Effectiveness of Helmet Cranial Remodeling in Older Infants with Positional Plagiocephaly

Hong Youl Kim, Yoon Kyu Chung, Yong Oock Kim, Hong Youl Kim, Yoon Kyu Chung, Yong Oock Kim

Abstract

Background: Management of positional plagiocephaly by wearing a cranial molding helmet has become a matter of growing medical interest. Some research studies reported that starting helmet therapy early (age 5 to 6 months) is important and leads to a significantly better outcome in a shorter treatment time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cranial remodeling treatment with wearing helmet for older infants (≥18 months).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 27 infants with positional plagiocephaly without synostosis, who were started from 2008 to 2012. Every child underwent a computerized tomography (CT) before starting helmet therapy to exclude synostosis of the cranial sutures and had CT performed once again after satisfactory completion of therapy. Anthropometric measurements were taken on using spreading calipers in every child. The treatment effect was compared using cranial vault asymmetry (CVA) and the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), which were obtained from diagonal measurements before and after therapy.

Results: The discrepancy of CVA and CVAI of all the patients significantly decreased after cranial molding helmet treatment in older infants (≥18 months) 7.6 mm from 15.6 mm to 8 mm and 4.51% from 9.42% to 4.91%. Six patients had confirmed successful outcome, and all subjects were good compliance patients. The treatment lasted an average of 16.4 months, was well tolerated, and had no complication. Additionally, the rate of the successful treatment (final CVA ≤5 mm) significantly decreased when the wearing time per was shorter.

Conclusion: This study showed that treatment by cranial remodeling orthosis was effective if the patient could wear the helmet longer and treatment duration was somewhat longer than in younger patients, well tolerated in older infants and had no morbidity. This therapeutic option is available and indicated in these older infants before other cranial remodeling surgery.

Keywords: Cranial vault asymmetry; Cranial vault asymmetry index; Helmet therapy; Positional plagiocephaly.

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Appearance and computed tomography of a positional plagiocephaly patient.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagonal measurement of patient and the treatment effect of the helmet therapy strategy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Case. (A) Three dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan before helmet therapy, CVA=19 mm, CVAI=11.18%. (B) 3D CT scan after 6.3 months helmet therapy, CVA=4 mm, CVAI=2.48%. CVA, cranial vault asymmetry; CAVI, cranial vault asymmetry index.

References

    1. Kelly KM, Littlefield TR, Pomatto JK, Manwaring KH, Beals SP. Cranial growth unrestricted during treatment of deformational plagiocephaly. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:193–199.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics AAP Task Force on infant positioning and SIDS: positioning and SIDS. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1120–1126.
    1. Argenta LC, David LR, Wilson JA, Bell WO. An increase in infant cranial deformity with supine sleeping position. J Craniofac Surg. 1996;7:5–11.
    1. Kane AA, Mitchell LE, Craven KP, Marsh JL. Observations on a recent increase in plagiocephaly without synostosis. Pediatrics. 1996;97:877–885.
    1. Turk AE, McCarthy JG, Thorne CH, Wisoff JH. The "back to sleep campaign" and deformational plagiocephaly: is there cause for concern? J Craniofac Surg. 1996;7:12–18.
    1. McKinney CM, Cunningham ML, Holt VL, Leroux B, Starr JR. Characteristics of 2733 cases diagnosed with deformational plagiocephaly and changes in risk factors over time. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45:208–216.
    1. van Vlimmeren LA, van der Graaf Y, Boere-Boonekamp MM, L'Hoir MP, Helders PJ, Engelbert RH. Risk factors for deformational plagiocephaly at birth and at 7 weeks of age: a prospective cohort study. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e408–e418.
    1. Dunn PM. Congenital sternomastoid torticollis: An intrauterine postural deformity. Arch Dis Child. 1974;49:824–825.
    1. Boere-Boonekamp MM, van der Linden-Kuiper LL. Positional preference: prevalence in infants and follow-up after two years. Pediatrics. 2001;107:339–343.
    1. Schaaf H, Malik CY, Streckbein P, Pons-Kuehnemann J, Howaldt HP, Wilbrand JF. Three-dimensional photographic analysis of outcome after helmet treatment of a nonsynostotic cranial deformity. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21:1677–1682.
    1. Kluba S, Schreiber R, Kraut W, Meisner C, Reinert S, Krimmel M. Does helmet therapy influence the ear shift in positional plagiocephaly? J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1301–1305.
    1. Morrison CS, Chariker M. Positional plagiocephaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. J Ky Med Assoc. 2006;104:136–140.
    1. Robinson S, Proctor M. Diagnosis and management of deformational plagiocephaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;3:284–295.
    1. Grigsby K. Cranial remolding helmet treatment of plagiocephaly: comparison of results and treatment length in younger versus older infant populations. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:55–63.
    1. Kluba S, Kraut W, Reinert S, Krimmel M. What is the optimal time to start helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:492–498.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel