The mindedness of maternal touch: An investigation of maternal mind-mindedness and mother-infant touch interactions

Laura Crucianelli, Lisa Wheatley, Maria Laura Filippetti, Paul M Jenkinson, Elizabeth Kirk, Aikaterini Katerina Fotopoulou, Laura Crucianelli, Lisa Wheatley, Maria Laura Filippetti, Paul M Jenkinson, Elizabeth Kirk, Aikaterini Katerina Fotopoulou

Abstract

Increasing evidence shows that maternal touch may promote emotion regulation in infants, however less is known about how parental higher-order social cognition abilities are translated into tactile, affect-regulatory behaviours towards their infants. During 10 min book-reading, mother-infant sessions when infants were 12 months old (N = 45), we investigated maternal mind-mindedness (MM), the social cognitive ability to understand an infant's mental state, by coding the contingency of maternal verbal statements towards the infants' needs and desires. We also rated spontaneous tactile interactions in terms of their emotional contingency. We found that frequent non-attuned mind-related comments were associated with touch behaviours that were not contingent with the infant's emotions; ultimately discouraging affective tactile responses from the infant. However, comments that were more appropriate to infant's mental states did not necessarily predict more emotionally-contingent tactile behaviours. These findings suggest that when parental high-order social cognitive abilities are compromised, they are also likely to translate into inappropriate, tactile attempts to regulate infant's emotions.

Keywords: Contingency; Infant touch; Maternal touch; Mind-mindedness; Mother-infant interaction.

Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of the illustration of Book One (a) and Book Two (b). Adapted from Wheatley, L. (2017). Mother-Infant Interaction During Book Sharing Across Socio-Economic Status Groups (Doctoral thesis). Retrieved from University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (http://uhra.herts.ac.uk/handle/2299/17516).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatter plot representing the significant multiple regression model taking into account the predicted values of non-attuned mind related comments and total quantity of maternal touch on non-contingent maternal touch at 12 months.

References

    1. Ainsworth M.S. Infant-mother attachment. Am. Psychol. 1979;34(10):932.
    1. Arnott B., Meins E. Links among antenatal attachment representations, postnatal mind-mindedness, and infant attachment security: a preliminary study of mothers and fathers. Bull. Menn. Clin. 2007;71(2):132–149.
    1. Atzil S., Barrett L.F. Social regulation of allostasis: commentary on Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference by Fotopoulou and Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2017;19(1):29–33.
    1. Beebe B., Jaffe J., Markese S., Buck K., Chen H., Cohen P. The origins of 12-month attachment: a microanalysis of 4-month mother-infant interaction. Attach. Hum. Dev. 2010;12(1–2):3–141.
    1. Bellieni C.V., Cordelli D.M., Marchi S., Ceccarelli S., Perrone S., Maffei M., Buonocore G. Sensorial saturation for neonatal analgesia. Clin. J. Pain. 2007;23(3):219–221.
    1. Bolis D., Schilbach L. Beyond one Bayesian brain: modeling intra-and inter-personal processes during social interaction: commentary on Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference by Fotopoulou & Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2017;19(1):35–38.
    1. Bowlby J. Basic Books; 1969. Attachment and Loss: Attachment; John Bowlby.
    1. Boyce P., Stubbs J., Todd A. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale: validation for an Australian sample. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 1993;27(3):472–476.
    1. Brauer J., Xiao Y., Poulain T., Friederici A.D., Schirmer A. Frequency of maternal touch predicts resting activity and connectivity of the developing social brain. Cereb. Cortex. 2016;26(8):3544–3552.
    1. Brooks R., Meltzoff A.N. Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: a longitudinal, growth curve modeling study. J. Child Lang. 2008;35(01):207–220.
    1. Bystrova K., Widström A.M., Matthiesen A.S., Ransjö‐Arvidson A.B., Welles‐Nyström B., Wassberg C. Skin to skin contact may reduce negative consequences of the stress of being born: a study on temperature in newborn infants, subjected to different ward routines in St. Petersburg. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(3):320–326.
    1. Bystrova K. Novel mechanism of humanfetal growth regulation: a potential role of lanugo, vernix caseosa and asecond tactile system of unmyelinated low-threshold C-afferents. Med. Hypotheses. 2009;72(2):143–146.
    1. Ciaunica A., Fotopoulou A. The touched self: psychological and philosophical perspectives on proximal intersubjectivity and the self. Embodiment Enaction Cult. Investig. Const. Shared World. 2017:173–192.
    1. Cox J.L., Holden J.M., Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. development of the 10-item edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br. J. Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–786.
    1. Croy I., Luong A., Triscoli C., Hofmann E., Olausson H., Sailer U. Interpersonal stroking touch is targeted to C tactile afferent activation. Behav. Brain Res. 2016;297:37–40.
    1. Fairhurst M.T., Löken L., Grossmann T. Physiological and behavioral responses reveal 9-month-old infants’ sensitivity to pleasant touch. Psychol. Sci. 2014;25(5):1124–1131. (0956797614527114)
    1. Feldman R., Eidelman A.I. Skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) accelerates autonomic and neurobehavioural maturation in preterm infants. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2003;45(4):274–281.
    1. Feldman R., Greenbaum C.W., Yirmiya N. Mother-infant affect synchrony as an antecedent of the emergence of self-control. Dev. Psychol. 1999;35(1):223.
    1. Feldman R., Granat A., Pariente C., Kanety,H, Kuint J., Gilboa-Schechtman E. Maternal depression andanxiety across the postpartum year and infant social engagement, fearregulation, and stress reactivity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2009;48(9):919–927.
    1. Ferber S.G., Feldman R., Makhoul I.R. The development of maternal touch across the first year of life. Early Hum. Dev. 2008;84(6):363–370.
    1. Field A. Sage publications; 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS.
    1. Field T. Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: a review. Dev. Rev. 2010;30(4):367–383.
    1. Fonagy P., Campbell C. What touch can communicate: commentary on Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference by Fotopoulou and Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2017;19(1):39–42.
    1. Fonagy P., Gergely G., Jurist E.L., Target M. Other Press; New York: 2004. Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self.
    1. Fotopoulou A., Tsakiris M. Mentalizing homeostasis: the social origins of interoceptive inference. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2017:1–26.
    1. Gentsch A., Panagiotopoulou E., Fotopoulou A. Active interpersonal touch gives rise to the social softness illusion. Curr. Biol. 2015;25(18):2392–2397.
    1. Gergely G., Watson J.S. Early socio-emotional development: contingency perception and the social-biofeedback model. Early Soc. Cogn.: Understand. Others First Months Life. 1999;60:101–136.
    1. Harlow H.F., Zimmermann R.R. The development of affectional responses in infant monkeys. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1958;102(5):501–509.
    1. Herrera E., Reissland N., Shepherd J. Maternal touch and maternal child-directed speech: effects of depressed mood in the postnatal period. J. Affect. Disord. 2004;81(1):29–39.
    1. Hertenstein M.J., Campos J.J. Emotion regulation via maternal touch. Infancy. 2001;2(4):549–566.
    1. Hollingshead A.B. 1975. Four Factor Index of Social Status.
    1. Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S., May S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, NJ: 2008. Model development; pp. 132–168.
    1. Jean A.D., Stack D.M., Fogel A. A longitudinal investigation of maternal touching across the first 6 months of life: age and context effects. Infant Behav. Dev. 2009;32(3):344–349.
    1. Kirk E., Pine K., Wheatley L., Howlett N., Schulz J., Fletcher B.C. A longitudinal investigation of the relationship between maternal mind-mindedness and theory of mind. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 2015;33(4):434–445.
    1. Kleckner I., Zhang J., Touroutoglou A., Chanes L., Xia C., Simmons W.K. Evidence for a large-scale brain system supporting allostasis and interoception in humans. bioRxiv. 2017:098970.
    1. Löken L.S., Wessberg J., McGlone F., Olausson H. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 2009;12(5):547–548.
    1. Laranjo J., Bernier A., Meins E. Associations between maternal mind-mindedness and infant attachment security: investigating the mediating role of maternal sensitivity. Infant Behav. Dev. 2008;31(4):688–695.
    1. Lausberg H., Sloetjes H. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behav. Res. Methods. 2009;41(3):841–849.
    1. Maitre N.L., Key A.P., Chorna O.D., Slaughter J.C., Matusz P.J., Wallace M.T., Murray M.M. The dual nature of early-life experience on somatosensory processing in the human infant brain. Curr. Biol. 2017;27(7):1048–1054.
    1. Malphurs J.E., Field T.M., Larraine C., Pickens J., Pelaez‐Nogueras M., Yando R., Bendell D. Altering withdrawn and intrusive interaction behaviors of depressed mothers. Infant Mental Health J. 1996;17(2):152–160.
    1. Mantis I., Stack D.M., Ng L., Serbin L.A., Schwartzman A.E. Mutual touch during mother–infant face-to-face still-face interactions: influences of interaction period and infant birthstatus. Infant Behav. Dev. 2014;37(3):258–267.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C. University of York; York, UK: 2015. Mind-mindedness Coding Manual, Version 2.2. Unpublished manuscript.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., Russell J., Clark‐Carter D. Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: a longitudinal study. Soc. Dev. 1998;7(1):1–24.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., Fradley E., Tuckey M. Rethinking maternal sensitivity: mothers’ comments on infants’ mental processes predict security of attachment at 12 months. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry. 2001;42(5):637–648.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., Wainwright R., Das Gupta M., Fradley E., Tuckey M. Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Dev. 2002;73(6):1715–1726.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., Wainwright R., Clark‐Carter D., Das Gupta M., Fradley E., Tuckey M. Pathways to understanding mind: Construct validity and predictive validity of maternal mind‐mindedness. Child Dev. 2003;74(4):1194–1211.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., Arnott B., Turner M., Leekam S.R. Mother-versus infant-centered correlates of maternal mind-mindedness in the first year of life. Infancy. 2011;16(2):137–165.
    1. Meins E., Fernyhough C., de Rosnay M., Arnott B., Leekam S.R., Turner M. Mind‐mindedness as a multidimensional construct: appropriate and nonattuned mind‐related comments independently predict infant-mother attachment in asocially diverse sample. Infancy. 2012;17(4):393–415.
    1. Moore E.R., Bergman N., Anderson G.C., Medley N. Vol. 11. The Cochrane Library; 2016. (Early Skin-to-skin Contact for Mothers and Their Healthy Newborn Infants). CD003519.
    1. Moszkowski R.J., Stack D.M., Chiarella S.S. Infant touch with gaze and affective behaviors during mother-infant still-face interactions: co-occurrence and functions of touch. Infant Behav. Dev. 2009;32(4):392–403.
    1. Panksepp J., Bishop P. An autoradiographic map of (3H) diprenorphine binding in rat brain: effects of social interaction. Brain Res. Bull. 1981;7(4):405–410.
    1. Peláez-Nogueras M., Field T., Gewirtz J.L., Cigales M., Gonzalez A., Sanchez A., Richardson S.C. The effects of systematic stroking versus tickling and poking on infant behavior. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 1997;18(2):169–178.
    1. Polan H.J., Ward M.J. Role of the mother's touch in failure to thrive: a preliminary investigation. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 1994;33(8):1098–1105.
    1. Reece C., Ebstein R., Cheng X., Ng T., Schirmer A. Maternal touch predicts social orienting in young children. Cogn. Dev. 2016;39:128–140.
    1. Rowe M.L., Goldin‐Meadow S. Early gesture selectively predicts later language learning. Dev. Sci. 2009;12(1):182–187.
    1. Sharp H., Pickles A., Meaney M., Marshall K., Tibu F., Hill J. Frequency of infant stroking reported by mothers moderates the effect of prenatal depression on infant behavioural and physiological outcomes. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45446.
    1. Stack D.M., Muir D.W. Adult tactile stimulation during face-to-face interactions modulates five-month-olds' affect and attention. Child Dev. 1992;63(6):1509–1525.
    1. Stack D.M., LePage D.E., Hains S., Muir D.W. Qualitatitive changes in maternal touch as a function of instructional condition during face-to-face social interactions. Infant Behav. Dev. 1996;19:761.
    1. Teneggi C., Canzoneri E., di Pellegrino G., Serino A. Social modulation of peripersonal space boundaries. Curr. Biol. 2013;23(5):406–411.
    1. Tomasello M., Farrar M.J. Joint attention and early language. Child Dev. 1986:1454–1463.
    1. Tronick E.Z., Gianino A.F. The transmission of maternal disturbance to the infant. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 1986;1986(34):5–11.
    1. Van IJzendoorn M.H. Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: a meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the Adult Attachment Interview. Psychol. Bull. 1995;117(3):387.
    1. Verhage M.L., Schuengel C., Madigan S., Fearon R.M., Oosterman M., Cassibba R. 2016. Narrowing the Transmission Gap: A Synthesis of Three Decades of Research on Intergenerational Transmission of Attachment.
    1. Weinberg M.K., Tronick E.Z. Infant affective reactions to the resumption of maternal interaction after the Still‐face. Child Dev. 1996;67(3):905–914.
    1. Weiss S.J., Wilson P., Hertenstein M.J., Campos R. The tactile context of a mother’s caregiving: implications for attachment of low birth weight infants. Infant Behav. Dev. 2000;23(1):91–111.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel