Supervised exercise after oesophageal cancer surgery: the PERFECT multicentre randomized clinical trial

J K van Vulpen, A E Hiensch, R van Hillegersberg, J P Ruurda, F J G Backx, G A P Nieuwenhuijzen, E A Kouwenhoven, R P R Groenendijk, D L van der Peet, E J Hazebroek, C Rosman, B P L Wijnhoven, M I van Berge Henegouwen, H W M van Laarhoven, P D Siersema, A M May, J K van Vulpen, A E Hiensch, R van Hillegersberg, J P Ruurda, F J G Backx, G A P Nieuwenhuijzen, E A Kouwenhoven, R P R Groenendijk, D L van der Peet, E J Hazebroek, C Rosman, B P L Wijnhoven, M I van Berge Henegouwen, H W M van Laarhoven, P D Siersema, A M May

Abstract

Background: This study investigated whether a supervised exercise programme improves quality of life (QoL), fatigue and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients in the first year after oesophagectomy.

Methods: The multicentre PERFECT trial randomly assigned patients to an exercise intervention (EX) or usual care (UC) group. EX patients participated in a 12-week moderate- to high-intensity aerobic and resistance exercise programme supervised by a physiotherapist. Primary (global QoL, QoL summary score) and secondary (QoL subscales, fatigue and cardiorespiratory fitness) outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks and analysed as between-group differences using either linear mixed effects models or ANCOVA.

Results: A total of 120 patients (mean(s.d.) age 64(8) years) were included and randomized to EX (61 patients) or UC (59 patients). Patients in the EX group participated in 96 per cent (i.q.r. 92-100 per cent) of the exercise sessions and the relative exercise dose intensity was high (92 per cent). At 12 weeks, beneficial EX effects were found for QoL summary score (3.5, 95 per cent c.i. 0.2 to 6.8) and QoL role functioning (9.4, 95 per cent c.i. 1.3 to 17.5). Global QoL was not statistically significant different between groups (3.0, 95 per cent c.i. -2.2 to 8.2). Physical fatigue was lower in the EX group (-1.2, 95 per cent c.i. -2.6 to 0.1), albeit not significantly. There was statistically significant improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness following EX compared with UC (peak oxygen uptake (1.8 ml/min/kg, 95 per cent c.i. 0.6 to 3.0)). After 24 weeks, all EX effects were attenuated.

Conclusions: A supervised exercise programme improved cardiorespiratory fitness and aspects of QoL.

Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register NTR 5045 (www.trialregister.nl/trial/4942).

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram of the PERFECT study. The study was conducted in nine Dutch hospitals: UMC Utrecht, Utrecht (2015–2019); Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), Almelo (2015–2019); Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven (2015–2019); St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein (2015–2017); IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel (2015–2017); Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen (2015–2019); Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam (formerly Amsterdam VU Medical Centre (2015–2019) and AMC Amsterdam (2017–2019)); Erasmus MC, Rotterdam (2017–2019).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Radar plots demonstrating changes from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks post baseline in quality of life and fatigue scores for participants randomized to the exercise and usual care groups. An asterisk indicates a statistically significant between-group difference. It should be noted that the scale of all QoL-symptom outcomes and fatigue outcomes were inverted to facilitate interpretability. An increase from baseline to 12 or 24 weeks post-baseline now indicates an improvement for all outcomes.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effects of the 12-week exercise intervention on QoL and fatigue 12 and 24 weeks post baseline for all participants and stratified for sex, type of surgery, subtype of carcinoma and time since surgery. Intention-to-treat mixed linear regression models were used to calculate differences between the exercise and usual care group at 12 and 24 weeks. Models were adjusted for the baseline value of the outcome and stratification factors. Between-group differences were based on participants for whom measurements at 12 or 24 weeks were available (EX: open surgery n =5; minimal invasive n =49; <6 months n =36; ≥6 months n =18, men n =46; women n =8, adenocarcinoma n =45 and squamous cell carcinoma n =8, UC: open surgery n =6; minimal invasive n =50; <6 months n =39; ≥6 months n =17; men n =49; women n =7; adenocarcinoma n =41; squamous cell carcinoma n =10). Blue zones show the cut-off for clinically relevant (i.e., ≥10 points for QoL and ≥2 for fatigue51) changes. Between-group differences are shown with corresponding 95 per cent confidence intervals. Confidence intervals not including 0 are considered statistically significant.

References

    1. Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BPL. et al.; CROSS study group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer [CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:1090–1098
    1. Gottlieb-Vedi E, Kauppila JH, Malietzis G, Nilsson M, Markar SR, Lagergren J.. Long-term survival in esophageal cancer after minimally invasive compared to open esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019;270:1005–1017
    1. Schandl A, Lagergren J, Johar A, Lagergren P.. Health-related quality of life 10 years after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer 2016;69:43–50
    1. Noordman BJ, Verdam MGE, Lagarde SM, Hulshof MCCM, van Hagen P, van Berge Henegouwen MI. et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-related quality of life in esophageal or junctional cancer: results from the randomized CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:268–275
    1. Noordman BJ, Verdam MGE, Lagarde SM, Shapiro J, Hulshof MCCM, van Berge Henegouwen MI. et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of esophageal or junctional cancer: results from the randomized CROSS trial. Ann Oncol 2018;29:445–451
    1. Sunde B, Klevebro F, Johar A, Johnsen G, Jacobsen A-B, Glenjen NI. et al. Health-related quality of life in a randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus surgery in patients with oesophageal cancer (NeoRes trial). Br J Surg 2019;106:1452–1463
    1. Schandl A, Johar A, Anandavadivelan P, Vikström K, Mälberg K, Lagergren P.. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2020;59:613–619
    1. Gannon JA, Guinan EM, Doyle SL, Beddy P, Reynolds JV, Hussey J.. Reduced fitness and physical functioning are long-term sequelae after curative treatment for esophageal cancer: a matched control study. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1–7
    1. Buffart LM, Kalter J, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK. et al. Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer Treat Rev 2017;52:91–104
    1. van Vulpen JK, Sweegers MG, Peeters PHM, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK. et al. Moderators of exercise effects on cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2020;52:303–314 doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002154
    1. Sweegers MG, Altenburg TM, Brug J, May AM, van Vulpen JK, Aaronson NK. et al. Effects and moderators of exercise on muscle strength, muscle function and aerobic fitness in patients with cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Br J Sports Med 2019;53:812.
    1. Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS. et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2019;51:2375–2390
    1. O’Neill LM, Guinan E, Doyle SL, Bennett AE, Murphy C, Elliott JA. et al. The RESTORE randomized controlled trial: impact of a multidisciplinary rehabilitative program on cardiorespiratory fitness in esophagogastric cancer survivorship. Ann Surg 2018;268:747–755
    1. van Vulpen JK, Siersema PD, van Hillegersberg R, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Kouwenhoven EA, Groenendijk RPR. et al. Physical ExeRcise Following Esophageal Cancer Treatment (PERFECT) study: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2017;17:1–9
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.
    1. Cardinal B, Esters J, Cardinal M.. Evaluation of the revised physical activity readiness questionnaire in older adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc 1996;28:468–472
    1. American Institute for Cancer Research. Guidelines For Cancer Survivors. (accessed 22 March 2021).
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A.. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213
    1. Low DE, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling GE, D'Journo XB. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG). Ann Surg 2015;262:286–294
    1. Abbott J, Teleni L, McKavanagh D, Watson J, McCarthy AL, Isenring E.. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients. Support Care Cancer 2016;24:3883–3887
    1. Jager-Wittenaar H, Ottery FD.. Assessing nutritional status in cancer: role of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2017;20:322–329
    1. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ. et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376
    1. Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW. et al.; EORTC Quality of Life Group. Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;69:79–88
    1. Lagergren P, Fayers P, Conroy T, Stein HJ, Sezer O, Hardwick R. et al.; European Organisation for Research Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal and Quality of Life Groups. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OG25, to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer of the oesophagus, the oesophago-gastric junction and the stomach. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:2066–2073
    1. Smets EMA, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JCJM.. The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 1995;39:315–325
    1. Wasserman K, Hansen J, Sue D, Stringer W, Whipp B.. Principles of Exercise Testing and Interpretation (4th edn). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
    1. Weggemans RM, Backx FJG, Borghouts L, Chinapaw M, Hopman MTE, Koster A. et al.; Committee Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines 2017. The 2017 Dutch Physical Activity Guidelines. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2018;15:58.
    1. Steins Bisschop CN, Courneya KS, Velthuis MJ, Monninkhof EM, Jones LW, Friedenreich C. et al. Control group design, contamination and drop-out in exercise oncology trials: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0120996.
    1. Korstjens I, May AM, van Weert E, Mesters I, Tan F, Ros WJG. et al. Quality of life after self-management cancer rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial comparing physical and cognitive-behavioral training versus physical training. Psychosom Med 2008;70:422–429
    1. May AM, Korstjens I, van Weert E, van den Borne B, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, van der Schans CP. et al. Long-term effects on cancer survivors’ quality of life of physical training versus physical training combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy: results from a randomized trial. Support Care Cancer 2009;17:653–663
    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum; 1988.
    1. Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J.. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:139–144
    1. Kampshoff CS, Jansen F, van Mechelen W, May AM, Brug J, Chinapaw MJM. et al. Determinants of exercise adherence and maintenance among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2014;11:80.
    1. Coebergh JWW, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Post PN, Razenberg PPA.. Serious co-morbidity among unselected cancer patients newly diagnosed in the southeastern part of The Netherlands in 1993–1996. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1131–1136
    1. Smith-Turchyn J, Richardson J, Tozer R, McNeely M, Thabane L.. Physical activity and breast cancer: a qualitative study on the barriers to and facilitators of exercise promotion from the perspective of health care professionals. Physiother Canada 2016;68:383–390
    1. RIVM. : Voldoen aan huidge beweegrichtlijnen volwassenen 2018.accessed 23 March 2020).
    1. Pompili C, Koller M, Velikova G, Franks K, Absolom K, Callister M. et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score reliably detects changes in QoL three months after anatomic lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2018;123:149–154
    1. Husson O, de Rooij BH, Kieffer J, Oerlemans S, Mols F, Aaronson NK. et al. The EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score as prognostic factor for survival of patients with cancer in the ‘real-world’: results from the population-based PROFILES registry. Oncologist 2020;25:e722–e732 doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0348
    1. Sweegers MG, Buffart LM, van Veldhuizen WM. et al. How does a supervised exercise program improve quality of life in patients with cancer? A concept mapping study examining patients’ perspectives. Oncologist 2019;24:e374–e383
    1. Hinz A, Singer S, Brähler E.. European reference values for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30: results of a German investigation and a summarizing analysis of six European general population normative studies. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2014;53:958–965
    1. Gamper E-M, Petersen MA, Aaronson N, Costantini A, Giesinger JM, Holzner B. et al.; EORTC Quality of Life Group. Development of an item bank for the EORTC Role Functioning Computer Adaptive Test (EORTC RF-CAT). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016;14:72.
    1. Guinan EM, Bennett AE, Doyle SL, O’Neill L, Gannon J, Foley G. et al. Measuring the impact of oesophagectomy on physical functioning and physical activity participation: a prospective study. BMC Cancer 2019;19:682.
    1. Giesinger JM, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Efficace F, Groenvold M, Kieffer JM. et al.; EORTC Quality of Life Group. A cross-cultural convergent parallel mixed methods study of what makes a cancer-related symptom or functional health problem clinically important. Psychooncology 2018;27:548–555
    1. Buffart LM, Sweegers MG, May AM, Chinapaw MJ, van Vulpen JK, Newton RU. et al. Targeting exercise interventions to patients with cancer in need: an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018;110:1190–1200
    1. Ilie G, Bradfield J, Moodie L, Lawen T, Ilie A, Lawen Z. et al. The role of response-shift in studies assessing quality of life outcomes among cancer patients: a systematic review. Front Oncol 2019;9:783.
    1. von Döbeln GA, Nilsson M, Adell G, Johnsen G, Hatlevoll I, Tsai J. et al. Pulmonary function and cardiac stress test after multimodality treatment of esophageal cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016;6:e53–e59
    1. Sinclair R, Navidi M, Griffin SM, Sumpter K.. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on cardiopulmonary physical fitness in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016;98:396–400
    1. Vainshelboim B, Lima RM, Myers J.. Cardiorespiratory fitness and cancer in women: a prospective pilot study. J Sport Heal Sci 2019;8:457–462
    1. Witlox L, Hiensch AE, Velthuis MJ, Steins Bisschop CN, Los M, Erdkamp FLG. et al. Four-year effects of exercise on fatigue and physical activity in patients with cancer. BMC Med 2018;16:86.
    1. DICA. Jaarrapportage DUCA 2018. accessed 19 January 2021).
    1. Purcell A, Fleming J, Bennett S, Burmeister B, Haines T.. Determining the minimal clinically important difference criteria for the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory in a radiotherapy population. Support Care Cancer 2010;18:307–315

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel