Motivations for (non)participation in population-based health studies among the elderly - comparison of participants and nonparticipants of a prospective study on influenza vaccination

Manas K Akmatov, Leonhard Jentsch, Peggy Riese, Marcus May, Malik W Ahmed, Damaris Werner, Anja Rösel, Jana Prokein, Inga Bernemann, Norman Klopp, Blair Prochnow, Thomas Illig, Christoph Schindler, Carlos A Guzman, Frank Pessler, Manas K Akmatov, Leonhard Jentsch, Peggy Riese, Marcus May, Malik W Ahmed, Damaris Werner, Anja Rösel, Jana Prokein, Inga Bernemann, Norman Klopp, Blair Prochnow, Thomas Illig, Christoph Schindler, Carlos A Guzman, Frank Pessler

Abstract

Background: Participation in epidemiological studies has strongly declined in recent years. We examined the reasons for (non)participation in population-based health studies among participants and nonparticipants of a prospective study on influenza vaccination among the elderly.

Methods: Males and females between 65 and 80 years of age (N = 5582) were randomly selected from the residents' registration office in Hannover, Germany, and were invited to participate in a study featuring vaccination with a seasonal adjuvanted influenza vaccine (Fluad™, Novartis) including five follow-up visits (day 0, 1/3, 7, 21, 70 with respect to vaccination). A 24-item nonresponder questionnaire, including 10 items on reasons for participating in a hypothetical health study, was mailed to 1500 randomly selected nonparticipants. The same 10 items were included in the end-of-study questionnaire administered to the participants in the vaccination study (n = 200). Logistic regression analysis with backward elimination was used to identify the reasons most strongly associated with nonparticipation.

Results: Five hundred thirty-one (35%) nonparticipants and 200 participants (100%) returned the respective questionnaires. Nonparticipation was associated with a lower interest in obtaining personal health information (OR = 3.32) and a preference for less invasive (OR = 3.01) and less time-demanding (OR = 2.19) studies. Responses to other items, e.g. regarding altruistic motives, monetary compensation, general interest of the study, or study approval through ethics committee and data security authority, did not differ between participants and nonparticipants.

Conclusions: Participation rates in health studies among elderly individuals could potentially be improved by reducing interventions and time demand, for instance by implementing methods of self-sampling and remote data collection.

Trial registration: No. 1100359 (ClinicalTrials.gov, date of registration: 09.02.2015).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02362919.

Keywords: Elderly; Germany; Motivations; Nonparticipants; Participation; Population-based study; Reasons.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons for participating in health research among participants and nonparticipants of the influenza vaccination study. * Chi-square test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Venn diagrams of the relationships across the three reasons mostly associated with (non)participation in a hypothetical health study among participants (a) and nonparticipants (b) of the influenza vaccination study. The data are based on the number of individuals who responded with “very important” or “important” to the questions on time demand and medical interventions, and “not important” or “not at all important” to the question on receiving health information (see Fig. 1, Table 2). Abbreviations: imp. = important; unimp. = unimportant

References

    1. Morton LM, Cahill J, Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:197–203. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj036.
    1. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17:643–653. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013.
    1. Hartge P. Participation in population studies. Epidemiology. 2006;17:252–254. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000209441.24307.92.
    1. Nummela O, Sulander T, Helakorpi S, Haapola I, Uutela A, Heinonen H, et al. Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1418–1425. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.003.
    1. Vind AB, Andersen HE, Pedersen KD, Jorgensen T, Schwarz P. Baseline and follow-up characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in a randomized clinical trial of multifactorial fall prevention in Denmark. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1844–1849. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02435.x.
    1. Townsley CA, Chan KK, Pond GR, Marquez C, Siu LL, Straus SE. Understanding the attitudes of the elderly towards enrolment into cancer clinical trials. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-34.
    1. Allsup SJ, Gosney MA. Difficulties of recruitment for a randomized controlled trial involving influenza vaccination in healthy older people. Gerontology. 2002;48:170–173. doi: 10.1159/000052837.
    1. Costas L, Bayas JM, Serrano B, Lafuente S, Munoz MA. Motivations for participating in a clinical trial on an avian influenza vaccine. Trials. 2012;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-28.
    1. Neugroschl J, Sano M, Luo X, Sewell M. Why They Stay: Understanding Research Participant Retention in Studies of Aging, Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. J Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2014;3(4):1000170.
    1. Akmatov M, Riese P, May M, Jentsch L, Ahmed M, Werner D, et al. Establishment of a cohort for deep phenotyping the host response to influenza vaccination among elderly individuals recruited from the general population. Submitted to Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics. 2016.
    1. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2 edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000.
    1. Elskamp AB, Hartholt KA, Patka P, van Beeck EF, van der Cammen TJ. Why older people refuse to participate in falls prevention trials: a qualitative study. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47:342–345. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.01.006.
    1. Attwood S, Morton KL, Mitchell J, Van EM, Sutton S. Reasons for non-participation in a primary care-based physical activity trial: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011577.
    1. Newington L, Metcalfe A. Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-10.
    1. Gaertner B, Seitz I, Fuchs J, Busch MA, Holzhausen M, Martus P, et al. Baseline participation in a health examination survey of the population 65 years and older: who is missed and why? BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0185-6.
    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:MR000008.
    1. Mahlmann L, Rocke C, Brand A, Hafen E, Vayena E. Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: an exploratory study. Appl Transl Genom. 2016;8:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.atg.2016.01.009.
    1. Schweitzer A, Akmatov MK, Kindler F, Kemmling Y, Kreienbrock L, Krause G, et al. The impact of distance and duration of travel on participation rates and participants’ satisfaction: results from a pilot study at one study centre in pretest 2 of the German national cohort. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007461.
    1. Akmatov MK, Mehraj J, Gatzemeier A, Strompl J, Witte W, Krause G, et al. Serial home-based self-collection of anterior nasal swabs to detect staphylococcus aureus carriage in a randomized population-based study in Germany. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;25:4–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.01.021.
    1. van Zon SK, Scholtens S, Reijneveld SA, Smidt N, Bültmann U. Active recruitment and limited participant-load related to high participation in large population-based biobank studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;78:52–62.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel