Parental influences on child physical activity and screen viewing time: a population based study

Ben J Smith, Anne Grunseit, Louise L Hardy, Lesley King, Luke Wolfenden, Andrew Milat, Ben J Smith, Anne Grunseit, Louise L Hardy, Lesley King, Luke Wolfenden, Andrew Milat

Abstract

Background: Parents can influence their children's physical activity participation and screen time.This study examined the relative significance of perceived parental barriers and self-efficacy in relation to children's physical activity participation and screen time viewing. The associations between these factors and the behaviours were analysed.

Methods: Cross-sectional population survey in New South Wales, Australia of parents of pre-school (N = 764), younger (Kindergarten, Grades 2 and 4; N = 1557) and older children (Grades 6, 8 and 10; N = 1665). Parents reported barriers and self-efficacy to influence their child's physical activity and screen time behaviours in a range of circumstances. Differences were examined by child's sex and age group, household income, maternal education and location of residence. The duration of physical activity and screen viewing was measured by parental report for pre-school and younger children and self-report for older children. Associations between parental factors and children's organised, non-organised and total activity and screen time were analysed.

Results: Cost, lack of opportunities for participation and transport problems were the barriers most often reported, particularly by low income parents and those in rural areas. The number of barriers was inversely related to children's time spent in organised activity, but not their non-organised activity. Higher parental self-efficacy was positively associated with organised physical activity in the younger and older children's groups and the non-organised activity of older children. School-age children (younger and older groups) were less likely to meet physical activity guidelines when parents reported ≥4 barriers (OR 3.76, 95% CI 1.25-11.34 and OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.71-8.11 respectively). Low parental self-efficacy was also associated with the likelihood of children exceeding screen time guidelines for each age group (pre-school OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.87; young children OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80; and older children OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74).

Conclusion: Parental barriers are associated with the time that children spend in both active and sedentary pursuits. These findings highlight family, economic and environmental factors that should be addressed in programs to promote child physical activity and tackle sedentary behaviour.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The proportion of children who do not meet guidelines for (A) physical activity or (B) screen time by the number of barriers reported by parents*. White bar 0-1 barrier. Grey bar 2-3 barriers. Black bar ≥4 barriers. *p-values derived from Chi-square test of independence
Figure 2
Figure 2
The proportion of children who do not meet guidelines for (A) physical activity or (B) screen time by the level of self-efficacy reported by parents*. Vertical lines < = 25th Perc. Diagonal lines >25- < 75th Perc. Black and white squares > = 75th Perc. *p-values derived from Chi-square test of independence

References

    1. Wang Y, Lobstein T. Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006;1:11–25. doi: 10.1080/17477160600586747.
    1. Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SY. Childhood obesity. Lancet. 2010;375:1737–1748. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60171-7.
    1. International Obesity Task Force: International Obesity TaskForce Prevalence Data: Global childhood overweight.
    1. Moreno LA, Rodriguez G. Dietary risk factors for development of childhood obesity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007;10:336–41. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3280a94f59.
    1. Jimenez-Pavon D, Kelly J, Reilly JJ. Associations between objectively measured habitual physical activity and adiposity in children and adolescents: systematic review. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;10:3–18. doi: 10.3109/17477160903067601.
    1. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ, Gorely T, Cameron N, Murdey I. Relationships between media use, body fatness and physical activity in children and youth: a meta-analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:1238–1246. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802706.
    1. Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R. IASO International Obesity TaskForce. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev. 2004;5(Suppl 1):4–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2004.00133.x.
    1. Hinkley T, Crawford D, Salmon J, Okely AD, Hesketh K. Preschool children and physical activity: a review of correlates. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34:435–441. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.02.001.
    1. Van Der Horst K, Paw MJ, Twisk JW, Van Mechelen W. A brief review on correlates of physical activity and sedentariness in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:1241–1250. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318059bf35.
    1. Brunton G, Thomas J, Harden S, Rees R, Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Shepherd J, Oakley Al. Promoting physical activity amongst children outside of physical education classes: a systematic review integrating intervention studies and qualitative studies. Health Educ J. 2005;64:323–338. doi: 10.1177/001789690506400404.
    1. Gorely T, Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ. Couch kids: correlates of television viewing among youth. Int J Behav Med. 2004;11:152–163. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1103_4.
    1. Gruber KJ, Haldeman LA. Using the family to combat childhood and adult obesity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6:A106.
    1. Campbell KJ, Hesketh KD. Strategies which aim to positively impact on weight, physical activity, diet and sedentary behaviours in children from zero to five years. A systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2007;8:327–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00305.x.
    1. Gustafson SL, Rhodes RE. Parental correlates of physical activity in children and early adolescents. Sports Med. 2006;36:79–97. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636010-00006.
    1. Salmon J, Timperio A, Telford A, Carver A, Crawford D. Association of family environment with children's television viewing and with low level of physical activity. Obes Res. 2005;13:1939–1951. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.239.
    1. Golan M. Parents as agents of change in childhood obesity-from research to practice. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006;1:66–76. doi: 10.1080/17477160600644272.
    1. Emerson E, Graham H, Hatton C. Household income and health status in children and adolescents in Britain. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16:354–360. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki200.
    1. Heitzler CD, Martin SL, Duke J, Huhman M. Correlates of physical activity in a national sample of children aged 9-13 years. Prev Med. 2006;42:254–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.01.010.
    1. Centre for Epidemiology and Research: 2005-2006 Report on Child Health from the New South Wales Population Health Survey. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2008.
    1. Sithole F, Veugelers PJ. Parent and child reports of children's activity. Health Rep. 2008;19:19–24.
    1. Booth ML, Okely AD, Chey TN, Bauman A. The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1986–1995. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200212000-00019.
    1. Hardy LL, Booth ML, Okely AD. The reliability of the Adolescent Sedentary Activity Questionnaire (ASAQ) Prev Med. 2007;45:71–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.014.
    1. Department of Health and Ageing. Australia's Physical Activity Recommendations for 5-12 year olds. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing; 2004.
    1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing: Get Up & Grow: Healthy Eating and Physical Activity for Early Childhood - Directors/Coordinators. Book.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Public Education. Children, Adolescents, and Television. Pediatr. 2001;107:423–426. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.2.423.
    1. Pocock M, Trivedi D, Wills W, Bunn F, Magnusson J. Parental perceptions regarding healthy behaviours for preventing overweight and obesity in young children: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Obes Rev. 2010;11:338–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00648.x.
    1. Hesketh K, Waters E, Green J, Salmon L, Williams J. Healthy eating, activity and obesity prevention: a qualitative study of parent and child perceptions in Australia. Health Promot Int. 2005;20:19–26. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dah503.
    1. Dwyer J, Needham L, Simpson JR, Heeney ES. Parents report intrapersonal, interpersonal, and environmental barriers to supporting healthy eating and physical activity among their preschoolers. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:338–346. doi: 10.1139/H07-195.
    1. Aitken R, King L, Bauman A. A comparison of Australian families' expenditure on active and screen-based recreation using the ABS Household Expenditure Survey 2003/04. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2008;32:238–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00222.x.
    1. Hardy L, Kelly B, Chapman K, King L, Farrell L. Parental perceptions of barriers to children's participation in organised sport in Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46:197–203. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01661.x.
    1. Voss L, Hosking J, Metcalf A, Jeffrey A, Wilkin T. Children from low-income families have less access to sports facilities, but are no less physically active; cross-sectional study. Child Care Health Dev. 2008;34:470–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00827.x.
    1. Zakarian JM, Hovell MF, Hofstetter CR, Sallis JF, Keating KJ. Correlates of vigorous exercise in a predominantly low SES and minority high school population. Prev Med. 1994;23:314–321. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1044.
    1. Slater A, Bowen J, Corsini N, Gardner C, Golley R, Noakes M. Understanding parent concerns about children's diet, activity and weight status: an important step towards effective obesity prevention interventions. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:1221–1228. doi: 10.1017/S1368980009992096.
    1. Inchley JC, Currie DB, Todd JM, Akhtar PC, Currie CE. Persistent socio-demographic differences in physical activity among Scottish schoolchildren 1990-2002. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15:386–388. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki084.
    1. Kelly LA, Reilly JJ, Fisher A, Montgomery C, Williamson A, McColl JH, Paton JY, Grant S. Effect of socioeconomic status on objectively measured physical activity. Arch Dis Child. 2006;91:35–38. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.080275.
    1. Coalter F. The Social Benefits of Sport: An Overview to Inform the Community Planning Process. Edinburgh: Sports Scotland; 2005.
    1. Gable S, Chang Y, Krull JL. Television watching and frequency of family meals are predictive of overweight onset and persistence in a national sample of school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.10.010.
    1. Eisenmann JC, Bartee RT, Smith DT, Welk GJ, Fu Q. Combined influence of physical activity and television viewing on the risk of overweight in US youth. Int J Obes. 2008;32:613–618. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803800.
    1. He M, Harris S, Piché L, Beynon C. Understanding screen-related sedentary behavior and its contributing factors among school-aged children: a social-ecologic exploration. Am J Health Promot. 2009;23:299–308. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.07070965.
    1. Hattersley L, Shrewsbury V, King L, Howlett S, Hardy L, Baur L. Adolescent-parent interactions and attitudes around screen time and sugary drink consumption: a qualitative study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:61. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-61.
    1. Certain LK, Kahn RS. Prevalence, correlates, and trajectory of television viewing among infants and toddlers. Pediatr. 2002;109:634–642. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.4.634.
    1. Nederhoff AJ. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psych. 1985;15:263–280. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel