What would 'upscaling' involve? A qualitative study of international variation in stroke rehabilitation

Kimberley Elizabeth Watkins, William Mark Magnus Levack, Farooq Azam Rathore, Elizabeth Jean Carleton Hay-Smith, Kimberley Elizabeth Watkins, William Mark Magnus Levack, Farooq Azam Rathore, Elizabeth Jean Carleton Hay-Smith

Abstract

Background: Demand for stroke rehabilitation is expected to grow dramatically; with the estimated prevalence of stroke survivors rising to 70 million worldwide by 2030. The World Health Organization's (WHO) report - Rehabilitation 2030: A call for action - has introduced the objective of 'upscaling' rehabilitation globally to meet demand. This research explored what upscaling stroke rehabilitation might mean for health professionals from countries at different stages of economic development.

Methods: Qualitative descriptive study design using semi-structured interviews was employed. Purposively sampled, clinical leaders in stroke rehabilitation were recruited for interviews from low through to high-income countries.

Results: Twelve rehabilitation professionals (medicine, physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech and language therapy) from high (United States of America, Germany, United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, New Zealand), upper-middle (Colombia and Turkey), lower-middle (Vietnam, Pakistan, Ghana), and low-income countries (Nepal and Sierra Leone) were interviewed. Upscaling was seen as a necessity. Successful scaling up will require initiatives addressing: political governance and managerial leadership, increasing knowledge and awareness of the value of rehabilitation, financial support, workforce developments, physical space and infrastructure, and the development of community services and reintegration.

Conclusion: Although there have been many gains within the development of stroke rehabilitation internationally, further investment is required to ensure that this patient population group continues to receive the best quality services. For the WHO to be successful in implementing their objective to upscale rehabilitation, specific attention will need to be paid to political, professional, economic, and sociocultural issues at global and local levels.

Keywords: Developing countries; Physical and rehabilitation medicine; Rehabilitation; Stroke rehabilitation; World Health Organization.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163–2196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2.
    1. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
    1. World Health Organization . Rehabilitation 2030: a call for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
    1. Langlois EV, Tunçalp Ö, Norris SL, Askew I, Ghaffar A. Qualitative evidence to improve guidelines and health decision-making. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(2):79–79A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.206540.
    1. Johnson W, Onuma O, Owolabi M, Sachdev S. Stroke: a global response is needed. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(9):634–634A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.181636.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>;2-G.
    1. World Bank Group . World Bank Country and Lending Groups. 2018.
    1. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
    1. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
    1. Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H. Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open. 2014;4(1):1–10. doi: 10.1177/2158244014522633.
    1. QRS International . NVivo (Version 12) [Computer Software] 2018.
    1. World Bank Group . GNI per capita, Atlas method (current US$) 2019.
    1. Haig AJ, Im J, Adewole D, Nelson V, Krabak B. The practice of physical and rehabilitation medicine in Sub-Saharan Africa and Antarctica: A white paper or a black mark? J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(6):401–405. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0367.
    1. Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry MD. Health-related rehabilitation services: Assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-276.
    1. Marshall IJ, Wang Y, Crichton S, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CDA. The effects of socioeconomic status on stroke risk and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(12):1206–1224. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00200-8.
    1. Ouyang F, Wang Y, Huang W, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Dang G, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and post-stroke functional outcome in deprived rural southern China: A population-based study. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(12):1–9.
    1. Prvu Bettger J, Liu C, Gandhi DBC, Sylaja PN, Jayaram N, Pandian JD. Emerging areas of stroke rehabilitation research in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. Stroke. 2019;50(11):3307–3313. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.023565.
    1. Kamenov K, Mills J-A, Chatterji S, Cieza A. Needs and unmet needs for rehabilitation services: A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(10):1227–1237. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1422036.
    1. Scheffler E, Mash R. Surviving a stroke in South Africa: outcomes of home-based care in a low-resource rural setting. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26(6):423–434. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1623473.
    1. Lindsay P, Furie KL, Davis SM, Donnan GA, Norrving B. World Stroke Organization Global Stroke Services Guidelines and Action Plan. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(10):4–13. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12371.
    1. Khan F, Owolabi MO, Amatya B, Hamzat TK, Ogunniyi A, Oshinowo H, et al. Challenges and barriers for implementation of the world health organization global disability action plan in low-and middle-income countries. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(4):367–376. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2276.
    1. Morris LD, Grimmer KA, Twizeyemariya A, Coetzee A, Leibbrandt DC, Louw QA. Health system challenges affecting rehabilitation services in South Africa. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;0(0):1–7.
    1. World Health Organization . Global strategy on human resources for health: Workforce 2030. World Health Organisation; 2016.
    1. Baaetiema L, Aikins A d-G, Sav A, Mnatzaganian G, CKY C, Somerset S, et al. Barriers to evidence-based acute stroke care in Ghana: A qualitative study on the perspectives of stroke care professionals. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):1–11.
    1. Nordin NAM, Aziz NAA, Aziz AFA, Singh DKA, Othman NAO, Sulong S, et al. Exploring views on long term rehabilitation for people with stroke in a developing country: Findings from focus group discussions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(118):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-118.
    1. Pandian JD, Srikanth V, Read SJ, Thrift AG. Poverty and stroke in India: A time to act. Stroke. 2007;38(11):3063–3069. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.496869.
    1. Rathore FA, Malik T, Waheed A, Butt AW. Pit falls in stroke rehabilitation: A Pakistani perspective. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2009;59(1):38–42.
    1. Rathore FA, Wasay M. Acute stroke care and long term rehabilitation in Pakistan: Challenges and solutions. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66(10):1203–1204.
    1. World Health Organization. Meeting on rehabilitation in Universal Health Coverage. Manila; 2017. Available from: . Cited 2019 Nov 19

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel