A second dose of kisspeptin-54 improves oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a Phase 2 randomized controlled trial

Ali Abbara, Sophie Clarke, Rumana Islam, Julia K Prague, Alexander N Comninos, Shakunthala Narayanaswamy, Deborah Papadopoulou, Rachel Roberts, Chioma Izzi-Engbeaya, Risheka Ratnasabapathy, Alexander Nesbitt, Sunitha Vimalesvaran, Rehan Salim, Stuart A Lavery, Stephen R Bloom, Les Huson, Geoffrey H Trew, Waljit S Dhillo, Ali Abbara, Sophie Clarke, Rumana Islam, Julia K Prague, Alexander N Comninos, Shakunthala Narayanaswamy, Deborah Papadopoulou, Rachel Roberts, Chioma Izzi-Engbeaya, Risheka Ratnasabapathy, Alexander Nesbitt, Sunitha Vimalesvaran, Rehan Salim, Stuart A Lavery, Stephen R Bloom, Les Huson, Geoffrey H Trew, Waljit S Dhillo

Abstract

Study question: Can increasing the duration of LH-exposure with a second dose of kisspeptin-54 improve oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)?

Summary answer: A second dose of kisspeptin-54 at 10 h following the first improves oocyte yield in women at high risk of OHSS.

What is known already: Kisspeptin acts at the hypothalamus to stimulate the release of an endogenous pool of GnRH from the hypothalamus. We have previously reported that a single dose of kisspeptin-54 results in an LH-surge of ~12-14 h duration, which safely triggers oocyte maturation in women at high risk of OHSS.

Study design, size, duration: Phase-2 randomized placebo-controlled trial of 62 women at high risk of OHSS recruited between August 2015 and May 2016. Following controlled ovarian stimulation, all patients (n = 62) received a subcutaneous injection of kisspeptin-54 (9.6 nmol/kg) 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either a second dose of kisspeptin-54 (D; Double, n = 31), or saline (S; Single, n = 31) 10 h thereafter. Patients, embryologists, and IVF clinicians remained blinded to the dosing allocation.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Study participants: Sixty-two women aged 18-34 years at high risk of OHSS (antral follicle count ≥23 or anti-Mullerian hormone level ≥40 pmol/L). Setting: Single centre study carried out at Hammersmith Hospital IVF unit, London, UK. Primary outcome: Proportion of patients achieving an oocyte yield (percentage of mature oocytes retrieved from follicles ≥14 mm on morning of first kisspeptin-54 trigger administration) of at least 60%. Secondary outcomes: Reproductive hormone levels, implantation rate and OHSS occurrence.

Main results and the role of chance: A second dose of kisspeptin-54 at 10 h following the first induced further LH-secretion at 4 h after administration. A higher proportion of patients achieved an oocyte yield ≥60% following a second dose of kisspeptin-54 (Single: 14/31, 45%, Double: 21/31, 71%; absolute difference +26%, CI 2-50%, P = 0.042). Patients receiving two doses of kisspeptin-54 had a variable LH-response following the second kisspeptin dose, which appeared to be dependent on the LH-response following the first kisspeptin injection. Patients who had a lower LH-rise following the first dose of kisspeptin had a more substantial 'rescue' LH-response following the second dose of kisspeptin. The variable LH-response following the second dose of kisspeptin resulted in a greater proportion of patients achieving an oocyte yield ≥60%, but without also increasing the frequency of ovarian over-response and moderate OHSS (Single: 1/31, 3.2%, Double: 0/31, 0%).

Limitations, reasons for caution: Further studies are warranted to directly compare kisspeptin-54 to more established triggers of oocyte maturation.

Wider implications of the findings: Triggering final oocyte maturation with kisspeptin is a novel therapeutic option to enable the use of fresh embryo transfer even in the woman at high risk of OHSS.

Study funding/competing interest(s): The study was designed, conducted, analysed and reported entirely by the authors. The Medical Research Council (MRC), Wellcome Trust & National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) provided research funding to carry out the studies. There are no competing interests to declare.

Trial registration number: Clinicaltrial.gov identifier NCT01667406.

Trial registration date: 8 August 2012.

Date of first patient's enrolment: 10 August 2015.

Keywords: ICSI outcome; IVF; OHSS; kisspeptin; oocyte maturation; trigger injection.

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow diagram showing the number of patients assessed for eligibility, study enrolment and kisspeptin-54 dosing group allocation. Seventy-six patients were screened for participation in the study, of whom 62 women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were randomized 1:1 to receive either one (Single, n = 31) or two (Double, n = 31) doses of kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In vitro fertilization study protocol using kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation. The timeline shows the day of menstrual cycle for a typical patient. On Day 2 or 3 of the menstrual cycle, daily subcutaneous recombinant FSH (Gonal F 112.5 IU) was commenced. Daily GnRH antagonist injections (Cetrotide 0.25 mg) were commenced after 5 days of recombinant FSH injections. If serum LH was undetectable (n = 62) received a subcutaneous injection of kisspeptin-54 (9.6 nmol/kg) 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval to trigger oocyte maturation (between 20 :30 and 23:00 h). Injections of GnRH-antagonist and FSH were stopped 24 h and 12 h prior to the first kisspeptin-54 injection, respectively. We have previously shown that this protocol and dose of kisspeptin-54 safely and effectively triggers oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) undergoing IVF treatment (Abbara et al., 2015). All patients then received a second injection 10 h after the first injection, but were randomized 1:1 to receive either a second dose of kisspeptin-54 (D; Double, n = 31), or saline (S; Single, n = 31) to determine if a second dose of kisspeptin-54 could increase the duration of LH-exposure and optimize oocyte yield compared to a single dose of kisspeptin-54. Serum reproductive hormones (LH, FSH, estradiol and progesterone) were measured immediately prior to as well as 4 and 10 h after the first kisspeptin-54 injection. Serum reproductive hormones were also measured immediately prior to as well as 4 and 10 h after the second injection (of kisspeptin-54 or saline). Transvaginal ultrasound-directed oocyte retrieval (TVOR) was carried out 36 h following the first kisspeptin-54 injection, and ICSI was performed using fresh sperm from the male partner. If a high quality blastocyst was available, elective single embryo transfer (eSET) was carried out 5 days following oocyte retrieval. Progesterone 100 mg daily intramuscular injections (Gestone, Nordic Pharma, UK) and estradiol valerate 2 mg orally three times daily (Progynova, Bayer, Germany) was commenced from the evening of TVOR until 12 weeks gestation. All women recruited to the study were regarded as being at high risk of OHSS and were routinely screened for the development of early OHSS (assessed on day of embryo transfer 3–5 days after TVOR) and late OHSS (assessed 11 days after embryo transfer). Biochemical pregnancy (serum βHCG > 10 iU/L) was assessed 11 days following embryo transfer and clinical pregnancy was assessed by ultrasonography at 6 weeks gestation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reproductive hormonal response following kisspeptin-54 trigger administration. All patients received 9.6 nmol/kg of kisspeptin-54 subcutaneously 36 h prior to oocyte retrieval to trigger oocyte maturation. Patients were then randomized to receive a second injection 10 h later of either saline (Single shown in red) or kisspeptin-54 9.6 nmol/kg (Double shown in blue). Serum LH in iU/L ( A), serum FSH in iU/L (B), serum estradiol in pmol/L ( C) and serum progesterone in nmol/L (D) is presented by kisspeptin-54 dosing group (single or double).

References

    1. Abbara A, Jayasena CN, Christopoulos G, Narayanaswamy S, Izzi-Engbeaya C, Nijher GMK, Comninos AN, Peters D, Buckley A, Ratnasabapathy R et al. . Efficacy of kisspeptin-54 to trigger oocyte maturation in women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:3322–3331.
    1. Abbara A, Ratnasabapathy R, Jayasena CN, Dhillo WS. The effects of kisspeptin on gonadotropin release in non-human mammals In: Kauffman AS, Smith JT (eds). Kisspeptin Signal Reprod Biol [Internet]. New York: Springer New York, 2013, 63–87. .
    1. Calhaz-Jorge C, Geyter C, de, Kupka M, Mouzon J, de, Erb K, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, Scaravelli G, Wyns C, Goossens V. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2012: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod Adv Access Publ [Internet] 2016;31:1638–1652.
    1. Caraty A, Smith JT, Lomet D, Ben Saïd S, Morrissey A, Cognie J, Doughton B, Baril G, Briant C, Clarke IJ. Kisspeptin synchronizes preovulatory surges in cyclical ewes and causes ovulation in seasonally acyclic ewes. Endocrinology 2007;148:5258–5267.
    1. Castillo JC, Humaidan P, Bernabéu R. Pharmaceutical options for triggering of final oocyte maturation in ART. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:1–7.
    1. Cho S-G, Yi Z, Pang X, Yi T, Wang Y, Luo J, Wu Z, Li D, Liu M. NIH public access. Cancer Res 2009;69:7062–7070.
    1. Clarke SA, Dhillo WS. Kisspeptin across the human lifespan: evidence from animal studies and beyond. J Endocrinol 2016;229:R83–R98.
    1. Clarkson J, d'Anglemont de Tassigny X, Moreno AS, Colledge WH, Herbison AE. Kisspeptin-GPR54 signaling is essential for preovulatory gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuron activation and the luteinizing hormone surge. J Neurosci 2008;28:8691–8697.
    1. Courbiere B, Oborski V, Braunstein D, Desparoir A, Noizet A, Gamerre M. Obstetric outcome of women with in vitro fertilization pregnancies hospitalized for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a case-control study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1629–1632.
    1. Delvinge A, Rozenberg S. Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:559–577.
    1. Demyttenaere K, Bonte L, Gheldof M, Vervaeke M, Meuleman C, Vanderschuerem D, D'Hooghe T. Coping style and depression level influence outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998;69:1026–1033.
    1. Dhillo WS, Chaudhri OB, Patterson M, Thompson EL, Murphy KG, Badman MK, McGowan BM, Amber V, Patel S, Ghatei MA et al. . Kisspeptin-54 stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal axis in human males. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:6609–6615.
    1. Ezcurra D, Humaidan P, Hillier S, Cole L, Cole L, Wolfenson C, Groisman J, Couto A, Hedenfalk M, Cortvrindt R et al. . A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet] 2014;12:95.
    1. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Humaidan P, Kol S, Banker M, Devroey P, García-Velasco JA. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and ‘freeze-all’ approach in GnRH antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril 2014;101:1008–1011.
    1. Gaast van der MH, Eijkemans MJC, Net van der JB, Boer de EJ, Burger CW, Leeuwen van FE, Fause BC, Macklon NS. Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet] 2006;13:476–480.
    1. Golan A, Ron-El R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Weinraub Z, Caspi E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1989;44:430–440.
    1. Golan A, Weissman A. Symposium: update on prediction and management of OHSS – a modern classification of OHSS. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:28–32.
    1. Gurbuz AS, Gode F, Ozcimen N, Isik AZ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist trigger and freeze-all strategy does not prevent severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a report of three cases. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:541–544.
    1. Haas J, Baum M, Meridor K, Hershko-Klement A, Elizur S, Hourvitz A, Orvieto R, Yinon Y. Is severe OHSS associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes? Evidence from a case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet] 2014;29:216–221. Reproductive Healthcare Ltd.
    1. Hoff JD, Quigley ME, Yen SSC. Hormonal dynamics at midcycle: a reevaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983;57:792–796.
    1. Humaidan P, Nelson SM, Devroey P, Coddington CC, Schwartz LB, Gordon K, Frattarelli JL, Tarlatzis BC, Fatemi HM, Lutjen P et al. . Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: review and new classification criteria for reporting in clinical trials. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1997–2004.
    1. Humaidan P, Thomsen LH, Alsbjerg B. GnRHa trigger and modified luteal support with one bolus of hCG should be used with caution in extreme responder patients. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2593–2594.
    1. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority Fertility treatment 2014: trends and figures [Internet]. 2016; Available from: .
    1. Jayaprakasan K, Chan Y, Islam R, Haoula Z, Hopkisson J, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning N. Prediction of in vitro fertilization outcome at different antral follicle count thresholds in a prospective cohort of 1,012 women Fertil Steril 2012;98:657–663.
    1. Jayasena CN, Abbara A, Comninos AN, Nijher GMK, Christopoulos G, Narayanaswamy S, Izzi-Engbeaya C, Sridharan M, Mason AJ, Warwick J et al. . Kisspeptin-54 triggers egg maturation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. J Clin Invest 2014;124:3667–3677.
    1. Jayasena CN, Abbara A, Narayanaswamy S, Comninos AN, Ratnasabapathy R, Bassett P, Mogford JT, Malik Z, Calley J, Ghatei MA et al. . Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1934–1941. Oxford University Press.
    1. Lee TH, Liu CH, Huang CC, Wu YL, Shih YT, Ho HN, Yang YS, Lee MS. Serum anti-müllerian hormone and estradiol levels as predictors of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod [Internet] 2008;23:160–167.
    1. Ling LP, Phoon JWL, Lau MSK, Chan JKY, Viardot-Foucault V, Tan TY, Nadarajah S, Tan HH. GnRH agonist trigger and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: relook at ‘freeze-all strategy. Reprod Biomed Online 2014;29:392–394.
    1. Matsui H, Takatsu Y, Kumano S, Matsumoto H, Ohtaki Tik. Peripheral administration of metastin induces marked gonadotropin release and ovulation in the rat. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;320:383–388.
    1. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril 1992;58:249–261.
    1. Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Fatemi HM, Steirteghem A Van, Devroey P. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 2006;85:112–120.
    1. Roux N, de, Genin E, Carel J-C, Matsuda F, Chaussain J-L, Milgrom E. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism due to loss of function of the KiSS1-derived peptide receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:10972–10976.
    1. Schork NJ. Personalized medicine: time for one-person trials. Nature [Internet] 2015;520:609–611.
    1. Seminara SB, Messager S, Chatzidaki EE, Thresher RR, Acierno JS, Shagoury JK, Bo-Abbas Y, Kuohung W, Schwinof KM, Hendrick AG et al. . The GPR54 gene as a regulator of puberty. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1614–1627.
    1. Serour GI, Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Sattar MA, Amin Y, Aboulghar H. Complications of medically assisted conception in 3,500 cycles. Fertil Steril 1998;70:638–642.
    1. Seyhan A, Ata B, Polat M, Son WY, Yarali H, Dahan MH. Severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger with the addition of 1500 IU hCG. Hum Reprod 2013;28:2522–2528.
    1. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1768–1774.
    1. Thomsen L, Humaidan P. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the 21st century: the role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger and kisspeptin. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:210–214.
    1. Toftager M, Bogstad J, Bryndorf T, Løssl K, Roskær J, Holland T, Prætorius L, Zedeler A, Nilas L, Pinborg A. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod 2016;31:1253–1264.
    1. Wada I, Matson PL, Troup SA, Lieberman BA. Assisted conception using buserelin and human menopausal gonadotrophins in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet] 1993;100:365–369.
    1. Youssef M, Veen F Van Der, Al-Inany H, Griesinger G, Mochtar M, Aboulfoutouh I, Khattab S, Wely M Van. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology cycles (Review). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus HCG for oocyte triggering in antagonist assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Rev 2011;2011:CD008046.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel