Effectiveness of text message based, diabetes self management support programme (SMS4BG): two arm, parallel randomised controlled trial

Rosie Dobson, Robyn Whittaker, Yannan Jiang, Ralph Maddison, Matthew Shepherd, Catherine McNamara, Richard Cutfield, Manish Khanolkar, Rinki Murphy, Rosie Dobson, Robyn Whittaker, Yannan Jiang, Ralph Maddison, Matthew Shepherd, Catherine McNamara, Richard Cutfield, Manish Khanolkar, Rinki Murphy

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of a theoretically based and individually tailored, text message based, diabetes self management support intervention (SMS4BG) in adults with poorly controlled diabetes.

Design: Nine month, two arm, parallel randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Primary and secondary healthcare services in New Zealand.

Participants: 366 participants aged 16 years and over with poorly controlled type 1 or type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥65 mmol/mol or 8%) randomised between June 2015 and November 2016 (n=183 intervention, n=183 control).

Interventions: The intervention group received a tailored package of text messages for up to nine months in addition to usual care. Text messages provided information, support, motivation, and reminders related to diabetes self management and lifestyle behaviours. The control group received usual care. Messages were delivered by a specifically designed automated content management system.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measure was change in glycaemic control (HbA1c) from baseline to nine months. Secondary outcomes included change in HbA1c at three and six months, and self efficacy, diabetes self care behaviours, diabetes distress, perceptions and beliefs about diabetes, health related quality of life, perceived support for diabetes management, and intervention engagement and satisfaction at nine months. Regression models adjusted for baseline outcome, health district category, diabetes type, and ethnicity.

Results: The reduction in HbA1c at nine months was significantly greater in the intervention group (mean -8.85 mmol/mol (standard deviation 14.84)) than in the control group (-3.96 mmol/mol (17.02); adjusted mean difference -4.23 (95% confidence interval -7.30 to -1.15), P=0.007). Of 21 secondary outcomes, only four showed statistically significant improvements in favour of the intervention group at nine months. Significant improvements were seen for foot care behaviour (adjusted mean difference 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.40 to 1.29), P<0.001), overall diabetes support (0.26 (0.03 to 0.50), P=0.03), health status on the EQ-5D visual analogue scale (4.38 (0.44 to 8.33), P=0.03), and perceptions of illness identity (-0.54 (-1.04 to -0.03), P=0.04). High levels of satisfaction with SMS4BG were found, with 161 (95%) of 169 participants reporting it to be useful, and 164 (97%) willing to recommend the programme to other people with diabetes.

Conclusion: A tailored, text message based, self management support programme resulted in modest improvements in glycaemic control in adults with poorly controlled diabetes. Although the clinical significance of these results is unclear, the findings support further investigation into the use of SMS4BG and other text message based support for this patient population.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614001232628.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from Waitemata District Health Board for the development of SMS4BG, and support from the Health Research Council of New Zealand in partnership with the Waitemata District Health Board and Auckland District Health Board, and the New Zealand Ministry of Health for the randomised controlled trial; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Trial registration flowchart

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 7th edn. Brussels, Belgium. : International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
    1. Joshy G, Dunn P, Fisher M, Lawrenson R. Ethnic differences in the natural progression of nephropathy among diabetes patients in New Zealand: hospital admission rate for renal complications, and incidence of end-stage renal disease and renal death. Diabetologia 2009;52:1474-8. 10.1007/s00125-009-1380-1
    1. Isaacs RD, Scott DJ. Diabetic patient discharges from Middlemore Hospital in 1983. N Z Med J 1987;100:629-31.
    1. Joshy G, Simmons D. Epidemiology of diabetes in New Zealand: revisit to a changing landscape. N Z Med J 2006;119:U1999.
    1. Negandhi PH, Ghouri N, Colhoun HM, et al. Scottish Diabetes Research Network Epidemiology Group Ethnic differences in glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus living in Scotland. PLoS One 2013;8:e83292. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083292
    1. Abouzeid M, Philpot B, Janus ED, Coates MJ, Dunbar JA. Type 2 diabetes prevalence varies by socio-economic status within and between migrant groups: analysis and implications for Australia. BMC Public Health 2013;13:252. 10.1186/1471-2458-13-252
    1. Elley CR, Kenealy T, Robinson E, et al. Cardiovascular risk management of different ethnic groups with type 2 diabetes in primary care in New Zealand. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008;79:468-73. 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.09.018
    1. Williams R, Van Gaal L, Lucioni C. Assessing the impact of complications on the costs of Type II diabetes. Diabetologia 2002;45:S13-7 10.1007/s00125-002-0859-9 .
    1. Eastman RC, Javitt JC, Herman WH, et al. Model of complications of NIDDM. II. Analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia. Diabetes Care 1997;20:735-44. 10.2337/diacare.20.5.735
    1. Eastman RC, Javitt JC, Herman WH, et al. Model of complications of NIDDM. I. Model construction and assumptions. Diabetes Care 1997;20:725-34. 10.2337/diacare.20.5.725
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Lifetime benefits and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications trial. JAMA 1996;276:1409-15. 10.1001/jama.1996.03540170053032
    1. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA 2001;285:182-9. 10.1001/jama.285.2.182
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Chou CH, Nocon RS, Chin MH, Peek ME. Mobile phone diabetes project led to improved glycemic control and net savings for Chicago plan participants. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:265-72. 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0589
    1. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2011;28:455-63. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.03180.x
    1. Saffari M, Ghanizadeh G, Koenig HG. Health education via mobile text messaging for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prim Care Diabetes 2014;8:275-85. 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.004
    1. Arambepola C, Ricci-Cabello I, Manikavasagam P, Roberts N, French DP, Farmer A. The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2016;18:e86. 10.2196/jmir.5425
    1. Heron KE, Smyth JM. Ecological momentary interventions: incorporating mobile technology into psychosocial and health behaviour treatments. Br J Health Psychol 2010;15:1-39. 10.1348/135910709X466063
    1. Boland P. The emerging role of cell phone technology in ambulatory care. J Ambul Care Manage 2007;30:126-33. 10.1097/01.JAC.0000264602.19629.84
    1. Pew Research Centre. Digital Differences 2012.
    1. Statistics New Zealand. Household use of information and communication technology:2009. 2010.
    1. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, et al. The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system-results from the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun 2010;15(Suppl 2):183-96. 10.1080/10810730.2010.499988
    1. McCloud RF, Okechukwu CA, Sorensen G, Viswanath K. Beyond access: barriers to internet health information seeking among the urban poor. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016;23:1053-9. 10.1093/jamia/ocv204
    1. Knapp C, Madden V, Wang H, Sloyer P, Shenkman E. Internet use and eHealth literacy of low-income parents whose children have special health care needs. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e75. 10.2196/jmir.1697
    1. Lorence D, Park H. Group disparities and health information: a study of online access for the underserved. Health Informatics J 2008;14:29-38. 10.1177/1460458207086332
    1. Mossberger K, Tolbert CJ, Bowen D, Jimenez B. Unraveling Different Barriers to Internet Use. Urban Aff Rev 2012;48:771-810 10.1177/1078087412453713 .
    1. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, et al. Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:318-21. 10.1136/jamia.2010.006015
    1. Chang BL, Bakken S, Brown SS, et al. Bridging the digital divide: reaching vulnerable populations. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:448-57. 10.1197/jamia.M1535
    1. Dobson R, Carter K, Cutfield R, et al. Diabetes Text-Message Self-Management Support Program (SMS4BG): A Pilot Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3:e32. 10.2196/mhealth.3988
    1. Whittaker R, Merry S, Dorey E, Maddison R. A development and evaluation process for mHealth interventions: examples from New Zealand. J Health Commun 2012;17(Suppl 1):11-21. 10.1080/10810730.2011.649103
    1. Dobson R, Whittaker R, Jiang Y, et al. Text message-based diabetes self-management support (SMS4BG): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016;17:179. 10.1186/s13063-016-1305-5
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726-32. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e126. 10.2196/jmir.1923
    1. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:641-51. 10.1177/0145721709335006
    1. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000;23:943-50. 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:246-52. 10.1370/afm.842
    1. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006;60:631-7. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020
    1. EuroQol Group EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
    1. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HAW, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;321:405-12. 10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405
    1. Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, et al. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977-86. 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401
    1. Zoungas S, Chalmers J, Ninomiya T, et al. ADVANCE Collaborative Group Association of HbA1c levels with vascular complications and death in patients with type 2 diabetes: evidence of glycaemic thresholds. Diabetologia 2012;55:636-43. 10.1007/s00125-011-2404-1
    1. Faruque LI, Wiebe N, Ehteshami-Afshar A, et al. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. CMAJ 2016.
    1. Dobson R, Whittaker R, Pfaeffli Dale L, Maddison R. The effectiveness of text message-based self-management interventions for poorly-controlled diabetes: A systematic review. Digit Health 2017;3 10.1177/2055207617740315.
    1. Gale EAM, Beattie SD, Hu J, Koivisto V, Tan MH. Recruitment to a clinical trial improves glycemic control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2989-92. 10.2337/dc07-0155
    1. Dobson R, Whittaker R, Bartley H, et al. Development of a Culturally Tailored Text Message Maternal Health Program: TextMATCH. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017;5:e49. 10.2196/mhealth.7205
    1. Armour TA, Norris SL, Jack L, Jr, Zhang X, Fisher L. The effectiveness of family interventions in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2005;22:1295-305. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01618.x
    1. Durie M. Whaiora: Māori health development. 2nd ed Oxford University Press, 1994.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel