Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China

Jingxuan Yang, Hua Bai, Jingxuan Yang, Hua Bai

Abstract

Objective: Episiotomy is still performed widely by obstetricians and midwives in some Chinese maternity units, but the reasons are unknown. This study aims to determine the knowledge, attitude and experience towards the practice of episiotomy among obstetricians and midwives in China's public hospitals and consider strategies to reduce its practice.

Methods: A cross-sectional web survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted among obstetricians and midwives in 90 public hospitals in Henan Province, China.

Results: 900 (82.21%) participants completed the questionnaire. Average knowledge level (4.15, SD=1.10) on complications and overuse was identified among participants. Episiotomy was performed more frequently in secondary hospitals than in tertiary hospitals (p<0.05). Senior clinicians were more likely to perform episiotomy than younger ones (p<0.05). Almost half of the clinicians (42.11%) considered the current rate of episiotomy (45%) to be right or too low. The most common reason for performing episiotomy identified by obstetricians (83.94%) and midwives (79.69%) was to reduce third-degree or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Both obstetricians (80.29%) and midwives (82.57%) agreed that the most significant obstacle to reducing the rate of episiotomy was lack of training on reducing perineal tears.

Conclusion: In sum, episiotomy was driven by previous training, practitioners' experience and local norms rather than the latest medical evidence. Clinicians in secondary hospitals and senior clinicians are key training targets. It is urgent to improve current clinical policies and surgical procedure guidelines for obstetricians and midwives regarding episiotomy.

Keywords: education & training (see medical education & training); maternal medicine; perinatology; urogynaecology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Béchard F, Geronimi J, Vieille P, et al. . Are we performing episiotomies correctly? A study to evaluate French technique in a high-risk maternity unit. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2018;47:331–8. 10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.04.010
    1. Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, et al. . Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;2:112–20. 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3
    1. Quoc Huy NV, Phuc An LS, Phuong LS, et al. . Pelvic floor and sexual dysfunction after vaginal birth with episiotomy in vietnamese women. Sex Med 2019;7:514–21. 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.09.002
    1. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;21:CD000081. 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2
    1. Main EK. New perinatal quality measures from the National quality forum, the joint commission and the leapfrog group. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:532–40. 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328332d1b0
    1. World Health Organization Division of Family Health Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood . Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Report of a technical working group. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996.
    1. Sagi-Dain L, Sagi S. Indications for episiotomy performance - a cross-sectional survey and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol 2016;36:361–5. 10.3109/01443615.2015.1065233
    1. CNGOF . Recommandations Pour La PratiqueMedicale. L’e’pisiotomie 2005.
    1. Obstetrics Group, Obstetrics and Gynecology Society, Chinese Medical Association . Clinical guidelines for operative vaginal delivery. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 2016;51:565–7.
    1. Clesse C, Lighezzolo-Alnot J, De Lavergne S, et al. . Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: comparative systematic review of changing practices. Health Care Women Int 2018;39:644–62. 10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253
    1. Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, et al. . Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth 2005;32:219–23. 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00373.x
    1. Sangkomkamhang U, Kongwattanakul K, Kietpeerakool C, et al. . Restrictive versus routine episiotomy among Southeast Asian term pregnancies: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2020;127:397–403. 10.1111/1471-0528.15982
    1. Zimmo K, Laine K, Fosse E, et al. . Episiotomy practice in six Palestinian hospitals: a population-based cohort study among singleton vaginal births. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021629. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021629
    1. Singh S, Thakur T, Chandhiok N, et al. . Pattern of episiotomy use & its immediate complications among vaginal deliveries in 18 tertiary care hospitals in India. Indian J Med Res 2016;143:474–80. 10.4103/0971-5916.184304
    1. Frass KA, Al-Harazi AH. Episiotomy is still performed routinely in Yemeni women. Saudi Med J 2010;31:764–7.
    1. Schantz C, Sim KL, Ly EM, et al. . Reasons for routine episiotomy: a mixed-methods study in a large maternity hospital in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Reprod Health Matters 2015;23:68–77. 10.1016/j.rhm.2015.06.012
    1. Blondel B, Alexander S, Bjarnadóttir RI, et al. . Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat project. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:746–54. 10.1111/aogs.12894
    1. Gundabattula SR, Surampudi K. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in South India. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:391–6. 10.1007/s00192-017-3398-0
    1. Yu J, Wang F. Analysis of the incidence and risk factors of anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery in women in Huangshi maternal and child health center of Hubei Province. Chin J Clin Obstet Gynecol 2019;20:439–40.
    1. Boujenah J, Tigaizin A, Fermaut M, et al. . Is episiotomy worthwile to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;232:60–4. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.014
    1. Wang Q, Zheng S-X, Ni Y-F, et al. . The effect of labor epidural analgesia on maternal-fetal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018;298:89–96. 10.1007/s00404-018-4777-6
    1. Tung CW, Cheon WC, Tong WMA, et al. . Incidence and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after various modes of vaginal deliveries in Chinese women. Chin Med J 2015;128:2420–5. 10.4103/0366-6999.164874
    1. Zhao Y, Xiao M, Tang F, et al. . The effect of water immersion delivery on the strength of pelvic floor muscle and pelvic floor disorders during postpartum period: an experimental study. Medicine 2017;96:e8124. 10.1097/MD.0000000000008124
    1. Zhu L, Li L, Lang J-he, et al. . Prevalence and risk factors for peri- and postpartum urinary incontinence in primiparous women in China: a prospective longitudinal study. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:563–72. 10.1007/s00192-011-1640-8
    1. Liang L, Min L, Li N. Survey on episiotomy among puerperal women in vaginal delivery from 2011 to 2014. Maternal Child Health Care China 2015;07:1087–9.
    1. National economy continued to recover in may. Available:
    1. Trinh AT, Roberts CL, Ampt AJ. Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy use among obstetricians and midwives in Viet Nam. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:101–7. 10.1186/s12884-015-0531-2
    1. Zhang M, Wang M, Zhao X, et al. . Risk factors for episiotomy during vaginal childbirth: a retrospective cohort study in Western China. J Evid Based Med 2018;11:233–41. 10.1111/jebm.12316
    1. Lin GUO, Yan D, Zheng Z. Establishment of predictive model of midwives’ decision on episiotomy during childbirth. Chin J Nurs 2019;54:1469–74.
    1. Yan W, Biru L, Xinfen X. Investigation on the current situation of labor analgesia in Chinese medical institutions. J Nurs Science 2020;35:16–19.
    1. Nassar AH, Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D. FIGO safe motherhood and newborn health Committee. FIGO statement: restrictive use rather than routine use of episiotomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;146:17–19.
    1. Lai CY, Cheung HW, Hsi Lao TT, et al. . Is the policy of restrictive episiotomy generalisable? A prospective observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:1116–21. 10.3109/14767050902994820
    1. Gyhagen M, Bullarbo M, Nielsen TF, et al. . Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse 20 years after childbirth: a national cohort study in singleton primiparae after vaginal or caesarean delivery. BJOG 2013;120:152–60. 10.1111/1471-0528.12020
    1. Khresheh R, Barclay L. Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives in Jordan. Women Birth 2020;33:e176–81. 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.007
    1. Hamilton LC. Statistics with STATA updated for version 9M. Thomson, Brooks Cole, 2006.
    1. Goueslard K, Cottenet J, Roussot A, et al. . How did episiotomy rates change from 2007 to 2014? Population-based study in France. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:208–18. 10.1186/s12884-018-1747-8
    1. Midwives Branch of Maternal and Child Health Care of China Association . Guideline of repairing techniques and material selection in episiotomy and perineal tears. Chinese Nurs Manag 2019;19:453–7.
    1. Trinh AT, Nippita TA, Dien TN, et al. . Perineal length among vietnamese women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2017;56:613–7. 10.1016/j.tjog.2017.08.006
    1. Bates LJ, Melon J, Turner R, et al. . Prospective comparison of obstetric anal sphincter injury incidence between an Asian and Western Hospital. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:429–37. 10.1007/s00192-018-3649-8
    1. Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, et al. . Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:66–72. 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3
    1. Gupta Janesh K, Akanksha S, Hofmeyr GJ. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural an aesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;5:2–6.
    1. Deliktas A, Kukulu K. A meta-analysis of the effect on maternal health of upright positions during the second stage of labour, without routine epidural analgesia. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:263–78. 10.1111/jan.13447
    1. Walker C, Rodríguez T, Herranz A, et al. . Alternative model of birth to reduce the risk of assisted vaginal delivery and perineal trauma. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1249–56. 10.1007/s00192-012-1675-5
    1. Ying HE, Hong, WANG Lin LI, et al. . Analysis of sensitive quality indicators of obstetrics and gynecology nursing. Hosp Admin J Chin PLA 2020;27:483–7.
    1. Muraca GM, Liu S, Sabr Y, et al. . Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2019;191:E1149–58. 10.1503/cmaj.190366
    1. Alexander JW, Karantanis E, Turner RM, et al. . Patient attitude and acceptance towards episiotomy during pregnancy before and after information provision: a questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31:521–8. 10.1007/s00192-019-04003-x
    1. Zhang-Rutledge K, Clark SL, Denning S, et al. . An initiative to reduce the episiotomy rate: association of feedback and the hawthorne effect with leapfrog goals. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:146–50. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002060
    1. de Freitas SS, Cabral AL, de Melo Costa Pinto R, et al. . Effects of perineal preparation techniques on tissue extensibility and muscle strength: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:951–7. 10.1007/s00192-018-3793-1
    1. He S, Jiang H, Qian X. Qualitative study on experiences Ｒelated to episiotomy of women from Shanghai communities. Med Society 2019;32:14–17.
    1. He S, Jiang H, Qian X, et al. . Women’s experience of episiotomy: a qualitative study from China. BMJ Open 2020;10:e033354. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033354
    1. Howard DH, Hockenberry J. Physician age and the abandonment of episiotomy. Health Serv Res 2019;54:650–7. 10.1111/1475-6773.13132
    1. Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Robbins JM, et al. . Physicians’ beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care. CMAJ 1995;153:769–79.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel