Effects of total fat intake on body fatness in adults

Lee Hooper, Asmaa S Abdelhamid, Oluseyi F Jimoh, Diane Bunn, C Murray Skeaff, Lee Hooper, Asmaa S Abdelhamid, Oluseyi F Jimoh, Diane Bunn, C Murray Skeaff

Abstract

Background: The ideal proportion of energy from fat in our food and its relation to body weight is not clear. In order to prevent overweight and obesity in the general population, we need to understand the relationship between the proportion of energy from fat and resulting weight and body fatness in the general population.

Objectives: To assess the effects of proportion of energy intake from fat on measures of body fatness (including body weight, waist circumference, percentage body fat and body mass index) in people not aiming to lose weight, using all appropriate randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least six months duration.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) to October 2019. We did not limit the search by language.

Selection criteria: Trials fulfilled the following criteria: 1) randomised intervention trial, 2) included adults aged at least 18 years, 3) randomised to a lower fat versus higher fat diet, without the intention to reduce weight in any participants, 4) not multifactorial and 5) assessed a measure of weight or body fatness after at least six months. We duplicated inclusion decisions and resolved disagreement by discussion or referral to a third party.

Data collection and analysis: We extracted data on the population, intervention, control and outcome measures in duplicate. We extracted measures of body fatness (body weight, BMI, percentage body fat and waist circumference) independently in duplicate at all available time points. We performed random-effects meta-analyses, meta-regression, subgrouping, sensitivity, funnel plot analyses and GRADE assessment.

Main results: We included 37 RCTs (57,079 participants). There is consistent high-quality evidence from RCTs that reducing total fat intake results in small reductions in body fatness; this was seen in almost all included studies and was highly resistant to sensitivity analyses (GRADE high-consistency evidence, not downgraded). The effect of eating less fat (compared with higher fat intake) is a mean body weight reduction of 1.4 kg (95% confidence interval (CI) -1.7 to -1.1 kg, in 53,875 participants from 26 RCTs, I2 = 75%). The heterogeneity was explained in subgrouping and meta-regression. These suggested that greater weight loss results from greater fat reductions in people with lower fat intake at baseline, and people with higher body mass index (BMI) at baseline. The size of the effect on weight does not alter over time and is mirrored by reductions in BMI (MD -0.5 kg/m2, 95% CI -0.6 to -0.3, 46,539 participants in 14 trials, I2 = 21%), waist circumference (MD -0.5 cm, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.2, 16,620 participants in 3 trials; I2 = 21%), and percentage body fat (MD -0.3% body fat, 95% CI -0.6 to 0.00, P = 0.05, in 2350 participants in 2 trials; I2 = 0%). There was no suggestion of harms associated with low fat diets that might mitigate any benefits on body fatness. The reduction in body weight was reflected in small reductions in LDL (-0.13 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.05), and total cholesterol (-0.23 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.14), with little or no effect on HDL cholesterol (-0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.00), triglycerides (0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07), systolic (-0.75 mmHg, 95% CI -1.42 to -0.07) or diastolic blood pressure(-0.52 mmHg, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.09), all GRADE high-consistency evidence or quality of life (0.04, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.07, on a scale of 0 to 10, GRADE low-consistency evidence).

Authors' conclusions: Trials where participants were randomised to a lower fat intake versus a higher fat intake, but with no intention to reduce weight, showed a consistent, stable but small effect of low fat intake on body fatness: slightly lower weight, BMI, waist circumference and percentage body fat compared with higher fat arms. Greater fat reduction, lower baseline fat intake and higher baseline BMI were all associated with greater reductions in weight. There was no evidence of harm to serum lipids, blood pressure or quality of life, but rather of small benefits or no effect.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01414062 NCT02353416 NCT02368405 NCT02396264 NCT01798719 NCT00438425.

Conflict of interest statement

AA: the World Health Organization (WHO) provided funding to the University of East Anglia towards the cost of carrying out the update of this systematic review, which partly covered the salary of AA. AA received funding from WHO to cover expenses associated with attendance at meetings of the NUGAG subgroup on diet and health.

OFJ: the World Health Organization (WHO) provided funding to the University of East Anglia towards the cost of carrying out the update of this systematic review, which partly covered the salary of OFJ.

DB: none known.

LH: the World Health Organization (WHO) provided funding to the University of East Anglia towards the cost of carrying out the update of this systematic review, which partly covered the salary of LH. LH is a member of the WHO NUGAG subgroup on diet and health and received funding from WHO to cover expenses associated with attendance at meetings of the NUGAG subgroup on diet and health.

CMS: none known.

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included adult and child RCT comparison.
3
3
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Fat reduction versus usual fat diet, outcome: 1.1 Weight, kg.
1.1. Analysis
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 1: Weight, kg
1.2. Analysis
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 2: BMI, kg/m2
1.3. Analysis
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 3: Waist circumference, cm
1.4. Analysis
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 4: Body fat, %
1.5. Analysis
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 5: Total cholesterol, mmol/L
1.6. Analysis
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 6: LDL cholesterol, mmol/L
1.7. Analysis
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 7: HDL cholesterol, mmol/L
1.8. Analysis
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 8: Triglycerides, mmol/L
1.9. Analysis
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 9: Total cholesterol/HDL
1.10. Analysis
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 10: Systolic blood pressure, mmHg
1.11. Analysis
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 11: Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg
1.12. Analysis
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1: Lower fat vs higher fat diet, Outcome 12: Quality of life
2.1. Analysis
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 1: Weight, kg SA fixed effects
2.2. Analysis
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 2: Weight, kg SA including only RCTs at low summary RoB
2.3. Analysis
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 3: Weight, kg SA excluding the largest trial, WHI
2.4. Analysis
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 4: Weight, kg SA excluding RCTs not free of systematic differences in care
2.5. Analysis
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 5: Weight, kg SA excluding studies not free of dietary differences other than fat
2.6. Analysis
2.6. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 6: Weight, kg SA excluding studies with potential compliance problems
2.7. Analysis
2.7. Analysis
Comparison 2: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, sensitivity analyses, Outcome 7: Weight, kg including partial data
3.1. Analysis
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 1: Weight, kg Subgrouping by trial duration
3.2. Analysis
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 2: Weight, kg Subgrouping by baseline fat intake
3.3. Analysis
3.3. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 3: Weight, kg Subgrouping by decade of first publication
3.4. Analysis
3.4. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 4: Weight, kg Subgrouping by sex
3.5. Analysis
3.5. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 5: Weight, kg Subgrouping by difference in %E from fat between control & reduced fat groups
3.6. Analysis
3.6. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 6: Weight, kg Subgrouping by achieving

3.7. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs…

3.7. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome…

3.7. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 7: Weight, kg Subgrouping by type of intervention

3.8. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs…

3.8. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome…

3.8. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 8: Weight, kg Subgrouping by lower fat arm fat goal

3.9. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs…

3.9. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome…

3.9. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 9: Weight, kg Subgrouping by mean BMI at baseline

3.10. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs…

3.10. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome…

3.10. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 10: Weight, kg Subgrouping by baseline health status

3.11. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs…

3.11. Analysis

Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome…

3.11. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 11: Weight, kg Subgrouping by assessed energy reduction
All figures (33)
3.7. Analysis
3.7. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 7: Weight, kg Subgrouping by type of intervention
3.8. Analysis
3.8. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 8: Weight, kg Subgrouping by lower fat arm fat goal
3.9. Analysis
3.9. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 9: Weight, kg Subgrouping by mean BMI at baseline
3.10. Analysis
3.10. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 10: Weight, kg Subgrouping by baseline health status
3.11. Analysis
3.11. Analysis
Comparison 3: Lower fat vs higher fat diet on body weight, subgrouping, Outcome 11: Weight, kg Subgrouping by assessed energy reduction

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel