Differences in NT-proBNP Response and Prognosis in Men and Women With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Melissa A Daubert, Eric Yow, Huiman X Barnhart, Ileana L Piña, Tariq Ahmad, Eric Leifer, Lawton Cooper, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Mona Fiuzat, Kirkwood Adams, Justin Ezekowitz, David J Whellan, James L Januzzi, Christopher M O'Connor, G Michael Felker, Melissa A Daubert, Eric Yow, Huiman X Barnhart, Ileana L Piña, Tariq Ahmad, Eric Leifer, Lawton Cooper, Patrice Desvigne-Nickens, Mona Fiuzat, Kirkwood Adams, Justin Ezekowitz, David J Whellan, James L Januzzi, Christopher M O'Connor, G Michael Felker

Abstract

Background NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is a prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. However, it is unclear whether there is a sex difference in NT-proBNP response and whether the therapeutic goal of NT-proBNP ≤1000 pg/mL has equivalent prognostic value in men and women with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results In a secondary analysis of the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment) trial we analyzed trends in NT-proBNP and goal attainment by sex. Differences in clinical characteristics, HF treatment, and time to all-cause death or HF hospitalization were compared. Landmark analysis at 3 months determined the prognostic value of early NT-proBNP goal achievement in men and women. Of the 286 (32%) women and 608 (68%) men in the GUIDE-IT trial, women were more likely to have a nonischemic cause and shorter duration of HF. Guideline-directed medical therapy was less intense over time in women. The absolute NT-proBNP values were consistently lower in women; however, the change in NT-proBNP and clinical outcomes were similar. After adjustment, women achieving the NT-proBNP goal had an 82% reduction in death or HF hospitalization compared with a 59% reduction in men. Conclusions Men and women with HF with reduced ejection fraction had a similar NT-proBNP response despite less intensive HF treatment among women. However, compared with men, the early NT-proBNP goal of ≤1000 pg/mL had greater prognostic value in women. Future efforts should be aimed at intensifying guideline-directed medical therapy in women, which may result in greater NT-proBNP reductions and improved outcomes in women with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01685840.

Keywords: N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; heart failure; women.

Conflict of interest statement

Drs O'Connor and Felker have received grant support from the National Institutes of Health. Drs Cooper, Leifer, and Desvigne‐Nickens are employees of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and were members of the GUIDE‐IT Steering Committee. Dr Januzzi is a trustee of the American College of Cardiology; has received grant support from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Innolife, Applied Therapeutics, and Abbott Diagnostics, and consulting income from Abbott, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche Diagnostics; and participates in clinical end point committees/data safety monitoring boards for Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen, Bayer, CVRx, and Takeda. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT diagram.
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram.
Study flow diagram of secondary analysis population and subgroup. GUIDE‐IT indicates Guiding Evidence Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment; and NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide.
Figure 2. Sex differences in target dosing…
Figure 2. Sex differences in target dosing of guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) at 1 year.
Pie charts indicating the proportion of men and women achieving target doses of β‐blocker therapy (top row) and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy (bottom row) at 1 year. Men were significantly more likely to be at or above target doses than women. *P=0.003; †P=0.08. NT‐proBNP indicates N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide.
Figure 3. Reasons for not titrating medications…
Figure 3. Reasons for not titrating medications by sex.
Bar graph indicating the reasons for not titrating medication dose in men and women. NT‐proBNP indicates N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide.
Figure 4. Change in NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type…
Figure 4. Change in NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) in men and women with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
The trend in NT‐proBNP was similar between men and women. Dots are median NT‐proBNP (pg/mL); whiskers are interquartile range.
Figure 5. Clinical outcomes in men and…
Figure 5. Clinical outcomes in men and women with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction.
The Kaplan‐Meier curves for the primary outcome of death or HF hospitalization (upper left) and secondary outcomes of death (upper right); HF hospitalization (lower left) and cardiovascular hospitalization (lower right). Clinical outcomes were similar in men and women.
Figure 6. Clinical outcomes in men and…
Figure 6. Clinical outcomes in men and women by early NT‐proBNP (N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide) goal achievement.
Clinical outcomes were similar between men and women not achieving the early NT‐proBNP goal (blue and red dashed lines). However, separation of the solid curves suggests a trend towards fewer events among women achieving the early NT‐proBNP goal compared with men achieving the early NT‐proBNP goal.

References

    1. Crousillat DR, Ibrahim NE. Sex differences in the management of advanced heart failure. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20:88. DOI: 10.1007/s11936-018-0687-y.
    1. Sullivan K, Doumouras BS, Santema BT, Walsh MN, Douglas PS, Voors AA, Van Spall H. Sex‐based differences in heart failure: pathophysiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes. Can J Cardiol. 2021:37:560–571. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.12.025.
    1. Dewan P, Rorth R, Jhund PS, Shen L, Raparelli V, Petrie MC, Abraham WT, Desai AS, Dickstein K, Kober L, et al. Differential impact of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:29–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.081.
    1. Ghali JK, Krause‐Steinrauf HJ, Adams KF, Khan SS, Rosenberg YD, Yancy CW, Young JB, Goldman S, Peberdy MA, Lindenfeld J. Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:2128–2134. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.05.012.
    1. Stolfo D, Uijl A, Vedin O, Stromberg A, Faxen UL, Rosano GMC, Sinagra G, Dahlstrom U, Savarese G. Sex‐based differences in heart failure across the ejection fraction spectrum: phenotyping, and prognostic and therapeutic implications. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:505–515. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.03.011.
    1. Aimo A, Vergaro G, Castiglione V, Barison A, Pasanisi E, Petersen C, Chubuchny V, Giannoni A, Poletti R, Maffei S, et al. Effect of sex on reverse remodeling in chronic systolic heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2017;5:735–742. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.07.011.
    1. Azad N, Kathiravelu A, Minoosepeher S, Hebert P, Fergusson D. Gender differences in the etiology of heart failure: a systematic review. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2011;8:15–23. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1263.2011.00015
    1. Eisenberg E, Di Palo KE, Pina IL. Sex differences in heart failure. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41:211–216. DOI: 10.1002/clc.22917.
    1. Piña IL, Kokkinos P, Kao A, Bittner V, Saval M, Clare B, Goldberg L, Johnson M, Swank A, Ventura H, et al. Baseline differences in the HF‐ACTION trial by sex. Am Heart J. 2009;158:S16–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.012.
    1. Truby LK, O’Connor C, Fiuzat M, Stebbins A, Coles A, Patel CB, Granger B, Pagidipati N, Agarwal R, Rymer J, et al. Sex differences in quality of life and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure: insights from the PAL‐HF trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13:e006134. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006134.
    1. Pina IL, Bittner V, Clare RM, Swank A, Kao A, Safford R, Nigam A, Barnard D, Walsh MN, Ellis SJ, et al. Effects of exercise training on outcomes in women with heart failure: analysis of HF‐ACTION (Heart Failure‐A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise TraiNing) by sex. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:180–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.10.007.
    1. Zusterzeel R, Curtis JP, Caños DA, Sanders WE, Selzman KA, Piña IL, Spatz ES, Bao H, Ponirakis A, Varosy PD, et al. Sex‐specific mortality risk by QRS morphology and duration in patients receiving CRT: results from the NCDR. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:887–894. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1162.
    1. Simon T, Mary‐Krause M, Funck‐Brentano C, Jaillon P. Sex differences in the prognosis of congestive heart failure: results from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study (CIBIS II). Circulation. 2001;103:375–380. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.103.3.375.
    1. Sun LY, Tu JV, Coutinho T, Turek M, Rubens FD, McDonnell L, Tulloch H, Eddeen AB, Mielniczuk LM. Sex differences in outcomes of heart failure in an ambulatory, population‐based cohort from 2009 to 2013. Can Med Assoc J. 2018;190:E848–E854. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.180177.
    1. Franke J, Lindmark A, Hochadel M, Zugck C, Koerner E, Keppler J, Ehlermann P, Winkler R, Zahn R, Katus HA, et al. Gender aspects in clinical presentation and prognostication of chronic heart failure according to NT‐proBNP and the Heart Failure Survival Score. Clin Res Cardiol. 2015;104:334–341. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0786-z.
    1. Kim HL, Kim MA, Choi DJ, Han S, Jeon ES, Cho MC, Kim JJ, Yoo BS, Shin MS, Seong IW, et al. Gender difference in the prognostic value of N‐terminal pro‐B type natriuretic peptide in patients with heart failure‐ a report from the Korean Heart Failure Registry (KorHF). Circ J. 2017;81:1329–1336. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1345.
    1. Taki M, Ishiyama Y, Mizuno H, Komori T, Kono K, Hoshide S, Kario K. Sex differences in the prognostic power of brain natriuretic peptide and N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide for cardiovascular events—the Japan Morning Surge‐Home Blood Pressure Study. Circ J. 2018;82:2096–2102. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0375.
    1. Felker GM, Anstrom KJ, Adams KF, Ezekowitz JA, Fiuzat M, Houston‐Miller N, Januzzi JL Jr, Mark DB, Piña IL, Passmore G, et al. Effect of natriuretic peptide‐guided therapy on hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality in high‐risk patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:713–720. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.10565.
    1. Felker GM, Ahmad T, Anstrom KJ, Adams KF, Cooper LS, Ezekowitz JA, Fiuzat M, Houston‐Miller N, Januzzi JL, Leifer ES, et al. Rationale and design of the GUIDE‐IT study: guiding evidence based therapy using biomarker intensified treatment in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:457–465. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.05.007.
    1. Januzzi JL Jr, Ahmad T, Mulder H, Coles A, Anstrom KJ, Adams KF, Ezekowitz JA, Fiuzat M, Houston‐Miller N, Mark DB, et al. Natriuretic peptide response and outcomes in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1205–1217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.055.
    1. Raymond I, Groenning BA, Hildebrandt PR, Nilsson JC, Baumann M, Trawinski J, Pedersen F. The influence of age, sex and other variables on the plasma level of N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in a large sample of the general population. Heart. 2003;89:745–751. DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.7.745.
    1. Neves J, Dufour JM. Handbook of Statistics. London, England: Elsevier; 2019:ch 1:3–31.
    1. Fiuzat M, Ezekowitz J, Alemayehu W, Westerhout CM, Sbolli M, Cani D, Whellan DJ, Ahmad T, Adams K, Piña IL, et al. Assessment of limitations to optimization of guideline‐directed medical therapy in heart failure from the GUIDE‐IT Trial: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:757–764. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0640.
    1. Greene SJ, Butler J, Albert NM, DeVore AD, Sharma PP, Duffy CI, Hill CL, McCague K, Mi X, Patterson JH, et al. Medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the CHAMP‐HF registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:351–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.070.
    1. Mejhert M, Holmgren J, Wandell P, Persson H, Edner M. Diagnostic tests, treatment and follow‐up in heart failure patients—is there a gender bias in the coherence to guidelines? Eur J Heart Fail. 1999;1:407–410. DOI: 10.1016/S1388-9842(99)00053-7.
    1. Chin KL, Skiba M, Tonkin A, Reid CM, Liew D, Krum H, Hopper I. The treatment gap in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: a systematic review of evidence‐based prescribing in practice. Heart Fail Rev. 2016;21:675–697. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-016-9575-2.
    1. Piña IL, Zheng QI, She L, Szwed H, Lang IM, Farsky PS, Castelvecchio S, Biernat J, Paraforos A, Kosevic D, et al. Sex difference in patients with ischemic heart failure undergoing surgical revascularization: results from the STICH Trial (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure). Circulation. 2018;137:771–780. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030526.
    1. Savarese G, Musella F, D’Amore C, Vassallo E, Losco T, Gambardella F, Cecere M, Petraglia L, Pagano G, Fimiani L, et al. Changes of natriuretic peptides predict hospital admissions in patients with chronic heart failure: a meta‐analysis. JACC Heart Fail. 2014;2:148–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2013.11.007.
    1. McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, et al. Angiotensin‐neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:993–1004. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409077.
    1. McMurray JJV, Jackson AM, Lam CSP, Redfield MM, Anand IS, Ge J, Lefkowitz MP, Maggioni AP, Martinez F, Packer M, et al. Effects of sacubitril‐valsartan versus valsartan in women compared with men with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: insights from PARAGON‐HF. Circulation. 2020;141:338–351. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044491.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel