Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Long-Term Upadacitinib Therapy in Five Randomized Controlled Trials

Martin Bergman, Maya H Buch, Yoshiya Tanaka, Gustavo Citera, Sami Bahlas, Ernest Wong, Yanna Song, Patrick Zueger, Mira Ali, Vibeke Strand, Martin Bergman, Maya H Buch, Yoshiya Tanaka, Gustavo Citera, Sami Bahlas, Ernest Wong, Yanna Song, Patrick Zueger, Mira Ali, Vibeke Strand

Abstract

Introduction: The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a patient-reported outcome tool recommended for the assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice. This analysis evaluated the long-term effect of upadacitinib vs. comparators on RAPID3 scores in patients with RA in the phase 3 SELECT clinical trial program.

Methods: This post hoc analysis included data from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily (QD) as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). The proportions of patients reporting RAPID3 remission (scores ≤ 3) were assessed at week 60. Correlations between absolute scores for RAPID3 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and 28-joint Disease Activity Score with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) at week 60 were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients.

Results: A total of 3117 patients were included from the SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, -MONOTHERAPY, -COMPARE, and -EARLY trials. By week 60, 32-52% of methotrexate-naïve and csDMARD inadequate responder (IR) patients treated with either upadacitinib 15 mg QD or upadacitinib 30 mg QD reported RAPID3 scores consistent with remission. The proportions were slightly lower in the biologic DMARD-IR SELECT-BEYOND population (19-28%). RAPID3 scores highly correlated (Spearman correlation values ≥ 0.58) with CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28(CRP) scores through week 60 (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Upadacitinib, as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARDs, was associated with patient-reported remission assessed by RAPID3 over 60 weeks across the SELECT RCTs in patients with RA.

Trial registration: SELECT-BEYOND (NCT02706847); SELECT-NEXT (NCT02675426); SELECT-MONOTHERAPY (NCT02706951); SELECT-EARLY (NCT02706873); SELECT-COMPARE (NCT02629159).

Keywords: RAPID3; Rheumatoid arthritis; Upadacitinib.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Percentage of patients in RAPID3 remission, LDA, MDA, and HDA across the SELECT trials at baseline and weeks 12/14, 24/26, and 60. Data are AO for SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, and -MONOTHERAPY, and LOCF for rescue patients then AO for SELECT-EARLY and -COMPARE. ADA adalimumab, AO as observed, bDMARD biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, csDMARD conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, EOW every other week, HDA high disease activity, IR inadequate response, LDA low disease activity, LOCF last observation carried forward, MDA moderate disease activity, MTX methotrexate, QD once daily, RAPID3 Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, UPA upadacitinib
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation between RAPID3 scores and A CDAI, B SDAI, and C DAS28(CRP) scores across the SELECT trials at week 60. Correlation coefficients of < 0.3 considered low correlation, 0.3–0.6 moderate, and > 0.6 high. Data are AO for SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, and -MONOTHERAPY, and LOCF for rescue patients then AO for SELECT-EARLY and -COMPARE. ADA adalimumab, AO as observed, CDAI Clinical Disease Activity Index, CI confidence interval, DAS28(CRP) 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein, EOW every other week, LOCF last observation carried forward, MTX methotrexate, QD once daily, RAPID3 Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, SDAI Simplified Disease Activity Index, UPA upadacitinib
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scores for components of composite measures of disease activity (CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28[CRP]) in patients with RAPID3 remission vs. patients not in RAPID3 remission at week 60. Remission/non-remission at week 60 determined through NRI. Component scores are AO for SELECT-NEXT, -BEYOND, and -MONOTHERAPY, and LOCF for rescue patients then AO for SELECT-EARLY and -COMPARE. ADA adalimumab, AO as observed, bDMARD biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, CDAI Clinical Disease Activity Index, csDMARD conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, DAS28(CRP) 28-joint Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein, EOW every other week, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, IR inadequate response, LOCF last observation carried forward, MTX methotrexate, NRI non-responder imputation, PhGA Physician’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, PtGA Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity, QD once daily, RAPID3 Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, SDAI Simplified Disease Activity Index, SJC28 swollen joint count for 28 joints, TJC28 tender joint count for 28 joints, UPA upadacitinib

References

    1. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73:924–939. doi: 10.1002/acr.24596.
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:685–699. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655.
    1. England BR, Tiong BK, Bergman MJ, et al. 2019 Update of the American College of Rheumatology recommended rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019;71:1540–1555. doi: 10.1002/acr.24042.
    1. Pincus T, Strand V, Koch G, et al. An index of the three core data set patient questionnaire measures distinguishes efficacy of active treatment from that of placebo as effectively as the American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria (ACR20) or the Disease Activity Score (DAS) in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:625–630. doi: 10.1002/art.10824.
    1. Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman MJ. RAPID3, an index to assess and monitor patients with rheumatoid arthritis, without formal joint counts: similar results to DAS28 and CDAI in clinical trials and clinical care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2009;35:773–778. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.10.008.
    1. AbbVie. Rinvoq. Prescribing information. 2022. . Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. AbbVie. Rinvoq. Summary of product characteristics. 2022. . Accessed 21 July 2022.
    1. Burmester GR, Kremer JM, Van den Bosch F, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-NEXT): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2503–2512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31115-2.
    1. Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2513–2524. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4.
    1. van Vollenhoven R, Takeuchi T, Pangan AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib monotherapy in methotrexate-naive patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (SELECT-EARLY): a multicenter, multi-country, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1607–1620. doi: 10.1002/art.41384.
    1. Smolen JS, Pangan AL, Emery P, et al. Upadacitinib as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate (SELECT-MONOTHERAPY): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study. Lancet. 2019;393:2303–2311. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30419-2.
    1. Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song I-H, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1788–1800. doi: 10.1002/art.41032.
    1. Tanaka Y. A review of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2020;30:779–787. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1782049.
    1. Conaghan PG, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, et al. Upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: a benefit-risk assessment across a phase III program. Drug Saf. 2021;44:515–530. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01036-w.
    1. Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M. Development of a multi-dimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) for the infrastructure of standard clinical care. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23:S19–28.
    1. Ward MM, Castrejon I, Bergman MJ, et al. Minimal clinically important improvement of routine assessment of patient index data 3 in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:27–30. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180153.
    1. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:276–282. doi: 10.11613/BM.2012.031.
    1. Strand V, Schiff M, Tundia N, et al. Effects of upadacitinib on patient-reported outcomes: results from SELECT-BEYOND, a phase 3 randomized trial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:263. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2059-8.
    1. Strand V, Pope J, Tundia N, et al. Upadacitinib improves patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: results from SELECT-NEXT. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:272. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2037-1.
    1. Strand V, Tundia N, Bergman M, et al. Upadacitinib improves patient-reported outcomes vs placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from SELECT-COMPARE. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60:5583–5594. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab158.
    1. Strand V, Tundia N, Wells A, et al. Upadacitinib monotherapy improves patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: results from SELECT-EARLY and SELECT-MONOTHERAPY. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021;60:3209–3221. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa770.
    1. Pincus T, Furer V, Keystone E, et al. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3) severity categories and response criteria: similar results to DAS28 (Disease Activity Score) and CDAI (Clinical Disease Activity Index) in the RAPID 1 (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage) clinical trial of certolizumab pegol. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63:1142–1149. doi: 10.1002/acr.20481.
    1. Singh H, Gupta V, Ray S, et al. Evaluation of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis by Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and its correlation to Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): an Indian experience. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:1663–1669. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2070-9.
    1. Che H, Combe B, Morel J, et al. Performance of patient-reported outcomes in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: the experience of the ESPOIR cohort. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34:646–654.
    1. Munõz JGB, Giraldo RB, Santos AM, et al. Correlation between rapid-3, DAS28, CDAI and SDAI as a measure of disease activity in a cohort of Colombian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:1143–1148. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3521-5.
    1. Pincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman M. A practical guide to scoring a Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores in 10–20 seconds for use in standard clinical care, without rulers, calculators, websites or computers. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2007;21:755–787. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2007.02.005.
    1. Yazici Y, Bergman M, Pincus T. Time to score quantitative rheumatoid arthritis measures: 28-Joint Count, Disease Activity Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Multidimensional HAQ (MDHAQ), and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID) scores. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:603–609.
    1. Khawaja MN, Bergman M, Yourish J, et al. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 and the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism provisional remission definitions as predictors of radiographic outcome in a rheumatoid arthritis clinical trial with tocilizumab. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017;69:609–615. doi: 10.1002/acr.23008.
    1. Strand V, Lee EB, Yazici Y, et al. Evaluation of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib by RAPID3: post hoc analyses from two phase 3 trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2018;37:2043–2053. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4077-3.
    1. Qorolli M, Rexhepi B, Rexhepi S, et al. Association between disease activity measured by RAPID3 and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39:827–834. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04258-z.
    1. Rubbert-Roth A, Enejosa J, Pangan AL, et al. Trial of upadacitinib or abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1511–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008250.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel