Effectiveness of bovine-derived xenograft versus bioactive glass with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics in adults: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

Maha A Bahammam, Maha A Bahammam

Abstract

Background: Periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) combines periodontal therapy with orthodontic therapy, which minimises treatment time. This study compared the effectiveness of a bovine-derived xenograft with that of bioactive glass when combined with PAOO for the treatment of adult patients with moderate crowding of the teeth.

Methods: In this prospective, single-masked clinical trial, 33 orthodontic patients (20 women, 13 men; mean age 21.2 ± 1.43 [18 - 27] years), were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Group 1 underwent a modified corticotomy technique on the labial side only, whereas group 2 was treated with the same technique combined with PAOO using a bovine-derived xenograft and group 3 was treated in the same way but combining PAOO with bioactive glass. The total treatment duration was recorded from the start of active orthodontic treatment, immediately after corticotomy, and at the time of debonding. Probing depth was evaluated clinically and bone density and root length were evaluated radiographically on the day of surgery (baseline, T1), post-treatment at debonding (T2), and 9 months post-treatment (T3).

Results: The duration of orthodontic treatment was markedly reduced to an average of 11.4 ± 0.14 weeks in all groups. All probing depths were < 3 mm, the interdental papillae were well preserved, there was no loss of tooth vitality, and there was no evidence of significant apical root resorption at any time interval. All groups showed a decrease in mean bone density at T2 followed by an increase at T3. The net percentage change that occurred between baseline and 9 months post-treatment was significantly different between the three groups. Groups 2 and 3, where grafts were incorporated, demonstrated a statistically significant greater increase in bone density than group 1 at T3.

Conclusion: Combination of orthodontic treatment and periodontal surgery is an effective treatment for adult patients that decreases the duration of active treatment and reduces the risk of root resorption. Use of a bovine-derived xenograft with modified corticotomy provided superior benefits in terms of increased bone density than did the use of bioactive glass.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02796911 .

Keywords: Alveolar bone density; Bone grafts; Corticotomy-assisted orthodontic treatment; Root resorption.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical procedures
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Occlusal and frontal Pre and post treatment intraoral pictures
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiographic assessment

References

    1. Mathews DP, Kokich VG. Managing treatment for the orthodontic patient with periodontal problems. Semin Orthod. 1997;3(1):21–38. doi: 10.1016/S1073-8746(97)80037-0.
    1. Kocadereli I. Changes in soft tissue profile after orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(1):67–72. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.125235.
    1. Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C, Kowalski CJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81708-1.
    1. Ong MM, Wang HL. Periodontic and orthodontic treatment in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(4):420–8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126597.
    1. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2001;35(5):331–9.
    1. Wilcko MT, Wilcko WM, Pulver JJ, Bissada NF, Bouquot JE. Accelerated osteogenic orthodontics technique: a 1-stage surgically facilitated rapid orthodontic technique with alveolar augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(10):2149–59. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.095.
    1. Hajji SS. The influence of accelerated osteogenic response on mandibular de- crowding; 2000
    1. Wilcko T, Wilcko WM, Bissada NF. An evidence-based analysis of periodontally accelerated orthodontic and osteogenic techniques’ A synthesis of Scientific perspectives. Semin Orthod. 2008;14(4):305–16. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2008.07.007.
    1. Wilcko WM, Ferguson DJ, Bouquot JE, Wilcko T. Rapid orthodontic decrowding with alveolar augmentation: case report. J Orthod. 2003;4:197–205.
    1. Kole H. Surgical operations on the alveolar ridge to correct occlusal abnormalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1959;12(4):413–20. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(59)90051-9.
    1. Frost HM. The regional acceleratory phenomenon: a review. Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1983;31(1):3–9.
    1. Yaffe A, Fine N, Binderman I. Regional accelerated phenomenon in the mandible following mucoperiosteal flap surgery. J Periodontol. 1994;65(1):79–83. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.1.79.
    1. Dinesh MR, Gupta S, Yannawar V, Sharma K, Agarwal A, Lagali P, et al. Periodontally accelerated osteogenic tooth movement in orthodontics: A review. Int J Adv Health Sci. 2011;1(11):32–7.
    1. Rothe LE, Bollen AM, Little RM, Herring SW, Chaison JB, Chen CS, et al. Trabecular and cortical bone as risk factors for orthodontic relapse. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(4):476–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.023.
    1. Kim H-S, Lee Y-J, Park Y-G, K-R C, Kang TG, Choo HR, et al. Histologic assessment of the biological effects after speedy surgical orthodontics in a beagle animal model: a preliminary study. Korean J Orthod. 2011;41(5):361–70. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2011.41.5.361.
    1. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(5):696–710.
    1. Richardson CR, Mellonig JT, Brunsvold MA, McDonnell HT, Cochran DL. Clinical evaluation of Bio-Oss: a bovine-derived xenograft for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(7):421–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.1999.260702.x.
    1. Sculean A, Pietruska M, Schwarz F, Willershausen B, Arweiler NB, Auschill TM. Healing of human intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal therapy with an enamel matrix protein derivative alone or combined with a bioactive glass. A controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(1):111–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00635.x.
    1. Tadic D, Epple M. A thorough physicochemical characterisation of 14 calcium phosphate-based bone substitution materials in comparison to natural bone. Biomaterials. 2004;25(6):987–94. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00621-5.
    1. Tamai N, Myoui A, Tomita T, Nakase T, Tanaka J, Ochi T, et al. Novel hydroxyapatite ceramics with an interconnective porous structure exhibit superior osteoconduction in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(1):110–7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.1222.
    1. Trombelli L, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Needleman I, Moles D, Scabbia A. A systematic review of graft materials and biological agents for periodontal intraosseous defects. J Clin Periodontol. 2002;29(Suppl 3):117–35. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.7.x.
    1. Froum SJ, Weinberg MA, Tarnow D. Comparison of bioactive glass synthetic bone graft particles and open debridement in the treatment of human periodontal defects. A clinical study. J Periodontol. 1998;69(6):698–709. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.6.698.
    1. Keles GC, Cetinkaya BO, Albayrak D, Koprulu H, Acikgoz G. Comparison of platelet pellet and bioactive glass in periodontal regenerative therapy. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64(6):327–33. doi: 10.1080/00016350600758651.
    1. Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Schwarz F. Regeneration of periodontal tissues: combinations of barrier membranes and grafting materials - biological foundation and preclinical evidence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):106–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01263.x.
    1. Wenz B, Oesch B, Horst M. Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone. Biomaterials. 2001;22(12):1599–606. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00312-4.
    1. Vercellotti T, Podesta A. Orthodontic microsurgery: a new surgically guided technique for dental movement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(4):325–31.
    1. Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21(1):9–19.
    1. Germec D, Giray B, Kocadereli I, Enacar A. Lower incisor retraction with a modified corticotomy. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(5):882–90.
    1. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(5):428–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x.
    1. Hasan E. Orthodontic maxillary canine retraction after partial corticotomy of the buccal plate; Clinical and radiographic investigations. Cairo: Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University; 2005.
    1. Moon CH, Wee JU, Lee HS. Intrusion of overerupted molars by corticotomy and orthodontic skeletal anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):1119–25. doi: 10.2319/092705-334.1.
    1. Ren A, Lv T, Kang N, Zhao B, Chen Y, Bai D. Rapid orthodontic tooth movement aided by alveolar surgery in beagles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(2):160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.029.
    1. Suya H. Corticotomy in orthodontics. In: Hosl E, Baldauf A, eds. Mechanical and Biological Basics in Orthodontic Therapy. Heidelberg, Germany: Hutlig Buch; 1991:207-26. Quoted in: Germec D, Giray B; Kocadereli I, Enacart A. Lower incisor retraction with a modified corticotomy. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:882–90.
    1. Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:283–93.
    1. Frost HM. The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part II. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:294–309.
    1. Mostafa YA, Mohamed Salah Fayed M, Mehanni S, ElBokle NN, Heider AM. Comparison of corticotomy-facilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(4):570–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.10.052.
    1. Gantes B, Rathbun E, Anholm M. Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports. J Periodontol. 1990;61(4):234–8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1990.61.4.234.
    1. Iino S, Sakoda S, Miyawaki S. An adult bimaxillary protrusion treated with corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and titanium miniplates. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(6):1074–82. doi: 10.2319/103105-384.
    1. Lee W, Karapetyan G, Moats R, Yamashita DD, Moon HB, Ferguson DJ, et al. Corticotomy-/osteotomy-assisted tooth movement microCTs differ. J Dent Res. 2008;87(9):861–7. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700904.
    1. Sebaoun JD, Kantarci A, Turner JW, Carvalho RS, Van Dyke TE, Ferguson DJ. Modeling of trabecular bone and lamina dura following selective alveolar decortication in rats. J Periodontol. 2008;79(9):1679–88. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080024.
    1. Wang L, Lee W, Lei DL, Liu YP, Yamashita DD, Yen SL. Tisssue responses in corticotomy- and osteotomy-assisted tooth movements in rats: histology and immunostaining. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(6):770. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.010.
    1. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Martins MC, Zenobio EG, Spolidoro LC, Marcantonio E., Jr Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(1):18–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00126.x.
    1. Owman-Moll P, Kurol J, Lundgren D. Continuous versus interrupted continuous orthodontic force related to early tooth movement and root resorption. Angle Orthod. 1995;65(6):395–401.
    1. Machado I, Ferguson DJ, Wilcko WM, Wilcko MT, Alkadhara T. Root resorption following orthodontics with and without alveolar corticotomy. J Dent Res. 2002;80(301):301.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel