Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases

Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona

Abstract

Background: The existing definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases are based on recommendations made over 30 years ago. New data and knowledge related to visual impairment that have accumulated over this period suggest that these definitions need to be revised.

Discussion: Three major issues need to be addressed in the revision of these definitions. First, the existing definitions are based on best-corrected visual acuity, which exclude uncorrected refractive error as a cause of visual impairment, leading to substantial underestimation of the total visual impairment burden by about 38%. Second, the cut-off level of visual impairment to define blindness in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases is visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, but with increasing human development the visual acuity requirements are also increasing, suggesting that a level less than 6/60 be used to define blindness. Third, the International Statistical Classification of Diseases uses the term 'low vision' for visual impairment level less than blindness, which causes confusion with the common use of this term for uncorrectable vision requiring aids or rehabilitation, suggesting that alternative terms such as moderate and mild visual impairment would be more appropriate for visual impairment less severe than blindness. We propose a revision of the definitions of visual impairment in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases that addresses these three issues. According to these revised definitions, the number of blind persons in the world defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in the better eye would be about 57 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 37 million using the existing International Statistical Classification of Diseases definition of best-corrected visual acuity less than 3/60 in the better eye, and the number of persons in the world with moderate visual impairment defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/18 to 6/60 in the better eye would be about 202 million as compared with the World Health Organization estimate of 124 million persons with low vision defined as best-corrected visual acuity less than 6/18 to 3/60 in the better eye.

Conclusion: Our suggested revision of the visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases takes into account advances in the understanding of visual impairment. This revised classification seems more appropriate for estimating and tracking visual impairment in the countries and regions of the world than the existing classification in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases.

References

    1. World Health Organization International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision Current version Version for 2003 Chapter VII H54 Blindness and low vision.
    1. Dandona R, Dandona L. Refractive error blindness. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:237–243.
    1. Dandona L, Foster A. Patterns of blindness. In: Tasman W, Jaeger EA, editor. Duane's Clinical Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. Chapter 53.
    1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP, Pararajasegaram R, Etya'ale D, Negrel AD, Resnikoff S. 2002 global update of available data on visual impairment: a compilation of population-based prevalence studies. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2004;11:67–115. doi: 10.1076/opep.11.2.67.28158.
    1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:844–851.
    1. Dandona L, Dandona R. What is the global burden of visual impairment? BMC Med. 2006;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-4-6.
    1. Taylor H. Refractive errors: magnitude of the need. Community Eye Health. 2000;13:1–2.
    1. West S, Sommer A. Prevention of blindness and priorities for the future. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:244–248.
    1. World Health Organization . The Management of Low Vision in Children – Report of a WHO Consultation, Bangkok, 23–24 July 1992. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993. WHO/PBL/93.27.
    1. Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Nutheti R, Rao GN. Planning low vision services in India: a population-based perspective. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1871–1878. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01183-1.
    1. Landes DS. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 1999.
    1. Dandona L, Dandona R, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Vilas K, Prasad MN, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Blindness in the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:908–916.
    1. Courtright P, Hoechsmann A, Metcalfe N, Chirambo M, Noertjojo K, Barrows J, Katz J, Chikwawa Survey Team Changes in blindness prevalence over 16 years in Malawi: reduced prevalence but increased numbers of blind. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1079–1082. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.9.1079.
    1. Fouad D, Mousa A, Courtright P. Sociodemographic characteristics associated with blindness in a Nile Delta governorate of Egypt. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:614–618. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.026997.
    1. Li S, Xu J, He M, Wu K, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. A survey of blindness and cataract surgery in Doumen county, China. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:1602–1608. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90459-1.
    1. Dunzhu S, Wang FS, Courtright P, Liu L, Tenzing C, Noertjojo K, Wilkie A, Santangelo M, Bassett KL. Blindness and eye diseases in Tibet: findings from a randomised, population based survey. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:1443–1448. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.12.1443.
    1. Laitinen A, Koskinen S, Harkanen T, Reunanen A, Laatikainen L, Aromaa A. A nationwide population-based survey on visual acuity, near vision, and self-reported visual function in the adult population in Finland. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:2227–2237. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.09.010.
    1. Taylor HR, Keeffe JE, Vu HT, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Pezzullo ML, Mitchell P. Vision loss in Australia. Med J Aust. 2005;182:565–568.
    1. Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, Klein R, Munoz B, Friedman DS, Kempen J, Taylor HR, Mitchell P, Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:477–485. doi: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477.
    1. United Nations Development Programme Human Development Reports 1990–2005.
    1. Taylor HR, Livingston PM, Stanislavsky YL, McCarty CA. Visual impairment in Australia: distance visual acuity, near vision, and visual field findings of the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:328–337.
    1. Dandona L, Dandona R, Naduvilath TJ, McCarty CA, Nanda A, Srinivas M, Mandal P, Rao GN. Is current eye-care-policy focus almost exclusively on cataract adequate to deal with blindness in India? Lancet. 1998;351:1312–1316. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09509-3.
    1. Dineen BP, Bourne RR, Ali SM, Huq DM, Johnson GJ. Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Bangladeshi adults: results of the National Blindness and Low Vision Survey of Bangladesh. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:820–828. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.820.
    1. VanNewkirk MR, Weih L, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Cause-specific prevalence of bilateral visual impairment in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:960–967. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00554-1.
    1. Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Giridhar P, Prasad MN, Vilas K, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Moderate visual impairment in India: the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:373–377. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.373.
    1. World Health Organization International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems Updating process.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel