Arm Ergometry to Improve Mobility in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (AMBOS)-Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Inga Heinrich, Friederike Rosenthal, Stefan Patra, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Götz H Welsch, Eik Vettorazzi, Sina C Rosenkranz, Jan Patrick Stellmann, Caren Ramien, Jana Pöttgen, Stefan M Gold, Christoph Heesen, Inga Heinrich, Friederike Rosenthal, Stefan Patra, Karl-Heinz Schulz, Götz H Welsch, Eik Vettorazzi, Sina C Rosenkranz, Jan Patrick Stellmann, Caren Ramien, Jana Pöttgen, Stefan M Gold, Christoph Heesen

Abstract

Background: Walking disability is one of the most frequent and burdening symptoms of progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Most of the exercise intervention studies that showed an improvement in mobility performance were conducted in low to moderately disabled relapsing-remitting MS patients with interventions using the legs. However, MS patients with substantial walking disability hardly can perform these tasks. Earlier work has indicated that aerobic arm training might also improve walking performance and could therefore be a therapeutic option in already moderately disabled progressive MS patients. Methods: Patients with progressive MS and EDSS 4-6.5 were randomized using a computer-generated algorithm list to either a waitlist control group (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG performed a 12-week home-based, individualized arm ergometry exercise training program. Maximum walking distance as measured by the 6-min walking test (6MWT) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included aerobic fitness, other mobility tests, cognitive functioning, as well as fatigue and depression. Results: Of n = 86 screened patients, 53 with moderate disability (mean EDSS 5.5, SD 0.9) were included and data of 39 patients were analyzed. Patients in the IG showed strong adherence to the program with a mean of 67 (SD 26.4) training sessions. Maximum work load (P max) increased in the training group while other fitness indicators did not. Walking distance in the 6MWT improved in both training and waitlist group but not significantly more in trained patients. Similarly, other mobility measures showed no differential group effect. Cognitive functioning remained unchanged. No serious events attributable to the intervention occurred. Conclusion: Although maximum work load improved, 3 months of high-frequency arm ergometry training of low to moderate intensity could not show improved walking ability or cognitive functioning in progressive MS compared to a waitlist CG. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03147105) and funded by the local MS self-help organization.

Keywords: aerobic exercise; arm ergometry; cognition; multiple sclerosis; progressive multiple sclerosis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Heinrich, Rosenthal, Patra, Schulz, Welsch, Vettorazzi, Rosenkranz, Stellmann, Ramien, Pöttgen, Gold and Heesen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design: The figure shows the inclusion criteria, the examinations before randomization (T0, Baseline) to either an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG) and the examination of both groups after 12 weeks (T1). Between T0 and T1, the IG completed a 12-week home-based training. After study completion (T1), patients of the CG were offered the same 12-week home-based training (waitlist).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Arm ergometer (Motomed, Reck). The figure shows the arm ergometer used in the trial.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Flow chart. The figure shows the participant flow chart starting with the assessment for eligibility for participation and through to study completion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Treatment effects (complete case analyses). Difference in the main outcomes are shown as change from baseline to T1 in the control group (CG, gray) and intervention group (IG, blue). Negative values indicate a decrease from baseline to T1. Change in each group is displayed for the 6-min-walking test (A), in peak oxygen consumption (B), maximum power performed (C) 25-foot-walking-test (D), quality of life measured by the hamburg Quality of Life in MS Questionnaire 10.0 (here, lower scores indicate higher QoL) (E) and the MS-walking-scale-12 (F). Each data point depicts the change of an individual participant from baseline to T1, boxplots represent median and interquartile range. 6 MWT, Six minute walking test; VO2peak/kg, Peak oxygen consumption; Pmax, maximal Power, T25W, Timed 25-foot walk; HAQUAMS, Hamburger Quality of Life Questionnaire in Multiple Sclerosis; MSWS-12, 12-item MS Walking Scale.

References

    1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, Hemmer B, Ciccarelli O. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. (2018) 6736:1–15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30481-1
    1. Heesen C, Haase R, Melzig S, Poettgen J, Berghoff M, Paul F, et al. . Perceptions on the value of bodily functions in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. (2018) 137:356–62. 10.1111/ane.12881
    1. Shi J, Wu X, Chen Y. Study on dalfampridine in the treatment of multiple sclerosis mobility disability: a metaanalysis. PLoS ONE. (2019) 14:222288. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222288
    1. Baird JF, Sandroff BM, Motl RW. Therapies for mobility disability in persons with multiple sclerosis. Exp Rev Neurotherapeut. (2018) 18:493–502. 10.1080/14737175.2018.1478289
    1. Latimer-Cheung AE, Pilutti LA, Hicks AL, Martin Ginis KA, Fenuta AM, MacKibbon KA, et al. . Effects of exercise training on fitness, mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review to inform guideline development. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2013) 94:1800–28.e3. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.020
    1. Campbell E, Coulter EH, Paul L. High intensity interval training for people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Multiple Scler Related Disord. (2018) 24:55–63. 10.1016/j.msard.2018.06.005
    1. Edwards T, Pilutti L. The effect of exercise training in adults with multiple sclerosis with severe mobility disability: A systematic review and future research directions. Multiple Scler Related Disord. (2017) 14:31–9. 10.1016/j.msard.2017.06.003
    1. Kjølhede T, Susanne S, Damian W, Jan-Patrick S, Steffen R, Bodil Ginnerup P, et al. . Can resistance training impact MRI outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis? MSJ. (2018) 24:1356–65. 10.1177/1352458517722645
    1. Ludyga S, Gerber M, Pühse U, Looser VN, Kamijo K. Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating moderators of long-term effects of exercise on cognition in healthy individuals. Nat Human Behav. (2020) 4:603–12. 10.1038/s41562-020-0851-8
    1. Briken S, Gold SM, Patra S, Vettorazzi E, Harbs D, Tallner A, et al. . Effects of exercise on fitness and cognition in progressive MS: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Mult Scler. (2014) 20:382–90. 10.1177/1352458513507358
    1. Gharakhanlou R, Wesselmann L, Rademacher A, Lampit A, Negaresh R, Kaviani M, et al. . Exercise training and cognitive performance in persons with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of clinical trials. Multiple Scler J.(2020). 10.1177/1352458520917935. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals Neurol. (2011) 69:292–302. 10.1002/ana.22366
    1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. (1983) 33: 1444–52. 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
    1. Goldman MD, Marrie RA, Cohen JA. Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Multiple Scler. (2008) 14:383–90. 10.1177/1352458507082607
    1. Jensen HB, Mamoei S, Ravnborg M, Dalgas U, Stenager E. Distribution-based estimates of minimum clinically important difference in cognition, arm function and lower body function after slow release-fampridine treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. (2016) 7:58–60. 10.1016/j.msard.2016.03.007
    1. Stellmann JP, Vettorazzi E, Poettgen J, Heesen C. A 3meter Timed Tandem Walk is an early marker of motor and cerebellar impairment in fully ambulatory MS patients. J Neurol Sci. (2014) 346:99–106. 10.1016/j.jns.2014.08.001
    1. Hobart J, Blight AR, Goodman A, Lynn F, Putzki N. Timed 25-foot walk: direct evidence that improving 20% or greater is clinically meaningful in MS. Neurology. (2013) 80:1509–17. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828cf7f3
    1. Sebastião E, Sandroff BM, Learmonth YC, Motl RW. Validity of the timed up and go test as a measure of functional mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation. (2016) 97:1072–7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.031
    1. Hobart JC, Blight AR, Goodman A, Lynn F, Putzki N. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability. Multiple Scler. (2003) 60:31–6. 10.1212/WNL.60.1.31
    1. Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (1982) 14:377–381. 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
    1. Helmstaedter C, Lendt M, Lux S. Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest. Diagnostica. (1999) 45:205–11. 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.205
    1. Zimmermann PFB. Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprüfung. Psytest: Würselen; (1994).
    1. Filser M, Schreiber H, Pöttgen J, Ullrich S, Lang M, Penner IK. The brief international cognitive assessment in multiple sclerosis (BICAMS): results from the German validation study. J Neurol. (2018) 265:2587–93. 10.1007/s00415-018-9034-1
    1. Tam JW, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The role of processing speed in the brief visuospatial memory test - Revised. Clin. Neuropsychol. (2013) 27:962–72. 10.1080/13854046.2013.797500
    1. López-Góngora M, Querol L, Escartín A. A one-year follow-up study of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An appraisal of comparative longitudinal sensitivity. BMC Neurol. (2015) 15:296. 10.1186/s12883-015-0296-2
    1. Schäffler N, Schönberg P, Stephan J, Stellmann JP, Gold SM. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. (2013) 128:114–21. 10.1111/ane.12083
    1. Penner IK, Raselli C, Stöcklin M, Opwis K, Kappos L, Calabrese P. The fatigue scale for motor and cognitive functions (FSMC): validation of a new instrument to assess multiple sclerosis-related fatigue. Multiple Sclerosis. (2009) 15:1509–17. 10.1177/1352458509348519
    1. Hautzinger M, Bailer M, Worrall H, Keller F. Beck-depressions-inventar (BDI). Testhandbuch der deutschen Ausgabe. Huber, Bern (1995).
    1. Fischer A, Fischer M, Nicholls R, Lau S, Poettgen J, Patas K, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy for major depression in multiple sclerosis using self-report questionnaires. Brain Behavior. (2015) 5:e00365. 10.1002/brb3.365
    1. Hautzinger M. The beck depression inventory in clinical practice. Nervenarzt. (1991) 62:689–96.
    1. Ytterberg C, Johansson S, Andersson M, Holmqvist LW, von Koch. L. Variations in functioning and disability in multiple sclerosis: a two-year prospective study. J Neurol. (2008) 255:967–73. 10.1007/s00415-008-0767-0
    1. Baquet L, Hasselmann H, Patra S, Stellmann J, Vettorazzi E, Engel AK, et al. . Short-term interval aerobic exercise training does not improve memory functioning in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis—a randomized controlled trial. PeerJ. (2018) 6:e6037. 10.1101/366161
    1. Westhoff M, Rühle KH, Greiwing A, Schomaker R, Eschenbacher H, Siepmann M, et al. . Ventilatorische und metabolische (Laktat-)Schwellen: positionspapier der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Spiroergometrie. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift. (2013) 138:275–80. 10.1055/s-0032-1332843
    1. Valent LJM, Dallmeijer AJ, Houdijk H, Slootmann HJ, Janssen TW, Post MWM, et al. . Effects of hand cycle training on physical capacity in individuals with tetraplegia: a clinical trial. Physical Therapy. (2009) 89:1051–60. 10.2522/ptj.20080340
    1. Jacobs PL. Effects of resistance and endurance training in persons with paraplegia. Med Sci Sports Exercise. (2009) 41:992–7. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318191757f
    1. Hettinga FJ, Hoogwerf M, van der Woude LHV. Handcycling: training effects of a specific dose of upper body endurance training in females. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2016) 116:1387–94. 10.1007/s00421-016-3395-x
    1. Pogliaghi S, Terziotti T, Cevese A, Balestreri F, Schena F. Adaptations to endurance training in the healthy elderly: arm cranking versus leg cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol. (2006) 97:723–31. 10.1007/s00421-006-0229-2
    1. Tew G, Nawaz S, Zwierska I, Saxton JM. Limb-specific and cross-transfer effects of arm-crank exercise training in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Clin Sci. (2009) 117:405–13. 10.1042/CS20080688
    1. Zwierska I, Walker RD, Choksy SA, Male JS, Pockley AG, Saxton JM. Upper- vs lower-limb aerobic exercise rehabilitation in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Vascular Surgery. (2005) 42:1122–30. 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.08.021
    1. O'Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J. et al. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. (2015) 1:32. 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y
    1. Tramacere I, Del Giovane C, Salanti G, D'Amico R, Filippini G. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) 2015:Cd011381. 10.1002/14651858.CD011381.pub2
    1. Ozkul C, Guclu-Gunduz A, Eldemir K, Apaydin Y, Yazici G, Irkec C. Combined exercise training improves cognitive functions in multiple sclerosis patients with cognitive impairment: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Multiple Scler Related Disord. (2020) 2020:102419. 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102419
    1. Kjolhede T, Vissing K, Dalgas U. Multiple sclerosis and progressive resistance training: a systematic review. Mult Scler. (2012) 18:1215–28. 10.1177/1352458512437418

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel