District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a systematic literature review

Deepthi Wickremasinghe, Iram Ejaz Hashmi, Joanna Schellenberg, Bilal Iqbal Avan, Deepthi Wickremasinghe, Iram Ejaz Hashmi, Joanna Schellenberg, Bilal Iqbal Avan

Abstract

Health management information systems (HMIS) produce large amounts of data about health service provision and population health, and provide opportunities for data-based decision-making in decentralized health systems. Yet the data are little-used locally. A well-defined approach to district-level decision-making using health data would help better meet the needs of the local population. In this second of four papers on district decision-making for health in low-income settings, our aim was to explore ways in which district administrators and health managers in low- and lower-middle-income countries use health data to make decisions, to describe the decision-making tools they used and identify challenges encountered when using these tools. A systematic literature review, following PRISMA guidelines, was undertaken. Experts were consulted about key sources of information. A search strategy was developed for 14 online databases of peer reviewed and grey literature. The resources were screened independently by two reviewers using pre-defined inclusion criteria. The 14 papers included were assessed for the quality of reported evidence and a descriptive evidence synthesis of the review findings was undertaken. We found 12 examples of tools to assist district-level decision-making, all of which included two key stages-identification of priorities, and development of an action plan to address them. Of those tools with more steps, four included steps to review or monitor the action plan agreed, suggesting the use of HMIS data. In eight papers HMIS data were used for prioritization. Challenges to decision-making processes fell into three main categories: the availability and quality of health and health facility data; human dynamics and financial constraints. Our findings suggest that evidence is available about a limited range of processes that include the use of data for decision-making at district level. Standardization and pre-testing in diverse settings would increase the potential that these tools could be used more widely.

Keywords: Decision-making; decentralization; evidence-based policy; health planning; health systems; low-income.

© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of the systematic review process.

References

    1. Abajebel S, Jira C, Beyene W. 2011. Utilization of health information system at district level in Jimma zone Oromia regional state, South West Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences 21: 65–76.
    1. AbouZahr C, Boerma T. 2005. Health information systems: the foundation of public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83: 578–83.
    1. Avan BI, Berhanu D, Umar N et al.District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a feasibility study of a data-informed platform for health in India, Nigeria and Ethiopia Health Policy and Planning 201631:ii3–ii11.
    1. Bhattacharyya K, Murray J. 2000. Community assessment and planning for maternal and child health programs: a participatory approach in Ethiopia. Human Organization 59: 255–66.
    1. Bhattacharyya S, Berhanu D, Taddesse N et al.District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a case study of the potential of public and private sector data in India and Ethiopia Health Policy and Planning 201631:ii25–ii34.
    1. Björkman M, Svensson J. 2009. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 735–69.
    1. Bossert T, Beauvais JC, Bowser D. 2000. Decentralization of Health Systems: Preliminary Review of Four Country Case Studies. Major Applied Research 6, Technical Report No. 1. Bethesda, Maryland: Partnerships for Health Reform Project, Abt Associates Inc.
    1. Bossert TJ, Beauvais JC. 2002. Decentralization of health systems in Ghana, Zambia, Uganda and the Philippines: a comparative analysis of decision space. Health Policy and Planning 17: 14–31.
    1. Braa J, Hanseth O, Heywood A, Mohammed W, Shaw V. 2007. Developing health information systems in developing countries: the flexible standards strategy. MIS Quarterly 31: 1–21.
    1. Braa J, Heywood A, Sahay S. 2012. Improving quality and use of data through data-use workshops: Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 90: 379–84.
    1. CDC Foundation. 2015Improving health care provider performance in developing countries. 2015accessed 12 January:
    1. Center for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York: PROSPERO: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. , accessed 12 January 2015.
    1. Chaulagai CN, Moyo CM, Koot J. et al. 2005. Design and implementation of a health management information system in Malawi: issues, innovations and results. Health Policy and Planning 20: 375–84.
    1. Chitama D, Baltussen R, Ketting E. et al. 2011. From papers to practices: district level priority setting processes and criteria for family planning, maternal, newborn and child health interventions in Tanzania. BMC Womens Health 11: 46.
    1. Compass Resource Management Ltd. 2013. Structured decision making: Welcome! , accessed 12 January 2015.
    1. Compass Resource Management Ltd. 2014Structured decision making: SDM brings innovative methods from the decision sciences into the real world. 2015accessed 12 January:
    1. Critical Skills Appraisal Programme. 2013. 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research , accessed 15 December 2015.
    1. de Savigny D, Kasale H, Mbuya C, Reid G. 2008. Fixing Health Systems. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
    1. Feldman MS, March JG. 1981. Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly 26: 171–86.
    1. Gautham M, Spicer N, Subharwal M et al.District decision-making for health in low-income settings: a qualitative study in Uttar Pradesh, India, on engaging the private health sector in sharing health-related data Health Policy and Planning 201631:ii35–ii46.
    1. Gill Z, Bailey PE. 2010. Bottom up and top down: a comprehensive approach to improve care and strengthen the health system. JPMA: Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 60: 927–35.
    1. Harrison T, Nutley T. 2010. A Review of Constraints to Using Data for Decision Making: Recommendations to Inform the Design of Interventions. Chapel Hill, N Carolina: MEASURE Evaluation.
    1. Heinonen T, Mercader M, Quianzon JL, Penera-Torralba M, Baluis L. 2000. Conceptualizing and applying a minimum basic needs approach in southern Philippines. Health Policy and Planning 15: 194–206.
    1. International Standards Organization (ISO) Standards. accessed 12 January: 2015.
    1. Israr SM, Islam A. 2006. Good governance and sustainability: a case study from Pakistan. International Journal of Health Planning Management 21: 313–25.
    1. Kimaro HC, Sahay S. 2007. An institutional perspective on the process of decentralization of Health Information Systems: a case study from Tanzania. Information Technology for Development 13: 363–90.
    1. La Vincente S, Aldaba B, Firth S. et al. 2013. Supporting local planning and budgeting for maternal, neonatal and child health in the Philippines. Health Research Policy and Systems 11: 3.
    1. Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Sebastian MS. et al. 2010. Decentralized health care priority-setting in Tanzania: evaluating against the accountability for reasonableness framework. Social Science & Medicine 71: 751–59.
    1. Maluka S, Kamuzora P, Sansebastian M. et al. 2011a. Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implementation Science 6: 11.
    1. Maluka SO, Hurtig AK, Sebastian MS. et al. 2011b. Decentralization and health care prioritization process in Tanzania: from national rhetoric to local reality. The International Journal of Health Planning Management 26: e102–20.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, Group TP. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6: e1000097.
    1. Mubyazi G, Kamugisha M, Mushi A, Blas E. 2004. Implications of decentralization for the control of tropical diseases in Tanzania: a case study of four districts. International Journal of Health Planning Management 19(Suppl 1): S167–85.
    1. Murthy N. 1998. Decentralized health planning: lessons from two districts in India. Journal of Health & Population in Developing Countries 1: 1–10.
    1. Mutale W, Chintu N, Amoroso C. et al. 2013. Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative. BMC Health Services Research 13(Suppl 2): S9.
    1. Mutemwa RI. 2006. HMIS and decision-making in Zambia: re-thinking information solutions for district health management in decentralized health systems. Health Policy and Planning 21: 40–52.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2007. Appendix H: Methodology Checklist: Qualitative Studies. London: NICE.
    1. Nnaji GA, Oguoma C, Nnaji LI, Nwobodo E. 2010. The challenges of budgeting in a newly introduced district health system: a case study. Global Public Health 5: 87–101.
    1. Nutley T. 2012. Improving Data Use in Decision Making: an Intervention to Strengthen Health Systems. Chapel Hill, N Carolina: MEASURE Evaluation.
    1. Nutley T, McNabb S, Salentine S. 2013. Impact of a decision-support tool on decision making at the district level in Kenya. Health Research Policy and Systems 11: 8.
    1. Nyamtema AS. 2010. Bridging the gaps in the Health Management Information System in the context of a changing health sector. BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making 10: 36.
    1. Pappaioanou M, Malison M, Wilkins K. et al. 2003. Strengthening capacity in developing countries for evidence-based public health: the data for decision-making project. Social Science & Medicine 57: 1925–37.
    1. Qazi MS, Ali M. 2011. Health Management Information System utilization in Pakistan: challenges, pitfalls and the way forward. Bioscience Trends 5: 245–54.
    1. Qazi MS, Ali M, Kuroiwa C. 2008. The Health Management Information System of Pakistan under devolution: health managers' perceptions. Bioscience Trends 2: 75–80.
    1. Sandiford P, Kanga GJ, Ahmed AM. 1994. The management of health services in Tanzania: Aa plea for health sector reform. International Journal of Health Planning Management 9: 295–308.
    1. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2012. Notes on Methodology Checklist: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Edinburgh: Healthcare Improvement Scotland.
    1. Shaikh S, Naeem I, Nafees A. et al. 2012. Experience of devolution in district health system of Pakistan: perspectives regarding needed reforms. JAMA: Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 62: 28
    1. Smith DL, Hansen H, Karim MS. 1989. Management information support for district health systems based on primary health care. Information Technology for Development 4: 779–811.
    1. Soeung SC, Grundy J, Ly CK. et al. 2006. Improving immunization coverage through budgeted microplans and sub-national performance agreements: early experience from Cambodia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 18: 29–38.
    1. Somanje H, Barry SP, Dramé B, Mwikisa-Ngenda C. 2012. Health systems strengthening: improving district health service delivery and community ownership and participation. African Health Monitor 15: 48–54.
    1. Stansfield SK, Walsh J, Prata N, Evans T. 2006. Information to Improve Decision Making for Health In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR. et al. (eds). Chapter 54 Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. 2nd edn Washington, DC: World Bank; , accessed 12 January 2015.
    1. Stone D. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd edn New York, London: WW Norton & Company.
    1. Talukder N, Rob U, Mahabub-Ul-Anwar M. 2008. Lessons learned from health sector reform: a four-country comparison. International Quarterly of Community Health Education 28: 153–64.
    1. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. 2012. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12: 8.
    1. Walshe K, Rundall TG. 2001. Evidence-based management: from theory to practice in health care. Milbank Quarterly 79: 429–57.
    1. Wilson RS, Arvai JL. 2011. Structured Decision Making: Using Decision Research to Improve Stakeholder Participation and Results. Corvallis, OR: Oregon Sea Grant, Oregon State University.
    1. World Bank. 2012. Country and lending groups. , accessed 13 March 2013.

Source: PubMed

Szponzorok és közreműködők

Egészségi állapot

Kábítószer-beavatkozások

3
Iratkozz fel