Bioequivalence Study of Amitriptyline Hydrochloride Tablets in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions

You Zhai, Lihua Wu, Yunliang Zheng, Minglan Wu, Yujie Huang, Qian Huang, Jianzhong Shentu, Qingwei Zhao, Jian Liu, You Zhai, Lihua Wu, Yunliang Zheng, Minglan Wu, Yujie Huang, Qian Huang, Jianzhong Shentu, Qingwei Zhao, Jian Liu

Abstract

Purpose: This study compares the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets, and assesses the bioequivalence of the two products in healthy Chinese volunteers to obtain sufficient evidence for the marketing approval of the generic drug.

Materials and methods: A randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03646526) was conducted under both fasting and fed conditions in healthy Chinese volunteers (24 subjects/condition). Eligible subjects randomly received a single 25 mg dose of either the test or the reference formulation, followed by a 3-week washout period. Blood samples were collected until 144 h following administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters were acquired based on the concentration-time profiles, including the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞), the peak plasma concentration (Cmax), the time to achieve Cmax (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (t1/2). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of amitriptyline were acquired for bioequivalence analysis, and values of these parameters for nortriptyline were used for comparison of therapeutic outcomes. Safety assessments included laboratory tests, physical examination, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The values of t1/2 and Tmax for amitriptyline were not significantly different between the test and reference products under both fasting and fed conditions (P > 0.05). The GMRs of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ between the two products, and corresponding 90% CIs, were all within the range of 80% to 125% under both fasting and fed conditions. The test and reference products were well tolerated and did not elicit serious adverse events.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the generic and reference products were well tolerated by the subjects and bioequivalent, according to the rate and extent of the drug absorption.

Keywords: amitriptyline hydrochloride; bioequivalence; nortriptyline; pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

Hunan Dongting Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Hunan, China) funded our study, which was the manufacturer of amitriptyline hydrochloride tablets. The funder had not any influence on data collection and analysis, manuscript preparation, and decision to publish. All authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2020 Zhai et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design and disposition of subjects.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of amitriptyline (A) and nortriptyline (B) after single oral administration of reference and test amitriptyline hydrochloride tablet in 24 healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting condition. Data represent the mean value for the 24 volunteers, and error bars represent the SD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles of amitriptyline (A) and nortriptyline (B) after single oral administration of reference and test amitriptyline hydrochloride tablet in 24 healthy Chinese volunteers under fed condition. Data represent the mean value for the 24 volunteers, and error bars represent the SD.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2017. Available from: . Accessed March1, 2019.
    1. Carvalho AF, Sharma MS, Brunoni AR, et al. The safety, tolerability and risks associated with the use of newer generation antidepressant drugs: a critical review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(5):270–288. doi:10.1159/000447034
    1. Hillhouse TM, Porter JH. A brief history of the development of antidepressant drugs: from monoamines to glutamate. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23(1):1–21. doi:10.1037/a0038550
    1. Pratt LA, Brody DJ, Gu Q. Antidepressant use in persons aged 12 and over: United States, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;76:1–8.
    1. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2010: With Special Feature on Death and Dying. Table 95. Hyattsville, MD; 2011.
    1. Vezmar S, Miljkovic B, Vucicevic K, et al. Amitriptyline for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007.
    1. Barbui C, Hotopf M. Amitriptyline v. the rest: still the leading antidepressant after 40 years of randomised controlled trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;178(2):129–144. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.2.129
    1. Cheng Q, Huang J, Xu L, et al. Analysis of time-course, dose-effect, and influencing factors of antidepressants in the treatment of acute adult patients with major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;23(2):76–87. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyz062
    1. Thour A, Marwaha R. Amitriptyline. 2020 Apr 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. Jan–. PMID: 30725910.
    1. Lohse MJ, Müller-Oerlinghausen B. Psychopharmaka In: Schwabe U, Pfaffrath D, editors. Arzneiverordnungsreport 2009. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009:820–864.
    1. Personal communication. GPRD. Available from: . Accessed July21, 2020.
    1. WHO Expert Committee. The selection and use of essential medicines. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2014;985:i–xiv, 1–219, back cover.
    1. Chinese national essential drug catalogue (basic medical and health institutions). China; 2018. Available from: . Accessed July21, 2020.
    1. Breyer-Pfaff U. The metabolic fate of amitriptyline, nortriptyline and amitriptylinoxide in man. Drug Metab Rev. 2004;36(3–4):723–746.
    1. Krüger R, Hölzl G, Kuss HJ, et al. Comparison of the metabolism of the three antidepressants amitriptyline, imipramine, and chlorimipramine in vitro in rat liver microsomes. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1986;88(4):505–513. doi:10.1007/BF00178516
    1. UpToDate. Tricyclic and tetracyclic drugs: pharmacology, administration, and side effects; 2016. [cited August 2, 2016]. Available from: . Accessed July21, 2020.
    1. Moore RA, Derry S, Aldington D, et al. Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(7):CD008242.
    1. Hiroki T, Suto T, Saito S, et al. Repeated administration of amitriptyline in neuropathic pain: modulation of the noradrenergic descending inhibitory system. Anesth Analg. 2017;125(4):1281–1288. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002352
    1. Rico-Villademoros F, Slim M, Calandre EP. Amitriptyline for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(10):1123–1150. doi:10.1586/14737175.2015.1091726
    1. Rampello L, Alvano A, Chiechio S, et al. Evaluation of the prophylactic efficacy of amitriptyline and citalopram, alone or in combination, in patients with comorbidity of depression, migraine, and tension-type headache. Neuropsychobiology. 2004;50(4):322–328. doi:10.1159/000080960
    1. Burch R. Antidepressants for preventive treatment of migraine. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2019;21(4):18. doi:10.1007/s11940-019-0557-2
    1. AMITRIPTYLINE HYDROCHLORIDE-amitriptyline hydrochloride tablet, film coated. Durham, NC: Inc, A.H.; 2016. Available from: . Accessed July21, 2020.
    1. Hicks JK, Swen JJ, Thorn CF, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotypes and dosing of tricyclic antidepressants. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;93(5):402–408. doi:10.1038/clpt.2013.2
    1. Draft Guidance on Amitriptyline Hydrochloride. US Food and Drug Administration. USA. Available from: . Accessed March 2010.
    1. Nam Y, Lim CH, Lee HS, et al. Single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of amitriptyline hydrochloride 10- and 25-mg tablet in healthy male Korean volunteers. Clin Ther. 2015;37(2):302–310. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.09.010
    1. Burch JE, Hullin RP. Amitriptyline pharmacokinetics. A crossover study with single doses of amitriptyline and nortriptyline. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981;74(1):35–42. doi:10.1007/BF00431754
    1. Charman WN, Porter CJ, Mithani S, et al. Physiochemical and physiological mechanisms for the effects of food on drug absorption: the role of lipids and pH. J Pharm Sci. 1997;86(3):269–282. doi:10.1021/js960085v
    1. Bae SK, Yang KH, Aryal DK, et al. Pharmacokinetics of amitriptyline and one of its metabolites, nortriptyline, in rats: little contribution of considerable hepatic first-pass effect to low bioavailability of amitriptyline due to great intestinal first-pass effect. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98(4):1587–1601. doi:10.1002/jps.21511
    1. McLean AJ, McNamara PJ, duSouich P, et al. Food, splanchnic blood flow, and bioavailability of drugs subject to first-pass metabolism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978;24(1):5–10. doi:10.1002/cpt19782415

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel