FCR and bevacizumab treatment in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Preetesh Jain, Hun Ju Lee, Wei Qiao, William Wierda, Ohad Benjamini, Jan Burger, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Zeev Estrov, Hagop Kantarjian, Michael Keating, Susan O'Brien, Preetesh Jain, Hun Ju Lee, Wei Qiao, William Wierda, Ohad Benjamini, Jan Burger, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Zeev Estrov, Hagop Kantarjian, Michael Keating, Susan O'Brien

Abstract

Background: Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) often achieve response with chemoimmunotherapy but have short remission durations. Studies have shown that patients with CLL have increased angiogenesis in the microenvironment; levels of proangiogenic growth factors such as VEGF and/or angiopoietin-2 are also elevated. Increased angiogenesis correlates with poor outcome in CLL. Bevacizumab (B) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF-A.

Methods: In this study, we analyzed whether a combination of bevacizumab with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab chemoimmunotherapy (FCR-B) could improve outcomes in patients with relapsed CLL. Sixty-two patients were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range, 31-84 years) and 40% had received >1 prior therapy for CLL. Sixty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 57 were evaluable for response. Six cycles were planned; 36 patients (59%) completed ≥4-6 cycles of the regimen.

Results: The overall response rate was 79%, with 13 (23%) complete remissions (CRs), 8 nodular partial remissions (14%), and 24 partial remissions (43%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 13.5 and 45 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n = 40), infections (n = 21), thrombocytopenia (n = 18) and anemia (n = 9).

Conclusions: Results with FCR-B were similar to those observed with an historical cohort of relapsed patients treated with FCR.

Keywords: FCR; anti-angiogenic therapy; bevacizumab; chemoimmunotherapy; chronic lymphocytic leukemia, CLL.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interests - The authors report no competing conflicts of interest.

© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Figures

Figure 1. Progression free survival (PFS) by…
Figure 1. Progression free survival (PFS) by therapy in patients receiving FCR-B and FCR
Shows comparison of FCR-B with the historical cohort of patients who were treated with salvage FCR (P=0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression free survival (PFS) by different FISH (Fluorescent in-situ hybridization) cytogenetic categories (del17p, del11q, negative FISH, trisomy 12 and del13q) in patients receiving FCR-B (P=0.037).
Figure 3. Overall survival (OS) by therapy…
Figure 3. Overall survival (OS) by therapy in patients receiving FCR-B and FCR
Shows comparison of FCR-B with the historical cohort of patients who were treated with salvage FCR (P=0.48).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival (OS) by different FISH (Fluorescent in-situ hybridization) cytogenetic categories (del17p, del11q, negative FISH, trisomy 12 and del13q) in patients receiving FCR-B (P=0.0015).

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel