Magnification and Refocusing Comparison in Cataract Surgery Using a Heads-Up Three-Dimensional Visualization System versus Conventional Binocular Microscopy

Mariana Ramírez Mejía, Leticia Arroyo Muñoz, Ana Beatriz Medina Perez, Cristina Mendoza Velasquez, Jimena Ceja Martínez, Azyadeh Camacho Ordonez, Oscar Guerrero-Berger, Mariana Ramírez Mejía, Leticia Arroyo Muñoz, Ana Beatriz Medina Perez, Cristina Mendoza Velasquez, Jimena Ceja Martínez, Azyadeh Camacho Ordonez, Oscar Guerrero-Berger

Abstract

Purpose: To compare magnification and refocusing during phacoemulsification with the NGENUITY® 3-D Visualization System (3-D) versus the conventional microscope (CM) OPMI LUMERA 700.

Setting: This study was performed in the Department of Anterior Segment of the Fundación Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Luz.

Design: Prospective, randomized, cross-sectional, multi-surgeon, and comparative study.

Methods: This study enrolled 100 patients (eyes) scheduled for phacoemulsification to measure the number of times changes in focusing and magnification were needed during cataract surgery.

Results: Our study included 100 patients. From the endpoints evaluated, "zoom-in" showed statistically significant differences for all of the four predefined cataract surgery steps (means: Step 1, 0.38 (CM) vs 0.08 (3-D); Step 2, 0.36 (CM) vs 0.06 (3-D); Step 3, 0.54 (CM) vs 0.22 (3-D); Step 4, 0.56 (CM) vs 0.24 (3-D); all comparisons, p <0.05). In Step 4, there was a statistically significant increased use of "focus-out" for the 3-D system (mean 0.16 (CM) vs 0.58 (3-D); p <0.05). "Focus-in" and "zoom-out" showed no group differences for all steps. The duration of surgery with the 3-D system was longer at each step and overall. The percentage of light intensity did not show a statistically significant difference between both systems, with a mean of 99.45 for CM vs 98.43% for the heads-up system.

Conclusion: The heads-up 3-D system is a safe option that offers excellent magnification for anterior segment visualization. The surgical time is longer, but adjusting settings like light intensity and brightness may facilitate some surgical steps early in the learning curve.

Keywords: cataract surgery; heads-up surgery; three-dimensional visualization; visualization systems.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2023 Ramírez Mejía et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Counter connected to the microscope footswitch.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of duration of surgery by system.

References

    1. Aaron KA, Vaughan J, Gupta R, et al. The risk of ergonomic injury across surgical specialties. PLos One. 2021;16(2):e0244868. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244868
    1. Miyake K, Ota I, Miyake S, Tanioka K, Kubota M, Mochizuki R. Application of a newly developed, highly sensitive camera and a 3-dimensional high-definition television system in experimental ophthalmic surgeries. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(12):1623–1629. doi:10.1001/archopht.117.12.1623
    1. Postel EA, Pulido JS, Byrnes GA, et al. Long-term follow-up of iatrogenic phototoxicity. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(6):753–757. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.6.753
    1. Ohno H. Utility of three-dimensional heads-up surgery in cataract and minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2071–2073. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S227318
    1. Weinstock RJ, Diakonis VF, Schwartz AJ, Weinstock AJ. Heads-up cataract surgery: complication rates, surgical duration, and comparison with traditional microscopes. J Refract Surg. 2019;35(5):318–322. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190410-02
    1. Berquet F, Henry A, Barbe C, et al. Comparing heads-up versus binocular microscope visualization systems in anterior and posterior segment surgeries: a retrospective study. Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(5):347–354. doi:10.1159/000507088
    1. Bin Helayel H, Al-Mazidi S, AlAkeely A. Can the three-dimensional heads-up display improve ergonomics, surgical performance, and ophthalmology training compared to conventional microscopy? Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:679–686. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S290396
    1. Kelkar JA, Kelkar AS, Bolisetty M. Initial experience with three-dimensional heads-up display system for cataract surgery - A comparative study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(9):2304–2309. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_231_21
    1. Velasque L, Arbousoff N, Rigaudier F, et al. Lux study: contribution of a three-dimensional, high dynamic range, ultra-high-definition heads-up visualization system to a significant delivered light intensity decrease during different types of ocular surgeries. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021;44(8):1129–1141. doi:10.1016/j.jfo.2021.01.006
    1. Kaschke M, Donnerhacke K, Rill M. Optical visualization, imaging, and structural analysis. In: Optical Devices in Ophthalmology and Optometry Technology: Design Principles and Clinical Applications. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2014:152.
    1. Eckardt C, Paulo EB. Heads-up Surgery for Vitreoretinal Procedures: an experimental and clinical study. Retina. 2016;36(1):137–147. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689
    1. Zhao XY, Zhao Q, Li NN, et al. Surgery-related characteristics, efficacy, safety and surgical team satisfaction of three-dimensional heads-up system versus traditional microscopic equipment for various vitreoretinal diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;261(3):669–679.
    1. Nariai Y, Horiguchi M, Mizuguchi T, Sakurai R, Tanikawa A. Comparison of microscopic illumination between a three-dimensional heads-up system and eyepiece in cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(4):1817–1821. doi:10.1177/1120672120929962
    1. Kim YJ, Kim YJ, Nam DH, et al. Contrast, visibility, and color balance between the microscope versus intracameral illumination in cataract surgery using a 3D visualization system. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(4):927–931. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1825_20
    1. Matsumoto CS, Shibuya M, Makita J, et al. Heads-up 3D surgery under low light intensity conditions: new high-sensitivity HD camera for ophthalmological microscopes. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5013463. doi:10.1155/2019/5013463

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel