Introducing NICE guidelines for intravenous fluid therapy into a district general hospital

Marcia McDougall, Bruce Guthrie, Arthur Doyle, Alan Timmins, Meghan Bateson, Emily Ridley, Gordon Drummond, Thenmalar Vadiveloo, Marcia McDougall, Bruce Guthrie, Arthur Doyle, Alan Timmins, Meghan Bateson, Emily Ridley, Gordon Drummond, Thenmalar Vadiveloo

Abstract

Background: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on intravenous fluid prescribing for adults in hospital, issued in 2013, advised less use of 0.9% sodium chloride than current practice, provided a logical system for prescribing and suggested further study of electrolyte abnormalities.

Aims: To describe the steps taken to establish and monitor guideline introduction and to assess effects on clinical biochemistry results, in a general hospital setting.

Methods: We used established principles of change to modify education, teaching, record keeping and audit throughout the hospital, changed the availability of intravenous fluid preparations in the wards and monitored the use of intravenous fluids. We anonymously linked local clinical chemistry records to nationally available patient records (NHS Scotland SMR01). We chose specified medical emergencies, and major emergency and elective general and orthopaedic surgery, where management would require intravenous fluids, for a two-phase cross-sectional study between 2007 and 2017, spanning the change in prescribing. Primary outcomes were abnormal bicarbonate, sodium, potassium and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and secondary outcomes were mortality and length of stay.

Results: Over the study period, sodium chloride 0.9% use decreased by 75%, and overall intravenous fluid use decreased from 0.65 to 0.40 L/occupied bed day. The incidence of acidosis decreased from 7.4% to 4.8% of all admissions (difference -2.7%, 95% CI -2.1 to -3.0). No important changes in other electrolytes were noted; in particular, plasma sodium values showed no adverse effects. Stage 1 AKI increased from 6.7% to 9.0% (difference 2.3%, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.0), but other causes for this cannot be excluded. Mortality and length of stay showed no adverse effects.

Conclusions and implications: Effective implementation of the guidelines required substantial time, effort and resource. NICE suggestions of fluid types for maintenance appear appropriate, but prescribed volumes continue to require careful clinical judgement.

Keywords: clinical practice guidelines; health professions education; quality improvement.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MMD has been a member of advisory panels on intravenous fluids for Baxter Healthcare and has given educational talks on fluid guidelines for Baxter Healthcare and Teva Healthcare.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monthly fluid use over the study period. (A) Changing use of total fluid, 0.9% sodium chloride, balanced electrolyte solutions (Hartmann’s solution and Plasma-Lyte) and the introduction of 0.18% sodium chloride and 4% glucose as a maintenance fluid. (B) Changes in the pattern of maintenance fluid use and potassium supplements over the same period. Before time mark B, all fluids containing potassium are shown, that is, 0.9% sodium chloride with potassium and 5% glucose with potassium. Note the different scale for fluid volume. Time marks apply to both panels and indicate: A: start of fluid education, B: Guidelines introduced and C: sustained campaign to encourage 0.18% sodium chloride and 4% glucose solutions with potassium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between the use of 0.9% sodium chloride (solid line) and the quarterly incidence of acidosis (filled circles), over the early study period. Time marks indicate: A: start of fluid education and B: guidelines introduced.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportional usage of intravenous crystalloid fluids in Scottish health boards, ranked in decreasing order of proportional use of 0.9% sodium chloride, for the financial years 2017 and 2018. The effect of implementing the NICE guidelines is clear, comparing NHS Fife to the pattern of use in other health boards. Note the greater use of 0.18% sodium chloride and 4% glucose, the limited use of 5% glucose and a smaller proportion of use of 0.9% sodium chloride, indicating maintenance prescribing based on the NICE guidelines. The two columns adjacent to NHS Fife show the start of similar prescribing in these hospital boards. NHS, National Health Service; NICE, National Institue for Health and Care Excellence.

References

    1. Powell AGMT, Paterson-Brown S, Drummond GB. Undergraduate medical textbooks do not provide adequate information on intravenous fluid therapy: a systematic survey and suggestions for improvement. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:35. 10.1186/1472-6920-14-35
    1. McCrory RFR, Gormley GJ, Maxwell AP, et al. . Learning to prescribe intravenous fluids: A scoping review. Perspect Med Educ 2017;6:369–79. 10.1007/s40037-017-0386-5
    1. Harris B, Schopflin C, Khaghani C, et al. . Perioperative intravenous fluid prescribing: a multi-centre audit. Perioper Med 2015;4:15. 10.1186/s13741-015-0025-9
    1. Lobo DN, Dube MG, Neal KR, et al. . Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an inadequate knowledge base. Clin Nutr 2001;20:125–30. 10.1054/clnu.2000.0154
    1. Chung LH, Chong S, French P. The efficiency of fluid balance charting: an evidence-based management project. J Nurs Manag 2002;10:103–13. 10.1046/j.0966-0429.2001.00296.x
    1. Rooker JC, Gorard DA. Errors of intravenous fluid infusion rates in medical inpatients. Clin Med 2007;7:482–5. 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-5-482
    1. Awad S, Allison SP, Lobo DN. Fluid and electrolyte balance: the impact of goal directed teaching. Clin Nutr 2008;27:473–8. 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.03.009
    1. Tang VCY, Lee EWY. Fluid balance chart: do we understand it? Clin Risk 2010;16:10–13. 10.1258/cr.2009.090005
    1. Leach RM, Brotherton A, Stroud M, et al. . Nutrition and fluid balance must be taken seriously. BMJ 2013;346:f801. 10.1136/bmj.f801
    1. Van Regenmortel N, Hendrickx S, Roelant E, et al. . 154 compared to 54 mmol per liter of sodium in intravenous maintenance fluid therapy for adult patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (TOPMAST): a single-center randomized controlled double-blind trial. Intensive Care Med 2019;45:1422–32. 10.1007/s00134-019-05772-1
    1. Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Maintenance intravenous fluids in acutely ill patients. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1350–60. 10.1056/NEJMra1412877
    1. Soni N, Powell–Tuck J, Gosling P, Lobo DN. British consensus guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy for adult surgical patients (GIFTASUP): Cassandra's view. Anaesthesia 2009;64:13–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05886_1.x
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Intravenous fluid therapy in adults in hospital Clinical guideline [CG174], 2013.
    1. Woodcock T. GIFTAHo; an improvement on GIFTASuP? new NICE guidelines on intravenous fluids. Anaesthesia 2014;69:410–5. 10.1111/anae.12644
    1. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, et al. . The reporting of studies conducted using observational Routinely-collected health data (record) statement. PLoS Med 2015;12:e1001885. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
    1. Kotter JP. Leading change. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press, 2012.
    1. National Confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death. extremes of age report, 1999. Available:
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007;370:1453–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
    1. ISD Scotland . General Acute Inpatient and Day Case - Scottish Morbidity Record (SMR01). Available: [Accessed 17 Dec 2020].
    1. KDIGO . Clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:1–138.
    1. Newcombe RG. Two-Sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:857–72. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>;2-E
    1. Lowry R. VassarStats. Available: [Accessed 11 Apr 2020].
    1. Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall International, 1996.
    1. Leach R, Crichton S, Morton N, et al. . Fluid management knowledge in hospital physicians: ‘Greenshoots’ of improvement but still a cause for concern. Clin Med 2020;20:e26–31. 10.7861/clinmed.2019-0433
    1. Mathur A, Johnston G, Clark L. Improving intravenous fluid prescribing. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 2020;50:181–7. 10.4997/JRCPE.2020.224
    1. Public Health Scotland . Hospital medicines utilisation database. Available: [Accessed 21 Jun 2020].
    1. NHS National Services Scotland . Assessment of SMR01 data Scotland 2014-2015. Available: [Accessed 17 Dec 2020].
    1. McDougall M, Ridley E. Junior doctors’ attitudes to fluid prescribing in NHS Fife. Scott Med J 2021.
    1. Ridley E. Fluid prescribing and administration: are we following NHS Fife IV fluid guidance? Scott Med J 2021;66:NP14.
    1. De Silva AN, Scibelli T, Itobi E, et al. . Improving peri-operative fluid management in a large teaching hospital: pragmatic studies on the effects of changing practice. Proc Nutr Soc 2010;69:499–507. 10.1017/S0029665110003824
    1. Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, et al. . Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg 2012;255:821–9. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5
    1. Yunos Nor'azim Mohd, Bellomo R, Glassford N, et al. . Chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration and acute kidney injury: an extended analysis. Intensive Care Med 2015;41:257–64. 10.1007/s00134-014-3593-0
    1. Thacker JKM, Mountford WK, Ernst FR, et al. . Perioperative fluid utilization variability and association with outcomes: considerations for enhanced recovery efforts in sample us surgical populations. Ann Surg 2016;263:502–10. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001402
    1. The Scottish Arthroplasty Project Annual Report, 2018. Available: [Accessed 9 May 2020].
    1. Scott NB, McDonald D, Campbell J, et al. . The use of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles in Scottish orthopaedic units--an implementation and follow-up at 1 year, 2010-2011: a report from the Musculoskeletal Audit, Scotland. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:117–24. 10.1007/s00402-012-1619-z
    1. The Scottish arthroplasty project report, 2019. Available: [Accessed 9 May 2020].
    1. Shin CH, Long DR, McLean D, et al. . Effects of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative outcomes: a hospital registry study. Ann Surg 2018;267:1084–92. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002220
    1. Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, et al. . Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy for major abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2263–74. 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel