A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding safety and tolerability study of the anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes

Bart Keymeulen, André van Maurik, Dave Inman, João Oliveira, Rene McLaughlin, Rachel M Gittelman, Bart O Roep, Pieter Gillard, Robert Hilbrands, Frans Gorus, Chantal Mathieu, Ursule Van de Velde, Nicolas Wisniacki, Antonella Napolitano, Bart Keymeulen, André van Maurik, Dave Inman, João Oliveira, Rene McLaughlin, Rachel M Gittelman, Bart O Roep, Pieter Gillard, Robert Hilbrands, Frans Gorus, Chantal Mathieu, Ursule Van de Velde, Nicolas Wisniacki, Antonella Napolitano

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Numerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose-response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16-27 years old, <32 days from diagnosis of type 1 diabetes) were scheduled to receive placebo or otelixizumab in one of four dose cohorts (cumulative i.v. dose 9, 18, 27 or 36 mg over 6 days; planned n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses.

Results: Thirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC0-120 min following otelixizumab 9 mg was above baseline for up to 18 months (difference from placebo 0.39 [95% CI 0.06, 0.72]; p = 0.023); no beta cell function preservation was observed at otelixizumab 18 and 27 mg.

Conclusions/interpretation: A metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817.

Funding: The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Graphical abstract.

Keywords: Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody; Autoreactive T cell; Epstein–Barr virus reactivation; Islet autoimmunity; Type 1 diabetes.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/7801303/bin/125_2020_5317_Figa_HTML.jpg
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow diagram. OTX, otelixizumab
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
EBV reactivation showing: (a) proportion of participants with EBV viral load >10,000 copies/106 PBMCs and proportion with EBV clinical symptoms; and (b) geometric mean copies of EBV viral load per 106 PBMCs. LLOQ, lower limit of quantification; OTX, otelixizumab
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Change from baseline in LS mean (± SEM) of C-peptide weighted mean AUC0–120 min following MMTT. LS: Least squares; OTX, otelixizumab
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Productive clonality over time by treatment group. (b) Box plot of productive clonality grouped by maximum EBV viral load. Boxes depict the IQR with lines for the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile. The whiskers (vertical lines) denote the largest value within 1.5× IQR above 75th percentile or below the 25th percentile. Black circles denote individual participant data (a) and individual outliers (b). OTX, otelixizumab
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean ± SEM partially exhausted CD8+ memory T cells over time by metabolic response

References

    1. Atkinson MA, von Herrath M, Powers AC, Clare-Salzler M. Current concepts on the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes—Considerations for attempts to prevent and reverse the disease. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):979–988. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0144.
    1. Paschou SA, Papadopoulou-Marketou N, Chrousos GP, Kanaka-Gantenbein C. On type 1 diabetes mellitus pathogenesis. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(1):R38–R46. doi: 10.1530/EC-17-0347.
    1. In’t Veld P. Insulitis in human type 1 diabetes: The quest for an elusive lesion. Islets. 2011;3(4):131–138. doi: 10.4161/isl.3.4.15728.
    1. Sherry NA, Tsai EB, Herold KC. Natural history of beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2005;54(Suppl 2):S32–S39. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.suppl_2.s32.
    1. Herold KC, Vignali DA, Cooke A, Bluestone JA. Type 1 diabetes: Translating mechanistic observations into effective clinical outcomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(4):243–256. doi: 10.1038/nri3422.
    1. Nathan DM, for the DCCT/EDIC Research Group The diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications study at 30 years: Overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(1):9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2148.
    1. Kalra S, Mukherjee JJ, Venkataraman S, et al. Hypoglycemia: The neglected complication. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2013;17(5):819–834. doi: 10.4103/2230-8210.117219.
    1. Dayan CM, Korah M, Tatovic D, Bundy BN, Herold KC. Changing the landscape for type 1 diabetes: The first step to prevention. Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1286–1296. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32127-0.
    1. Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, et al. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(25):2598–2608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980.
    1. Herold KC, Hagopian W, Auger JA, et al. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(22):1692–1698. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012864.
    1. Keymeulen B, Walter M, Mathieu C, et al. Four-year metabolic outcome of a randomised controlled CD3-antibody trial in recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients depends on their age and baseline residual beta cell mass. Diabetologia. 2010;53(4):614–623. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1644-9.
    1. Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Ehlers MR, AbATE Study Team et al. Teplizumab (anti-CD3 mAb) treatment preserves C-peptide responses in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial: Metabolic and immunologic features at baseline identify a subgroup of responders. Diabetes. 2013;62(11):3766–3774. doi: 10.2337/db13-0345.
    1. Demeester S, Keymeulen B, Kaufman L, et al. Preexisting insulin autoantibodies predict efficacy of otelixizumab in preserving residual β-cell function in recent-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):644–651. doi: 10.2337/dc14-1575.
    1. MacDonald A, Ambery P, Donaldson J, Hicks K, Keymeulen B, Parkin J. Subcutaneous administration of otelixizumab is limited by injection site reactions: Results of an exploratory study in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016;124(5):288–293. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101241.
    1. Hale G, Rebello P, Al Bakir I, et al. Pharmacokinetics and antibody responses to the CD3 antibody otelixizumab used in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;50(11):1238–1248. doi: 10.1177/0091270009356299.
    1. Aronson R, Gottlieb PA, Christiansen JS, DEFEND Investigator Group et al. Low-dose otelixizumab anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody DEFEND-1 study: Results of the randomized phase III study in recent-onset human type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(10):2746–2754. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0327.
    1. Ambery P, Donner TW, Biswas N, Donaldson J, Parkin J, Dayan CM. Efficacy and safety of low-dose otelixizumab anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in preserving C-peptide secretion in adolescent type 1 diabetes: DEFEND-2, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-Centre study. Diabet Med. 2014;31(4):399–402. doi: 10.1111/dme.12361.
    1. Vlasakakis G, Napolitano A, Barnard R, et al. Target engagement and cellular fate of otelixizumab: A repeat dose escalation study of an anti-CD3ε mAb in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(4):704–714. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13842.
    1. Rosenzweig M, Rosenthal CA, Torres VM, Vaickus L. Development of a quantitative assay to measure EBV viral load in patients with autoimmune type 1 diabetes and healthy subjects. J Virol Methods. 2010;164(1–2):111–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.11.018.
    1. Long S, Thorpe J, DeBerg HA, et al. Partial exhaustion of CD8 T cells and clinical response to teplizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Sci Immunol. 2016;1(5):eaai7793. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aai7793.
    1. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: A method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Phys. 1979;237(3):E214–E223. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1979.237.3.E214.
    1. Gerlo E, Gorus F. Calibration of ion-exchange HPLC measurements of glycohemoglobin: Effect on interassay precision. Clin Chem. 1997;43(12):2353–2357. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/43.12.2353.
    1. Keymeulen B, Candon S, Fafi-Kremer S, et al. Transient Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in CD3 monoclonal antibody-treated patients. Blood. 2010;115(6):1145–1155. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-02-204875.
    1. Herold KC, Bundy BN, Long SA, Type 1 Diabetes TrialNet Study Group et al. An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(7):603–613. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1902226.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel