Treatment of Dimpling from Cellulite

Roberto Amore, Domenico Amuso, Vincenza Leonardi, Andrea Sbarbati, Giamaica Conti, Maria Albini, Francesco Leva, Ferdinando Terranova, Antonio Guida, Konstantinos Gkritzalas, Liya Gavashely, Roman Velichenko, Roberto Amore, Domenico Amuso, Vincenza Leonardi, Andrea Sbarbati, Giamaica Conti, Maria Albini, Francesco Leva, Ferdinando Terranova, Antonio Guida, Konstantinos Gkritzalas, Liya Gavashely, Roman Velichenko

Abstract

Background: Cellulite can be seen on the skin in widespread alterations of the skin surface and dimpling. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of the manual subcision technique to treat dimpling from cellulite, using a specific class IIA medical device (Celluerase).

Methods: The multi-center observational study assessed 200 women treated in a single session for different dimpling, using manual subcision administered by Celluerase. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by the authors, and the patients assessed satisfaction levels.

Results: Two hundred women between 20 and 55 years were treated. The medical evaluation of patients saw improvements with an average score of 8.1, whereas the subjective evaluation by patients gave an average improvement score of 7.8. Adverse events were reported.

Discussion: Women have septa orientation at right angels to the skin surface, and those with cellulite have an irregular septa conformation, with some septa being hypertrophic-thickened, and others being narrowed-lysed. Magnetic resonance imaging has confirmed that cellulite depressions are associated with a significant increase of thickness of underlying subcutaneous fibrous septa. Subcision has immediate results because it eliminates traction on the skin.

Conclusion: The study has shown the effectiveness and safety of the manual subcision in the treatment of dimpling. The device used, designed specifically for this technique, has shown itself to be very helpful and effective in terms of practical use, aesthetic outcome and safety, with various advantages compared with other commonly used devices.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A 45-year-old woman with widespread alterations to skin texture (orange peel).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
A 42-year-old woman with dimpling in the buttock area and on the back of the thighs, an excellent candidate for subcision.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Graphic representation of the variation in subcutaneous connective tissue in a woman without cellulite and with cellulite. In all women, the fibrous septa are mainly at right angles to the skin’s surface. In cellulite, they are variable in size, thickened, and lysed. The thickened fibrous septa cause the skin to be retracted toward the muscle fiber, causing dimpling.
Video Graphic 1.
Video Graphic 1.
See video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, which shows step-by-step the manual technique of subcision. Including marking out the dimpling lesions with tangential overhead lighting, infiltration with anesthetic solution in a superficial right plane and posttreatment management. This video is available in the “Related Videos” section of the Full-Text article on PRSGlobalOpen.com or available at http://links.lww.com/PRSGO/A766.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The dimpling to be treated is marked with the patient in the standing position. An auxiliary light from above is useful in highlighting these lesions. Those who can only be seen with muscle contraction or by handling the area must not be treated.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Infiltration with anesthetic solution is carried out on the lesion to be treated and which is marked beforehand. After a few minutes, the infiltrated areas will look lighter in color due to a passing ischemia caused by the adrenaline (see right buttock).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
The cutting edges of the device are kept parallel to the skin’s surface, keeping the index fingertip in contact with the formation detected on the device (A). The device is inserted 5 mm from the lateral margin of the dimpling (B) at an angle of about 60°. The movement continues as far as the hypodermis (C), which is perceived when there is no more resistance to the movement itself. The operator makes circular movements—clockwise and counterclockwise—parallel to the surface of the skin, moving laterally and forward. The physician will easily perceive the cutting of the hypertrophic septa.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Images pre- (A) and immediately posttreatment (B). The treated areas will look swollen, bruised, and irregular, but they are already free from retraction.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.
A 33-year-old woman treated with 1 subcision session using Celluerase (A). Result at 1 month (B).
Fig. 9.
Fig. 9.
A 42-year-old woman treated with 1 subcision session using Celluerase (A). Result at 3 months (B).

References

    1. Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-called cellulite: an invented disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4:221–229..
    1. Rossi AB, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14:251–262..
    1. Hexsel DM. Body Repair. Women’s Dermatology. 2001:Nova Iorque, N.Y.: Parthenon Publishing; 586–595..
    1. Querleux B. Magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy of skin and subcutis. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2004;3:156–161..
    1. Mirrashed F, Sharp JC, Krause V, et al. Pilot study of dermal and subcutaneous fat structures by MRI in individuals who differ in gender, BMI, and cellulite grading. Skin Res Technol. 2004;10:161–168..
    1. Lucassen GE, van der Sluys WL, van Herk JJ, et al. The effectiveness of massage treatment on cellulite as monitored by ultrasound imaging. Skin Res Technol. 1997;3:154.
    1. Quatresooz P, Xhauflaire-Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, et al. Cellulite histopathology and related mechanobiology. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2006;28:207–210..
    1. Hexsel DM, Abreu M, Rodrigues TC, et al. Side-by-side comparison of areas with and without cellulite depressions using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35:1471–1477..
    1. Pugliese PT. The pathogenesis of cellulite: a new concept. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2007;6:140–142..
    1. Omi T, Sato S, Kawana S. Ultrastructural assessment of cellulite morphology: clues to a therapeutic strategy? Laser Ther. 2013;22:131–136..
    1. Turati F, Pelucchi C, Marzatico F, et al. Efficacy of cosmetic products in cellulite reduction: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:1–15..
    1. Rotunda AM, Avram MM, Avram AS. Cellulite: is there a role for injectables? J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7:147–154..
    1. Caruso MK, Roberts AT, Bissoon L, et al. An evaluation of mesotherapy solutions for inducing lipolysis and treating cellulite. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61:1321–1324..
    1. Sivagnanam G. Mesotherapy—the French connection. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2010;1:4–8..
    1. de Godoy JMP, de Godoy ACP, Godoy MFG. Considering the hypothesis of the pathophysiology of cellulite in its treatment. Dermatol Reports. 2017;9:7352.
    1. Chang P, Wiseman J, Jacoby T, et al. Noninvasive mechanical body contouring: (Endermologie) a one-year clinical outcome study update. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1998;22:145–153..
    1. Gold MH. Cellulite—an overview of non-invasive therapy with energy-based systems. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2012;10:553–558..
    1. Ortonne JP, Queille-Roussel C, Duteil L, et al. Treatment of cellulite: effectiveness and sustained effect at 6 months with endermologie demonstrated by several quantitative evaluation methods. Nouv Dermatol. 2004;23:261–269..
    1. Schlaudraff KU, Kiessling MC, Császár NB, et al. Predictability of the individual clinical outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for cellulite. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:171–183..
    1. Knobloch K, Joest B, Krämer R, et al. Cellulite and focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy for non-invasive body contouring: a randomized trial. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2013;3:143–155..
    1. Peterson JD, Goldman MP. Laser, light, and energy devices for cellulite and lipodystrophy. Clin Plast Surg. 2011;38:463–74, vii..
    1. Khan MH, Victor F, Rao B, et al. Treatment of cellulite: Part II. Advances and controversies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62:373–384.; quiz 385.
    1. Friedmann DP, Vick GL, Mishra V. Cellulite: a review with a focus on subcision. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2017;10:17–23..
    1. Zerini I, Sisti A, Cuomo R, et al. Cellulite treatment: a comprehensive literature review. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2015;14:224–240..
    1. Kapoor R, Shome D, Ranjan A. Use of a novel combined radiofrequency and ultrasound device for lipolysis, skin tightening and cellulite treatment. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19:266–274..
    1. Wanner M, Avram M. An evidence-based assessment of treatments for cellulite. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:341–345..
    1. Hexsel D, Dal Forno T, Hexsel C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cellulite depressed lesions successfully treated by subcision. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42:693–696..
    1. Kaminer MS, Coleman WP, 3rd, Weiss RA, et al. Multicenter pivotal study of vacuum-assisted precise tissue release for the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:336–347..
    1. Orentreich DS, Orentreich N. Subcutaneous incisionless (subcision) surgery for the correction of depressed scars and wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21:543–549..
    1. Hexsel DM, Mazzuco R. Subcision: a treatment for cellulite. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:539–544..
    1. Kaminer MS, Coleman WP, 3rd, Weiss RA, et al. A multicenter pivotal study to evaluate tissue stabilized-guided subcision using the Cellfina device for the treatment of cellulite with 3-year follow-up. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43:1240–1248..
    1. Sasaki GH. Single treatment of grades II and III cellulite using a minimally invasive 1,440-nm pulsed Nd:YAG laser and side-firing fiber: an institutional review board-approved study with a 24-month follow-up period. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37:1073–1089..
    1. DiBernardo BE, Sasaki GH, Katz BE, et al. A multicenter study for cellulite treatment using a 1440-nm Nd:YAG wavelength Laser with side-firing fiber. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36:335–343..
    1. Katz B. Quantitative & qualitative evaluation of the efficacy of a 1440 nm Nd:YAG laser with novel bi-directional optical fiber in the treatment of cellulite as measured by 3-dimensional surface imaging. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12:1224–1230..
    1. Gorney M, Martello J. Patient selection criteria. Clin Plast Surg. 1999;26:37–40, vi..
    1. Martello J, Bailey CW., Jr. Doctor-patient relationship. The consultation. Clin Plast Surg. 1999;26:53–5, vi..
    1. Bayrakci Tunay V, Akbayrak T, Bakar Y, et al. Effects of mechanical massage, manual lymphatic drainage and connective tissue manipulation techniques on fat mass in women with cellulite. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24:138–142..
    1. de Godoy JM, Groggia MY, Ferro Laks L, et al. Intensive treatment of cellulite based on physiopathological principles. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:834280.
    1. Namias A, Kaplan B. Tumescent anesthesia for dermatologic surgery. Cosmetic and noncosmetic procedures. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24:755–758..
    1. McCalmont TH, Leshin B. Lask GP, Moy RL. Preoperative evaluation of the cutaneous surgery patient. In: Principles and Techniques of Cutaneous Surgery. 1996:New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill; 101–112..
    1. Hoffman BB, Lefkowitz RJ. Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Mollinoff PB. Catecholamines, sympathomimetic drugs and adrenergic receptor antagonists. In: Goodman & Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 1996:New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill; 199–248..
    1. Rossi AM, Katz BE. A modern approach to the treatment of cellulite. Dermatol Clin. 2014;32:51–59..
    1. Lotti T, Ghersetich I, Grappone C, et al. Proteoglycans in so-called cellulite. Int J Dermatol. 1990;29:272–274..
    1. Merlen JF, Curri SB, Sarteel AM. [Cellulitis, a conjunctive microvascular disease]. Phlebologie. 1979;32:279–282..
    1. Shoham N, Gefen A. Mechanotransduction in adipocytes. J Biomech. 2012;45:1–8..
    1. Halberg N, Khan T, Trujillo ME, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha induces fibrosis and insulin resistance in white adipose tissue. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:4467–4483..
    1. Querleux B, Cornillon C, Jolivet O, et al. Anatomy and physiology of subcutaneous adipose tissue by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: relationships with sex and presence of cellulite. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8:118–124..
    1. Rosenbaum M, Prieto V, Hellmer J, et al. An exploratory investigation of the morphology and biochemistry of cellulite. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1934–1939..
    1. Lemperle G, Morhenn V, Charrier U. Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27:354–366.; discussion 367.
    1. Boraldi F, Croce MA, Quaglino D, et al. Cell-matrix interactions of in vitro human skin fibroblasts upon addition of hyaluronan. Tissue Cell. 2003;35:37–45..
    1. Croce MA, Dyne K, Boraldi F, et al. Hyaluronan affects protein and collagen synthesis by in vitro human skin fibroblasts. Tissue Cell. 2001;33:326–331..

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel