Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses

Almudena Llorente-Guillemot, Santiago García-Lazaro, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Rafael J Perez-Cambrodi, Alejandro Cerviño, Almudena Llorente-Guillemot, Santiago García-Lazaro, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Rafael J Perez-Cambrodi, Alejandro Cerviño

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to assess visual performance after PureVision high addition multifocal contact lens (PM) fitting through contrast sensitivity measured under different illumination levels for both distance and near.

Methods: In a cross-over study, 20 presbyopic patients were randomly assigned to PM or spectacles. Near contrast sensitivity was measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 system. Distance contrast sensitivity and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured with the Functional Vision Analyser under photopic (85 cd/m(2) ) and mesopic (3.0 cd/m(2) ) conditions, the latter also under two levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux and 28 lux. Near VA was measured by logMAR charts under approximately 80 cd/m(2) luminance settings.

Results: Average monocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.03 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.16 ± 0.10 and 0.23 ± 0.07 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.03 ± 0.05 and 0.05 ± 0.06 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Average binocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.05 ± 0.07 and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.10 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.08 ± 0.06 and 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the contrast sensitivity with the two types of correction for both distance and near, with spectacle correction being better in all cases.

Conclusion: PureVision multifocal contact lenses preserve good VA and good visual performance under real-life conditions.

© 2011 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2011 Optometrists Association Australia.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel