Immunogenicity and safety of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine in Japanese adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Leilani Sanchez, Osamu Matsuoka, Satoshi Inoue, Takahiro Inoue, Ya Meng, Takahiro Nakama, Kumiko Kato, Aseem Pandey, Lee-Jah Chang, Leilani Sanchez, Osamu Matsuoka, Satoshi Inoue, Takahiro Inoue, Ya Meng, Takahiro Nakama, Kumiko Kato, Aseem Pandey, Lee-Jah Chang

Abstract

A trivalent high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine has been licensed in healthy adults ≥65 years of age and provides better protection against influenza infection and related complications than trivalent standard-dose vaccine. This phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03233217), conducted at two sites in Japan, examined the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent formulation of the high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4-HD). Healthy adults ≥65 years of age were randomized to receive IIV4-HD by intramuscular injection (n = 60), IIV4-HD by subcutaneous injection (n = 60), or a quadrivalent standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4-SD) by subcutaneous injection (n = 55). Irrespective of administration route, post-vaccination (day 28-35) hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titers and seroconversion rates were higher for IIV4-HD than for IIV4-SD. Hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titers and seroconversion rates were also higher for intramuscular than subcutaneous administration of IIV4-HD. Solicited reactions were more common in participants who received IIV4-HD administered subcutaneously than in those who received IIV4-HD administered intramuscularly or IIV4-SD administered subcutaneously. Unsolicited adverse events were similar between the vaccine groups, and no safety signals were detected. This study showed that IIV4-HD administered by either intramuscular or subcutaneous injection was well tolerated and highly immunogenic in healthy Japanese adults ≥65 years of age. Although this study was descriptive, the results add to the evidence that high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines are more immunogenic than standard-dose vaccines in this age group and that intramuscular administration provides greater immunogenicity and lower reactogenicity than subcutaneous administration.

Keywords: Japan; Quadrivalent influenza vaccine; elderly adults; high-dose influenza vaccine; immunogenicity; intramuscular; safety; subcutaneous.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design and participant disposition. The first 10 participants enrolled (cohort 1) were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive IIV4-HD by IM or SC injection. After review of the local and systemic adverse events (AEs) occurring within 7 days post-vaccination by the sponsor’s safety review team, the remaining 165 participants enrolled (cohort 2) were assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive IIV4-HD by IM injection, IIV4-HD by SC injection, or IIV4-SD by SC injection. Safety analysis was conducted for all participants who received a study vaccine (safety analysis set). Immunogenicity analysis was conducted for all participants in cohort 2 completing the study according to protocol (immunogenicity analysis set). Abbreviations: IIV4-HD, high-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; IIV4-SD, standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; IM, intramuscular; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Solicited reactions. Participants recorded solicited reactions for 7 days after vaccination. Injection-site erythema, swelling, induration and bruising were grade 1 if 25–50 mm in diameter, grade 2 if 51–100 mm in diameter, and grade 3 if >100 mm in diameter. Fever was grade 1 if 100.4–101.1°F (38.0–38.4°C), grade 2 if 101.2–102.0°F (38.5–38.9°C), and grade 3 if ≥102.1°F (≥39.0°C). All other solicited reactions were grade 1 if transient, required minimal therapeutic intervention, and did not interfere with daily activities; grade 2 if they required additional therapeutic intervention or interfered with daily activities but posed no significant permanent risk, and grade 3 if they interrupted usual daily activities, significantly affected clinical status, or required intensive therapeutic intervention. Values are for the safety analysis set (N = 60 for IIV4-HD IM, N = 60 for IIV4-HD SC, and N = 55 for IIV4-SD SC). Abbreviations: IIV4-HD, high-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; IIV4-SD, standard-dose quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine; IM, intramuscular; SC, subcutaneous.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Post-vaccination HAI GMTs (a) and seroconversion rates (b). HAI titers were measured on day 0 and 28–35 days after vaccination for the seven influenza strains included in IIV4-HD and IIV4-SD. The three strains in IIV4-SD not identical to those in IIV4-HD are indicated as “-like” strains. (A) Post-vaccination HAI GMTs for each vaccination group 28–35 days after vaccination. (B) Proportions of patients in each group seroconverting. Seroconversion was defined as a HAI titer

References

    1. US CDC . 2018-19 acip background; 23 August 2018. [accessed 2019 Jan 30]. .
    1. Seidman JC, Richard SA, Viboud C, Miller MA.. Quantitative review of antibody response to inactivated seasonal influenza vaccines. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012;6:52–62. doi:10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00268.x. PMID: 21668661.
    1. Smetana J, Chlibek R, Shaw J, Splino M, Prymula R. Influenza vaccination in the elderly. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14:540–49. doi:10.1080/21645515.2017.1343226. PMID: 28708957.
    1. World Health Organization . Influenza. Vaccine use. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2019. [accessed 2019 March11]. .
    1. International Longevity Center Japan . A profile of older japanese. Tokyo, Japan: ILC-Japan; 2013. March31. [[accessed 2019 Mar 6]. .
    1. Lee JS, Kawakubo K. Influenza vaccination coverage in japan. Lancet. 2003;362:1767. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14870-2. PMID: 14643141.
    1. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare . Q&a on influenza, fy 2017. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2017. [accessed 2019 April2]. .
    1. Sugaya N, Shinjoh M, Nakata Y, Tsunematsu K, Yamaguchi Y, Komiyama O, Takahashi H, Mitamura K, Narabayashi A, Takahashi T, et al. Three-season effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccine in preventing influenza illness and hospitalization in children in japan, 2013-2016. Vaccine. 2018;36:1063–71. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.024. PMID: 29361343.
    1. Tisa V, Barberis I, Faccio V, Paganino C, Trucchi C, Martini M, Ansaldi F. Quadrivalent influenza vaccine: A new opportunity to reduce the influenza burden. J Prev Med Hyg. 2016;57:E28–33. PMID: 27346937.
    1. Caini S, Huang QS, Ciblak MA, Kusznierz G, Owen R, Wangchuk S, Henriques CM, Njouom R, Fasce RA, Yu H, et al. Epidemiological and virological characteristics of influenza b: results of the global influenza b study. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015;9(Suppl 1):3–12. doi:10.1111/irv.12319. PMID: 26256290.
    1. Tsuzuki S, Schwehm M, Eichner M. Simulation studies to assess the long-term effects of japan’s change from trivalent to quadrivalent influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2018;36:624–30. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.12.058. PMID: 29292176.
    1. Robertson CA, DiazGranados CA, Decker MD, Chit A, Mercer M, Greenberg DP. Fluzone(r) high-dose influenza vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15:1495–505. doi:10.1080/14760584.2016.1254044. PMID: 27813430.
    1. DiazGranados CA, Dunning AJ, Kimmel M, Kirby D, Treanor J, Collins A, Pollak R, Christoff J, Earl J, Landolfi V, et al. Efficacy of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:635–45. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1315727. PMID: 25119609.
    1. Falsey AR, Treanor JJ, Tornieporth N, Capellan J, Gorse GJ. Randomized, double-blind controlled phase 3 trial comparing the immunogenicity of high-dose and standard-dose influenza vaccine in adults 65 years of age and older. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:172–80. doi:10.1086/599790. PMID: 19508159.
    1. Izurieta HS, Chillarige Y, Kelman J, Wei Y, Lu Y, Xu W, Lu M, Pratt D, Chu S, Wernecke M, et al. Relative effectiveness of cell-cultured and egg-based influenza vaccines among the u.S. Elderly, 2017–18. J Infect Dis. 2018. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiy716. PMID: 30561688.
    1. Young-Xu Y, Snider JT, van Aalst R, Mahmud SM, Thommes EW, Lee JKH, Greenberg DP, Chit A. Analysis of relative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines using an instrumental variable method. Vaccine. 2019;37:1484–90. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.063. PMID: 30745146.
    1. DiazGranados CA, Robertson CA, Talbot HK, Landolfi V, Dunning AJ, Greenberg DP. Prevention of serious events in adults 65 years of age or older: A comparison between high-dose and standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccines. Vaccine. 2015;33:4988–93. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.07.006. PMID: 26212007.
    1. Robison SG, Thomas AR. Assessing the effectiveness of high-dose influenza vaccine in preventing hospitalization among seniors, and observations on the limitations of effectiveness study design. Vaccine. 2018;36:6683–87. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.09.050. PMID: 30287157.
    1. Shay DK, Chillarige Y, Kelman J, Forshee RA, Foppa IM, Wernecke M, Lu Y, Ferdinands JM, Iyengar A, Fry AM, et al. Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines among us medicare beneficiaries in preventing postinfluenza deaths during 2012–2013 and 2013–2014. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:510–17. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiw641. PMID: 28329311.
    1. Chang LJ, Meng Y, Janosczyk H, Landolfi V, Talbot HK. Safety and immunogenicity of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine administered by intramuscular route in subjects aged 65 years and older (oral abstract). San Francisco (CA): IDWeek. 2018. October 6.
    1. International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) . Clinical safety data management: definitions and standards for expedited reporting e2a. Geneva (Switzerland): International Council for Harmonisation;1994. October. [accessed 2019 Jan 22]. .
    1. Greenberg DP, Robertson CA, Noss MJ, Blatter MM, Biedenbender R, Decker MD. Safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared to licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in adults. Vaccine. 2013;31:770–76. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.074. PMID: 23228813.
    1. Wilkinson K, Wei Y, Szwajcer A, Rabbani R, Zarychanski R, AM A-S, Mahmud SM. Efficacy and safety of high-dose influenza vaccine in elderly adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine. 2017;35:2775–80. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.092. PMID: 28431815.
    1. Samson SI, Leventhal PS, Salamand C, Meng Y, Seet BT, Landolfi V, Greenberg D, Hollingsworth R. Immunogenicity of high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18:295–308. doi:10.1080/14760584.2019.1575734. PMID: 30689467.
    1. Ikeno D, Kimachi K, Kino Y, Harada S, Yoshida K, Tochihara S, Itamura S, Odagiri T, Tashiro M, Okada K, et al. Immunogenicity of an inactivated adjuvanted whole-virion influenza a (h5n1, nibrg-14) vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection. Microbiol Immunol. 2010;54:81–88. doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2009.00191.x. PMID: 20377741.
    1. Cook IF, Barr I, Hartel G, Pond D, Hampson AW. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of an inactivated influenza vaccine administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection in elderly adults. Vaccine. 2006;24:2395–402. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.11.057. PMID: 16406171.
    1. Pitel M. The subcutaneous injection. Am J Nurs. 1971;71:76–79. PMID: 5203348.
    1. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, Davoust J, Lebecque S, YJ L, Pulendran B, Palucka K. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000;18:767–811. doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.767. PMID: 10837075.
    1. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development . Influenza vaccination rates (indicator). Paris (France): OECD; 2018. [accessed 2019 February15]. .
    1. 56th World Health Assembly . Prevention and control of influenza pandemics and annual epidemics. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2003. .
    1. Lee JKH, Lam GKL, Shin T, Kim J, Krishnan A, Greenberg DP, Chit A. Efficacy and effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccination for older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17:435–43. doi:10.1080/14760584.2018.1471989. PMID: 29715054.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel