Adenomyosis and Infertility-Review of Medical and Surgical Approaches

Maria Szubert, Edward Koziróg, Olga Olszak, Klaudia Krygier-Kurz, Jakub Kazmierczak, Jacek Wilczynski, Maria Szubert, Edward Koziróg, Olga Olszak, Klaudia Krygier-Kurz, Jakub Kazmierczak, Jacek Wilczynski

Abstract

The aim of this review is to clarify the relative association between adenomyosis and infertility and the possible treatment for an infertile patient. Although adenomyosis is detected more often in women of late reproductive age, its influence on pregnancy rates is important, especially considering the tendency to delay pregnancy among women in developed countries. In this article, we present a critical analysis of the literature data concerning the impact of adenomyosis on fertility. The possible effects of treatment on the pregnancy rate will also be discussed. We conducted a literature search; publications from Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases published from 1982 to 2019 were retrieved using terms 'adenomyosis and infertility' and 'adenomyosis and pregnancy outcomes', extensively studied in the aspects of diagnosis, pathogenesis of infertility and possible treatment methods. Molecular studies have given deep insight into the pathogenesis of adenomyosis in the recent few years, but there is a huge discrepancy between in vitro studies and praxis. Oral contraceptive pills, anti-prostaglandins, oral or parenteral progestins, danazol and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues have all been used to control menstrual pain and menorrhagia in women with adenomyosis, but they temporarily suppress the menstrual cycle. Additionally, endometrial ablation and hysterectomy used to alleviate pain caused by adenomyosis exclude pregnancy planning. The development of imaging techniques-ultrasound and MRI-enables the diagnosis of adenomyosis with very high accuracy nowadays, but the methods of treatment mentioned above have not given satisfactory results in women planning pregnancy. For these patients, the high-intensity-focused ultrasound method (HIFU) and combined treatment before assisted reproductive techniques can prove beneficial in adenomyosis patients.

Keywords: GnRH; adenomyosis; in vitro fertilisation; infertility.

Conflict of interest statement

There is no potential conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of data extraction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Globally enlarged uterus with heterogenic myometrium (yellow arrow) and asymmetric thickeness (white arrow); 41 year-old nulliparous woman with 5 years of infertility anamnesis (own material).

References

    1. Graziano A., Monte G.L., Piva I., Caserta D., Karner M., Engl B., Marci R. Diagnostic findings in adenomyosis: A pictorial review on the major concerns. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2015;19:1146–1154.
    1. Harada T., Khine Y.M., Kaponis A., Nikellis T., Decavalas G., Taniguchi F. The Impact of Adenomyosis on Women’s Fertility. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2016;71:557–568. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000346.
    1. Li J.J., Chung J.P., Wang S., Li T.C., Duan H. The Investigation and Management of Adenomyosis in Women Who Wish to Improve or Preserve Fertility. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:6832685. doi: 10.1155/2018/6832685.
    1. Ecker A.M., Chamsy D., Austin R.M., Guido R.S., Lee T.T., Mansuria S.M., Rindos N.B., Donnellan N.M. Use of Uterine Characteristics to Improve Fertility-Sparing Diagnosis of Adenomyosis. J. Gynecol. Surg. 2018;34:183–189. doi: 10.1089/gyn.2017.0112.
    1. Senturk L.M., Imamoglu M. Adenomyosis: What is new? Womens Health. 2015;11:717–724. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.60.
    1. Eisenberg V.H., Arbib N., Schiff E., Goldenberg M., Seidman D.S., Soriano D. Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis Are Prevalent in Women Undergoing Surgery for Endometriosis and May Suggest a Higher Risk of Infertility. BioMed Res. Int. 2017;2017:8967803. doi: 10.1155/2017/8967803.
    1. Van den Bosch T., Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018;51:16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013.
    1. Genc M., Genc B., Cengiz H. Adenomyosis and accompanying gynecological pathologies. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015;291:877–881. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3498-8.
    1. Bergeron C., Amant F., Ferenczy A. Pathology and physiopathology of adenomyosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2006;20:511–521. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.016.
    1. Leyendecker G., Wildt L., Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: Tissue injury and repair. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2009;280:529–538. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0.
    1. Garavaglia E., Audrey S., Annalisa I., Stefano F., Iacopo T., Laura C., Massimo C. Adenomyosis and its impact on women fertility. Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 2015;13:327–336.
    1. Yen C.F., Huang S.J., Lee C.L., Wang H.S., Liao S.K. Molecular Characteristics of the Endometrium in Uterine Adenomyosis and Its Biochemical Microenvironment. Reprod. Sci. 2017;24:1346–1361. doi: 10.1177/1933719117691141.
    1. Zhou C., Zhang T., Liu F., Ni X., Huo R., Shi Z. The differential expression of mRNAs and long noncoding RNAs between ectopic and eutopic endometria provides new insights into adenomyosis. Mol. Biosyst. 2016;12:362–370. doi: 10.1039/C5MB00733J.
    1. De Bruijn A.M., van den Bosch T., de Leeuw R.A., Dueholm M., Exacoustos C., Valentin L., Bourne T., Timmerman D., Huirne J.A. A sonographic classification and reporting system for diagnosing adenomyosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;53:151.
    1. Di Spiezio Sardo A., Calagna G., Santangelo F., Zizolfi B., Tanos V., Perino A., De Wilde R.L. The Role of Hysteroscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adenomyosis. BioMed Res. Int. 2017;2017:2518396. doi: 10.1155/2017/2518396.
    1. Khandeparkar M.S., Jalkote S., Panpalia M., Nellore S., Mehta T., Ganesan K., Parikh F.R. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of subtle nuances of uterine adenomyosis in infertility. Glob. Reprod. Health. 2018;3:e14. doi: 10.1097/GRH.0000000000000014.
    1. Kunz G., Beil D., Huppert P., Noe M., Kissler S., Leyendecker G. Adenomyosis in endometriosis--prevalence and impact on fertility. Evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Hum. Reprod. 2005;20:2309–2316. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei021.
    1. Vigano P., Corti L., Berlanda N. Beyond infertility: Obstetrical and postpartum complications associated with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2015;104:802–812. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.030.
    1. Buggio L., Monti E., Gattei U., Dridi D., Vercellini P. Adenomyosis: Fertility and obstetric outcome. A comprehensive literature review. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70:295–302.
    1. Vlahos N.F., Theodoridis T.D., Partsinevelos G.A. Myomas and Adenomyosis: Impact on Reproductive Outcome. BioMed Res. Int. 2017;2017:5926470. doi: 10.1155/2017/5926470.
    1. Benagiano G., Brosens I., Habiba M. Adenomyosis: A life-cycle approach. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2015;30:220–232. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.005.
    1. Chiang C.H., Chang M.Y., Shiau C.S., Hou H.C., Soong Y.K. Effect of a sonographically diffusely enlarged uterus without distinct uterine masses on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1999;16:369–372. doi: 10.1023/A:1020593930366.
    1. Maubon A., Faury A., Kapella M., Pouquet M., Piver P. Uterine junctional zone at magnetic resonance imaging: A predictor of in vitro fertilization implantation failure. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2010;36:611–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01189.x.
    1. Benagiano G., Brosens I. The endometrium in adenomyosis. Womens Health. 2012;8:301–312. doi: 10.2217/WHE.12.8.
    1. Vannuccini S., Tosti C., Carmona F., Huang S.J., Chapron C., Guo S.W., Petraglia F. Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: An update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2017;35:592–601. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.016.
    1. Fischer C.P., Kayisili U., Taylor H.S. HOXA10 expression is decreased in endometrium of women with adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2011;95:1133–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.060.
    1. Xiao Y., Li T., Xia E., Yang X., Sun X., Zhou Y. Expression of integrin β3 and osteopontin in the eutopic endometrium of adenomyosis during the implantation window. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013;170:419–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.007.
    1. Jiang Y., Jiang R., Cheng X., Zhang Q., Hu Y., Zhang H., Cao Y., Zhang M., Wang J., Ding L., et al. Decreased expression of NR4A nuclear receptors in adenomyosis impairs endometrial decidualization. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2016;22:655–668. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gaw042.
    1. Wu D., Li G., Lin R., Li C., Zhao S. Progesterone Promotes HOXa-10 Expression in Mouse during Embryo Implantation Period. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012;11:3076–3080.
    1. Yao M.W., Lim H., Schust D.J., Choe S.E., Farago A., Ding Y., Michaud S., Church G.M., Maas R.L. Gene expression profiling reveals progesterone-mediated cell cycle and immunoregulatory roles of Hoxa-10 in the preimplantation uterus. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003;17:610–627. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0290.
    1. Surrey E.S., Minjarez D.A., Schoolcraft W.B. The incidence of aberrant endometrial alphavbeta(3) vitronectin expression in a high risk infertility population: Could prolonged GnRH agonist therapy play a role? J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2007;24:553–556. doi: 10.1007/s10815-007-9164-3.
    1. Garcıa P., Nieto A., Sanchez M.A., Pizarro M., Flores J.M. Expression of alphav, alpha4, alpha5 and beta3 integrin subunits, fibronectin and vitronectin in goat peri-implantation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004;80:91–100. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00157-X.
    1. Fayazi M., Boroujeni M.B., Salehnia M., Khansarinejad B. Ovarian stimulation by exogenous gonadotropin decreases the implantation rate and expression of mouse blastocysts integrins. Iran. Biomed. J. 2014;18:8–15.
    1. Carrarelli P., Yen C.F., Funghi L., Arcuri F., Tosti C., Bifulco G., Luddi A., Lee C.L., Petraglia F. Expression of Inflammatory and Neurogenic Mediators in Adenomyosis. Reprod. Sci. 2017;24:369–375. doi: 10.1177/1933719116657192.
    1. Benagiano G., Brosens I., Habiba M. Structural and molecular features of the endomyometrium in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014;20:386–402. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt052.
    1. Ishikawa M., Nakata T., Yaginuma Y., Nishiwaki K., Goishi K., Saitoh S. Expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in adenomyosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993;169:730–734. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90653-Z.
    1. Orazov M.R., Radzinsky V.E., Nosenko E.N., Khamoshina M.B., Dukhin A.O., Lebedeva M.G. Immune-inflammatory predictors of the pelvic pain syndrome associated with adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(Suppl. S1):44–46. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1399696.
    1. Ota H., Igarashi S., Sato N., Tanaka H., Tanaka T. Involvement of catalase in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis and adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2002;78:804–809. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03344-7.
    1. Busca A., Parra-Herran C. The role of pathologic evaluation of endometrial ablation resections in predicting ablation failure and adenomyosis in hysterectomy. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2016;212:778–782. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.06.007.
    1. Wood C. Adenomyosis: Difficult to diagnose, and difficult to treat. Diagn. Ther. Endosc. 2001;7:89–95. doi: 10.1155/DTE.7.89.
    1. Kohn J.R., Shamshirsaz A.A., Popek E., Guan X., Belfort M.A., Fox K.A. Pregnancy after endometrial ablation: A systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125:43–53. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14854.
    1. De Bruijn A.M., Smink M., Lohle P.N., Huirne J.A., Twisk J.W., Wong C., Schoonmade L., Hehenkamp W.J. Uterine Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Adenomyosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2017;28:1629–1642. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.034.
    1. Zhang L., Rao F., Setzen R. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: Selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017;96:707–714. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13159.
    1. Zhou C.Y., Xu X.J., He J. [Pregnancy outcomes and symptom improvement of patients with adenomyosis treated with high intensity focused ultrasound ablation] Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;51:845–849. (In Chinese)
    1. Otsubo Y., Nishida M., Arai Y., Ichikawa R., Taneichi A., Sakanaka M. Association of uterine wall thickness with pregnancy outcome following uterine-sparing surgery for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2016;56:88–91. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12419.
    1. Younes G., Tulandi T. Conservative Surgery for Adenomyosis and Results: A Systematic Review. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:265–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.014.
    1. Allen C., Hopewell S., Prentice A., Gregory D. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain in women with endometriosis. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017;1:CD004753. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004753.pub4.
    1. Nyachieo A., Siristatidis C.S., Vaidakis D. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;10:CD007618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007618.pub2.
    1. Vercellini P., Viganò P., Somigliana E., Fedele L. Endometriosis: Pathogenesis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014;10:261–275. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.255.
    1. Huang B.S., Seow K.M., Tsui K.H., Huang C.Y., Lu Y.F., Wang P.H. Fertility outcome of infertile women with adenomyosis treated with the combination of a conservative microsurgical technique and GnRH agonist: Long-term follow-up in a series of nine patients. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;51:212–216. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.04.008.
    1. Vannuccini S., Luisi S., Tosti C., Sorbi F., Petraglia F. Role of medical therapy in the management of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2018;109:398–405. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.013.
    1. Matsushima T., Akira S., Fukami T., Yoneyama K., Takeshita T. Efficacy of Hormonal Therapies for Decreasing Uterine Volume in Patients with Adenomyosis. Gynecol. Minim. Invasive Ther. 2018;7:119–123. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_35_18.
    1. Osuga Y., Fujimoto-Okabe H., Hagino A. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of dienogest in the treatment of painful symptoms in patients with adenomyosis: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Fertil. Steril. 2017;108:673–678. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.021.
    1. Dasrilsyah R.A., Shan L.P., Kwang N.B., Shafiee M.N., Omar M.H. Spontaneous conception following GnRHa and progestogen therapy in adenomyosis. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2016;27:77–79. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2015-0061.
    1. Mijatovic V., Florijn E., Halim N., Schats R., Hompes P. Adenomyosis has no adverse effects on IVF/ICSI outcomes in women with endometriosis treated with long-term pituitary down-regulation before IVF/ICSI. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2010;151:62–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.047.
    1. Thalluri V., Tremellen K.P. Ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis has a negative impact on successful implantation following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Hum. Reprod. 2012;27:3487–3492. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des305.
    1. Costello M.F., Lindsay K., McNally G. The effect of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilisation and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection treatment outcome. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2011;158:229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.030.
    1. Vercellini P., Consonni D., Dridi D., Bracco B., Frattaruolo M.P., Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2014;29:964–977. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu041.
    1. Kwack J.Y., Kwon Y.S. Conservative surgery of diffuse adenomyosis with TOUA: Single surgeon experience of one hundred sixteen cases and report of fertility outcomes. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2018;34:290–294. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.12.008.
    1. Al Jama F.E. Management of adenomyosis in subfertile women and pregnancy outcome. Oman Med. J. 2011;26:178–181. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.43.
    1. Saremi A., Bahrami H., Salehian P., Hakak N., Pooladi A. Treatment of adenomyomectomy in women with severe uterine adenomyosis using a novel technique. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2014;28:753–760. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.02.008.
    1. Kishi Y., Yabuta M., Taniguchi F. Who will benefit from uterus-sparing surgery in adenomyosis-associated subfertility? Fertil. Steril. 2014;102:802–807. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.028.
    1. Chang W.H., Wang K.C., Lee N.R., Huang N., Su W.H., Chao H.T., Yen M.S., Fuh J.L., Wang P.H. Reproductive performance of severely symptomatic women with uterine adenomyoma who wanted preservation of the uterus and underwent combined surgical-medical treatment. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013;52:39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2013.01.007.
    1. Dai Z., Feng X., Gao L., Huang M. Local excision of uterine adenomyomas: A report of 86 cases with follow-up analyses. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2012;161:84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.028.
    1. Osada H., Silber S., Kakinuma T., Nagaishi M., Kato K., Kato O. Surgical procedure to conserve the uterus for future pregnancy in patients suffering from massive adenomyosis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2011;22:94–99. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.09.014.
    1. Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I., Kumakiri J., Kuroda K., Jinushi M. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: A review of nine cases. Fertil. Steril. 2010;94:862–868. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010.
    1. Nishida M., Takano K., Arai Y., Ozone H., Ichikawa R. Conservative surgical management for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2010;94:715–719. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.046.
    1. Hadisaputra W., Anggraeni T.D. Laparoscopic resection versus myolysis in the management of symptomatic uterine adenomyosis: Alternatives to conventional treatment. Med. J. Indones. 2006;15:9–17. doi: 10.13181/mji.v15i1.208.
    1. Rajuddin R., Jacoeb T.Z. Management of adenomyosis in infertile women: Comparison between laparotomic resection and administration of aromatase inhibitor (Experience in 55 cases) Med. J. Indones. 2006;15:18–23. doi: 10.13181/mji.v15i1.209.
    1. Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I., Shimanuki H., Kumakiri J., Kitano T., Kinoshita K. Laparoscopic adenomyomectomy and hysteroplasty: A novel method. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2006;13:150–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.12.004.
    1. Fujishita A., Masuzaki H., Khan K.N., Kitajima M., Ishimaru T. Modified reduction surgery for adenomyosis. A preliminary report of the transverse H incision technique. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2004;57:132–138. doi: 10.1159/000075830.
    1. Vannuccini S., Petraglia F. Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Research. 2019;8 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17242.1. F1000 Faculty Rev-283.
    1. Sõritsa D., Saare M., Laisk-Podar T., Peters M., Sõritsa A., Matt K., Karro H., Salumets A. Pregnancy rate in endometriosis patients according to the severity of the disease after using a combined approach of laparoscopy, GnRH agonist treatment and in vitro fertilization. Gynecol. Obstet. Investig. 2015;79:34–39. doi: 10.1159/000365329.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel