Combining a Hudl App With Telehealth to Increase Home Exercise Program Adherence in People With Chronic Diseases Experiencing Financial Distress: Randomized Controlled Trial

Ann Van de Winckel, Tanjila Nawshin, Casey Byron, Ann Van de Winckel, Tanjila Nawshin, Casey Byron

Abstract

Background: Patients with chronic diseases often need to adhere to long-term individualized home exercise programs (HEPs). Limited adherence to long-term exercise given during physical therapy (PT) visits reduces the capacity of exercise to manage or improve symptoms related to chronic disease. In addition, a lower socioeconomic status negatively impacts exercise adherence. To mitigate this, apps that motivate people to exercise could be a viable option. Using an app through telehealth may help adults with chronic diseases to achieve long-term HEP adherence. However, because apps for rehabilitation are an emerging field, the feasibility of the app needs to be evaluated.

Objective: To address HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress, we aim to evaluate the feasibility of and satisfaction with the Hudl Technique app and telehealth and satisfaction with PT care and to monitor HEP adherence and compliance (ie, percentage of participant-recorded videos sent) in participants using the app with telehealth compared with those using standard HEPs on paper.

Methods: We recruited patients scheduled for outpatient PT. We performed a randomized controlled trial in which the experimental group received weekly HEP demonstrations through app videos on a tablet with feedback on their self-recorded HEP video performance from the telehealth physical therapist. The control group received HEPs on paper without feedback, as is customary in PT practice. Demographic, clinical, and health coverage information was collected for screening and baseline measurements. Adherence and compliance were evaluated. Both groups completed surveys at 8 and 24 weeks on their satisfaction with PT care, and the experimental group also completed a survey on their satisfaction with the app with telehealth use. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used for within-group and between-group comparisons and analyzed with JMP, version 13.

Results: Overall, 45 adults with chronic diseases who were experiencing financial distress were randomized into experimental (23/45, 51%) and control (22/45, 49%) groups, with 74% (17/23) and 86% (19/22) participants completing the 24-week HEP, respectively. The experimental group had an HEP adherence frequency of 4 (SD 2) to 5 (SD 2) times per week at 8 and 24 weeks (P=.14), whereas HEP adherence decreased in the control group from 4 (SD 2) to 3 (SD 2) times per week (P=.07), with a significant difference (P=.01) between groups at 24 weeks. Of the total participants, 68% (15/22) sent videos. They sent 68% (16/24) of the requested number of videos on average. The average score for PT care satisfaction was maintained at 87% in the experimental group (P=.99), whereas it decreased from 89% at 8 weeks to 74% at 24 weeks (P=.008) in the control group. App-related adverse events were not observed.

Conclusions: The Hudl app/telehealth platform is feasible for delivering HEPs and maintaining HEP adherence in participants with chronic diseases who are experiencing financial distress.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02659280; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02659280.

Keywords: chronic disease; spinal cord injury; stroke; telehealth; telemedicine; traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Ann Van de Winckel, Tanjila Nawshin, Casey Byron. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 18.03.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples of Hudl app video captures of the telehealth physical therapist’s home exercise program. The telehealth physical therapist used the tools displayed on the right-hand side of the screen (arrows, plumb line, chronometer, etc) to highlight the parts that participants needed to pay attention to.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) flowchart.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage responses in categories unsatisfied (red), neutral (orange), satisfied (green), and no response (blue) from the survey completed by the experimental and control groups. The experimental group answered 7 questions related to app with telemedicine use, feasibility, and ease of interaction with the telehealth physical therapist. The eighth question was answered by both groups and pertained to their rating of satisfaction with the overall physical therapy experience. The answer options ranged from scores 1 to 3 (being not satisfied [scoring very unsatisfied to a little unsatisfied]), score 4 (neutral), or scores 5 to 7 (satisfied [scoring a little satisfied to very satisfied]) or no response. The question and answer options for each question are detailed at the bottom of the figure.

References

    1. About Chronic Diseases. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) 2019. Apr 26, [2020-03-21]. .
    1. Ward BW, Schiller JS, Goodman RA. Multiple chronic conditions among US adults: a 2012 update. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Apr 17;11:E62. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.130389.
    1. Benjamin RM. Multiple chronic conditions: a public health challenge. Public Health Rep. 2010;125(5):626–7.
    1. Pentecost C, Taket A. Understanding exercise uptake and adherence for people with chronic conditions: a new model demonstrating the importance of exercise identity, benefits of attending and support. Health Educ Res. 2011 Oct;26(5):908–22. doi: 10.1093/her/cyr052.
    1. Stütz T, Emsenhuber G, Huber D, Domhardt M, Tiefengrabner M, Oostingh GJ, Fötschl U, Matis N, Ginzinger Si. Mobile phone-supported physiotherapy for frozen shoulder: feasibility assessment based on a usability study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul 20;4(2):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7085.
    1. Beinart NA, Goodchild CE, Weinman JA, Ayis S, Godfrey EL. Individual and intervention-related factors associated with adherence to home exercise in chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1940–50. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.027.
    1. Jansons PS, Haines TP, O'Brien L. Interventions to achieve ongoing exercise adherence for adults with chronic health conditions who have completed a supervised exercise program: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Apr;31(4):465–477. doi: 10.1177/0269215516653995.
    1. Faber M, Andersen MH, Sevel Cl, Thorborg K, Bandholm T, Rathleff M. The majority are not performing home-exercises correctly two weeks after their initial instruction-an assessor-blinded study. Peer J. 2015 Jul;3:e1102. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1102. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1102.
    1. Picorelli AM, Pereira LSM, Pereira DS, Felício D, Sherrington C. Adherence to exercise programs for older people is influenced by program characteristics and personal factors: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2014 Sep;60(3):151–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.06.012.
    1. Lambert TE, Harvey LA, Avdalis C, Chen LW, Jeyalingam S, Pratt CA, Tatum HJ, Bowden JL, Lucas BR. An app with remote support achieves better adherence to home exercise programs than paper handouts in people with musculoskeletal conditions: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2017.05.015.
    1. Blanquero J, Cortés-Vega MD, García-Frasquet MÁ, Sánchez-Laulhé PR, Nieto Díaz de Los Bernardos MI, Suero-Pineda A. Exercises using a touchscreen tablet application improved functional ability more than an exercise program prescribed on paper in people after surgical carpal tunnel release: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2019 Apr;65(2):81–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2019.02.008.
    1. Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, Green BB, Ginsburg AS. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(2):e52. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3951.
    1. Thiamwong L, Stout JR, Sole ML, Ng BP, Yan X, Talbert S. Physio-Feedback and Exercise Program (PEER) improves balance, muscle strength, and fall risk in older adults. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Nov 01;13(6):289–96. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20200324-01.
    1. Ellis T, Latham NK, DeAngelis TR, Thomas CA, Saint-Hilaire M, Bickmore TW. Feasibility of a virtual exercise coach to promote walking in community-dwelling persons with Parkinson disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun;92(6):472–81; quiz 482. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31828cd466.
    1. Quintero LM, Moore JW, Yeager MG, Rowsey K, Olmi DJ, Britton-Slater J, Harper ML, Zezenski LE. Reducing risk of head injury in youth soccer: an extension of behavioral skills training for heading. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jan;53(1):237–248. doi: 10.1002/jaba.557.
    1. 2021 Minnesota Department of Human Services Telemedicine. MN Department of Human Services website. 2019. [2019-07-27]. .
    1. Program SR. Center for Connected Health Policy website. 2020. Sep, [2018-02-08]. .
    1. Weiler R. Übersense Coach app for sport medicine? Slow motion video analysis (Mobile App User Guide) Br J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;50(4):255–6. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094876.
    1. Neal BS, Lack SD, Barton CJ, Birn-Jeffery A, Miller S, Morrissey D. Is markerless, smart phone recorded two-dimensional video a clinically useful measure of relevant lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain? A validity and reliability study. Phys Ther Sport. 2020 May;43:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.02.004.
    1. Bush T, Cherkin D, Barlow W. The impact of physician attitudes on patient satisfaction with care for low back pain. Arch Fam Med. 1993 Mar;2(3):301–5. doi: 10.1001/archfami.2.3.301.
    1. Hudak PL, Wright JG. The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3167–77. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012.
    1. Keith RA. Patient satisfaction and rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Sep;79(9):1122–8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90182-4.
    1. Nitse PS, Rushing V. Patient satisfaction: the new area of focus for the physician's office. Health Mark Q. 1996;14(2):73–84. doi: 10.1300/j026v14n02_07.
    1. Silveira P, van de Langenberg R, van Het Reve E, Daniel F, Casati F, de Bruin ED. Tablet-based strength-balance training to motivate and improve adherence to exercise in independently living older people: a phase II preclinical exploratory trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 12;15(8):e159. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2579.
    1. Stangroom J. Chi Square Calculator. Social Science Statistics. 2021. [2020-05-03]. .
    1. Motulsky H. McNemar Test Calculator. GraphPad. 2018. [2020-05-03]. .
    1. Hedges LV, Okin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985.
    1. Morris SB, DeShon RP. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychol Methods. 2002 Mar;7(1):105–25. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105.
    1. Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Calculation of effect sizes. Psychometrica. 2016 May 20; doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17823.92329.
    1. Beattie PF, Pinto MB, Nelson MK, Nelson R. Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation. Phys Ther. 2002 Jun;82(6):557–65.
    1. Shanthanna H, Strand NH, Provenzano DA, Lobo CA, Eldabe S, Bhatia A, Wegener J, Curtis K, Cohen SP, Narouze S. Caring for patients with pain during the COVID-19 pandemic: consensus recommendations from an international expert panel. Anaesthesia. 2020 Jul;75(7):935–944. doi: 10.1111/anae.15076.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel