COMIRESTROKE-A clinical study protocol for monitoring clinical effect and molecular biological readouts of COM prehensive I ntensive RE habilitation program after STROKE: A four-arm parallel-group randomized double blinded controlled trial with a longitudinal design

Kamila Řasová, Patrícia Martinková, Michaela Vařejková, Barbora Miznerová, Markéta Pavlíková, Jana Hlinovská, David Hlinovský, Štěpánka Philippová, Michal Novotný, Karolína Pospíšilová, Paula Biedková, Romana Vojíková, Jan Havlík, Valerie Bríd O'Leary, Marie Černá, Aleš Bartoš, Tom Philipp, Kamila Řasová, Patrícia Martinková, Michaela Vařejková, Barbora Miznerová, Markéta Pavlíková, Jana Hlinovská, David Hlinovský, Štěpánka Philippová, Michal Novotný, Karolína Pospíšilová, Paula Biedková, Romana Vojíková, Jan Havlík, Valerie Bríd O'Leary, Marie Černá, Aleš Bartoš, Tom Philipp

Abstract

Introduction: While the role of physiotherapy as part of a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation is indisputable, clear evidence concerning the effectiveness of different rehabilitation managements [interdisciplinary implementing the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF) vs. multidisciplinary model] and physiotherapy categories (neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" vs. motor/skill acquisitions using technologies) are still lacking. In this study, four kinds of comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation with different management and content of physical therapy will be compared. Moreover, focus will be placed on the identification of novel biological molecules reflective of effective rehabilitation. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are transcripts (>200 bps) of limited coding potential, which have recently been recognized as key factors in neuronal signaling pathways in ischemic stroke and as such, may provide a valuable readout of patient recovery and neuroprotection during therapeutic progression.

Methods and analysis: Adults after the first ischemic stroke in an early sub-acute phase with motor disability will be randomly assigned to one of four groups and undergo a 3 weeks comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation of different types: interdisciplinary team work using ICF model as a guide; multidisciplinary teamwork implementing neuroproprioceptive "facilitation and inhibition" physiotherapy; multidisciplinary teamwork implementing technology-based physiotherapy; and standard multidisciplinary teamwork. Primary (the Goal Attainment Scale, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule) and secondary (motor, cognitive, psychological, speech and swallowing functions, functional independence) outcomes will be measured. A blood sample will be obtained upon consent (20 mls; representing pre-rehabilitation molecular) before and after the inpatient program. Primary outcomes will be followed up again 3 and 12 months after the end of the program. The overarching aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of various rehabilitation managements and physiotherapeutic categories implemented by patients post ischemic stroke via analysis of primary, secondary and long non-coding RNA readouts. This clinical trial will offer an innovative approach not previously tested and will provide new complex analysis along with public assessable molecular biological evidence of various rehabilitation methodology for the alleviation of the effects of ischemic stroke.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05323916, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT05323916.

Keywords: disability and health model; international classification of functioning; ischemic stroke; lncRNA—long non-coding RNA; motor disability; motor recovery; physiotherapy; rehabilitation.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2022 Řasová, Martinková, Vařejková, Miznerová, Pavlíková, Hlinovská, Hlinovský, Philippová, Novotný, Pospíšilová, Biedková, Vojíková, Havlík, O'Leary, Černá, Bartoš and Philipp.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Planned Recruitment and Randomization Process.

References

    1. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. (2009) 8:741–54. 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4
    1. Yagi M, Yasunaga H, Matsui H, Morita K, Fushimi K, Fujimoto M, et al. . Impact of rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan. Stroke. (2017) 48:740–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015147
    1. Bindawas SM, Vennu V, Moftah E. Improved functions and reduced length of stay after inpatient rehabilitation programs in older adults with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neuro Rehabil. (2017) 40:369–90. 10.3233/NRE-161425
    1. Bunketorp-Käll L, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Samuelsson H, Pekny T, Blomvé K, Pekna M, et al. . Long-term improvements after multimodal rehabilitation in late phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. (2017) 48:1916–24. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016433
    1. Hopman WM, Verner J. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. (2003) 34:801–5. 10.1161/01.STR.0000092205.92969.00
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. (2011) 377:1693–702. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
    1. Perin C, Bolis M, Limonta M, Meroni R, Ostasiewicz K, Cornaggia CM, et al. . Differences in rehabilitation needs after stroke: a similarity analysis on the ICF core set for stroke. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:4291. 10.3390/ijerph17124291
    1. Rasova K, Freeman J, Martinkova P, Pavlikova M, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, et al. . The organisation of physiotherapy for people with multiple sclerosis across Europe: a multicentre questionnaire survey. BMC Health Serv Res. (2016) 16:552. 10.1186/s12913-016-1750-6
    1. Zhang T, Liu L, Xie R, Peng Y, Wang H, Chen Z, et al. . Value of using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health for stroke rehabilitation assessment: a multicenter clinical study. Medicine. (2018) 97:e12802. 10.1097/MD.0000000000012802
    1. Brewer L, Horgan F, Hickey A, Williams D. Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies. QJM. (2013) 106:11–25. 10.1093/qjmed/hcs174
    1. Johansson BB. Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. (2011) 123:147–59. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01417.x
    1. Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. (2020) 19:348–60. 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6
    1. van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2005) 76:503–8. 10.1136/jnnp.2004.040436
    1. Martinková P, Drabinová A, Liaw YL, Sanders EA, McFarland JL, Price RM. Checking equity: why differential item functioning analysis should be a routine part of developing conceptual assessments. CBE Life Sci Educ. (2017) 16:rm2. 10.1187/cbe.16-10-0307
    1. Martinková P, Hladká A, PotuŽníková E. Is academic tracking related to gains in learning competence? Using propensity score matching and differential item change functioning analysis for better understanding of tracking implications. Learn Instruction. (2020) 66:101286. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101286
    1. Martinková P, Freeman J, Drabinová A, Erosheva E, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, et al. . Physiotherapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis across Europe: Regions and other factors that matter. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2018) 22:59–67. 10.1016/j.msard.2018.03.005
    1. Takeuchi N, Izumi S-I. Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Res Treat. (2013) 2013:128641. 10.1155/2013/128641
    1. Straudi S, Basaglia N. Neuroplasticity-based technologies and interventions for restoring motor functions in multiple sclerosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 958:171–85. 10.1007/978-3-319-47861-6_11
    1. Rasová K, Bučková B, Prokopiusová T, Procházková M, Angel G, Marková M, et al. . A three-arm parallel-group exploratory trial documents balance improvement without much evidence of white matter integrity changes in people with multiple sclerosis following two months ambulatory neuroproprioceptive “facilitation and inhibition” physical therapy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. (2021) 6:889–899. 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06701-0
    1. Vaney C, Gattlen B, Lugon-Moulin V, Meichtry A, Hausammann R, Foinant D, et al. . Robotic-assisted step training (lokomat) not superior to equal intensity of over-ground rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2012) 26:212–21. 10.1177/1545968311425923
    1. Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy H. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2004) 22:245–60.
    1. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. Willis Lecture Stroke. (2000) 31:223–30. 10.1161/01.STR.31.1.223
    1. Perkel JM. Visiting “noncodarnia”. Biotechniques. (2013) 54:301. 10.2144/000114037
    1. Wolska M, Jarosz-Popek J, Junger E, Wicik Z, Porshoor T, Sharif L, et al. . Long non-coding RNAs as promising therapeutic approach in ischemic stroke: a comprehensive review. Mol Neurobiol. (2021) 58:1664–82. 10.1007/s12035-020-02206-8
    1. Ren W, Yang X. Pathophysiology of long non-coding RNAs in ischemic stroke. Front Mol Neurosci. (2018) 11:96. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00096
    1. Caley DP, Pink RC, Trujillano D, Carter DR. Long noncoding RNAs, chromatin, and development. Sci World J. (2010) 10:90–102. 10.1100/tsw.2010.7
    1. Xiao C, Sharp JA, Kawahara M, Davalos AR, Difilippantonio MJ, Hu Y, et al. . The XIST noncoding RNA functions independently of BRCA1 in X inactivation. Cell. (2007) 128:977–89. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.034
    1. Marcho C, Bevilacqua A, Tremblay KD, Mager J. Tissue-specific regulation of Igf2r/Airn imprinting during gastrulation. Epigenetics Chromatin. (2015) 8:10. 10.1186/s13072-015-0003-y
    1. O'Leary VB, Hain S, Maugg D, Smida J, Azimzadeh O, Tapio S, et al. . Long non-coding RNA PARTICLE bridges histone and DNA methylation. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:1790. 10.1038/s41598-017-01875-1
    1. O'Leary VB, Ovsepian SV, Carrascosa LG, Buske FA, Radulovic V, Niyazi M, et al. . PARTICLE, a triplex-forming long ncRNA, regulates locus-specific methylation in response to low-dose irradiation. Cell Rep. (2015) 11:474–85. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.043
    1. Williams T, Ngo LH, Wickramasinghe VO. Nuclear export of RNA: different sizes, shapes and functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. (2018) 75:70–7. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.08.054
    1. Clark BS, Blackshaw S. Understanding the role of lncRNAs in nervous system development. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2017) 1008:253–82. 10.1007/978-981-10-5203-3_9
    1. Bechara EG, Didiot MC, Melko M, Davidovic L, Bensaid M, Martin P, et al. . A novel function for fragile X mental retardation protein in translational activation. PLoS Biol. (2009) 7:e16. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000016
    1. Castets M, Schaeffer C, Bechara E, Schenck A, Khandjian EW, Luche S, et al. . FMRP interferes with the Rac1 pathway and controls actin cytoskeleton dynamics in murine fibroblasts. Hum Mol Genet. (2005) 14:835–44. 10.1093/hmg/ddi077
    1. Xu Q, Deng F, Xing Z, Wu Z, Cen B, Xu S, et al. . Long non-coding RNA C2dat1 regulates CaMKIIδ expression to promote neuronal survival through the NF-κB signaling pathway following cerebral ischemia. Cell Death Dis. (2016) 7:e2173. 10.1038/cddis.2016.57
    1. Ye X, Zhou XJ, Zhang H. Exploring the role of autophagy-related gene 5 (ATG5) yields important insights into autophagy in autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases. Front Immunol. (2018) 9:2334. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02334
    1. Deng Y, Chen D, Gao F, Lv H, Zhang G, Sun X, et al. . Silencing of long non-coding RNA GAS5 suppresses neuron cell apoptosis and nerve injury in ischemic stroke through inhibiting DNMT3B-dependent MAP4K4 methylation. Transl Stroke Res. (2020) 11:950–66. 10.1007/s12975-019-00770-3
    1. Enderby P, Pandyan A, Bowen A, Hearnden D, Ashburn A, Conroy P, et al. . Accessing rehabilitation after stroke - a guessing game? Disabil Rehabil. (2017) 39:709–13. 10.3109/09638288.2016.1160448
    1. Alexander MP. Stroke rehabilitation outcome. A potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care. Stroke. (1994) 25:128–34. 10.1161/01.STR.25.1.128
    1. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. (1990) 21:241–6. 10.1161/01.STR.21.2.241
    1. Burton CR, Horne M, Woodward-Nutt K, Bowen A, Tyrrell P. What is rehabilitation potential? Development of a theoretical model through the accounts of healthcare professionals working in stroke rehabilitation services. Disabil Rehabil. (2015) 37:1955–60. 10.3109/09638288.2014.991454
    1. Hu MH, Hsu SS, Yip PK, Jeng JS, Wang YH. Early and intensive rehabilitation predicts good functional outcomes in patients admitted to the stroke intensive care unit. Disabil Rehabil. (2010) 32:1251–9. 10.3109/09638280903464448
    1. MZCR . Registrační List Ošetrovacího Dne Následné Komplexní Intenzivní RehabilitacNí LécBy U Pacientu Se Získaným PošKozením Mozku (Registration Sheet of the Treatment Day Following Comprehensive Intensive Rehabilitation Treatment for Patients With Acquired Brain Damage), REGISTRACNÍ LIST_OD_00033, kranioprogram_MZ CR, Praha, 2020. Praha: MZČR.
    1. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L, et al. . Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke. (2002) 33:1610–7. 10.1161/01.STR.0000017100.68294.52
    1. Turner-Stokes L. Cost-efficiency of longer-stay rehabilitation programmes: can they provide value for money? Brain Injury. (2007) 21:1015–21. 10.1080/02699050701591445
    1. Malhotra S, Pandyan AD, Rosewilliam S, Roffe C, Hermens H. Spasticity and contractures at the wrist after stroke: time course of development and their association with functional recovery of the upper limb. Clin Rehabil. (2011) 25:184–91. 10.1177/0269215510381620
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. (2013) 346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Grefkes C, Fink GR. Recovery from stroke: current concepts and future perspectives. Neurol Res Pract. (2020) 2:17. 10.1186/s42466-020-00060-6
    1. Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, Ward NS, Wolf SL, Borschmann K, et al. . Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. (2017) 12:444–50. 10.1177/1747493017711816
    1. van Swieten J. Modified Rankin Scale for Neurologic Disability: MDCalc ©. (2021). Available online at: (accessed October 22, 2022).
    1. American Medical Association. Pre-Stroke Modified Rankin Score (mRS). (2020). Available online at: (accessed October 22, 2022).
    1. Lacas A, Rockwood K. Frailty in primary care: a review of its conceptualization and implications for practice. BMC Med. (2012) 10:4. 10.1186/1741-7015-10-4
    1. Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J. et al. Developing the world health organization disability assessment schedule 20. Bull World Health Organ. (2010) 88:815–23. 10.2471/BLT.09.067231
    1. Branch, IR . ICF e-Learning Tool. Available online at: (accessed October 22, 2022).
    1. Angerová Y . Advances in an Inter-Professional Approach to the Examination Rehabilitation of Patients After Brain Injury. (2022). Available online at: (accessed October 22, 2022).
    1. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1982) 14:377–81. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
    1. Bukowski L, Bonavolonta M, Keehn MT, Morgan KA. Interdisciplinary roles in stroke care. Nurs Clin North Am. (1986) 21:359–74. 10.1016/S0029-6465(22)00423-6
    1. Yagura H, Miyai I, Suzuki T, Yanagihara T. Patients with severe stroke benefit most by interdisciplinary rehabilitation team approach. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2005) 20:258–63. 10.1159/000087708
    1. Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, Zorowitz RD, Bakas T, Clark P, et al. . Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Stroke. (2010) 41:2402–48. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181e7512b
    1. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. . ICF Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. (2004) 2004 (Suppl. 44):135–41. 10.1080/16501960410016776
    1. Prodinger B, Reinhardt JD, Selb M, Stucki G, Yan T, Zhang X, et al. . Towards system-wide implementation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in routine practice: developing simple, intuitive descriptions of ICF categories in the ICF generic and rehabilitation set. J Rehabil Med. (2016) 48:508–14. 10.2340/16501977-2066
    1. Reed GM, Lux JB, Bufka LF, Trask C, Peterson DB, Stark S, et al. . Operationalizing the international classification of functioning, disability and health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol. (2005) 2005:122–31. 10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.122
    1. Tempest S, Harries P, Kilbride C, De Souza L. To adopt is to adapt: the process of implementing the ICF with an acute stroke multidisciplinary team in England. Disabil Rehabil. (2012) 34:1686–94. 10.3109/09638288.2012.658489
    1. Branch IR . The ICF Intervention Table. (2022). Available online at: (accessed August 9, 2022).
    1. Mehrholz J, Thomas S, Werner C, Kugler J, Pohl M, Elsner B. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2017) 5:Cd006185. 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub4
    1. Su F, Xu W. Enhancing brain plasticity to promote stroke recovery. Front Neurol. (2020) 11:554089. 10.3389/fneur.2020.554089
    1. Epple C, Maurer-Burkhard B, Lichti M-C, Steiner T. Vojta therapy improves postural control in very early stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled pilot trial. Neurol Res Pract. (2020) 2:23. 10.1186/s42466-020-00070-4
    1. Gunning E, Uszynski MK. Effectiveness of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation method on gait parameters in patients with stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2019) 100:980–6. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.020
    1. Rasova K, Prochazkova M, Tintera J, Ibrahim I, Zimova D, Stetkarova I. Motor programme activating therapy influences adaptive brain functions in multiple sclerosis: clinical and MRI study. Int J Rehabil Res. (2015) 38:49–54. 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000090
    1. Rasová K, Martinková P, Soler B, Freeman J, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J, et al. . Real-world goal setting and use of outcome measures according to the international classification of functioning, disability and health: a european survey of physical therapy practice in multiple sclerosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:4774. 10.3390/ijerph17134774
    1. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S, et al. . The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med. (2001) 33:273–8. 10.1080/165019701753236464
    1. Havlík J, Horák P, Rasová K, Rezníčková J, Zeman J. The evaluation of the tremor: signal database of healthy control subjects. Praha: IFMBE Proceedings; (2018).
    1. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. (1971) 9:97–113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
    1. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; (1992).
    1. Wilson JT, Hareendran A, Grant M, Baird T, Schulz UG, Muir KW, et al. . Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified rankin scale. Stroke. (2002) 33:2243–6. 10.1161/
    1. Mediano MFF, Mok Y, Coresh J, Kucharska-Newton A, Palta P, Lakshminarayan K, et al. . Prestroke physical activity and adverse health outcomes after stroke in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Stroke. (2021) 52:2086–95. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032695
    1. Lyden P, Raman R, Liu L, Emr M, Warren M, Marler J. National institutes of health stroke scale certification is reliable across multiple venues. Stroke. (2009) 40:2507–11. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532069
    1. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. (1991) 337:1521–6. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O
    1. Reeves M, Lisabeth L, Williams L, Katzan I, Kapral M, Deutsch A, et al. . Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for acute stroke: rationale, methods and future directions. Stroke. (2018) 49:1549–56. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018912
    1. Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. (2009) 18:873–80. 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9
    1. Ustun TB Kostanjesek N Chatterji S Rehm J World Health Organisation . Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0). In: Üstiün TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J. Geneva: World Health Organization (2010). Available online at:
    1. Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. Am J Occup Ther. (1990) 44:519–25. 10.5014/ajot.44.6.519
    1. Turner-Stokes L, Williams H, Johnson J. Goal attainment scaling: does it provide added value as a person-centred measure for evaluation of outcome in neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury? J Rehabil Med. (2009) 41:528–35. 10.2340/16501977-0383
    1. Bertrand AM, Mercier C, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J, Gravel D. Reliability of maximal static strength measurements of the arms in subjects with hemiparesis. Clin Rehabil. (2007) 21:248–57. 10.1177/0269215506070792
    1. Chen HM, Chen CC, Hsueh IP, Huang SL, Hsieh CL. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2009) 23:435–40. 10.1177/1545968308331146
    1. Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL. Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2012) 93:1039–45. 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.033
    1. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. (2005) 36:2493–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
    1. Persson CU, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS, Grimby-Ekman A, Hansson PO. Timed up & go as a measure for longitudinal change in mobility after stroke - postural stroke study in gothenburg (POSTGOT). J Neuroeng Rehabil. (2014) 11:83. 10.1186/1743-0003-11-83
    1. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the berg balance scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. (2008) 88:559–66. 10.2522/ptj.20070205
    1. Cheng DK, Nelson M, Brooks D, Salbach NM. Validation of stroke-specific protocols for the 10-meter walk test and 6-minute walk test conducted using 15-meter and 30-meter walkways. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2020) 27:251–61. 10.1080/10749357.2019.1691815
    1. Ring H, Feder M, Schwartz J, Samuels G. Functional measures of first-stroke rehabilitation inpatients: usefulness of the functional independence measure total score with a clinical rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (1997) 78:630–5. 10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90429-9
    1. Kostalova M, Mrackova M, Marecek R, Berankova D, Eliasova I, Janousova E, et al. . The 3F test dysarthric profile—normative speach values in Czech. Cesk Slov Neurol Neurochir. (2013) 76:614–18.
    1. Rusz J, Tykalova T, Ramig LO, Tripoliti E. Guidelines for speech recording and acoustic analyses in dysarthrias of movement disorders. Mov Disord. (2021) 36:803–14. 10.1002/mds.28465
    1. Nakase-Thompson R, Manning E, Sherer M, Yablon SA, Gontkovsky SL, Vickery C. Brief assessment of severe language impairments: initial validation of the mississippi aphasia screening test. Brain Injury. (2005) 19:685–91. 10.1080/02699050400025331
    1. Štenová V, Cséfalvay Z. Test Pomenovania Obrázkov. Bratislava: SAL; (2011).
    1. Jaywant A, Toglia J, Gunning FM, O'Dell MW. Subgroups defined by the montreal cognitive assessment differ in functional gain during acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2020) 101:220–6. 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.08.474
    1. Bartos A, Fayette D. Validation of the czech montreal cognitive assessment for mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease and czech norms in 1,552 elderly persons. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2018) 46:335–45. 10.1159/000494489
    1. Bartoš A. Two original Czech tests for memory evaluation in three minutes – amnesia light and brief assessment (ALBA) [article in Czech: Dvě pu°vodní české zkoušky k vyšetrení paměti za tři minuty - Amnesia Light and Brief Assessment (ALBA)]. Cesk Slov Neurol N. (2019) 82:420–9. 10.14735/amcsnn2019420
    1. Bartoš A, Diondet S. Amnesia light and brief assessment (ALBA) test – the second version and repeated examinations. [article in Czech: Test Amnesia Light and Brief Assessment (ALBA) – druhá verze a opakovaná vyšetrení]. Cesk Slov Neurol N. (2020) 83:535–43. 10.14735/amcsnn2020535
    1. Bartoš A. Do not test but POBAV (ENTERTAIN) – written intentional naming of pictures and their recall as a brief cognitive test [article in Czech: Netestuj, ale POBAV: písemné záměrné Pojmenování OBrázku A jejich Vybavení jako krátká kognitivní zkouška]. Cesk Slov Neurol N. (2016) 79:671–9. Available online at:
    1. Cella D, Lai JS, Nowinski CJ, Victorson D, Peterman A, Miller D, et al. . Neuro-QOL: brief measures of health-related quality of life for clinical research in neurology. Neurology. (2012) 78:1860–7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318258f744
    1. Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. (2001) 125:279–84. 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00297-2
    1. Team RC. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; (2021).
    1. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. (2015) 67:1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    1. Pinheiro JBD, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. R Core Team. _nlme: Linear Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models_. R package version 3.1-152. (2021). Available online at: (accessed May 30, 2022).
    1. Hladká A, Martinková P. difNLR: generalized logistic regression models for DIF and DDF detection. R J. (2020) 12:300–23. 10.32614/RJ-2020-014
    1. Martinková P, Drabinová A. Shinyitemanalysis for teaching psychometrics and to enforce routine analysis of educational tests. R J. (2018) 10:503–15. 10.32614/RJ-2018-074

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel