Computed tomography scanning facilitates the diagnosis of sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis: results of a prospective multicenter French cohort study

Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Julien Marion, Marie Lapierre, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Danielle Colin, Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere, Christian Marcelli, Damien Loeuille, Philippe Aegerter, Sandrine Guis, Philippe Gaudin, Maxime Breban, Alain Saraux, Study Group of Spondylarthritis, Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Julien Marion, Marie Lapierre, Sandrine Jousse-Joulin, Danielle Colin, Isabelle Chary-Valckenaere, Christian Marcelli, Damien Loeuille, Philippe Aegerter, Sandrine Guis, Philippe Gaudin, Maxime Breban, Alain Saraux, Study Group of Spondylarthritis

Abstract

Objective: To assess the performance of computed tomography (CT) scanning for ascertaining sacroiliitis in patients with suspected spondylarthritis (SpA).

Methods: The Echography in Spondylarthritis French cohort consists of 489 patients with suspected SpA. At baseline, all patients underwent clinical examination, HLA-B typing, and pelvic radiography. Pelvic CT scanning was performed if sacroiliitis on radiography was considered uncertain or if patients presented with buttock pain duration of >6 months. A set of 100 paired radiographs and CT scans was read in a blinded manner by 2 radiologists, and the kappa coefficient was used to assess their interreader reliability. One of the radiologists read the 173 available pairs of radiographs and CT scans performed at baseline.

Results: After training, interreader reliability was moderate for sacroiliitis grading on radiographs (κ = 0.59), excellent on CT scans (κ = 0.91), and excellent for ascertaining sacroiliitis on both radiographs (κ = 1) and CT scans (κ = 0.96). The first and second readers considered the quality of imaging to be excellent in 66% and 67%, respectively, of the radiographs (κ = 0.88) and in 93% and 92%, respectively, of the CT scans (κ = 0.93). Concordance between radiographs and CT scans was low for sacroiliitis grading (κ = 0.08) or ascertainment (κ = 0.16). Definite sacroiliitis was ascertained on radiographs in 6 patients (3.5%) (confirmed by CT scans in 4 patients) and on CT scans in 32 patients (18.5%). A history of uveitis was associated with definite sacroiliitis on radiographs (P = 0.04) and CT scans (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Definite sacroiliitis was underestimated by radiography, as compared to CT scanning. CT scanning should facilitate the diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis in patients with suspected SpA.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00794404.

Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel