POD1UM-303/InterAACT 2: A phase III, global, randomized, double-blind study of retifanlimab or placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell anal carcinoma

Sheela Rao, Mark Jones, Jill Bowman, Chuan Tian, Jean-Philippe Spano, Sheela Rao, Mark Jones, Jill Bowman, Chuan Tian, Jean-Philippe Spano

Abstract

Background: Squamous carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) is a human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven cancer with poor prognosis in locally advanced or recurrent settings. Carboplatin-paclitaxel is the preferred first-line regimen for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic SCAC, with the reported median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 8.1 and 20.0 months, respectively. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrates improved survival in HPV-driven cervical and head and neck cancers. Retifanlimab (INCMGA00012) is an investigational humanized, hinge-stabilized, immunoglobulin G4κ monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), with characteristics common to the ICB class. In POD1UM-202, retifanlimab showed substantial clinical activity and an expected safety profile in patients with advanced SCAC who progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy. Based on these encouraging results, POD1UM-303/InterAACT 2 (NCT04472429), a phase III, double-blind, randomized, multiregional study, investigates the addition of retifanlimab to the standard of care (SOC) carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic SCAC not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy.

Methods and analysis: Patients ≥18 years with inoperable locally recurrent or metastatic SCAC, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and no prior systemic chemotherapy or PD-(L)1-directed therapy will be enrolled and stratified by PD-L1 expression, region, and extent of disease. Patients with well-controlled human immunodeficiency virus infection are eligible. Planned enrollment is approximately 300 patients worldwide, with a 1:1 randomization to retifanlimab or placebo. Patients will receive up to six induction cycles (24 weeks) of carboplatin (area-under-the-curve 5 on day 1) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every 28 days per SOC. Concurrently, retifanlimab 500 mg or placebo will be administered intravenously in a blinded fashion on day 1 of each 28-day cycle for up to 13 cycles (1 year) in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or premature discontinuation. Crossover to open-label retifanlimab will be allowed for patients assigned to placebo upon verification of progression by blinded independent central radiographic review (BICR). The primary study endpoint is PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary endpoints are OS, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, and retifanlimab pharmacokinetics. The study is currently recruiting.

Clinical trial registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04472429; https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2020-000826-24.

Keywords: anal cancer; carboplatin; paclitaxel; retifanlimab; squamous carcinoma.

Conflict of interest statement

SR reports advisory role or honoraria from Amgen, Celgene, and Shire and travel grants from Bayer, Celgene, and Incyte Corporation. MJ, JB, and CT report employment and stock ownership for Incyte Corporation. J-PS reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Biogaran, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Leo Pharma, Mylan, Myriad Genetics, Novartis, Pfizer, and Pierre Fabre; a consulting or advisory role for Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche; and a grant from MSD Avenir.

Copyright © 2022 Rao, Jones, Bowman, Tian and Spano.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
POD1UM-303/InterAACT 2 study design. *Verified by BICR. †Optional crossover period for qualified patients. ART/HAART, antiretroviral therapy/highly active antiretroviral therapy; AUS, Australia; BICR, blinded independent central radiographic review; EU, European Union; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; NA, North America; PD, progressive disease; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; R, randomization; ROW, rest of the world; SCAC, squamous carcinoma of the anal canal; UK, United Kingdom.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
    1. Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA, et al. . Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer (2004) 101:270–80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20365
    1. Valvo F, Ciurlia E, Avuzzi B, Doci R, Ducreux M, Roelofsen F, et al. . Cancer of the anal region. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol (2019) 135:115–27. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.007
    1. Islami F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Bray F, Jemal A. International trends in anal cancer incidence rates. Int J Epidemiol (2017) 46:924–38. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw276
    1. Deshmukh AA, Suk R, Shiels MS, Sonawane K, Nyitray AG, Liu Y, et al. . Recent trends in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus incidence and mortality in the United States, 2001-2015. J Natl Cancer Inst (2020) 112:829–38. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz219
    1. Morris V, Eng C. Summary of emerging targets in anal cancer: The case for an immunotherapy based-approach. J Gastrointest Oncol (2016) 7:721–6. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.08.03
    1. Morton M, Melnitchouk N, Bleday R. Squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Curr Probl Cancer (2018) 42:486–92. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.11.001
    1. Pessia B, Romano L, Giuliani A, Lazzarin G, Carlei F, Schietroma M. Squamous cell anal cancer: Management and therapeutic options. Ann Med Surg (Lond) (2020) 55:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.016
    1. Gunderson LL, Winter KA, Ajani JA, Pedersen JE, Moughan J, Benson AB, 3rd, et al. . Long-term update of US GI intergroup RTOG 98-11 phase III trial for anal carcinoma: Survival, relapse, and colostomy failure with concurrent chemoradiation involving fluorouracil/mitomycin versus fluorouracil/cisplatin. J Clin Oncol (2012) 30:4344–51. doi: 10.1200/jco.2012.43.8085
    1. Rao S, Sclafani F, Eng C, Adams RA, Guren MG, Sebag-Montefiore D, et al. . International rare cancers initiative multicenter randomized phase II trial of cisplatin and fluorouracil versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced anal cancer: InterAAct. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38:2510–8. doi: 10.1200/jco.19.03266
    1. Jacome AA, Eng C. Experimental and investigational drugs for the treatment of anal cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs (2018) 27:941–50. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1543659
    1. Parkin DM. The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002. Int J Cancer (2006) 118:3030–44. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21731
    1. Morris VK, Rashid A, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Das P, Chang G, Ohinata A, et al. . Clinicopathologic features associated with human papillomavirus/p16 in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Oncologist (2015) 20:1247–52. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0091
    1. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G, Jr, Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, et al. . Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med (2016) 375:1856–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602252
    1. Colombo N, Dubot C, Lorusso D, Caceres MV, Hasegawa K, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. . Pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer. N Engl J Med (2021) 385:1856–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112435
    1. Lakhani N, Mehnert JM, Rasco D, Gordon M, Lohr J, Sharma S, et al. . A phase 1 study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of MGA012 (anti-PD-1 antibody) in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer (2017) 5:87. P249. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0288-4
    1. Mehnert JM, Joshua A, Lakhani N, Banerji U, Rasco D, Lugowska I, et al. . First-in-human phase 1 study of INCMGA00012 in patients with advanced solid tumors: interim results of the cohort expansion phase. J Immunother Cancer (2018) 6:115. P669. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0423-x
    1. Condamine T, Owens S, Feldman P, Motte-Mohs RL, Muth P, Sumrow B, et al. . Pharmacodynamic correlates in a phase I study of INCMGA00012, a PD-1 antagonistic monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res (2019) 79:Abstract CT085. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.Am2019-ct085
    1. Chen X, Wang P, Kaul S, Sumrow B, Yeleswaram S. Assessment of flat dosing strategy for INCMGA00012 in patients with advanced tumors. Cancer Res (2019) 79:Abstract LB–268. doi: 10.1158/1538-7445.Am2019-lb-268
    1. Rao S, Capdevila J, Gilbert D, Kim S, Dahan L, Kayyal T, et al. . LBA42 POD1UM-202: phase II study of retifanlimab in patients (pts) with squamous carcinoma of the anal canal (SCAC) who progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol (2020) 31:S1170–S1. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2272
    1. Morris VK, Salem ME, Nimeiri H, Iqbal S, Singh P, Ciombor K, et al. . Nivolumab for previously treated unresectable metastatic anal cancer (NCI9673): A multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol (2017) 18:446–53. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30104-3
    1. Ott PA, Piha-Paul SA, Munster P, Pishvaian MJ, van Brummelen EMJ, Cohen RB, et al. . Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent carcinoma of the anal canal. Ann Oncol (2017) 28:1036–41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx029
    1. Marabelle A, Cassier PA, Fakih M, Kao S, Nielsen D, Italiano A, et al. . Pembrolizumab for previously treated advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma: Results from the non-randomised, multicohort, multicentre, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol (2022) 7:446–54. doi: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00382-4
    1. Lonardi S, Prete AA, Morano F, Messina M, Formica V, Corsi DC, et al. . Randomized phase II trial of avelumab alone or in combination with cetuximab for patients with previously treated, locally advanced, or metastatic squamous cell anal carcinoma: The CARACAS study. J Immunother Cancer (2021) 9:e002996. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002996
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (2009) 45:228–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, Soulières D, Tahara M, de Castro G, Jr, et al. . Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet (2019) 394:1915–28. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32591-7
    1. Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Vergote I, Miller A, de Melo AC, Kim H-S, et al. . Survival with cemiplimab in recurrent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med (2022) 386:544–55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112187

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel