Global prevalence of visual impairment associated with myopic macular degeneration and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050: systematic review, meta-analysis and modelling

Timothy R Fricke, Monica Jong, Kovin S Naidoo, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas J Naduvilath, Suit May Ho, Tien Yin Wong, Serge Resnikoff, Timothy R Fricke, Monica Jong, Kovin S Naidoo, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Thomas J Naduvilath, Suit May Ho, Tien Yin Wong, Serge Resnikoff

Abstract

Purpose: We used systematic review and meta-analysis to identify and assimilate evidence quantifying blindness and visual impairment (VI) associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD), then derived models to predict global patterns. The models were used to estimate the global prevalence of blindness and VI associated with MMD from 2000 to 2050.

Methods: The systematic review identified 17 papers with prevalence data for MMD VI fitting our inclusion criteria. Data from six papers with age-specific data were scaled to relative age-dependent risk and meta-analysed at VI and blindness levels. We analysed variance in all MMD VI and blindness data as a proportion of high myopia against variables from the place and year of data collection, with a model based on health expenditure providing the best correlation. We used this model to estimate the prevalence and number of people with MMD VI in each country in each decade.

Results: We included data from 17 studies comprising 137 514 participants. We estimated 10.0 million people had VI from MMD in 2015 (prevalence 0.13%, 95% CI 5.5 to 23.7 million, 0.07% to 0.34%), 3.3 million of whom were blind (0.04%, 1.8 to 7.8 million, 0.03% to 0.10%). We estimate that by 2050, without changing current interventions, VI from MMD will grow to 55.7 million people (0.57%, 29.0 to 119.7 million, 0.33% to 1.11%), 18.5 million of whom will be blind (0.19%, 9.6 to 39.7 million, 0.11% to 0.37%).

Conclusion: The burden of MMD blindness and VI will rise significantly without efforts to reduce the development and progression of myopia and improve the management of MMD.

Keywords: blindness; macular degeneration; myopia; prevalence; visual impairment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no relevant proprietary interests. TRF: consultant for Brien Holden Vision Institute. MJ: no financial disclosures. KSN: no financial disclosures. PS: no financial disclosures. TN: no financial disclosures. SMH: no financial disclosures. TYW: consultant and on advisory boards for Allergan, Bayer and Novartis. SR: consultant for Brien Holden Vision Institute and previously worked for Thea Pharmaceuticals (2008-2010).

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram summarising the systematic search, using medical subject headings (MeSH) terms, and review process for identifying evidence on the prevalence of MMD VI and/or blindness. Our inclusion criteria were population-based or blindness registry studies quantifying prevalence, with sampling representative of whole communities. Exclusion criteria were unspecified or ambiguous definitions, not specifying the number of eligible participants, participation rate

Figure 2

The age distribution of global…

Figure 2

The age distribution of global blindness associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in…

Figure 2
The age distribution of global blindness associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in 2000 and 2050. Both age-specific global prevalence (top) and the number of people predicted to be blind (bottom) are shown.

Figure 3

Predicted prevalence of, and number…

Figure 3

Predicted prevalence of, and number of people with, blindness and visual impairment (VI)…

Figure 3
Predicted prevalence of, and number of people with, blindness and visual impairment (VI) associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD) for each decade in 2000–2050. The top graph shows the crude all-ages prevalence of blindness (triangles and dashed line) and VI (squares with solid line) associated with MMD. The bottom graph shows the number of people with blindness (striped columns) and VI (unfilled columns) associated with MMD. Error bars represent 95% CIs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The age distribution of global blindness associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in 2000 and 2050. Both age-specific global prevalence (top) and the number of people predicted to be blind (bottom) are shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted prevalence of, and number of people with, blindness and visual impairment (VI) associated with myopic macular degeneration (MMD) for each decade in 2000–2050. The top graph shows the crude all-ages prevalence of blindness (triangles and dashed line) and VI (squares with solid line) associated with MMD. The bottom graph shows the number of people with blindness (striped columns) and VI (unfilled columns) associated with MMD. Error bars represent 95% CIs.

References

    1. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. . Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2013;1:e339–49. 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70113-X
    1. Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. . Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmol 2016;123:1036–42. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
    1. Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Lai C-C, et al. . Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res 2016;52:156–87. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.12.001
    1. Verhoeven VJ, Wong KT, Buitendijk GH, et al. . Visual consequences of refractive errors in the general population. Ophthalmology 2015;122:101–9. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.030
    1. Tideman JW, Snabel MC, Tedja MS, et al. . Association of axial length with risk of uncorrectable visual impairment for Europeans with myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016;134:1355–63. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4009
    1. Yamada M, Hiratsuka Y, Roberts CB, et al. . Prevalence of visual impairment in the adult Japanese population by cause and severity and future projections. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2010;17:50–7. 10.3109/09286580903450346
    1. Nakamura Y, Tomidokoro A, Sawaguchi S, et al. . Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural Southwest Island of Japan. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2315–21. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.043
    1. Xu L, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. . Causes of blindness and visual impairment in urban and rural areas in Beijing. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1134.e1–1134.e11. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.035
    1. Liang YB, Friedman DS, Wong TY, et al. . Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural Chinese adult population. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1965–72. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.030
    1. Tang Y, Wang X, Wang J, et al. . Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in a Chinese adult population. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1480–8. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.022
    1. Zhao J, Ellwein LB, Cui H, et al. . Prevalence of vision impairment in older adults in rural China: the China Nine-Province Survey. Ophthalmology 2010;117:409–16. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.023
    1. Wu L, Sun X, Zhou X, et al. . Causes and 3-year-incidence of blindness in Jing-An District, Shanghai, China 2001-2009. BMC Ophthalmol 2011;11:1–6. 10.1186/1471-2415-11-10
    1. Huang S, Zheng Y, Foster PJ, et al. . Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in Chinese adults in urban Southern China. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1362–7. 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.138
    1. Tsai IL, Woung LC, Tsai CY, et al. . Trends in blind and low vision registrations in Taipei City. Eur J Ophthalmol 2008;18:118–24. 10.1177/112067210801800120
    1. Liu JH, Cheng CY, Chen SJ, et al. . Visual impairment in a Taiwanese population: prevalence, causes, and socioeconomic factors. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2001;8:339–50. 10.1080/09286586.2001.11644261
    1. Hsu W, Cheng C, Liu J, et al. . Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmol 2004;111:62–9.
    1. Klaver CC, Wolfs RC, Vingerling JR, et al. . Age-specific prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in an older population: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:653–8. 10.1001/archopht.116.5.653
    1. Farber MD. National Registry for the Blind in Israel: estimation of prevalence and incidence rates and causes of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2003;10:267–77. 10.1076/opep.10.4.267.15910
    1. Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP. MRC trial of assessment & management of older people in the community. causes of visual impairment in people aged 75 years and older in Britain: an add-on study to the MRC Trial of Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:365–70.
    1. Buch H, Vinding T, Nielsen NV. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment according to World Health Organization and United States criteria in an aged, urban Scandinavian population The Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2347–57. 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00823-5
    1. Nowak MS, Smigielski J. The Prevalence of Age-Related Eye Diseases and Cataract Surgery among Older Adults in the City of Lodz, Poland. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:1–7. 10.1155/2015/605814
    1. United Nations Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects: the 2015 Revision. United Nations: 2015. (accessed 19 Feb 2016).
    1. World Health Organization, Brien Holden Vision Institute. The impact of myopia and high myopia. Report of the Joint World Health Organization - Brien Holden Vision Institute (WHO-BHVI) Global Scientific Meeting on Myopia held at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia, 16-18 March 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Spaide RF, Ohno-Matsui K, Yannuzzi LA, et al. . Pathologic Myopia. New York: Springer, 2014.
    1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10. 2016. (accessed 20 Dec 2016).
    1. World Bank. World Development Indicators. 2018. (accessed 23 Mar 2017).
    1. Cheung CMG, Arnold JJ, Holz FG, et al. . Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization. Ophthalmology 2017;124:1690–1711. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.028
    1. Wong TY, Ferreira A, Hughes R, et al. . Epidemiology and disease burden of pathologic myopia and myopic choroidal neovascularization: an evidence-based systematic review. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:9–25. 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.010

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel