Effects of Two Melt Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Technologies and Common Sterilization Methods on the Properties of a Medical Grade PLGA Copolymer

Marion Gradwohl, Feng Chai, Julien Payen, Pierre Guerreschi, Philippe Marchetti, Nicolas Blanchemain, Marion Gradwohl, Feng Chai, Julien Payen, Pierre Guerreschi, Philippe Marchetti, Nicolas Blanchemain

Abstract

Although bioabsorbable polymers have garnered increasing attention because of their potential in tissue engineering applications, to our knowledge there are only a few bioabsorbable 3D printed medical devices on the market thus far. In this study, we assessed the processability of medical grade Poly(lactic-co-glycolic) Acid (PLGA)85:15 via two additive manufacturing technologies: Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) and Direct Pellet Printing (DPP) to highlight the least destructive technology towards PLGA. To quantify PLGA degradation, its molecular weight (gel permeation chromatography (GPC)) as well as its thermal properties (differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)) were evaluated at each processing step, including sterilization with conventional methods (ethylene oxide, gamma, and beta irradiation). Results show that 3D printing of PLGA on a DPP printer significantly decreased the number-average molecular weight (Mn) to the greatest extent (26% Mn loss, p < 0.0001) as it applies a longer residence time and higher shear stress compared to classic FFF (19% Mn loss, p < 0.0001). Among all sterilization methods tested, ethylene oxide seems to be the most appropriate, as it leads to no significant changes in PLGA properties. After sterilization, all samples were considered to be non-toxic, as cell viability was above 70% compared to the control, indicating that this manufacturing route could be used for the development of bioabsorbable medical devices. Based on our observations, we recommend using FFF printing and ethylene oxide sterilization to produce PLGA medical devices.

Keywords: additive manufacturing; bioabsorbable; medical devices; polymer; sterilization.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Description of the manufacturing process n°1, including extrusion of the Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide) (PLGA) filament and Fused Filament Fabrication; (b) Description of the manufacturing process n°2: Direct Pellet Printing; (c) Dimensions of the 3D printed sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Comparison of mass of PLGA samples printed on FFF and PAM printer. All data were analyzed using a non parametric student t-test *** p < 0.001, (b) FFF and (c) DPP printed samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Evaluation of (a) the number-average molecular weight (Mn), (b) weight-average (Mw), and (c) polydispersity index (IP) of PLGA 85:15 from successively printed samples; All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Impact of additive manufacturing steps on the (a) Mn, (b) Mw and (c) polydispersity index of PLGA 85:15; All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and were analyzed using Anova one-way test and compared to the control * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms of PLGA 85:15 raw material, filament, PAM, and Ultimaker 3 3D printed constructs with a heating rate of 10 °C/min for the first heating run. (b) TGA thermogram of PLGA 85:15 pellets.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Impact of ethylene oxide as well as beta, rand, and gamma irradiation sterilization methods on the (a) Mn, (b) Mw, and (c) polydispersity index of PLGA 85:15; All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and were analyzed using Anova one-way test and compared to the control * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Impact of ethylene oxide, as well as beta, rand, and gamma irradiation sterilization methods on the (a) Glass transition temperature (Tg), and (b) the crystallinity of PLGA 85:15; All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) and were analyzed using Anova one-way test and compared to control * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Impact of ethylene oxide, as well as beta, rand, and gamma irradiation methods on cytotoxicity of PLGA constructs after sterilization; All data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8).

References

    1. Franchetti M., Kress C. An Economic Analysis Comparing the Cost Feasibility of Replacing Injection Molding Processes with Emerging Additive Manufacturing Techniques. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017;88:2573–2579. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-8968-7.
    1. Nikoubashman O., Heringer S., Feher K., Brockmann M.-A., Sellhaus B., Dreser A., Kurtenbach K., Pjontek R., Jockenhövel S., Weis J., et al. Development of a Polymer-Based Biodegradable Neurovascular Stent Prototype: A Preliminary In Vitro and In Vivo Study. Macromol. Biosci. 2018;18:1700292. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201700292.
    1. Liao L., Peng C., Li S., Lu Z., Fan Z. Evaluation of Bioresorbable Polymers as Potential Stent Material—In Vivo Degradation Behavior and Histocompatibility. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017;134 doi: 10.1002/app.44355.
    1. de Melo L.P., Salmoria G.V., Fancello E.A., de Mello Roesler C.R. Effect of Injection Molding Melt Temperatures on PLGA Craniofacial Plate Properties during In Vitro Degradation. Int. J. Biomater. 2017;2017:1256537. doi: 10.1155/2017/1256537.
    1. Maurus P.B., Kaeding C.C. Bioabsorbable Implant Material Review. Oper. Tech. Sports Med. 2004;12:158–160. doi: 10.1053/j.otsm.2004.07.015.
    1. Konan S., Haddad F.S. A Clinical Review of Bioabsorbable Interference Screws and Their Adverse Effects in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery. Knee. 2009;16:6–13. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.06.001.
    1. Ramot Y., Haim-Zada M., Domb A.J., Nyska A. Biocompatibility and Safety of PLA and Its Copolymers. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016;107:153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.012.
    1. Mohseni M., Hutmacher D.W., Castro N.J. Independent Evaluation of Medical-Grade Bioresorbable Filaments for Fused Deposition Modelling/Fused Filament Fabrication of Tissue Engineered Constructs. Polymers. 2018;10:40. doi: 10.3390/polym10010040.
    1. Prabhu B., Karau A., Wood A., Dadsetan M., Liedtke H., DeWitt T. Bioresorbable Materials for Orthopedic Applications (Lactide and Glycolide Based) In: Li B., Webster T., editors. Orthopedic Biomaterials: Progress in Biology, Manufacturing, and Industry Perspectives. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2018. pp. 287–344.
    1. Gunatillake P.A., Adhikari R. Biodegradable Synthetic Polymers for Tissue Engineering. Eur. Cell Mater. 2003;5:1–16. doi: 10.22203/ecm.v005a01.
    1. Chye Joachim Loo S., Ping Ooi C., Chiang Freddy Boey Y. Influence of Electron-Beam Radiation on the Hydrolytic Degradation Behaviour of Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) (PLGA) Biomaterials. 2005;26:3809–3817. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.014.
    1. Woodard L.N., Grunlan M.A. Hydrolytic Degradation and Erosion of Polyester Biomaterials. ACS Macro Lett. 2018;7:976–982. doi: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424.
    1. Ahlinder A., Fuoco T., Finne-Wistrand A. Medical Grade Polylactide, Copolyesters and Polydioxanone: Rheological Properties and Melt Stability. Polym. Test. 2018;72:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.10.007.
    1. Ahlinder A., Fuoco T., Morales-López Á., Yassin M.A., Mustafa K., Finne-Wistrand A. Nondegradative Additive Manufacturing of Medical Grade Copolyesters of High Molecular Weight and with Varied Elastic Response. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020;137:48550. doi: 10.1002/app.48550.
    1. Jain S., Fuoco T., Yassin M.A., Mustafa K., Wistrand A.F. Printability and Critical Insight into Polymer Properties during Direct- Extrusion Based 3D Printing of Medical Grade Polylactide and Copolyesters. Biomacromolecules. 2019;21:388–396. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01112.
    1. Sterilization of Implantable Polymer-Based Medical Devices: A Review. [(accessed on 30 July 2019)]; ScienceDirect. Available online: .
    1. Sterilization Techniques for Biodegradable Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering Applications. [(accessed on 30 July 2019)]; Available online:
    1. Holy C.E., Cheng C., Davies J.E., Shoichet M.S. Optimizing the Sterilization of PLGA Scaffolds for Use in Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials. 2000;22:25–31. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00136-8.
    1. Haim Zada M., Kumar A., Elmalak O., Mechrez G., Domb A.J. Effect of Ethylene Oxide and Gamma (γ-) Sterilization on the Properties of a PLCL Polymer Material in Balloon Implants. ACS Omega. 2019;4:21319–21326. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02889.
    1. Pietrzak W.S. Effects of Ethylene Oxide Sterilization on 82: 18 PLLA/PGA Copolymer Craniofacial Fixation Plates. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2010;21:177–181. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c50e9c.
    1. Phillip E., Murthy N.S., Bolikal D., Narayanan P., Kohn J., Lavelle L., Bodnar S., Pricer K. Ethylene Oxide’s Role as a Reactive Agent during Sterilization: Effects of Polymer Composition and Device Architecture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2013;101B:532–540. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.32853.
    1. Ethylene Oxide Sterilization of Medical Devices: A Review. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Ethylene Oxide Potential Toxicity: Expert Review of Medical Devices: Vol 5, No 3. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Lucas A.D., Merritt K., Hitchins V.M., Woods T.O., McNamee S.G., Lyle D.B., Brown S.A. Residual Ethylene Oxide in Medical Devices and Device Material. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)];J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2013 66:548–552. Available online: .
    1. Kinetics of the Aeration of Ethylene-Oxide Sterilized Plastics. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Aeration of Ethylene Oxide-Sterilized Polymers. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. FDA Ethylene Oxide Sterilization for Medical Devices. [(accessed on 18 February 2020)]; Available online: .
    1. Loo S.C.J., Ooi C.P., Boey Y.C.F. Radiation Effects on Poly (Lactide-Co-Glycolide) (PLGA) and Poly(l-Lactide) (PLLA) Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2004;83:259–265. doi: 10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00271-4.
    1. Davison L., Themistou E., Buchanan F., Cunningham E. Low Temperature Gamma Sterilization of a Bioresorbable Polymer, PLGA. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018;143:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.09.009.
    1. Montanari L., Cilurzo F., Selmin F., Conti B., Genta I., Poletti G., Orsini F., Valvo L. Poly (Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Microspheres Containing Bupivacaine: Comparison between Gamma and Beta Irradiation Effects. J. Control. Release. 2003;90:281–290. doi: 10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00153-6.
    1. Cingolani A., Casalini T., Caimi S., Klaue A., Sponchioni M., Rossi F., Perale G. A Methodologic Approach for the Selection of Bio-Resorbable Polymers in the Development of Medical Devices: The Case of Poly(l-Lactide-Co-ε-Caprolactone) Polymers. 2018;10:851. doi: 10.3390/polym10080851.
    1. Tsuji H., Mizuno A., Ikada Y. Properties and Morphology of Poly(L-lactide). III. Effects of Initial Crystallinity on Long-term in Vitro Hydrolysis of High Molecular Weight Poly(L-lactide) Film in Phosphate-buffered Solution. [(accessed on 12 May 2020)];J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000 77:1452–1464. Available online: .
    1. Widmer M.S., Gupta P.K., Lu L., Meszlenyi R.K., Evans G.R.D., Brandt K., Savel T., Gurlek A., Patrick C.W., Mikos A.G. Manufacture of Porous Biodegradable Polymer Conduits by an Extrusion Process for Guided Tissue Regeneration. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1945–1955. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00099-4.
    1. Shim J.-H., Kim J.Y., Park J.K., Hahn S.K., Rhie J.-W., Kang S.-W., Lee S.-H., Cho D.-W. Effect of Thermal Degradation of SFF-Based PLGA Scaffolds Fabricated Using a Multi-Head Deposition System Followed by Change of Cell Growth Rate. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2010;21:1069–1080. doi: 10.1163/092050609X12457428919034.
    1. Ragaert K., Cardon L., Dekeyser A., Degrieck J. Machine Design and Processing Considerations for the 3D Plotting of Thermoplastic Scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2010;2:014107. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014107.
    1. Woodruff M.A., Hutmacher D.W. The Return of a Forgotten Polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st Century. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010;35:1217–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002.
    1. Soufivand A.A., Abolfathi N., Hashemi A., Lee S.J. The Effect of 3D Printing on the Morphological and Mechanical Properties of Polycaprolactone Filament and Scaffold. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020;31:1038–1046. doi: 10.1002/pat.4838.
    1. Peltola S.M., Melchels F.P.W., Grijpma D.W., Kellomäki M. A Review of Rapid Prototyping Techniques for Tissue Engineering Purposes. Ann. Med. 2008;40:268–280. doi: 10.1080/07853890701881788.
    1. Faisant N., Siepmann J., Richard J., Benoit J.P. Mathematical Modeling of Drug Release from Bioerodible Microparticles: Effect of Gamma-Irradiation. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2003;56:271–279. doi: 10.1016/S0939-6411(03)00104-8.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel