role of noninvasive testing in the clinical evaluation of women with suspected ischemic heart disease: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;130:350–379. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000061.
    1. Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, et al. 2012 focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–2747. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs253.
    1. Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Bezanson JL, Dolor RJ, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women—2011 update. Circulation. 2011;123:1243. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8.
    1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2013 update. Circulation. 2013;127:e6. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad.
    1. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–383. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
    1. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–1251. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
    1. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized latent variable modelling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models: chapman and hall. 2014.
    1. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A. Generalized multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychometrika. 2004;69:167–190. doi: 10.1007/BF02295939.
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of medical Care in Diabetes - 2009. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(suppl 1):S13–S61. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S013.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Type 2 diabetes: newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes.
    1. Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events. Diabetologia. 2014;57:1542–1551. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3260-6.
    1. Hu G, Jousilahti P, Qiao Q, Katoh S, Tuomilehto J. Sex differences in cardiovascular and total mortality among diabetic and non-diabetic individuals with or without history of myocardial infarction. Diabetologia. 2005;48:856–861. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1730-6.
    1. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 2006;332:73–78. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38678.389583.7C.
    1. Gao F, Lam CSP, Sim LL, Koh TH, Foo D, Ong HY, et al. Impact of the joint association between sex, age and diabetes on long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:308. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1612-x.
    1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Dans T, Avezum A, Lanas F, et al. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364:937–952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9.
    1. Rivellese AA, Riccardi G, Vaccaro O. Cardiovascular risk in women with diabetes. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;20:474–480. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.01.008.
    1. Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts, including 775,385 individuals and 12,539 strokes. Lancet. 2014;383:1973–1980. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60040-4.
    1. Gu Q, Burt VL, Paulose-Ram R, Dillon CF. Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: data from the National Health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2004. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:789–798. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.185.
    1. Chou AF, Scholle SH, Weisman CS, Bierman AS, Correa-de-Araujo R, Mosca L. Gender disparities in the quality of cardiovascular disease care in private managed care plans. Womens Health Issues. 2007;17:120–130. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.03.002.
    1. Lewey J, Shrank WH, Bowry ADK, Kilabuk E, Brennan TA, Choudhry NK. Gender and racial disparities in adherence to statin therapy: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2013;165:665–78.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.02.011.
    1. Russo G, Pintaudi B, Giorda C, Lucisano G, Nicolucci A, Cristofaro MR, et al. Age- and gender-related differences in LDL-cholesterol Management in Outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:957105.
    1. Lip GY, Laroche C, Boriani G, Cimaglia P, Dan GA, Santini M, et al. Sex-related differences in presentation, treatment, and outcome of patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe: a report from the euro observational research Programme pilot survey on atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:24–31. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu155.
    1. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119.
    1. Wagstaff AJ, Overvad TF, Lip GY, Lane DA. Is female sex a risk factor for stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM. 2014;107:955–967. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcu054.
    1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death. Circulation. 1998;98:946. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.98.10.946.
    1. Comer SK, Dutta MJ. Women’s Heart Health in Singapore: A Culture-Centered Framework. [White paper]. Retrieved from .
    1. Gao F, Lam CS, Yeo KK, Machin D, de Carvalho LP, Sim LL, et al. Influence of ethnicity, age, and time on sex disparities in long-term cause-specific mortality after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003760. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003760.
    1. Lefler LL, McSweeney JC, Garner KK. “Missing pieces”: exploring cardiac risk perceptions in older women. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2013;6:107–115. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20121217-01.
    1. Ose D, Rochon J, Campbell SM, Wensing M, Freund T, van Lieshout J, et al. Health-related quality of life and risk factor control: the importance of educational level in prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24:679–678. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt139.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel