Single-arm, open-label, dose escalation phase I study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation with electroencephalography biomarkers in paediatric disorders of consciousness: a study protocol

Ghazala T Saleem, Joshua Benjamin Ewen, Jewel E Crasta, Beth S Slomine, Gabriela Lucila Cantarero, Stacy J Suskauer, Ghazala T Saleem, Joshua Benjamin Ewen, Jewel E Crasta, Beth S Slomine, Gabriela Lucila Cantarero, Stacy J Suskauer

Abstract

Introduction: Children with disorders of consciousness (DOC) represent the highest end of the acquired brain injury (ABI) severity spectrum for survivors and experience a multitude of functional impairments. Current clinical management in DOC uses behavioural evaluation measures and interventions that fail to (1) describe the physiological consequences of ABI and (2) elicit functional gains. In paediatric DOC, there is a critical need to develop evidence-based interventions to promote recovery of basic responses to improve rehabilitation and aid decision-making for medical teams and caregivers. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the safety, tolerability and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in children with DOC.

Methods and analysis: This study is an open-label dose escalation trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and feasibility of tDCS in 10 children (5-17 years) receiving inpatient rehabilitation for DOC. This study will follow a modified rule-based design, allowing for intrapatient escalation, where a cohort of patients will be assigned to an initial tDCS current of 0.5 or 1 mA based on participant's head circumference and according to the safety data available in other paediatric populations. The subsequent assignment of increased current (1 or 2 mA) according to the prespecified rules will be based on the clinical observation of adverse events in the patients. The study will include up to three, 20 min sessions of anodal tDCS (sham, 0.5 or 1 mA, 1 or 2 mA) applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The primary outcomes are adverse events, pain associated with tDCS and intolerable disruption of inpatient care. Secondary outcomes are changes in electroencephalography (EEG) phase-locking and event-related potential components and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised total score from prestimulation to poststimulation.

Ethics and dissemination: The Johns Hopkins IRB (#IRB00174966) approved this study. Trial results will be disseminated through journals and conferences.

Registration number: NCT03618849.

Keywords: brain injuries; child; electroencephalography; tDCS; transcranial direct current stimulation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart. AE, adverse event; CRS-R, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised; EEG, electroencephalography; FLACC, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

References

    1. Yeh N, Slomine BS, Paasch V, et al. . Rehabilitation in children with disorder of consciousness. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2019;7:94–103. 10.1007/s40141-019-0214-4
    1. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. . Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of rehabilitation medicine; and the National Institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99:1699–709. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.001
    1. Chung MG, Lo WD. Noninvasive brain stimulation: the potential for use in the rehabilitation of pediatric acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015;96:S129–S137. 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.013
    1. Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M. Emerging treatments for traumatic brain injury. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2009;14:67–84. 10.1517/14728210902769601
    1. Bender A, Jox RJ, Grill E, et al. . Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic procedures. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015;112:235–42. 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0235
    1. Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, et al. . A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2011;14:1133–45. 10.1017/S1461145710001690
    1. Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson MD, et al. . Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimul 2015;8:76–87. 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012
    1. Thibaut A, Bruno M-A, Ledoux D, et al. . tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology 2014;82:1112–8. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260
    1. Rivera-Urbina GN, Nitsche MA, Vicario CM, et al. . Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Rev Neurosci 2017;28:173–84. 10.1515/revneuro-2016-0045
    1. Gillick B, Menk J, Mueller B, et al. . Synergistic effect of combined transcranial direct current stimulation/constraint-induced movement therapy in children and young adults with hemiparesis: study protocol. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:178 10.1186/s12887-015-0498-1
    1. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 2008;1:206–23. 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004
    1. Bolognini N, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Using non-invasive brain stimulation to augment motor training-induced plasticity. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:8 10.1186/1743-0003-6-8
    1. Angelakis E, Liouta E, Andreadis N, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation effects in disorders of consciousness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:283–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.002
    1. Duarte NdeAC, Grecco LAC, Galli M, et al. . Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with treadmill training on balance and functional performance in children with cerebral palsy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2014;9:e105777 10.1371/journal.pone.0105777
    1. Stoykov ME, Madhavan S. Motor priming in neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther 2015;39:33–42. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000065
    1. Peters HT, Edwards DJ, Wortman-Jutt S, et al. . Moving forward by stimulating the brain: transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke hemiparesis. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00394
    1. Saleem GT, Crasta JE, Slomine BS, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric motor disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2019;100:724–38. 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.011
    1. Binzer I, Schmidt HU, Timmermann T, et al. . Immediate responses to individual dialogic music therapy in patients in low awareness states. Brain Inj 2016;30:919–25. 10.3109/02699052.2016.1144082
    1. O’Kelly J, James L, Palaniappan R, et al. . Neurophysiological and behavioral responses to music therapy in vegetative and minimally conscious states. Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7.
    1. Thibaut A, Di Perri C, Chatelle C, et al. . Clinical Response to tDCS Depends on Residual Brain Metabolism and Grey Matter Integrity in Patients With Minimally Conscious State. Brain Stimul 2015;8:1116–23. 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.024
    1. Napolitani M, Bodart O, Canali P, et al. . Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with high-density EEG in altered states of consciousness. Brain Inj 2014;28:1180–9. 10.3109/02699052.2014.920524
    1. Bai Y, Xia X, Wang Y, et al. . Fronto-Parietal coherence response to tDCS modulation in patients with disorders of consciousness. Int J Neurosci 2018;128:587–94. 10.1080/00207454.2017.1403440
    1. Bowyer SM. Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present. Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol 2016;2 10.1186/s40810-015-0015-7
    1. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, et al. . Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 1999;8:194–208. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)8:4<194::AID-HBM4>;2-C
    1. Morlet D, Fischer C. MMN and novelty P3 in coma and other altered states of consciousness: a review. Brain Topogr 2014;27:467–79. 10.1007/s10548-013-0335-5
    1. Zhang Y, Song W, Du J, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: combined behavioral and event-related potential evidence. Front Neurol 2017;8 10.3389/fneur.2017.00620
    1. Englander J, Cifu DX, Diaz-Arrastia R. Seizures and traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:1223–4. 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.002
    1. Ekici B. Transcranial direct current stimulation–induced seizure clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2015. Available: [Accessed 25 Jan 2018].
    1. Thibaut A, Wannez S, Donneau A-F, et al. . Controlled clinical trial of repeated prefrontal tDCS in patients with chronic minimally conscious state. Brain Inj 2017;31:466–74. 10.1080/02699052.2016.1274776
    1. Gillick BT, Kirton A, Carmel JB, et al. . Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:739 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00739
    1. Kessler SK, Minhas P, Woods AJ, et al. . Dosage considerations for transcranial direct current stimulation in children: a computational modeling study. PLoS One 2013;8:e76112 10.1371/journal.pone.0076112
    1. Nellhaus G. Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics 1968;41:106–14.
    1. Kirton A, Ciechanski P, Zewdie E, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation for children with perinatal stroke and hemiparesis. Neurology 2017;88:259–67. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003518
    1. Collange Grecco LA, de Almeida Carvalho Duarte N, Mendonça ME, et al. . Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with virtual reality for improving gait in children with spastic diparetic cerebral palsy: a pilot, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2015;29:1212–23. 10.1177/0269215514566997
    1. Andrade AC, Magnavita GM, Allegro JVBN, et al. . Feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation use in children aged 5 to 12 years. J Child Neurol 2014;29:1360–5. 10.1177/0883073813503710
    1. Crellin DJ, Harrison D, Santamaria N, et al. . The psychometric properties of the flacc scale used to assess procedural pain. J Pain 2018;19:862–72. 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.02.013
    1. Chertin B, Zeldin A, Kocherov S, et al. . Use of caudal analgesia supplemented with low dose of morphine in children who undergo renal surgery. Curr Urol 2015;9:132–7. 10.1159/000442867
    1. Teplan M. Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Meas Sci Rev 2002;2.
    1. Kayser J, Tenke CE. Principal components analysis of Laplacian waveforms as a generic method for identifying Erp generator patterns: I. evaluation with auditory oddball tasks. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:348–68. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.034
    1. Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK coma recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:2020–9.
    1. Gillick BT, Gordon AM, Feyma T, et al. . Non-Invasive brain stimulation in children with unilateral cerebral palsy: a protocol and risk mitigation guide. Front Pediatr 2018;6 10.3389/fped.2018.00056
    1. Verrusio W, Ettorre E, Vicenzini E, et al. . The Mozart effect: a quantitative EEG study. Conscious Cogn 2015;35:150–5. 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.005
    1. Thair H, Holloway AL, Newport R, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a beginner's guide for design and implementation. Front Neurosci 2017;11:641 10.3389/fnins.2017.00641
    1. Oberfeld D, Franke T. Evaluating the robustness of repeated measures analyses: the case of small sample sizes and nonnormal data. Behav Res Methods 2013;45:792–812. 10.3758/s13428-012-0281-2
    1. Brunner E, Puri ML. Nonparametric methods in factorial designs. Statistical Papers 2001;42:1–52. 10.1007/s003620000039
    1. Hupfeld KE, Ketcham CJ. Behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor and language planning in minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): feasibility, limitations and future directions. J Child Dev Disord 2016;2 10.4172/2472-1786.100029
    1. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al. . The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002;58:349–53. 10.1212/WNL.58.3.349

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel