Brincidofovir Is Not a Substrate for the Human Organic Anion Transporter 1: A Mechanistic Explanation for the Lack of Nephrotoxicity Observed in Clinical Studies

Timothy K Tippin, Marion E Morrison, Thomas M Brundage, Hervé Momméja-Marin, Timothy K Tippin, Marion E Morrison, Thomas M Brundage, Hervé Momméja-Marin

Abstract

Background: Brincidofovir (BCV) is an orally bioavailable lipid conjugate of cidofovir (CDV) with increased in vitro potency relative to CDV against all 5 families of double-stranded DNA viruses that cause human disease. After intravenous (IV) administration of CDV, the organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1) transports CDV from the blood into the renal proximal tubule epithelial cells with resulting dose-limiting nephrotoxicity.

Objective: To study whether OAT1 transports BCV and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and renal safety profile of oral BCV compared with IV CDV.

Methods: The cellular uptake of BCV and its major metabolites was assessed in vitro. Renal function at baseline and during and after treatment in subjects in BCV clinical studies was examined.

Results: In OAT1-expressing cells, uptake of BCV and its 2 major metabolites (CMX103 and CMX064) was the same as in mock-transfected control cells and was not inhibited by the OAT inhibitor probenecid. In human pharmacokinetic studies, BCV administration at therapeutic doses resulted in detection of CDV as a circulating metabolite; peak CDV plasma concentrations after oral BCV administration in humans were <1% of those observed after IV CDV administration at therapeutic doses. Analysis of renal function and adverse events from 3 BCV clinical studies in immunocompromised adult and pediatric subjects indicated little to no evidence of associated nephrotoxicity. Over 80% of subjects who switched from CDV or foscarnet to BCV experienced an improvement in renal function as measured by maximum on-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Conclusions: The lack of BCV uptake through OAT1, together with lower CDV concentrations after oral BCV compared with IV CDV administration, likely explains the superior renal safety profile observed in immunocompromised subjects receiving BCV compared with CDV.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01143181 NCT00942305 NCT01241344.

Conflict of interest statement

T. K. Tippin, M. E. Morrison, and T. M. Brundage are employees and shareholders of Chimerix. H. Momméja-Marin was formerly an employee of Chimerix.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Chemical structures of BCV and metabolites.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Net OAT1-mediated uptake of BCV, CDV, CMX103, and CMX064 in the absence or presence of probenecid. Net OAT1-mediated uptake was determined from total uptake in OAT1-expressing cells minus uptake in mock-transfected control cells after incubation with 5 μM BCV, 25 μM CDV, 25 μM CMX103, or 25 μM CMX064 for 5 minutes in the presence or absence of 100 μM probenecid. Data are mean and SD of triplicate or quadruplicate samples from one experiment. *P < 0.05 versus mock-transfected cells; †Significantly lower uptake in the presence of probenecid, a nonspecific inhibitor of OAT1.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Mean change from BL in eGFR in virally infected subjects administered BCV (CMX001) or placebo (CMV Prevention Study). Mean change from BL in eGFR as calculated through the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (4 inputs) is presented by visit and dose. P-values (Satterthwaite t test) for CMX001 100 mg BIW relative to pooled placebo: *Week 8, P = 0.0013 (CMX001 n = 31, placebo n = 36); †week 10, P = 0.0103 (CMX001 n = 21, placebo n = 21); ‡posttreatment week 1, P = 0.0025 (CMX001 n = 49, placebo n = 57).
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Percentages of subjects with stable or improved renal function based on CKD stage after multiple administrations of BCV (CMX001). eGFR was calculated for each subject and assigned to one of the 5 stages of CKD: stages 1 and 2, eGFR ≥60 mL·min−1·1.73 m−2; stage 3, 30–59 mL·min−1·1.73 m−2; and stages 4 and 5, ≤29 mL·min−1·1.73 m−2. Subjects were judged to have stable or improved renal function if the highest on-treatment CKD stage or last on-treatment CKD stage was the same as or lower than BL. Data are from the AdV Preemptive Treatment Study (Study 202 Pediatric) and the Expanded Access Study (Study 350 Pediatric, Study 350 Adult). Data from the Expanded Access Study are separated by dose for the adult subjects. wk, week.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Percentages of subjects with improved eGFR from BL after multiple administrations of BCV in virally infected subjects with previous CDV use (Expanded Access Study). BL and on-treatment eGFR were estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (4 inputs) formula in adult subjects and the Schwartz formula in pediatric subjects.

References

    1. Cihlar T, Lin DC, Pritchard JB, et al. The antiviral nucleotide analogs cidofovir and adefovir are novel substrates for human and rat renal organic anion transporter 1. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;56:570–580.
    1. Cihlar T, Ho ES, Lin DC, et al. Human renal organic anion transporter 1 (hOAT1) and its role in the nephrotoxicity of antiviral nucleotide analogs. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2001;20:641–648.
    1. Ho ES, Lin DC, Mendel DB, et al. Cytotoxicity of antiviral nucleotides adefovir and cidofovir is induced by the expression of human renal organic anion transporter 1. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:383–393.
    1. Gilead Vistide (cidofovir injection) prescribing information. Available at: . Accessed August 19, 2015.
    1. Lacy SA, Hitchcock MJ, Lee WA, et al. Effect of oral probenecid coadministration on the chronic toxicity and pharmacokinetics of intravenous cidofovir in cynomolgus monkeys. Toxicol Sci. 1998;44:97–106.
    1. Sweet DH. Organic anion transporter (Slc22a) family members as mediators of toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005;204:198–215.
    1. Cundy KC, Li ZH, Lee WA. Effect of probenecid on the distribution, metabolism, and excretion of cidofovir in rabbits. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996;24:315–321.
    1. Polis MA, Spooner KM, Baird BF, et al. Anticytomegaloviral activity and safety of cidofovir in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and cytomegalovirus viruria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:882–886.
    1. Lanier R, Trost L, Tippin T, et al. Development of CMX001 for the treatment of poxvirus infections. Viruses. 2010;2:2740–2762.
    1. Bidanset DJ, Beadle JR, Wan WB, et al. Oral activity of ether lipid ester prodrugs of cidofovir against experimental human cytomegalovirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:499–503.
    1. Kern ER, Collins DJ, Wan WB, et al. Oral treatment of murine cytomegalovirus infections with ether lipid esters of cidofovir. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:3516–3522.
    1. Toth K, Spencer JF, Dhar D, et al. Hexadecyloxypropyl-cidofovir, CMX001, prevents adenovirus-induced mortality in a permissive, immunosuppressed animal model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7293–7297.
    1. Buller RM, Owens G, Schriewer J, et al. Efficacy of oral active ether lipid analogs of cidofovir in a lethal mousepox model. Virology. 2004;318:474–481.
    1. Rice AD, Adams MM, Wallace G, et al. Efficacy of CMX001 as a post exposure antiviral in New Zealand White rabbits infected with rabbitpox virus, a model for orthopoxvirus infections of humans. Viruses. 2011;3:47–62.
    1. Rice AD, Adams MM, Lampert B, et al. Efficacy of CMX001 as a prophylactic and presymptomatic antiviral agent in New Zealand white rabbits infected with rabbitpox virus, a model for orthopoxvirus infections of humans. Viruses. 2011;3:63–82.
    1. Trost LC, Rose ML, Khouri J, et al. The efficacy and pharmacokinetics of brincidofovir for the treatment of lethal rabbitpox virus infection: a model of smallpox disease. Antivir Res. 2015;117:115–121.
    1. Tippin T, Lampert BM, Ware RW, et al. Metabolism and Disposition of 14C-CMX001 in Rats, Monkeys and Humans. 18th North American Regional International Society for the Study of Xenobiotics (ISSX) Meeting; October 14–18, 2012; Dallas, TX. 2012; ISSX Online Abstracts; suppl 7:47.
    1. Marty FM, Winston DJ, Rowley SD, et al. CMX001 to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1227–1236.
    1. Grimley M, Chemaly R, Englund J, et al. The First Interventional Trial for Adenovirus (AdV): Brincidofovir (CMX001) for AdV in HCT. 53rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; September 10–13, 2013; Denver, CO. 2013; Abstract T-351a.
    1. Painter W, Robertson A, Trost LC, et al. First pharmacokinetic and safety study in humans of the novel lipid antiviral conjugate CMX001, a broad-spectrum oral drug active against double-stranded DNA viruses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:2726–2734.
    1. Schwartz GJ, Work DF. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:1832–1843.
    1. Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, et al. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–254.
    1. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification. Available at: . Accessed September 30, 2015.
    1. Wright SH, Dantzler WH. Molecular and cellular physiology of renal organic cation and anion transport. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:987–1049.
    1. Sweet DH, Bush KT, Nigam SK. The organic anion transporter family: from physiology to ontogeny and the clinic. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2001;281:F197–F205.
    1. Cihlar T, Laflamme G, Fisher R, et al. Novel nucleotide human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase inhibitor GS-9148 with a low nephrotoxic potential: characterization of renal transport and accumulation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:150–156.
    1. Uwai Y, Ida H, Tsuji Y, et al. Renal transport of adefovir, cidofovir, and tenofovir by SLC22A family members (hOAT1, hOAT3, and hOCT2). Pharm Res. 2007;24:811–815.
    1. Cundy KC. Clinical pharmacokinetics of the antiviral nucleotide analogues cidofovir and adefovir. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36:127–143.
    1. Cundy KC, Li ZH, Hitchcock MJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in monkeys. Evidence for a prolonged elimination phase representing phosphorylated drug. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996;24:738–744.
    1. Hsu V, de Vieira LTM, Zhao P, et al. Towards quantitation of the effects of renal impairment and probenecid inhibition on kidney uptake and efflux transporters, using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and simulations. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2014;53:283–293.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel