Maintenance of Acromegaly Control in Patients Switching From Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligands to Oral Octreotide

Susan L Samson, Lisa B Nachtigall, Maria Fleseriu, Murray B Gordon, Marek Bolanowski, Artak Labadzhyan, Ehud Ur, Mark Molitch, William H Ludlam, Gary Patou, Asi Haviv, Nienke Biermasz, Andrea Giustina, Peter J Trainer, Christian J Strasburger, Laurence Kennedy, Shlomo Melmed, Susan L Samson, Lisa B Nachtigall, Maria Fleseriu, Murray B Gordon, Marek Bolanowski, Artak Labadzhyan, Ehud Ur, Mark Molitch, William H Ludlam, Gary Patou, Asi Haviv, Nienke Biermasz, Andrea Giustina, Peter J Trainer, Christian J Strasburger, Laurence Kennedy, Shlomo Melmed

Abstract

Purpose: The phase 3 CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial (NCT03252353) evaluated efficacy and safety of oral octreotide capsules (OOCs) in patients with acromegaly who previously demonstrated biochemical control while receiving injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs).

Methods: In this double-blind study, patients (N = 56) stratified by prior SRL dose were randomly assigned 1:1 to OOC or placebo for 36 weeks. The primary end point was maintenance of biochemical control at the end of treatment (mean insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] ≤ 1.0 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; weeks 34 and 36). Time to loss of IGF-1 response and proportion requiring reversion to injectable SRLs were assessed as broader control measures.

Results: Mean IGF-1 measurements were 0.80 and 0.97 × ULN for OOC and 0.84 and 1.69 × ULN for placebo, at baseline and end of treatment, respectively. Mean growth hormone (GH) changed from 0.66 to 0.60 ng/mL for OOCs and 0.90 to 2.57 ng/mL for placebo. Normalization of IGF-1 levels (≤ 1.0 × ULN) was maintained in 58.2% for OOCs vs 19.4% for placebo (P = .008); GH levels were maintained (< 2.5 ng/mL) in 77.7% for OOC vs 30.4% for placebo (P = .0007). Median time to loss of response (IGF-1 > 1.0 or ≥ 1.3 × ULN definitions) for patients receiving placebo was 16 weeks; for patients receiving OOCs, it was not reached for both definitions during the 36-week trial (P < .0001). Of the patients in the OOC group, 75% completed the trial on oral therapy. The OOC safety profile was consistent with previous SRL experience.

Conclusions: OOCs may be an effective therapy for patients with acromegaly who previously were treated with injectable SRLs.

Keywords: oral octreotide; IGF-1; acromegaly; growth hormone; somatostatin analogues; somatostatin receptor ligands.

© Endocrine Society 2020.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study design for the CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial, including screening, DPC period, and OLE. DPC, double-blind placebo-controlled; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; OLE, open-label extension; OOC, oral octreotide capsules; SRL, somatostatin receptor ligand; SV, screening visit.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient disposition for all patients screened for the CHIASMA OPTIMAL trial. AE, adverse event; OOC, oral octreotide capsules.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and growth hormone (GH) at baseline and end of treatment. A, The observed mean IGF-1 change from baseline to end of DPC treatment is shown in the OOC group and the placebo group. B, The observed mean change in GH from baseline to end of DPC treatment is shown in the OOC group and the placebo group. GH levels were assessed every 30 (±5) minutes for 2 hours: at the first SV from time 0 to 2 hours (prior to SRL administration, if planned), at baseline from time 0 to 2 hours (prior to study medication), at week 36/EOT, and at all other visits in OLE, 2 to 4 hours after study medication administration. Displayed error bars show the SE. DPC, double-blind placebo-controlled; EOT, end of treatment; OOC, oral octreotide capsules; SRL, somatostatin receptor ligand; ULN, upper limit of normal.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proportion of patients who had biochemical response at the end of double-blind placebo-controlled (DPC) treatment. The proportion of patients in the OOC and the placebo groups who maintained their A, IGF-1 and B, GH response at the end of the DPC period. Adjusted proportions were obtained from an exact logistic regression model including covariates for treatment group, baseline SRL dose (low vs medium or high) and baseline IGF-I level (

References

    1. Colao A, Grasso LFS, Giustina A, et al. Acromegaly. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):20.
    1. Giustina A, Barkan A, Beckers A, et al. A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly comorbidities: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;105(4):e937-e946.
    1. Melmed S, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, et al. A consensus statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(9):552-561.
    1. Devesa J, Almengló C, Devesa P. Multiple effects of growth hormone in the body: is it really the hormone for growth? Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016;9:47-71.
    1. Freda PU. Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;71(2):166-170.
    1. Melmed S. Pituitary-tumor endocrinopathies. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(10):937-950.
    1. Gadelha MR, Kasuki L, Lim DST, Fleseriu M. Systemic complications of acromegaly and the impact of the current treatment landscape: an update. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(1):268-332.
    1. Chen CJ, Ironside N, Pomeraniec IJ, et al. Microsurgical versus endoscopic transsphenoidal resection for acromegaly: a systematic review of outcomes and complications. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(11):2193-2207.
    1. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, et al. ; Endocrine Society . Acromegaly: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):3933-3951.
    1. Strasburger CJ, Karavitaki N, Störmann S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of parenteral somatostatin analogue injections in 195 patients with acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(3):355-362.
    1. Fleseriu M, Fogelfeld L, Gordon MB, et al. An evaluation of the Acromegaly Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (Acro-TSQ) in adult patients with acromegaly, including correlations with other patient-reported outcome measures: data from two large multicenter international studies. Pituitary. 2020;23(4):347-358.
    1. Bevan JS, Newell-Price J, Wass JA, et al. Home administration of lanreotide Autogel by patients with acromegaly, or their partners, is safe and effective. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(3):343-349.
    1. Salvatori R, Nachtigall LB, Cook DM, et al. ; SALSA Study Group . Effectiveness of self- or partner-administration of an extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide in lanreotide-naïve patients with acromegaly. Pituitary. 2010;13(2):115-122.
    1. Neggers SJ, Pronin V, Balcere I, et al. ; LEAD Study Group . Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg at extended dosing intervals in patients with acromegaly biochemically controlled with octreotide LAR: the LEAD study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(3):313-323.
    1. Geer E, Sisco J, Adelman D, et al. Relationship between responses from acromegaly patients treated with a stable dose of injectable somatostatin analogues in routine clinical practice and their endocrinology health care professional regarding treatment outcomes: preliminary findings. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(Suppl 1):SUN-LB077.
    1. Geer E, Sisco J, Adelman D, et al. Patient reported outcome data from acromegaly patients treated with injectable somatostatin analogues in routine clinical practice: preliminary results. J Endocr Soc. 2019;3(Suppl 1):SAT-434.
    1. Melmed S, Popovic V, Bidlingmaier M, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral octreotide in acromegaly: results of a multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(4):1699-1708.
    1. Tuvia S, Pelled D, Marom K, et al. A novel suspension formulation enhances intestinal absorption of macromolecules via transient and reversible transport mechanisms. Pharm Res. 2014;31(8):2010-2021.
    1. Tuvia S, Atsmon J, Teichman SL, et al. Oral octreotide absorption in human subjects: comparable pharmacokinetics to parenteral octreotide and effective growth hormone suppression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(7):2362-2369.
    1. Chanson P, Borson-Chazot F, Kuhn JM, Blumberg J, Maisonobe P, Delemer B; Lanreotide Acromegaly Study Group . Control of IGF-I levels with titrated dosing of lanreotide Autogel over 48 weeks in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69(2):299-305.
    1. Lancranjan I, Atkinson AB. Results of a European multicentre study with Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients. Sandostatin LAR Group. Pituitary. 1999;1(2):105-114.
    1. Lancranjan I, Bruns C, Grass P, et al. Sandostatin LAR: a promising therapeutic tool in the management of acromegalic patients. Metabolism. 1996;45(8 Suppl 1):67-71.
    1. Melmed S, Cook D, Schopohl J, Goth MI, Lam KS, Marek J. Rapid and sustained reduction of serum growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 in patients with acromegaly receiving lanreotide Autogel therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study with a 52 week open extension. Pituitary. 2010;13(1):18-28.
    1. Carmichael JD, Bonert VS, Nuño M, Ly D, Melmed S. Acromegaly clinical trial methodology impact on reported biochemical efficacy rates of somatostatin receptor ligand treatments: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1825-1833.
    1. Bidlingmaier M, Friedrich N, Emeny RT, et al. Reference intervals for insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I) from birth to senescence: results from a multicenter study using a new automated chemiluminescence IGF-I immunoassay conforming to recent international recommendations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):1712-1721.
    1. Manolopoulou J, Alami Y, Petersenn S, et al. Automated 22-kD growth hormone-specific assay without interference from pegvisomant. Clin Chem. 2012;58(10):1446-1456.
    1. Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, et al. Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(2):526-529.
    1. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD, et al. ; Acromegaly Consensus Group . A consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(7):3141-3148.
    1. van Esdonk MJ, van Zutphen EJM, Roelfsema F, et al. How are growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 reported as markers for drug effectiveness in clinical acromegaly research? A comprehensive methodologic review. Pituitary. 2018;21(3):310-322.
    1. AlDallal S. Acromegaly: a challenging condition to diagnose. Int J Gen Med. 2018;11:337-343.
    1. Katznelson L, Atkinson JL, Cook DM, Ezzat SZ, Hamrahian AH, Miller KK; AACE Acromegaly Task Force . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly–2011 update: executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(4):636-646.
    1. Milani D, Carmichael JD, Welkowitz J, et al. Variability and reliability of single serum IGF-I measurements: impact on determining predictability of risk ratios in disease development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(5):2271-2274.
    1. Giustina A, Chanson P, Kleinberg D, et al. ; Acromegaly Consensus Group . Expert consensus document: a consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(4):243-248.
    1. Ramírez C, Vargas G, González B, et al. Discontinuation of octreotide LAR after long term, successful treatment of patients with acromegaly: is it worth trying? Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(1):21-26.
    1. Stewart PM, James RA. The future of somatostatin analogue therapy. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;13(3):409-418.
    1. Vilar L, Fleseriu M, Naves LA, et al. Can we predict long-term remission after somatostatin analog withdrawal in patients with acromegaly? Results from a multicenter prospective trial. Endocrine. 2014;46(3):577-584.
    1. Colao A, Bronstein MD, Freda P, et al. ; Pasireotide C2305 Study Group . Pasireotide versus octreotide in acromegaly: a head-to-head superiority study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(3):791-799.
    1. Baldelli R, Colao A, Razzore P, et al. Two-year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with slow release lanreotide (30 mg). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(11):4099-4103.
    1. Chieffo C, Cook D, Xiang Q, Frohman LA. Efficacy and safety of an octreotide implant in the treatment of patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):4047-4054.
    1. Sheppard M, Bronstein MD, Freda P, et al. Pasireotide LAR maintains inhibition of GH and IGF-1 in patients with acromegaly for up to 25 months: results from the blinded extension phase of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase III study. Pituitary. 2015;18(3):385-394.
    1. Tutuncu Y, Berker D, Isik S, et al. Comparison of octreotide LAR and lanreotide autogel as post-operative medical treatment in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2012;15(3):398-404.
    1. Fleseriu M, Melmed S, Mangal B, Strasburger CJ, Biermasz NR. Longitudinal assessment of response to treatment with oral octreotide capsules in patients with acromegaly: post-hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial. Poster presented at: European Congress of Endocrinology; May 28–31, 2016, Munich, Germany.
    1. Biermasz NR, van Dulken H, Roelfsema F. Ten-year follow-up results of transsphenoidal microsurgery in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(12):4596-4602.
    1. Marquez Y, Tuchman A, Zada G. Surgery and radiosurgery for acromegaly: a review of indications, operative techniques, outcomes, and complications. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:386401.
    1. Geer EB, Sisco J, Adelman DT, et al. Observed discordance between outcomes reported by acromegaly patients and their treating endocrinology medical provider. Pituitary. 2020;23(2):140-148.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel