Doctors' learning habits: CME activities among Norwegian physicians over the last decade

Magne Nylenna, Olaf G Aasland, Magne Nylenna, Olaf G Aasland

Abstract

Background: Coping with the increasing body of medical knowledge is a main challenge to all doctors. The aim of this study was to investigate self reported reading and learning habits among Norwegian doctors and their subjective ability to keep professionally updated.

Methods: A cross sectional survey among a randomised sample of Norwegian doctors was undertaken in 2004 (n = 1005, response rate 71%). A similar study with many identical questions was done in 1993 (n = 1041, response rate 71%) and a comparison of the results was made.

Results: Attending courses/congresses and reading medical literature were reported to be the most important sources of professional information in 2004, just like in 1993. Less time was spent on courses/congresses in 2004 than in 1993, and more time was spent on medical reading. The internet was regarded as useful for their professional life for three out of five, mostly among the younger and least among GPs. Two out of three doctors felt that they could obtain sufficient information for keeping updated in 2004, the same proportion as in 1993. A correlation was found between subjective coping with the information and a high level of continuing medical education (CME)-activities. The information copers had a higher level of job satisfaction than non-copers.

Conclusion: Over the last decade Norwegian doctors spend less time on attending courses/congresses and more time on medical reading, while the level of self perceived coping with information has been unchanged. The changing pattern of professional updating may reflect a more general individualistic trend in society. The consistent finding of a correlation between reading and attending courses, subjective coping and job satisfaction gives good reasons for recommending a high level of CME-activities among doctors.

References

    1. Nylenna M, Aasland OG, Falkum E. Keeping professionally updated : Perceived coping and CME profiles among physicians. Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professions. 1996;16:241–9. doi: 10.1002/chp.4750160406.
    1. Aasland OG, Olff M, Falkum E, Schweder T, Ursin H. Health complaints and job stress in Norwegian physicians. The use of an overlapping questionnaire design. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:1615–29. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00093-2.
    1. Warr P, Cook J, Wall T. Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being. J Occup Psychol. 1979;52:129–48.
    1. Shannon S. Educational objectives for CME programmes. Lancet. 2003;361:1308. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13020-6.
    1. Zeiger RF. Towards continuous medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;20:91–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30049.x.
    1. Towle A. Continuing medical education: Changes in health care and continuing medical education for the 21st century. BMJ. 1998;316:301–4.
    1. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systemtic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.274.9.700.
    1. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ. 1998;317:465–8.
    1. O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2001. Art. No.: CD003030. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.
    1. Putnam R. Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
    1. Bergeron B. Online CME options: an update. J Med Pract Manage. 2006;22:55–7.
    1. Harden RM. A new vision for distance learning and continuing medical education. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2005;25:43–51. doi: 10.1002/chp.8.
    1. Riska E. Towards gender balance: but will women physicians have an impact on medicine? Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:179–87. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00218-5.
    1. McMurray JE, Linzer M, Konrad TR, Douglas J, Shugerman R, Nelson K. The work lives of women physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:372–80.
    1. Visser MRM, Smets EMA, Oort FJ, de Haes HCJM. Stress, satisfaction and burnout among Dutch medical specialists. Can Med Assn J. 2003;168:271–5.
    1. Kushnis T, Cohen AH, Kitai E. Continuing medical education and primary physicians' job stress, burnout and dissatisfaction. Med Educ. 2000;34:430–6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00538.x.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel