A Novel Method to Accelerate Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Low-Intensity Direct Electrical Current in Patients Requiring en-Masse Retraction of the Upper Anterior Teeth: A Preliminary Clinical Report

Rashad I Shaadouh, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Rabab Al-Sabbagh, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Ghiath Mahmoud, Ghassan Idris, Rashad I Shaadouh, Mohammad Y Hajeer, Rabab Al-Sabbagh, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Ghiath Mahmoud, Ghassan Idris

Abstract

Background: Shortening the duration of orthodontic treatment by speeding up the rate of tooth movement has become an essential goal for both orthodontists and patients. This preliminary report aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of a new intraoral removable electrical device in accelerating the en-masse retraction of the upper anterior teeth using low-intensity direct electrical current.

Methods: This prospective preliminary interventional clinical study was conducted at the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Syria, between March 2019 and February 2020. The sample consisted of six patients (four females and two males; mean age: 19.55 ± 0.89 years) whose initial diagnosis was class II division I malocclusion, and their treatment plan suggested the extraction of upper first premolars followed by en-masse retraction. The electrical stimulation was applied on the maxillary anterior region during the en-masse retraction phase using a specially fabricated removable device that was designed by two coauthors of this manuscript (RIS, MYH). Patients were asked to wear their own electrical devices inside their mouths for five hours daily. The primary outcomes were the en-masse retraction rate and duration. The secondary outcomes were safety and patient acceptance.

Results: The average total retraction rate during the treatment period was 0.97±0.06 mm/month. The total amount of retraction achieved during follow-up was 5.65 ± 0.85 mm, which was about 91.86% of the space resulting from the extraction of the upper first premolars. The mean treatment duration to complete the en-masse retraction was 5.66±0.81 months. No side effects of the electrical stimulation were found during the follow-up.

Conclusions: Low-intensity direct electrical current could be an effective method to accelerate orthodontic movement. The electrical accelerating device used in this study effectively increased the en-masse retraction rate of the upper anterior teeth without any side effects and with high patient acceptance.

Keywords: acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement; electrical stimulation; en-masse retraction; orthodontic tooth movement; retraction rate; upper anterior teeth retraction.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Copyright © 2023, Shaadouh et al.

Figures

Figure 1. The electrical accelerating device. (a)…
Figure 1. The electrical accelerating device. (a) Frontal view of the device; (b) Side view of the device; (c) Occlusal view of the device; (d) Top view of the device.
Figure 2. The electrical accelerating device. (A)…
Figure 2. The electrical accelerating device. (A) Frontal view of the device inside the patient's mouth; (B) Occlusal view of the device inside the patient's mouth.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the electrical…
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the electrical circuit.
B1: Battery, Q1,Q2: Transistors; R1,R2: Resistors; D1, D2, D3: Diodes.

References

    1. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36:275–283.
    1. Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:513–523.
    1. Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: a clinical perspective. Talic NF. Saudi Dent J. 2011;23:55–59.
    1. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158:0–20.
    1. Effectiveness of minimally invasive surgical procedures in the acceleration of tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alfawal AM, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:33.
    1. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. Al-Naoum F, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72:1880–1889.
    1. Is it possible to achieve favorable accelerated dental changes with no periodontal complications when retracting upper anterior teeth assisted by flapless corticotomy compared to traditional corticotomy? A two-arm randomized controlled trial. Khlef HN, Hajeer MY. ScientificWorldJournal. 2022;2022:4261248.
    1. Systematic review: is high-energy laser therapy (HELT) with flapless corticotomy effective in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement? Shaadouh RI, Hajeer MY, Mahmoud G, Murad RM. Cureus. 2022;14:0.
    1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy in the retraction of four upper incisors: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Al-Imam GM, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Mdalal Y, Almashaal E. Dent Med Probl. 2019;56:385–394.
    1. Efficiency of corticision in accelerating leveling and alignment of crowded lower anterior teeth in young adult patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Sirri OR, Burhan AS, Hajeer MY, Nawaya FR, Abdulhadi A. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2020;14:26–31.
    1. Evaluation of the acceleration, skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of low-level laser therapy combined with fixed posterior bite blocks in children with skeletal anterior open bite: a three-arm randomised controlled trial. Hasan AA, Rajeh N, Hajeer MY, Hamadah O, Ajaj MA. Int Orthod. 2022;20:100597.
    1. Assessment of dentoalveolar changes following leveling and alignment of severely crowded upper anterior teeth using self-ligating brackets alone or with flapless piezocision compared to traditional brackets: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Haj Hamed Y, Alkhouri I, Zinah E. Cureus. 2023;15:0.
    1. Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing treatment time: a clinical investigation. Bhad Patil WA, Karemore AA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161:652–658.
    1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical interventions versus non-surgical ones when used in conjunction with fixed appliances to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Alfailany DT, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Mahaini L, Darwich K, Aljabban O. Cureus. 2022;14:0.
    1. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage. Park HS, Kwon TG. . Angle Orthod. 2004;74:703–710.
    1. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement. I. The effect of electric currents on periodontal cyclic nucleotides. Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:14–32.
    1. Electric currents, bone remodeling, and orthodontic tooth movement: II. Increase in rate of tooth movement and periodontal cyclic nucleotide levels by combined force and electric current. Davidovitch Z, Finkelson MD, Steigman S, Shanfeld JL, Montgomery PC, Korostoff E. Am J Orthod. 1980;77:33–47.
    1. Effect of micro-pulsed electricity on experimental tooth movement. Hashimoto H. Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;49:352–361.
    1. The effects of electrical current from a micro-electrical device on tooth movement. Kim DH, Park YG, Kang SG. Korean J Orthod. 2008;38:337–346.
    1. Comparison of rate of tooth movement and pain perception during accelerated tooth movement associated with conventional fixed appliances with micro-osteoperforations - a randomised controlled trial. Attri S, Mittal R, Batra P, Sonar S, Sharma K, Raghavan S, Rai KS. J Orthod. 2018;45:225–233.
    1. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:809–818.
    1. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Patil S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:18–29.
    1. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:803–810.
    1. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in class II division 1 patients. Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Nanda R. Angle Orthod. 2009;79:240–247.
    1. Efficiency of piezosurgery technique in miniscrew supported en-masse retraction: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Tunçer NI, Arman-Özçirpici A, Oduncuoglu BF, Göçmen JS, Kantarci A. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39:586–594.
    1. Comparison of rate of orthodontic tooth movement in adolescent patients undergoing treatment by first bicuspid extraction and en-mass retraction, associated with low level laser therapy in passive self-ligating and conventional brackets: a randomized controlled trial. Lalnunpuii H, Batra P, Sharma K, Srivastava A, Raghavan S. Int Orthod. 2020;18:412–423.
    1. Velocity of orthodontic active space closure with and without photobiomodulation therapy: a single-center, cluster randomized clinical trial. Samara SA, Nahas AZ, Rastegar-Lari TA. Lasers Dent Sci. 2018;2:109–118.
    1. Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) during surgically-assisted acceleration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mousa MM, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Almahdi WH. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44:622–635.
    1. Evaluation of the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in fixed orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Mousa MM, Hajeer MY, Sultan K, Almahdi WH, Alhaffar JB. Cureus. 2023;15:0.
    1. Pain, discomfort, and functional impairments when retracting upper anterior teeth using two-step retraction with transpalatal arches versus en-masse retraction with mini-implants: a randomized controlled trial. Mousa MM, Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Cureus. 2023;15:0.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel