Engaging patients and family members to design and implement patient-centered kidney disease research

Teri Browne, Amy Swoboda, Patti L Ephraim, Katina Lang-Lindsey, Jamie A Green, Felicia Hill-Briggs, George L Jackson, Suzanne Ruff, Lana Schmidt, Peter Woods, Patty Danielson, Shakur Bolden, Brian Bankes, Chelsie Hauer, Tara Strigo, L Ebony Boulware, Teri Browne, Amy Swoboda, Patti L Ephraim, Katina Lang-Lindsey, Jamie A Green, Felicia Hill-Briggs, George L Jackson, Suzanne Ruff, Lana Schmidt, Peter Woods, Patty Danielson, Shakur Bolden, Brian Bankes, Chelsie Hauer, Tara Strigo, L Ebony Boulware

Abstract

We need more research projects that partner and engage with patients and family members as team members. Doing this requires that patients and family members set research priorities and fully participate in research teams. Models for this patient and family member engagement as research partners can help increase patient centered outcomes research. In this article, we describe how we have successfully engaged patients with kidney disease and family members as Co-Investigators on a 5-year research project testing a health system intervention to improve kidney disease care. Background This article describes a method for successful engagement of patients and family members in all stages of a 5-year comparative effectiveness research trial to improve transitions of care for patients from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease. Methods This project utilized the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute's conceptual model for engagement with patients and family members. We conducted a qualitative analysis of grant planning meetings to determine patient and family member Co-Investigators' priorities for research and to include these engagement efforts in the research design. Patient and family member Co-Investigators partnered in writing this paper. Results Patients and family members were successfully engaged in remote and in-person meetings to contribute actively to research planning and implementation stages. Three patient-centered themes emerged from our data related to engagement that informed our research plan: kidney disease treatment decision-making, care transitions from chronic to end-stage kidney disease, and patient-centered outcomes. Conclusions The model we have employed represents a new paradigm for kidney disease research in the United States, with patients and family members engaged as full research partners. As a result, the study tests an intervention that directly responds to their needs, and it prioritizes the collection of outcomes data most relevant to patient and family member Co-Investigators. Trial registration NCT02722382 .

Keywords: Care transitions; Family member research partners; Kidney disease; Outcomes; PCORI; Patient and public involvement; Patient centered; Patient research partners; Shared decision-making.

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process for Engaging Patients in Development of Research Proposal (Pre-Funding)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Process for Engaging Patients and Family Members on the Research Team

References

    1. Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA. 2014;312:1513–1514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.11100.
    1. Gnadinger T. Shaping studies to meet patients’ needs. Health Aff. 2016;35:603. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0223.
    1. Terry SF. The study is open: participants are now recruiting investigators. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:371. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf1001.
    1. Chalmers I, Atkinson P, Fenton M, Firkins L, Crowe S, Cowan K. Tackling treatment uncertainties together: the evolution of the James Lind initiative, 2003–2013. J R Soc Med. 2013;106(12):482–491. doi: 10.1177/0141076813493063.
    1. Shippee ND, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Nabhan M, Brito JP, Boehmer K, Hasan R, Firwana B, Erwin PJ. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 2015;18(5):1151–1166. doi: 10.1111/hex.12090.
    1. Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R, Milne R, Buchanan P, Gabbay J, Gyte G, Oakley A, Stein K. Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Expect. 2008;11(1):72–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x.
    1. Staniszewska S. Patient and public involvement in health services and health research: a brief overview of evidence, policy and activity. J Res Nurs. 2009;14(4):295–298. doi: 10.1177/1744987109106811.
    1. Hargraves I, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision making: the need for patient-clinician conversation, not just information. Health Aff. 2016;35:627–629. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354.
    1. Havas K, Douglas C, Bonner A. Person-centred care in chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study of patients’ desires for self-management support. BMC Nephrol. 2017;18:17. doi: 10.1186/s12882-016-0416-2.
    1. Lavallee DC, Chenok KE, Love RM, et al. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Aff. 2016;35:575–582. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362.
    1. de Wit M, Cooper C, Reginster J-Y. Practical guidance for patient-centred health research. Lancet. 2019;393:1095–1096. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30034-0.
    1. Laura P, Forsythe KLC, Szydlowski V, et al. Patient engagement in research: Early findings from the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Health Aff. 2019;38:359–367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . Person and family engagement strategy. Woodlawn: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2016.
    1. Narva AS, Norton JM, Boulware LE. Educating patients about CKD: the path to self-management and patient-centered care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;11(4):694–703. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07680715.
    1. Nunes JAW, Cavanaugh KL, Fagerlin A. An informed and activated patient: addressing barriers in the pathway from education to outcomes. Am J Kid Dis. 2016;67:1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.017.
    1. O'Hare AM. Patient-centered care in renal medicine: five strategies to meet the challenge. Am J Kid Dis. 2018;71(5):732–736. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.022.
    1. Potluri VS, Dember LM, Reese PP. Honoring patient preferences in initiation of dialysis: problems, proposals, and a path forward. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:236–237. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7796.
    1. Gutman T, Tong A, Howell M, et al. Principles and strategies for involving patients in research in chronic kidney disease: report from national workshops. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019. 10.1093/ndt/gfz076.
    1. Kimmel PL, Jefferson N, Norton JM, Star RA. How community engagement is enhancing NIDDK research. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:768–770. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14591218.
    1. Peipert JD, Hays RD. Expanding the patient's voice in nephrology with patient-reported outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30:530–532. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019010019.
    1. United State Renal Data System . 2019 USRDS annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Bethesda: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2019.
    1. Browne T, Forfang D, Pucci K, Joseph J, Brereton L. The National Kidney Foundation 2017 Patient Centered Outcomes Research Stakeholders’ Conference Summary Report. 2017.
    1. Demian MN, Lam NN, Mac-Way F, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Fernandez N. Opportunities for engaging patients in kidney research. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2017;17:4.
    1. Cukor D, Cohen LM, Cope EL, et al. Patient and other stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research institute funded studies of patients with kidney diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(9):1703–1712. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09780915.
    1. Hurst FP, Chianchiano D, Upchurch L, et al. Stimulating patient engagement in medical device development in kidney disease: a report of a kidney health initiative workshop. Am J Kid Dis. 2017;70(4):561–569. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.03.013.
    1. Speyer E, Subramanian L, Tentori F. Increasing the relevance of clinical research for patients with kidney disease. Am J Kid Dis. 2017;69:11–13. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.10.005.
    1. Hynes D, Arruda J, Berbaum M, et al. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. 2019. Evaluating a patient-centered medical home for patients receiving dialysis for kidney disease.
    1. Davison SN, Jassal SV. Supportive care: integration of patient-centered kidney care to manage symptoms and geriatric syndromes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(10):1882–1891. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01050116.
    1. Weisbord SD. Patient-centered dialysis care: depression, pain, and quality of life. Semin Dial. 2016;29(2):158–164. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12464.
    1. Grubbs V, Moss AH, Cohen LM, et al. A palliative approach to dialysis care: a patient-centered transition to the end of life. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(12):2203–2209. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00650114.
    1. Mehrotra R, Cukor D, Unruh M, et al. Comparative efficacy of therapies for treatment of depression for patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(6):369–379. doi: 10.7326/M18-2229.
    1. Green JA, Ephraim PL, Hill-Briggs FF, et al. Putting patients at the center of kidney care transitions: PREPARE NOW, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;73:98–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.004.
    1. Boulware LE, Ephraim PL, Browne T, et al. Researching health together: engaging patients and stakeholders from topic identification to policy change. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publishing; 2020. Achieving patient centered health care innovation through stakeholder engagement; pp. 302–322.
    1. O'Lone E, Viescelli AK, Craig JC, et al. Establishing core cardiovascular outcome measures for trials in hemodialysis: report of an international consensus workshop. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76(1):109–120. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.01.022.
    1. Hanson CS, Gutman T, Craig JC, et al. Identifying important outcomes for young people with CKD and their caregivers: a nominal group technique study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;74(1):82–94. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.040.
    1. Tong A, Manns B, Wang AYM, et al. Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the standardized outcomes in nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop. Kidney Int. 2018;94(6):1053–1068. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.018.
    1. González AM, Gutman T, Lopez-Vargas P, et al. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in CKD: a multinational nominal group technique study. Am J Kid Dis. 2020. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.03.022.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . ESRD Treatment Choices (ETC) model. 2020.
    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Advancing American kidney health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2019.
    1. Evangelidis N, Tong A, Manns B, et al. Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in hemodialysis: an international delphi survey. Am J Kid Dis. 2017;70(4):464–475. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.11.029.
    1. Urquhart-Secord R, Craig JC, Hemmelgarn B, et al. Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in hemodialysis: an international nominal group technique study. Am J Kid Dis. 2016;68:444–454. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.02.037.
    1. Weiner D, Watnick S. The ESRD quality incentive program—can we bridge the chasm? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(6):1697–1706. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101079.
    1. Fowler K. Innovation in chronic kidney disease: the need for the patient voice. Patient. 2017;10(6):673–676.
    1. Conway PT. Trust patient insights at both the individual and national level. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;13(1):1–2. doi: 10.2215/CJN.13211117.
    1. Linde PG, Archdeacon P, Breyer MD, et al. Overcoming barriers in kidney health—forging a platform for innovation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:1902–1910. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015090976.
    1. Dewar BJ. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research–a framework for future development and understanding. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:48–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01162.x.
    1. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:985–991. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1.
    1. Barrett TM, Green JA, Greer RC, et al. Advanced CKD care and decision making: which health care professionals do patients rely on for CKD treatment and advice? Kid Med. 2020;2(5):532–P542. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.05.008.
    1. Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24:1033–1041. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3.
    1. Sofaer S. Qualitative research methods. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2002;14:329–336. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.329.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967.
    1. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Newbury Park: SAGE publications limited; 2012.
    1. Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:13–21. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z.
    1. Carman KL, Workman TA. Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.009.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel