Effect of Galcanezumab Following Treatment Cessation in Patients With Migraine: Results From 2 Randomized Phase 3 Trials

Virginia L Stauffer, Shufang Wang, Menelaos Voulgaropoulos, Vladimir Skljarevski, Amy Kovacik, Sheena K Aurora, Virginia L Stauffer, Shufang Wang, Menelaos Voulgaropoulos, Vladimir Skljarevski, Amy Kovacik, Sheena K Aurora

Abstract

Objective: We examined the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab after treatment cessation in randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, migraine prevention studies (EVOLVE-1; EVOLVE-2).

Background: Galcanezumab is indicated for migraine prevention in adults.

Methods: Adults with episodic migraine were enrolled into EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2, which randomized 858 and 915 patients, respectively, to galcanezumab 120 mg (an initial 240-mg loading dose), galcanezumab 240 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously once monthly for 6 months. After treatment completion or discontinuation, patients entered a 4-month posttreatment period. Efficacy and safety from the posttreatment periods are reported.

Results: Overall, 740 patients (EVOLVE-1) and 830 (EVOLVE-2) patients entered the posttreatment periods, about 95% and 96% of patients, respectively, completed. In EVOLVE-1, change from pre-randomization baseline in monthly migraine headache days decreased over the posttreatment period from (mean [SE]) 5.2 (0.4) days (Month 6) to 4.1 (0.4) days (Month 10) for 120 mg and from 5.3 (0.4) days (Month 6) to 3.8 (0.4) days (Month 10) for 240 mg, and was stable for placebo (3.4 [0.3] days [Month 6] to 3.3 [0.3] days [Month 10]); differences between each galcanezumab dose group and placebo were statistically significant at each month, except for galcanezumab 240 mg at Month 10 (120 mg vs placebo: P < .001 Months 1-6, P = .007 Month 7, P = .044 Month 8, P = .016 Month 9, and P = .042 Month 10; 240 mg vs placebo: P < .001 Months 1-7, P = .015 Month 8, P = .021 Month 9, and P = .238 Month 10). EVOLVE-2 showed similar results. In both trials, there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups and placebo for time-to-first loss of 50% response. During the posttreatment periods, 1.6% (EVOLVE-1) and 2.3% (EVOLVE-2) of patients initiated migraine preventive treatments. At Month 10, quality of life among galcanezumab-treated patients was similar to those taking placebo. The most common posttreatment emergent adverse event was upper respiratory tract infections. There were no discontinuations due to adverse events during the posttreatment periods.

Conclusions: Galcanezumab treatment effects were reduced during the posttreatment periods, but did not return to baseline. There were no unexpected adverse events after galcanezumab cessation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02614183 NCT02614196.

Keywords: clinical trial; galcanezumab; migraine; posttreatment period; treatment cessation.

© 2019 Eli Lilly and Company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache day (MHDs) in the treatment and posttreatment periods of EVOLVE‐1 (A) and EVOLVE‐2 (B). LS mean change ± SE is shown. P values are for the treatment vs placebo comparison. *P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001. GMB, galcanezumab; LS, least squares; SE, standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of patients (50% responders) with at least 50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) at Months 6 and 10 of EVOLVE‐1 (A) and EVOLVE‐2 (B). The proportion of patients ± SE with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in MHDs (model estimated rate) is shown. *P < .05 vs PBO; **≤ .001 vs PBO. GMB, galcanezumab, MHD, migraine headache day; N, population size; PBO, placebo; SE, standard error.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of patients demonstrating first loss of 50% response from after double‐blind treatment of EVOLVE‐1 (A) and EVOLVE‐2 (B). The analysis includes patients who were 50% responders at the last month of the double‐blind treatment period and who also entered the posttreatment period. Patients who were sustained 50% responders during the entire posttreatment period were censored. GMB, galcanezumab; N, population size; PBO, placebo.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean change from baseline in monthly migraine headache days (MHD) with acute medication use during the treatment and posttreatment periods of EVOLVE‐1 (A) and EVOLVE‐2 (B). LS mean change ± SE is shown. *P < .05 vs PBO; **P < .01 vs PBO; ***P < .001 vs PBO. GMB, galcanezumab; LS, least squares; N, population size; PBO, placebo; SE, standard error.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean change from baseline in Migraine‐Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (version 2.1) Role Function‐Restrictive Domain score at Months 6 and 10 of EVOLVE‐1 (A) and EVOLVE‐2 (B). LS mean change ± SE is shown. **≤ .001 vs PBO. GMB, galcanezumab; LS, least squares; N, population size; PBO, placebo; SE, standard error.

References

    1. Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine–current understanding and treatment. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:257‐270.
    1. Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: Figures and trends from government health studies. Headache. 2018;58:496‐505.
    1. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990‐2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211‐1259.
    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68:343‐349.
    1. Reuter U. A review of monoclonal antibody therapies and other preventative treatments in migraine. Headache. 2018;58(Suppl 1):48‐59.
    1. Russo AF. Calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP): A new target for migraine. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:533‐552.
    1. Villalón CM, Olesen J. The role of CGRP in the pathophysiology of migraine and efficacy of CGRP receptor antagonists as acute antimigraine drugs. Pharmacol Ther. 2009;124:309‐323.
    1. AIMOVIG (erenumab‐aooe) injection, for subcutaneous use . US Prescribing Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen; East Hanover, NJ: Novartis; 2018. Available at .
    1. EMGALITY (galcanezumab‐gnlm) injection, for subcutaneous use . Full Prescribing Information. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2018. Available at .
    1. AJOVY TM (fremanezumab‐vfrm) injection . Prescribing Information. North Wales, PA: Teva Pharmaceuticals; 2018. Available at.
    1. Vidarsson G, Dekkers G, Rispens T. IgG subclasses and allotypes: From structure to effector functions. Front Immunol. 2014;5:520.
    1. Benschop RJ, Collins EC, Darling RJ, et al. Development of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene‐related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis‐related pain. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:578‐585.
    1. Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, Ossipov MH, Kim BK, Yang JY. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: Results of the EVOLVE‐2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1442‐1454.
    1. Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, Carter JN, Ailani J, Conley RR. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: The EVOLVE‐1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:1080‐1088.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) . The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33:629‐808.
    1. Brandes JL, Saper JR, Diamond M, et al. Topiramate for migraine prevention: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:965‐973.
    1. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Headache. 2007;47:170‐180.
    1. Silberstein SD, Neto W, Schmitt J, Jacobs D, Group M‐S. Topiramate in migraine prevention: Results of a large controlled trial. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:490‐495.
    1. Silberstein SD. Topiramate in migraine prevention: A 2016 perspective. Headache. 2017;57:165‐178.
    1. Dodick DW, Ashina M, Brandes JL, et al. ARISE: A Phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1026‐1037.
    1. Dodick DW, Silberstein SD, Bigal ME, et al. Effect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1999‐2008.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, Hallstrom Y, et al. A controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2123‐2132.
    1. Tfelt‐Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia . 2012;32:6‐38.
    1. Macedo A, Banos JE, Farre M. Placebo response in the prophylaxis of migraine: A meta‐analysis. Eur J Pain. 2008;12:68‐75.
    1. van der Kuy PH, Lohman JJ. A quantification of the placebo response in migraine prophylaxis. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:265‐270.
    1. Diener HC, Schorn CF, Bingel U, et al. The importance of placebo in headache research. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:1003‐1011.
    1. Kaptchuk TJ, Stason WB, Davis RB, et al. Sham device v inert pill: Randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments. BMJ. 2006;332:391‐397.
    1. Khan A, Redding N, Brown WA. The persistence of the placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42:791‐796.
    1. Geddes JR, Carney SM, Davies C, et al. Relapse prevention with antidepressant drug treatment in depressive disorders: A systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361:653‐651.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel