IL-36γ (IL-1F9) is a biomarker for psoriasis skin lesions

Angelo Massimiliano D'Erme, Dagmar Wilsmann-Theis, Julia Wagenpfeil, Michael Hölzel, Sandra Ferring-Schmitt, Sonja Sternberg, Miriam Wittmann, Bettina Peters, Andreas Bosio, Thomas Bieber, Joerg Wenzel, Angelo Massimiliano D'Erme, Dagmar Wilsmann-Theis, Julia Wagenpfeil, Michael Hölzel, Sandra Ferring-Schmitt, Sonja Sternberg, Miriam Wittmann, Bettina Peters, Andreas Bosio, Thomas Bieber, Joerg Wenzel

Abstract

In recent years, different genes and proteins have been highlighted as potential biomarkers for psoriasis, one of the most common inflammatory skin diseases worldwide. However, most of these markers are not only psoriasis-specific but also found in other inflammatory disorders. We performed an unsupervised cluster analysis of gene expression profiles in 150 psoriasis patients and other inflammatory skin diseases (atopic dermatitis, lichen planus, contact eczema, and healthy controls). We identified a cluster of IL-17/tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα)-associated genes specifically expressed in psoriasis, among which IL-36γ was the most outstanding marker. In subsequent immunohistological analyses, IL-36γ was confirmed to be expressed in psoriasis lesions only. IL-36γ peripheral blood serum levels were found to be closely associated with disease activity, and they decreased after anti-TNFα-treatment. Furthermore, IL-36γ immunohistochemistry was found to be a helpful marker in the histological differential diagnosis between psoriasis and eczema in diagnostically challenging cases. These features highlight IL-36γ as a valuable biomarker in psoriasis patients, both for diagnostic purposes and measurement of disease activity during the clinical course. Furthermore, IL-36γ might also provide a future drug target, because of its potential amplifier role in TNFα- and IL-17 pathways in psoriatic skin inflammation.

References

    1. J Immunol. 2011 Feb 15;186(4):2613-22
    1. Semin Immunol. 2013 Dec 15;25(6):458-65
    1. J Clin Invest. 2012 Nov;122(11):3965-76
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Dec 8;95(25):14863-8
    1. Nat Immunol. 2010 Nov;11(11):973
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Mar;131(3):677-87
    1. J Pathol. 2005 Mar;205(4):435-42
    1. J Immunol. 2014 Jun 15;192(12):6053-61
    1. Semin Immunol. 2013 Dec 15;25(6):394-407
    1. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2013 Aug;33(4):594-9
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2012 May;132(5):1346-53
    1. Pharmacogenomics J. 2007 Jun;7(3):212-20
    1. Allergy. 2012 Aug;67(8):969-75
    1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Jun;127(6):1420-32
    1. Exp Dermatol. 2012 Nov;21(11):822-6
    1. Nat Immunol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1014-22
    1. Annu Rev Pathol. 2012;7:385-422
    1. J Immunol. 2013 Mar 1;190(5):2252-62
    1. Blood. 2011 Nov 24;118(22):5813-23
    1. Trends Immunol. 2013 Apr;34(4):174-81
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72 Suppl 2:ii104-10
    1. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2014 Apr;24(4):477-9
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2007 Nov;127(11):2585-95
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2008 Jan;128(1):67-78
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Jul;165(1):189-93
    1. Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;104(2):130-4
    1. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):620-8
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5116-21
    1. J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 2;279(14):13677-88
    1. Br J Dermatol. 2010 Mar;162(3):568-78
    1. J Exp Med. 2007 Oct 29;204(11):2603-14
    1. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2007 Oct;27(5):605-7
    1. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;12(4):486-90
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2011 Dec;131(12):2428-37
    1. J Invest Dermatol. 2009 Mar;129(3):641-9
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Sep 9;89(3):432-7

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel