Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG

Tino Zaehle, Stefan Rach, Christoph S Herrmann, Tino Zaehle, Stefan Rach, Christoph S Herrmann

Abstract

Non-invasive electrical stimulation of the human cortex by means of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been instrumental in a number of important discoveries in the field of human cortical function and has become a well-established method for evaluating brain function in healthy human participants. Recently, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has been introduced to directly modulate the ongoing rhythmic brain activity by the application of oscillatory currents on the human scalp. Until now the efficiency of tACS in modulating rhythmic brain activity has been indicated only by inference from perceptual and behavioural consequences of electrical stimulation. No direct electrophysiological evidence of tACS has been reported. We delivered tACS over the occipital cortex of 10 healthy participants to entrain the neuronal oscillatory activity in their individual alpha frequency range and compared results with those from a separate group of participants receiving sham stimulation. The tACS but not the sham stimulation elevated the endogenous alpha power in parieto-central electrodes of the electroencephalogram. Additionally, in a network of spiking neurons, we simulated how tACS can be affected even after the end of stimulation. The results show that spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) selectively modulates synapses depending on the resonance frequencies of the neural circuits that they belong to. Thus, tACS influences STDP which in turn results in aftereffects upon neural activity.The present findings are the first direct electrophysiological evidence of an interaction of tACS and ongoing oscillatory activity in the human cortex. The data demonstrate the ability of tACS to specifically modulate oscillatory brain activity and show its potential both at fostering knowledge on the functional significance of brain oscillations and for therapeutic application.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Stimulation details and results.
Figure 1. Stimulation details and results.
A: Location of stimulation and EEG electrodes: The tACS electrodes were placed bilaterally over the occipital cortex (PO9, PO10, international 10/10 system); EEG is measured from parieto-occipital midline electrodes CPz, Pz, and POz. B: Timeline of experimental events: The experiment started with the determination of the individual alpha frequency during a 1-minute period in which the participants were in a relaxed state with eyes closed followed by an evaluation of an individual phosphene threshold. Subsequently, the participants performed a simple detection task for 16 minutes. During this period, EEG recording was stopped after 3 minutes (Pre-measure) and a 10 minute stimulation (either tACS or Sham) was given, followed by a further 3 minute EEG recording (Post-measure). C: Group averaged EEG activity: Average FFT power spectra for the 3 minute intervals preceding (pre, dotted line) and following (post, solid line) the stimulation condition separately for the tACS-group (left) and the Sham-group (right). D: mean individual alpha amplitude for tACS and sham group: There is an increase in individual alpha power from pre- to post-stimulus measurement in the subjects that received tACS (solid line), but not for the subjects that received sham-stimulation (dotted line). No tACS related alpha modulation can be observed in the upper and lower frequency band. Data are normalized to the pre-stimulation alpha power. Asterisks indicate statistical significance. Data are the means ±s.e.m.
Figure 2. Network simulation of tACS.
Figure 2. Network simulation of tACS.
A: Spike timing dependent plasticity: synaptic weights are increased if a post-synaptic potential follows a pre-synaptic spike (long-term potentiation, LTP) and decreased if a post-synaptic potential occurs prior to a pre-synaptic spike (long-term depression, LTD). B: Schematic illustration of the network: A driving neuron establishes a recurrent loop with each neuron of a hidden layer. The total synaptic delay, Δt, (i.e., the sum of both delays of the loop) varied between 20 and 160 ms. The driving neuron was stimulated with a spike train of 10 Hz repetition rate. C: Synaptic weights of the back-projection as a function of the total synaptic delay of the recurrent loops: Grey dots display synaptic weights at the start of the simulation, black dots represent synaptic weights after the end of simulation. External stimulation of the driving neuron at 10 Hz resulted in increased weights for recurrent loops with a total delay between 60 and 100 ms, and dramatically reduced synaptic weights for loops with total delays outside this interval. Note, that the highest synaptic weights are observed at 100 ms, i.e., for loops with a resonance frequency near the stimulation frequency.

References

    1. Womelsdorf T, Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R, Singer W, Desimone R, et al. Modulation of neuronal interactions through neuronal synchronization. Science. 2007;316:1609–1612.
    1. Ward LM. Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;7:553–559.
    1. Berger H. Über das Elektroenzephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten. 1929;87:527–570.
    1. Palva S, Palva JM. New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:150–158.
    1. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Heise KF, Gruber WR, Holz E, et al. Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1846–1852.
    1. Angelakis E, Stathopoulou S, Frymiare JL, Green DL, Lubar JF, et al. EEG neurofeedback: a brief overview and an example of peak alpha frequency training for cognitive enhancement in the elderly. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;21:110–129.
    1. Schmid RG, Tirsch WS, Reitmeir P. Correlation of developmental neurological findings with spectral analytical EEG evaluations in pre-school age children. Electroencephalogr. Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103:516–527.
    1. Montez T, Poil SS, Jones BF, Manshanden I, Verbunt JP, et al. Altered temporal correlations in parietal alpha and prefrontal theta oscillations in early-stage Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:1614–1619.
    1. Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Gerloff C. Enhancing cognitive performance with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at human individual alpha frequency. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:1129–1133.
    1. Romei V, Gross J, Thut G. On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input regulation: correlation or causation? J Neurosci. 2010;30:8692–8697.
    1. Hanslmayr S, Sauseng P, Doppelmayr M, Schabus M, Klimesch W. Increasing individual upper alpha power by neurofeedback improves cognitive performance in human subjects. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005;30:1–10.
    1. Zoefel B, Huster RJ, Herrmann CS. Neurofeedback training of the upper alpha frequency band in EEG improves cognitive performance. Neuroimage. 2010 doi: .
    1. Hanslmayr S, Aslan, Staudigl T, Klimesch W, Herrmann CS, et al. Prestimulus oscillations predict visual perception performance between and within subjects. Neuroimage. 2007;37:1465–1473.
    1. Thut G, Nietzel A, Brandt SA, Pascual-Leone A. Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9494–9502.
    1. van Dijk H, Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R, Jensen O. Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1816–1823.
    1. Engel AK, Fries P, Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:704–716.
    1. Silvanto J, Muggleton N, Walsh V. State-dependency in brain stimulation studies of perception and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12:447–454.
    1. Merton PA, Morton HB. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature. 1980;285:227.
    1. Merton PA, Hill DK, Morton HB, Marsden CD. Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle. Lancet. 1982;2:597–600.
    1. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Res Bull. 2006;68:459–463.
    1. Antal A, Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation and visual perception. Perception. 2008;37:367–374.
    1. Wassermann EM, Grafman J. Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:503–505.
    1. Nitsche MA, Antal A, Liebtanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, et al. Neuroplasticity induced by transcranial direct current stimulation. In: Wassermann EM, Epstein CM, Ziemann U, Walsh V, Paus T, et al., editors. Oxford handbook of transcranial stimulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. pp. 201–218.
    1. Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation. 2008;1:206–223.
    1. Kanai R, Chaieb L, Antal A, Walsh V, Paulus W. Frequency-dependent electrical stimulation of the visual cortex. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1839–1843.
    1. Pogosyan A, Gaynor LD, Eusebio A, Brown P. Boosting cortical activity at Beta-band frequencies slows movement in humans. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1637–1641.
    1. Schwiedrzik CM. Retina or visual cortex? The site of phosphene induction by transcranial alternating current stimulation. Front Integr Neurosci. 2009;3:6.
    1. Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999;29:169–195.
    1. Vogel F. (Berlin: Springer); 2000. Genetics And The Electroencephalogram.
    1. Paulus W. On the difficulties of separating retinal from cortical origins of phosphenes when using transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:987–991.
    1. Schutter DJ, Hortensius R. Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:1080–1084.
    1. Buzsaki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science. 2004;304:1926–1929.
    1. Buzsaki G. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Rhythms of the brain.
    1. Knyazev GG. Motivation, emotion, and their inhibitory control mirrored in brain oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31:377–395.
    1. Boggio PS, Rigonatti SP, Ribeiro RB, Myczkowski ML, Nitsche MA, et al. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11:249–254.
    1. Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008;71:493–498.
    1. Ferrucci R, Bortolomasi M, Vergari M, Tadini L, Salvoro B, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. J Affect Disord. 2009;118:215–219.
    1. Hummel FC, Voller B, Celnik P, Floel A, Giraux P, et al. Effects of brain polarization on reaction times and pinch force in chronic stroke. BMC Neurosci. 2006;7:73.
    1. Monti A, Cogiamanian F, Marceglia S, Ferrucci R, Mameli F, et al. Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:451–453.
    1. Nitsche MA, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review. Exp Neurol. 2009;219:14–19.
    1. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Noninvasive brain stimulation protocols in the treatment of epilepsy: current state and perspectives. Neurotherapeutics. 2009;6:244–250.
    1. Schlaug G, Renga V. Transcranial direct current stimulation: a noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2008;5:759–768.
    1. Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008;65:1571–1576.
    1. Jo JM, Kim YH, Ko MH, Ohn SH, Joen B, et al. Enhancing the working memory of stroke patients using tDCS. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88:404–409.
    1. Boggio PS, Ferrucci R, Rigonatti SP, Covre P, Nitsche M, et al. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2006;249:31–38.
    1. Boggio PS, Khoury LP, Martins DC, Martins OE, de Macedo EC, et al. Temporal cortex direct current stimulation enhances performance on a visual recognition memory task in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:444–447.
    1. Herrmann CS, Demiralp T. Human EEG gamma oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:2719–2733.
    1. Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Monto S, Rytsala H, Suominen K, Isometsa E, et al. Breakdown of long-range temporal correlations in theta oscillations in patients with major depressive disorder. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10131–10137.
    1. Monto S, Vanhatalo S, Holmes MD, Palva JM. Epileptogenic neocortical networks are revealed by abnormal temporal dynamics in seizure-free subdural EEG. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17:1386–1393.
    1. Parish LM, Worrell GA, Cranstoun SD, Stead SM, Pennell P, et al. Long-range temporal correlations in epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic human hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2004;125:1069–1076.
    1. Uhlhaas PJ, Singer W. Neural synchrony in brain disorders: relevance for cognitive dysfunctions and pathophysiology. Neuron. 2006;52:155–168.
    1. Marshall L, Helgadottir H, Molle M, Born J. Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature. 2006;444:610–613.
    1. Kirov R, Weiss C, Siebner HR, Born J, Marshall L. Slow oscillation electrical brain stimulation during waking promotes EEG theta activity and memory encoding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:15460–15465.
    1. Francis JT, Gluckman BJ, Schiff SJ. Sensitivity of neurons to weak electric fields. J Neurosci. 2003;23:7255–7261.
    1. Miranda PC, Lomarev M, Hallett M. Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1623–1629.
    1. McDonnell MD, Abbott D. What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000348.
    1. Kanai R, Paulus W, Walsh V. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121:1551–1554.
    1. Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–1901.
    1. Thut G, Pascual-Leone A. A review of combined TMS-EEG studies to characterize lasting effects of repetitive TMS and assess their usefulness in cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Brain Topogr. 2010;22:219–232.
    1. Markram H, Lubke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science. 1997;275:213–215.
    1. Hutcheon B, Yarom Y. Resonance, oscillation and the intrinsic frequency preferences of neurons. Trends Neurosci. 2000;23:216–222.
    1. Basar E, Basar-Eroglu C, Karakas S, Schurmann M. Gamma, alpha, delta, and theta oscillations govern cognitive processes. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;39:241–248.
    1. Friederici AD. Broca's area and the ventral premotor cortex in language: functional differentiation and specificity. Cortex. 2006;42:472–475.
    1. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci. 1997;17:4302–4311.
    1. Tovee MJ. Face processing: getting by with a little help from its friends. Curr Biol. 1998;8:R317–R320.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel