Development and Validation of a Novel Scoring System for Predicting Technical Success of Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: The PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) Score
Georgios Christopoulos, David E Kandzari, Robert W Yeh, Farouc A Jaffer, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Michael R Wyman, Khaldoon Alaswad, William Lombardi, J Aaron Grantham, Jeffrey Moses, Georgios Christakopoulos, Muhammad Nauman J Tarar, Bavana V Rangan, Nicholas Lembo, Santiago Garcia, Daisha Cipher, Craig A Thompson, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Georgios Christopoulos, David E Kandzari, Robert W Yeh, Farouc A Jaffer, Dimitri Karmpaliotis, Michael R Wyman, Khaldoon Alaswad, William Lombardi, J Aaron Grantham, Jeffrey Moses, Georgios Christakopoulos, Muhammad Nauman J Tarar, Bavana V Rangan, Nicholas Lembo, Santiago Garcia, Daisha Cipher, Craig A Thompson, Subhash Banerjee, Emmanouil S Brilakis
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to develop a novel parsimonious score for predicting technical success of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) performed using the hybrid approach.
Background: Predicting technical success of CTO PCI can facilitate clinical decision making and procedural planning.
Methods: We analyzed clinical and angiographic parameters from 781 CTO PCIs included in PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) using a derivation and validation cohort (2:1 sampling ratio). Variables with strong association with technical success in multivariable analysis were assigned 1 point, and a 4-point score was developed from summing all points. The PROGRESS CTO score was subsequently compared with the J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry in Japan) score in the validation cohort.
Results: Technical success was 92.9%. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with technical success included proximal cap ambiguity (beta coefficient [b] = 0.88), moderate/severe tortuosity (b = 1.18), circumflex artery CTO (b = 0.99), and absence of "interventional" collaterals (b = 0.88). The resulting score demonstrated good calibration and discriminatory capacity in the derivation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 2.633; p = 0.268, and receiver-operator characteristic [ROC] area = 0.778) and validation (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square = 5.333; p = 0.070, and ROC area = 0.720) subset. In the validation cohort, the PROGRESS CTO and J-CTO scores performed similarly in predicting technical success (ROC area 0.720 vs. 0.746, area under the curve difference = 0.026, 95% confidence interval = -0.093 to 0.144).
Conclusions: The PROGRESS CTO score is a novel useful tool for estimating technical success in CTO PCI performed using the hybrid approach.
Keywords: chronic total occlusion; percutaneous coronary intervention; scoring; technical success.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed