Population Pharmacokinetics of Brentuximab Vedotin in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Hematologic Malignancies: Model-Informed Hypothesis Generation for Pediatric Dosing Regimens

Ajit Suri, Diane R Mould, Gregory Song, Judith Kinley, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Ajit Suri, Diane R Mould, Gregory Song, Judith Kinley, Karthik Venkatakrishnan

Abstract

Prior pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies found that patients aged <12 years exhibited decreased ADC area under the curve (AUC) compared with those aged ≥12 years. This population PK (POPPK) analysis used data from pediatric (NCT01492088) and adult (NCT00430846) studies of brentuximab vedotin to quantify body size effects on ADC exposure. Data were collected from 84 patients with a median age of 25.7 years (range, 7.7-87.3 years), 34 of whom (40.5%) were aged <18 years; median patient weight was 67 kg (range, 21-154 kg), and median body surface area was 1.8 m2 (range, 0.87-2.81 m2 ). ADC PK was described by a linear 3-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. POPPK modeling indicated that dosing brentuximab vedotin at 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 1.2 mg/kg every 2 weeks resulted in lower ADC AUC values in small/moderate-sized pediatric patients (<28 kg and 28-49 kg, respectively) compared with large pediatric/adult patients (50-100 kg). Dosing at 71.5 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and 47.7 mg/m2 every 2 weeks was predicted to achieve comparable AUC values across all body weight ranges and a similar AUC to that in the 50- to 100-kg group at the standard doses of 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and 1.2 mg/kg every 2 weeks, respectively. These results have generated a hypothesis to support evaluation of brentuximab vedotin at 48 mg/m2 every 2 weeks in combination with adriamycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine chemotherapy in an ongoing pediatric trial in frontline Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT02979522).

Keywords: oncology; pediatrics; population pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

A.S., G.S., and J.K. disclose employment by and D.R.M. is a paid consultant for Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. K.V. discloses previous employment by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, and current employment by EMD Serono, Inc. Writing assistance for this article was provided by Rebecca Vickers and Hedley Coppock of FireKite, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare plc, and was funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All editorial procedures complied with Good Publication Practice 3 guidelines (Battisti WP, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:461‐464).

© 2020 Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Brentuximab vedotin mechanism of action. Figure reproduced from Suri A, Mould DR, Liu Y, Jang G, Venkatakrishnan K. Population PK and exposure‐response relationships for the antibody‐drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin in CTCL patients in the phase III ALCANZA study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(5)989‐999. ©2018 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Brentuximab vedotin final ADC and MMAE pharmacokinetic model. ADC, antibody‐drug conjugate; ALFM, rate constant to describe the decline in direct conversion of ADC to MMAE following TAD; CLM, apparent MMAE clearance; CLP, ADC clearance; EXP, exponential; FM, fraction metabolized; KD, binding rate constant; Klag, rate constant for lag compartment; MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E; QM, apparent MMAE intercompartmental clearance; QP1 and QP2, ADC intercompartmental clearance from central to first and second peripheral compartments; T‐DTIME, time since last dose; VM and VMP, apparent volume of MMAE central and peripheral compartments; VPc, volume of ADC central compartment; VPp1 and VPp2, volume of ADC first and second peripheral compartments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Final pharmacokinetic model visual predictive checks for ADC (A, B) and MMAE (C, D) by age group (adult [A, C] or pediatric [B, D]), by time since first dose. For ADC (A, B), observed concentrations are represented by open blue circles. The 95% prediction interval is shown by the dashed black lines, and the 50th percentile is shown as the solid black line. The 95% interval of the observed data is shown by the dashed red lines and the median is shown as the solid red line. The purple‐shaded area is the 95% confidence interval of the 95% prediction interval, and the pink‐shaded area is the 95% confidence interval of the median. For MMAE (C, D), the top panels show the model‐predicted 95% prediction interval (black dashed lines and shaded green area), the observed concentrations (blue circles), and the 95% interval of the observed values (red dashed lines). The lower panels show the observed proportion of BLQ samples (blue lines with blue circles), and the 90% prediction interval of this proportion. ADC, antibody‐drug conjugate; BLQ, below the limit of quantitation; BV, brentuximab vedotin; LLOQ, lower limit of quantitation; MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Simulated ADC AUC by body weight range (A, C, E, G) and concentration‐to‐time profiles (B, D, F, H) following 1.8 mg/kg every‐3‐week dosing (A, B), 71.5 mg/m2 every‐3‐week dosing (C, D), 1.2 mg/kg every‐2‐week dosing (E, F), and 47.7 mg/m2 every‐2‐week dosing (G, H). Each box plot illustrates: the median by the horizontal line in the center, the 25th percentile by the lower end of the box, the 75th percentile by the upper end of the box, the 5th percentile by the lower whisker, and the 95th percentile by the upper whisker. ADC, antibody‐drug conjugate; AUC, area under the concentration‐to‐time curve.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Simulated MMAE AUC by body weight range (A, C, E, G) and concentration‐to‐time profiles (B, D, F, H) following 1.8 mg/kg every‐3‐week dosing (A, B), 71.5 mg/m2 every‐3‐week dosing (C, D), 1.2 mg/kg every‐2‐week dosing (E, F), and 47.7 mg/m2 every‐2‐week dosing (G, H). Each box plot illustrates: the median by the horizontal line in the center, the 25th percentile by the lower end of the box, the 75th percentile by the upper end of the box, the 5th percentile by the lower whisker, and the 95th percentile by the upper whisker. AUC, area under the concentration‐to‐time curve; MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E.

References

    1. Berger GK, McBride A, Lawson S, et al. Brentuximab vedotin for treatment of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;109:42‐50.
    1. Alperovich A, Younes A. Targeting CD30 using brentuximab vedotin in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer J. 2016;22(1):23‐26.
    1. Suri A, Mould DR, Liu Y, Jang G, Venkatakrishnan K. Population PK and exposure‐response relationships for the antibody‐drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin in CTCL patients in the phase III ALCANZA study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(5):989‐999.
    1. van der Weyden CA, Pileri SA, Feldman AL, Whisstock J, Prince HM. Understanding CD30 biology and therapeutic targeting: a historical perspective providing insight into future directions. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7(9):e603.
    1. Younes A, Gopal AK, Smith SE, et al. Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(18):2183‐2189.
    1. US FDA . ADCETRIS (brentuximab vedotin) Highlights of Prescribing Information. . Published 2018. Accessed June 15, 2020.
    1. Moskowitz CH, Nademanee A, Masszi T, et al. Brentuximab vedotin as consolidation therapy after autologous stem‐cell transplantation in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma at risk of relapse or progression (AETHERA): a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9980):1853‐1862.
    1. Prince HM, Kim YH, Horwitz SM, et al. Brentuximab vedotin or physician's choice in CD30‐positive cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open‐label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):555‐566.
    1. Pro B, Advani R, Brice P, et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN‐35) in patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma: results of a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(18):2190‐2196.
    1. Horwitz S, O'Connor OA, Pro B, et al. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for CD30‐positive peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (ECHELON‐2): a global, double‐blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10168):229‐240.
    1. Connors JM, Jurczak W, Straus DJ, et al. Brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy for stage III or IV Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(4):331‐344.
    1. Locatelli F, Mauz‐Koerholz C, Neville K, et al. Brentuximab vedotin for paediatric relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma and anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma: a multicentre, open‐label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(10):e450‐e461.
    1. Faucette S, Wagh S, Trivedi A, Venkatakrishnan K, Gupta N. Reverse translation of US Food and Drug Administration reviews of oncology new molecular entities approved in 2011‐2017: lessons learned for anticancer drug development. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(2):123‐146.
    1. Ji Y, Jin JY, Hyman DM, Kim G, Suri A. Challenges and opportunities in dose finding in oncology and immuno‐oncology. Clin Transl Sci. 2018;11(4):345‐351.
    1. Venkatakrishnan K, Friberg LE, Ouellet D, et al. Optimizing oncology therapeutics through quantitative translational and clinical pharmacology: challenges and opportunities. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;97(1):37‐54.
    1. Gupta N, Zhao Y, Hui AM, Esseltine DL, Venkatakrishnan K. Switching from body surface area‐based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;79(5):789‐800.
    1. Bullock JM, Lin T, Bilic S. Clinical pharmacology tools and evaluations to facilitate comprehensive dose finding in oncology: a continuous risk‐benefit approach. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(suppl 10):S105‐S115.
    1. Fanale MA, Forero‐Torres A, Rosenblatt JD, et al. A phase I weekly dosing study of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed/refractory CD30‐positive hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(1):248‐255.
    1. Li H, Han TH, Hunder NN, Jang G, Zhao B. Population pharmacokinetics of brentuximab vedotin in patients with CD30‐expressing hematologic malignancies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(9):1148‐1158.
    1. Ogura M, Tobinai K, Hatake K, et al. Phase I/II study of brentuximab vedotin in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory CD30‐positive Hodgkin's lymphoma or systemic anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(7):840‐846.
    1. Younes A, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP, et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN‐35) for relapsed CD30‐positive lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(19):1812‐1821.
    1. Zhao B, Chen R, O'Connor OA, et al. Brentuximab vedotin, an antibody‐drug conjugate, in patients with CD30‐positive haematologic malignancies and hepatic or renal impairment. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;82(3):696‐705.
    1. Suri A, Mould DR, Song G, et al. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and exposure‐response assessment for the antibody‐drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin in Hodgkin's lymphoma in the phase III ECHELON‐1 study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;106(6):1268‐1279.
    1. Sekimizu M, Iguchi A, Mori T, et al. Phase I clinical study of brentuximab vedotin (SGN‐35) involving children with recurrent or refractory CD30‐positive Hodgkin's lymphoma or systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma: rationale, design and methods of BV‐HLALCL study: study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):122.
    1. Glantz SA, Slinker BA. Primer of Applied Regression and Analysis of Variance. New York, NY: McGraw‐Hill; 1990.
    1. Han TH, Gopal AK, Ramchandren R, et al. CYP3A‐mediated drug‐drug interaction potential and excretion of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody‐drug conjugate, in patients with CD30‐positive hematologic malignancies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53(8):866‐877.
    1. Han TH, Kennedy D, Hayes S, Lynch CM. The pharmacokinetics of brentuximab vedotin (SGN‐35), an antibody‐drug conjugate (ADC) [abstract]. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91(suppl 1):PII‐1.
    1. Boeckmann AJ, Beal SL, Sheiner LB. Parts I through VIII, NONMEM Installation Guide. NONMEM Project Group, University of California; 1998.
    1. Beal SL. Ways to fit a PK model with some data below the quantification limit. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2001;28(5):481‐504.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Clinical growth charts. . Accessed May 27, 2020.
    1. Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high‐dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem‐cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin's disease: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9323):2065‐2071.
    1. Santoro A, Bredenfeld H, Devizzi L, et al. Gemcitabine in the treatment of refractory Hodgkin's disease: results of a multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(13):2615‐2619.
    1. Zinzani PL, Bendandi M, Stefoni V, et al. Value of gemcitabine treatment in heavily pretreated Hodgkin's disease patients. Haematologica. 2000;85(9):926‐929.
    1. Venkatesh H, Di Bella N, Flynn TP, Vellek MJ, Boehm KA, Asmar L. Results of a phase II multicenter trial of single‐agent gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or chemotherapy‐refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Lymphoma. 2004;5(2):110‐115.
    1. Oki Y, Pro B, Fayad LE, et al. Phase 2 study of gemcitabine in combination with rituximab in patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2008;112(4):831‐836.
    1. Linch DC, Winfield D, Goldstone AH, et al. Dose intensification with autologous bone‐marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin's disease: results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet. 1993;341(8852):1051‐1054.
    1. Franklin A, Zecca M, Fagioli F, et al. Phase 1 results from a phase 1/2 study to assess the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (A+AVD) in pediatric patients (pts) with advanced stage newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). Blood. 2018;132(1):1644.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel