Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 Flow Modulation Device: a multicenter experience

Francesco Briganti, Giuseppe Leone, Lorenzo Ugga, Mariano Marseglia, Antonio Macera, Andrea Manto, Luigi Delehaye, Maurizio Resta, Mariachiara Resta, Nicola Burdi, Nunzio Paolo Nuzzi, Ignazio Divenuto, Ferdinando Caranci, Mario Muto, Domenico Solari, Paolo Cappabianca, Francesco Maiuri, Francesco Briganti, Giuseppe Leone, Lorenzo Ugga, Mariano Marseglia, Antonio Macera, Andrea Manto, Luigi Delehaye, Maurizio Resta, Mariachiara Resta, Nicola Burdi, Nunzio Paolo Nuzzi, Ignazio Divenuto, Ferdinando Caranci, Mario Muto, Domenico Solari, Paolo Cappabianca, Francesco Maiuri

Abstract

Background: Experience with the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using the p64 Flow Modulation Device is still limited. This study discusses the results and complications of this new flow diverter device.

Methods: 40 patients (30 women, 10 men) with 50 cerebral aneurysms treated in six Italian neurointerventional centers with the p64 Flow Modulation Device between April 2013 and September 2015 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Complete occlusion was obtained in 44/50 aneurysms (88%) and partial occlusion in 3 (6%). In the other three aneurysms (6%), two cases of asymptomatic in-stent thrombosis and one intraprocedural occlusion of the parent vessel occurred. Technical complications were observed in eight procedures (16%). Permanent morbidity due to acute in-stent thrombosis and consequent ischemic stroke occurred in one patient (2.5%). No delayed aneurysm rupture, subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage, or ischemic complications occurred and there were no deaths.

Conclusions: Endovascular treatment with the p64 Flow Modulation Device is a safe treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms, resulting in a high rate of occlusion. As with other flow diverter devices, we recommend this treatment mainly for large-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery siphon. However, endovascular treatment with the p64 device should also be encouraged in difficult cases such as aneurysms of the posterior circulation and beyond the circle of Willis.

Keywords: Aneurysm; Angiography; Flow Diverter.

Conflict of interest statement

FB serves as proctor for Covidien. NPN serves as proctor for Sequent Medical, Covidien and as consultant for Covidien, MicroVention, Sequent Medical.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A 70-year-old man with a fusiform right middle cerebral artery aneurysm. (A) Pretreatment time-of-flight MR angiogram. (B, C) Pretreatment three-dimensional digital subtraction angiogram with flow diverter device length and size evaluation. (D) Deployment of two p64 flow diverter devices. (E) Angiogram at the end of the procedure shows immediate contrast stasis (F) Three-month follow-up angiogram after p64 placement shows complete exclusion of the aneurysm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 58-year-old woman with a large fenestration basilar artery aneurysm with compression on the brainstem. (A) Left vertebral artery angiogram. (B) Non-subtracted image shows fully opened p64 and coiling of the sac. (C, D) Early angiogram after deployment of p64 flow diverter device. (E, F) Three-month follow-up shows persistent occlusion of the aneurysm (E) but also in-stent thrombosis (F). (G, H) MRI before (G) and 3 months after (H) the procedure shows reduced compression on the brainstem.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A 66-old-man with a large partially thrombosed aneurysm of the P2 tract of the right posterior cerebral artery. (A, B) Non-subtracted image (anteroposterior and oblique views). (C) Non-subtracted image showing deployment of the p64 device. (D) Three-month follow-up angiogram after p64 placement shows complete occlusion of the aneurysm.

References

    1. Brinjikji W, Murad HM, Lanzino G, et al. . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, et al. . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75. 10.1177/1971400915602803
    1. Arrese I, Sarabia R, Pintado R, et al. . Flow-diverter devices for intracranial aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2013;73:193–9; discussion 199–200 10.1227/01.neu.0000430297.17961.f1
    1. Chiu AH, Cheung AK, Wenderoth JD, et al. . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34. 10.3174/ajnr.A4329
    1. Kallmes DF, Ding YH, Dai D, et al. . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576
    1. Maimon S, Gonen L, Nossek E, et al. . Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:979–87. 10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2
    1. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P, et al. . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–5. 10.3174/ajnr.A2907
    1. Lubicz B, Van der Elst O, Collignon L, et al. . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–6. 10.3174/ajnr.A4143
    1. Wagner A, Cortsen M, Hauerberg J, et al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:709–18. 10.1007/s00234-011-0949-9
    1. Mpotsaris A, Skalej M, Beuing O, et al. . Long-term occlusion results with SILK flow diversion in 28 aneurysms: do recanalizations occur during follow-up? Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:300–10. 10.1177/1591019915583119
    1. Shankar JJ, Tampieri D, Iancu D, et al. . SILK flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registry. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:273–8. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011708
    1. Briganti F, Napoli M, Tortora F, et al. . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52. 10.1007/s00234-012-1047-3
    1. O'Kelly CJ, Spears J, Chow M, et al. . Canadian experience with the pipeline embolization device for repair of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:381–7. 10.3174/ajnr.A3224
    1. Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C, et al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46. 10.3174/ajnr.A3246
    1. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Aguilar Perez M, et al. . Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 2012;54:369–82. 10.1007/s00234-011-0948-x
    1. Briganti F, Napoli M, Leone G, et al. . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1683–90. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.029
    1. Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW, et al. . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901. 10.1148/radiol.12120422
    1. Kocer N, Islak C, Kizilkilic O, et al. . Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: initial experience with short-term follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1158–71. 10.3171/2014.1.JNS131442
    1. Möhlenbruch MA, Herweh C, Jestaedt L, et al. . The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1155–61. 10.3174/ajnr.A4251
    1. Martínez-Galdámez M, Pérez S, Vega A, et al. . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline Flex embolization device: a case series of 30 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:396–401. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011669
    1. Wakhloo AK, Lylyk P, de Vries J, et al. . Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:98–107. 10.3174/ajnr.A4078
    1. Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, et al. . p64 Flow Modulation Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:173–80. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011743
    1. Fischer S, Aguilar-Pérez M, Henkes E, et al. . Initial experience with p64: a novel mechanically detachable flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial saccular sidewall aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2082–9. 10.3174/ajnr.A4420
    1. Ley D, Mühl-Benninghaus R, Yilmaz U, et al. . The Derivo embolization device, a second-generation flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, evaluated in an elastase-induced aneurysm model. Clin Neuroradiol. Published Online First: 23 Dec 2015. 10.1007/s00062-015-0493-9
    1. O'Kelly CJ, Krings T, Fiorella D, et al. . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–7.
    1. Puffer RC, Piano M, Lanzino G, et al. . Treatment of cavernous sinus aneurysms with flow diversion: results in 44 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:948–51. 10.3174/ajnr.A3826
    1. Briganti F, Delehaye L, Leone G, et al. . Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:287–94. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011460
    1. Pistocchi S, Blanc R, Bartolini B, et al. . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019
    1. Benaissa A, Januel AC, Herbreteau D, et al. . Endovascular treatment with flow diverters of recanalized and multitreated aneurysms initially treated by endovascular approach. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:44–9. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011046
    1. Kim BM, Shin YS, Baik MW. Pipeline embolization device for large/giant or fusiform aneurysms: an Initial multi-center experience in Korea. Neurointervention 2016;11:10–17. 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.10

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel