A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Position Emission Tomography (PET)-Guided Dose Escalation Radiotherapy to Conventional Radiotherapy in Chemoradiotherapy Treatment of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Jianshe Wang, Junnian Zheng, Tianyou Tang, Feng Zhu, Yuanhu Yao, Jing Xu, Andrew Z Wang, Longzhen Zhang, Jianshe Wang, Junnian Zheng, Tianyou Tang, Feng Zhu, Yuanhu Yao, Jing Xu, Andrew Z Wang, Longzhen Zhang

Abstract

Background: This pilot trial is designed to determine whether PET/CT-guided radiotherapy dose escalation can improve local control while minimizing toxicity for the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Methods: 67 patients were randomized into the three treatment arms: conventional chemoradiotherapy (group A), CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group B) and PET/CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy (group C). Radiotherapy was delivered using the simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique in the dose-escalation treatment arms. Patients received concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: The use of PET/CT significantly changed the treatment volume delineation of the gross tumor volume. 3-year local progression-free (LPF) survival rates of three groups were 83.3%, 90.9% and 100%, respectively. The 3-year regional progression-free survival (RPFS) rates were 95.8%, 95.5% and 100%, respectively. The 3-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 79.2%, 86.4% and 95.2%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.3%, 90.9% and 95.2%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 79.2%, 86.4% and 95.2%, respectively. No patient had grade 4 late toxicity.

Conclusions: PET/CT-guided dose escalation radiotherapy is well-tolerated and appears to be superior to conventional chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NPC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02089204.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of trial.
Fig 1. CONSORT flow diagram of trial.
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the…
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the treatment groups.
(a). The 3-year LPF survival rates of three groups. (b). The 3-year DFS rates of three groups. Group A: conventional chemoradiotherapy group; Group B: CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy group; Group C: PET/CT-guided dose escalation chemoradiotherapy group. The 3-year LPF and DFS were statistically significant between groups A and C (P

References

    1. Wei WI, Sham JS (2005) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet 365: 2041–2054.
    1. Spratt DE, Lee N (2012) Current and emerging treatment options for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 5: 297–308. 10.2147/OTT.S28032
    1. Wee J, Tan EH, Tai BC, Wong HB, Leong SS, et al. (2005) Randomized trial of radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer stage III and IV nasopharyngeal cancer of the endemic variety. J Clin Oncol 23: 6730–6738.
    1. Marks JE, Bedwinek JM, Lee F, Purdy JA, Perez CA (1982) Dose-response analysis for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an historical perspective. Cancer 50: 1042–1050.
    1. Teo PM, Leung SF, Tung SY, Zee B, Sham JS, et al. (2006) Dose-response relationship of nasopharyngeal carcinoma above conventional tumoricidal level: a study by the Hong Kong nasopharyngeal carcinoma study group (HKNPCSG). Radiother Oncol 79: 27–33.
    1. Teo PM, Leung SF, Lee WY, Zee B (2000) Intracavitary brachytherapy significantly enhances local control of early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the existence of a dose-tumor-control relationship above conventional tumoricidal dose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46: 445–458.
    1. Hara W, Loo BW Jr., Goffinet DR, Chang SD, Adler JR, et al. (2008) Excellent local control with stereotactic radiotherapy boost after external beam radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71: 393–400. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.027
    1. Xiao WW, Huang SM, Han F, Wu SX, Lu LX, et al. (2011) Local control, survival, and late toxicities of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy: long-term results of a phase 2 study. Cancer 117: 1874–1883. 10.1002/cncr.25754
    1. Bakst RL, Lee N, Pfister DG, Zelefsky MJ, Hunt MA, et al. (2011) Hypofractionated dose-painting intensity modulated radiation therapy with chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80: 148–153. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.026
    1. Madani I, Duthoy W, Derie C, De Gersem W, Boterberg T, et al. (2007) Positron emission tomography-guided, focal-dose escalation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68: 126–135.
    1. Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, DeLong DM, Patz EF, Coleman RE (1994) Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities. J Nucl Med 35: 1771–1776.
    1. Hung GU, Wu IS, Lee HS, You WC, Chen HC, et al. (2011) Primary tumor volume measured by FDG PET and CT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 36: 447–451. 10.1097/RLU.0b013e31821738b8
    1. Butler EB, Teh BS, Grant WH 3rd, Uhl BM, Kuppersmith RB, et al. (1999) Smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost: a new accelerated fractionation schedule for the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45: 21–32.
    1. Tomitaka E, Murakami R, Teshima K, Nomura T, Nakaguchi Y, et al. (2011) Longitudinal changes over 2 years in parotid glands of patients treated with preoperative 30-Gy irradiation for oral cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41: 503–507. 10.1093/jjco/hyq236
    1. Paulino AC, Johnstone PA (2004) FDG-PET in radiotherapy treatment planning: Pandora's box? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59: 4–5.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel