Evaluation of different methods for the diagnosis of primary caries lesions: Study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

Ana Paula Taboada Sobral, Marcela Letícia Leal Gonçalves, Alexandre Senkiw D Annibale, Elaine Marcilio Santos, Carolina Cardoso Guedes, Juliana Maria Altavista Sagretti Gallo, Elza Padilha Ferri, Lívia Alves Corrêa Moretti, Lara Jansiski Motta, Alessandro Melo Deana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Ana Paula Taboada Sobral, Marcela Letícia Leal Gonçalves, Alexandre Senkiw D Annibale, Elaine Marcilio Santos, Carolina Cardoso Guedes, Juliana Maria Altavista Sagretti Gallo, Elza Padilha Ferri, Lívia Alves Corrêa Moretti, Lara Jansiski Motta, Alessandro Melo Deana, Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana, Sandra Kalil Bussadori

Abstract

Background: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), dental caries is considered one of the greatest pediatric health problems in the world, due to its high prevalence and incidence. Therefore, the early diagnosis of caries lesions is a fundamental procedure for planning treatment aimed at prevention, minimal intervention and promotion of oral health. The present study aims to evaluate, through a randomized and controlled clinical study, which is the best strategy for diagnosing primary caries lesions located in the interproximal region.

Materials and methods: Eighty patients, aged between 4 and 10 years will be randomized and allocated into 2 groups for analysis and comparison of methods for diagnosing caries lesions. The following diagnostic methods will be analyzed and compared: visual clinical examination using ICDAS (International Caries Detection and Assessment System), the iTero Element 5D System (intraoral scanner with near infrared imaging (NIRI) technology) and bitewing radiography (BWX). All evaluations will be carried out by 02 examiners. Examiners will be trained and calibrated to use the visual and radiographic criteria and also to use the iTero 5D intraoral scanner, following the manufacturer's instructions.

Trial registration: NCT04900246 in ClinicalTrial.gov. First released in 05/11/2021 and last updated in 10/06/2021.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. SPIRIT figure as recommended by…
Fig 1. SPIRIT figure as recommended by 2013 SPIRIT statement.
Fig 2. Description of the ICDAS criteria…
Fig 2. Description of the ICDAS criteria for proximal and occlusal surfaces [14].

References

    1. Angelopoulou M V., Beinlich M, Crain A. Early Childhood Caries and Weight Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41(4):261–72.
    1. World Health Organization. Ending childhood dental caries. 2019.
    1. Filho Leão, Borges Jorge César, and de Souza Thayse Rodrigues. Caries detection methods: from traditional to new clinical use technologies. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo 23.3 (2017): 253–265 [in Portuguese].
    1. Braga M. M., Mendes F. M., Ekstrand K. R. Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent. Clin. North. Am. 2010; 54 (3): 479–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2010.03.006
    1. Purger F., Souza P. R., Rodrigues J. A. et al.. In vivo Comparison of Methods for Approximal Caries Detection in Primary Molars. Caries Res. 2011; 45: 219.
    1. Wenzel A. Bitewing and digital bitewing radiography for detection of caries lesions. J. Dent. Res. 2004; 83 (Spec No C): C72–5. doi: 10.1177/154405910408301s14
    1. Braga Ma Minatel et al.. The use of ICDAS for caries diagnosis and treatment planning. PRO-odonto prevenção, 2012; 5, (4): 9–55 [in Portuguese].
    1. Wenzel A, Hirsch E, Christensen J, Matzen LH, Scaf G, Frydenberg M. Detection of cavitated approximal surfaces using cone beam CT and intraoral receptors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(1):39458105. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/39458105
    1. Mariath AAS, Casagrande L, de Araujo FB. Grey levels and radiolucent lesion depth as cavity predictors for approximal dentin caries lesions in primary teeth. Caries Res 2007;36:377–81. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/88910115
    1. Mialhe FL, Bosquiroli V, Silva JO. Knowledge and use of methods for detecting carious lesions by dentists. Varia Scientia 2005. 5(10):23–33 [in Portuguese].
    1. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003. Jan;134(1):87–95. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0021
    1. Litzenburger F, Heck K, Pitchika V, Neuhaus KW, Jost FN, Hickel R, et al.. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability of bitewing radiography and near-infrared light transillumination for proximal caries detection and assessment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018. Feb;47(3):20170292. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170292
    1. Söchtig F, Hickel R, Kühnisch J. Caries detection and diagnostics with near-infrared light transillumination: clinical experiences. Quintessence Int. 2014. Jun;45(6):531–8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a31533
    1. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al.. The International Caries detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007; 35: 170–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x
    1. Kühnisch J, Söchtig F, Pitchika V, Laubender R, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, et al.. In vivo validation of near-infrared light transillumination for interproximal dentin caries detection. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. May;20(4):821–9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1559-4

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel