EMBalance - validation of a decision support system in the early diagnostic evaluation and management plan formulation of balance disorders in primary care: study protocol of a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Laura Rammazzo, Dimitris Kikidis, Amal Anwer, Nora Macdonald, Efthymios Kyrodimos, Christoph Maurer, Floris Wuyts, Linda Luxon, Athanasios Bibas, Doris-Eva Bamiou, Laura Rammazzo, Dimitris Kikidis, Amal Anwer, Nora Macdonald, Efthymios Kyrodimos, Christoph Maurer, Floris Wuyts, Linda Luxon, Athanasios Bibas, Doris-Eva Bamiou

Abstract

Background: Balance problems are caused by multiple factors and often lead to falls and related fractures, bringing large socio-economic costs. The complexity of balance control mechanisms, the lack of medical expertise, and the absence of specialised equipment contribute to the delayed or incorrect diagnosis and management ofthese patients. Advances in computer science have allowed the development of computer systems that support clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions based on individualised patient data. The aim of the EMBalance decision support system (DSS) is to support doctors facing this clinical challenge, to make a definitive diagnosis and implement an effective management plan. The EMBalance study will determine the accuracy of this supportive tool when used by non-specialist doctors. This study is funded by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme.

Methods/design: EMBalance is a proof-of-concept study designed as a non-commercial, international, multi-centre, single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial to be carried out at four clinical sites in the United Kingdom, Germany, Greece and Belgium. The study is comprised of three stages: internal pilot, phase I (diagnosis) and stage II (management). For this purpose, 200 patients presenting with persistent dizziness (>3 months' duration) to primary care services will be randomised to either the intervention group (diagnostic assessment with the DSS) or a control group (diagnostic assessment without the DSS). Patients allocated to the intervention group will be assessed by a doctor with the support of the EMBalance DSS, while patients allocated to the control group will receive a visit as per standard practice. Ultimately, all patients' diagnoses and management plans will be certified by a consultant in neuro-otology.

Discussion: EMBalance is the first trial to test the accuracy of a DSS in both the diagnosis of and the management plan for vestibular disorders across the healthcare systems of four different countries. The EMBalance study is the result of a combined effort of engineers and physicians to develop an accurate tool to support non-specialist doctors, with no risk for the patient. This trial will provide reliable information about the benefits of implementing DSSs in primary care while supporting the feasibility of testing the EMBalance algorithms in further research.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02704819 . Registered 29 February 2016.

Keywords: Decision support system; Dizziness; Feasibility study; Randomised controlled trial; Vertigo; Vestibular disease.

References

    1. Lockhart DB, Ting LH. Optimal sensorimotor transformations for balance. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10(10):1329–36. doi: 10.1038/nn1986.
    1. Colledge NR, Wilson JA, Macintyre CC, MacLennan WJ. The prevalence and characteristics of dizziness in an elderly community. Age Ageing. 1994;23(2):117–20. doi: 10.1093/ageing/23.2.117.
    1. Hobeika CP. Equilibrium and balance in the elderly. Ear Nose Throat J. 1999;78(8):558–62.
    1. Royal College of Physicians . Hearing and balance disorders: achieving excellence in diagnosis and management. Report of a working party. London: Author; 2008.
    1. Pavlou M, Davies RA, Bronstein AM. The assessment of increased sensitivity to visual stimuli in patients with chronic dizziness. J Vestib Res. 2006;16(4-5):223–31.
    1. Neuhauser HK, Radtke A, von Brevern M, Lezius F, Feldmann M, Lempert T. Burden of dizziness and vertigo in the community. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(19):2118–24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2118.
    1. Scuffham P, Chaplin S, Legood R. Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(9):740–4. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.9.740.
    1. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293(10):1223–38. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1223.
    1. Keen PGW, Morton MS. Decision support systems: an organizational perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1978.
    1. Eom S, Kim E. A survey of decision support system applications. J Oper Res Soc. 2006;57(15):1264–78. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602140.
    1. Shim JP, Warkentin M, Courtney JF, Power DJ, Sharda R, Carlsson C. Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decis Support Syst. 2002;33(2):111–26. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7.
    1. Walton RT, Gierl C, Yudkin P, Mistry H, Vessey MP, Fox J. Evaluation of computer support for prescribing (CAPSULE) using simulated cases. BMJ. 1997;315(7111):791–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7111.791.
    1. Shortliffe EH. Computer programs to support clinical decision making. JAMA. 1987;258(1):61–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1987.03400010065029.
    1. Koch HK, Smith MC. Office-based ambulatory care for patients 75 years old and over: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1980 and 1981. Hyattsville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics; 1985.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hróbjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleža-Jerić K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
    1. Caulfield T. Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment. Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):58–61.
    1. Urbaniak GC, Plous S. Research Randomizer (version 4.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved June 2015 from .

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel