Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada

Shiliang Liu, Daniel Krewski, Yuanli Shi, Yue Chen, Richard T Burnett, Shiliang Liu, Daniel Krewski, Yuanli Shi, Yue Chen, Richard T Burnett

Abstract

The association between ambient air pollution and adverse health effects, such as emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and mortality from respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, has been studied extensively in many countries, including Canada. Recently, studies conducted in China, the Czech Republic, and the United States have related ambient air pollution to adverse pregnancy outcomes. In this study, we examined association between preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) among singleton live births and ambient concentrations of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone in Vancouver, Canada, for 1985-1998. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for such effects. Low birth weight was associated with exposure to SO2 during the first month of pregnancy (OR = 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01-1.22, for a 5.0 ppb increase). Preterm birth was associated with exposure to SO2 (OR = 1.09, 95% CI, 1.01-1.19, for a 5.0 ppb increase) and to CO (OR = 1.08, 95% CI, 1.01-1.15, for a 1.0 ppm increase) during the last month of pregnancy. IUGR was associated with exposure to SO2 (OR = 1.07, 95% CI, 1.01-1.13, for a 5.0 ppb increase), to NO2 (OR = 1.05, 95% CI, 1.01-1.10, for a 10.0 ppb increase), and to CO (OR = 1.06, 95% CI, 1.01-1.10, for a 1.0 ppm increase) during the first month of pregnancy. In conclusion, relatively low concentrations of gaseous air pollutants are associated with adverse effects on birth outcomes in populations experiencing diverse air pollution profiles.

References

    1. Horm Res. 1992;38(5-6):208-10
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1994 Dec;129(2):264-71
    1. Environ Res. 1994 Jan;64(1):36-52
    1. Epidemiol Rev. 1993;15(2):414-43
    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Oct;74(9):693-7
    1. Arch Environ Health. 1995 Nov-Dec;50(6):407-15
    1. BMJ. 1996 Feb 17;312(7028):410-4
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Aug;104 Suppl 4:699-714
    1. Epidemiology. 1999 Nov;10(6):666-70
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Mar 15;151(6):602-13
    1. Arch Environ Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;55(1):26-30
    1. Epidemiology. 2000 Jul;11(4):427-33
    1. JAMA. 2000 Aug 16;284(7):843-9
    1. Epidemiology. 2000 Sep;11(5):502-11
    1. N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 14;343(24):1742-9
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Nov 1;154(9):817-26
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Jan 1;155(1):17-25
    1. JAMA. 2002 Mar 6;287(9):1132-41
    1. Inhal Toxicol. 2000;12 Suppl 4:15-39
    1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1979 Mar 30;48(1 Pt 1):19-28
    1. Toxicol Lett. 1980 Jan;5(1):3-9
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Oct;93(10):1049-59
    1. Pediatrics. 1987 Oct;80(4):502-11
    1. Hereditas. 1987;107(2):197-203
    1. Am J Hypertens. 1991 Aug;4(8):700-8
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1515-28
    1. Lancet. 1993 Apr 10;341(8850):938-41
    1. Environ Res. 1997 Jan;72(1):24-31
    1. Lancet. 1997 May 31;349(9065):1582-7
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 May;105(5):514-20
    1. Epidemiology. 1997 Mar;8(2):162-7
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Jun;105(6):608-12
    1. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1997;30(2):184-95
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb 1;147(3):309-14
    1. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1998 Aug;48(8):689-700
    1. Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4122-6
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jan;107(1):17-25
    1. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999 Jan;13(1):35-57
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107(6):475-80
    1. Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jun;107 Suppl 3:451-60
    1. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Aug;56(8):539-43
    1. Mutat Res. 1993 Oct;289(2):145-55
    1. Health Rep. 1993;5(3):281-90

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel