Non-invasive stimulation techniques to relieve abdominal/pelvic pain: Is more always better?

Marie-Philippe Harvey, Alain Watier, Émilie Dufort Rouleau, Guillaume Léonard, Marie-Philippe Harvey, Alain Watier, Émilie Dufort Rouleau, Guillaume Léonard

Abstract

Chronic abdominal and pelvic pain is a common condition that has significant impact on quality of life, and causes billions of dollars in direct and indirect costs. Emerging data suggest that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), alone or in combination with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), could be a promising therapeutic avenue to reduce chronic pain. The encouraging results coming from these studies prompted us to try combining TENS and tDCS in 4 of our patients who suffered from chronic abdominal/pelvic pain and to compare the effect with 5 other patients who received TENS alone. Pain intensity was assessed with a visual analog scale before, during and after the stimulation. We observed that there was a slight decrease in pain which was similar in both patient groups (TENS alone and TENS combined with tDCS). These observations suggest that combining TENS and tDCS in patients suffering from chronic pelvic and/or abdominal pain produces no additional benefit, compared to TENS alone. Future studies, looking at the effect of several/consecutive TENS and tDCS sessions should be conducted.

Keywords: Abdominal pain; Chronic pain; Pelvic pain; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Léonard G has received research funding from Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec; Watier A and Dufort Rouleau É are employees of the Sherbrooke University Hospital Centre; Watier A and Léonard G are employees of the University of Sherbrooke.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pain intensity assessed with a 10 cm visual analog scale ranges from 0 to 10. Each point represents mean ± SEM (standard error of mean). There were 5 patients in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) group and 4 patients in the TENS + transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) group.

References

    1. Chiarioni G, Asteria C, Whitehead WE. Chronic proctalgia and chronic pelvic pain syndromes: new etiologic insights and treatment options. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4447–4455.
    1. Sharma A, Lelic D, Brock C, Paine P, Aziz Q. New technologies to investigate the brain-gut axis. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:182–191.
    1. Fenton BW, Palmieri PA, Boggio P, Fanning J, Fregni F. A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain. Brain Stimul. 2009;2:103–107.
    1. Schabrun SM, Jones E, Elgueta Cancino EL, Hodges PW. Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:451–459.
    1. Istek A, Gungor Ugurlucan F, Yasa C, Gokyildiz S, Yalcin O. Randomized trial of long-term effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on chronic pelvic pain. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290:291–298.
    1. Gokyildiz S, Kizilkaya Beji N, Yalcin O, Istek A. Effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation therapy on chronic pelvic pain. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73:99–105.
    1. Antal A, Terney D, Kühnl S, Paulus W. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates chronic pain and reduces short intracortical inhibition. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39:890–903.
    1. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88:287–294.
    1. Léonard G, Cloutier C, Marchand S. Reduced analgesic effect of acupuncture-like TENS but not conventional TENS in opioid-treated patients. J Pain. 2011;12:213–221.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel