A Phase 2 Study of Concurrent Radiation Therapy, Temozolomide, and the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Valproic Acid for Patients With Glioblastoma

Andra V Krauze, Sten D Myrehaug, Michael G Chang, Diane J Holdford, Sharon Smith, Joanna Shih, Philip J Tofilon, Howard A Fine, Kevin Camphausen, Andra V Krauze, Sten D Myrehaug, Michael G Chang, Diane J Holdford, Sharon Smith, Joanna Shih, Philip J Tofilon, Howard A Fine, Kevin Camphausen

Abstract

Purpose: Valproic acid (VPA) is an antiepileptic agent with histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) activity shown to sensitize glioblastoma (GBM) cells to radiation in preclinical models. We evaluated the addition of VPA to standard radiation therapy (RT) plus temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

Methods and materials: Thirty-seven patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled between July 2006 and April 2013. Patients received VPA, 25 mg/kg orally, divided into 2 daily doses concurrent with RT and TMZ. The first dose of VPA was given 1 week before the first day of RT at 10 to 15 mg/kg/day and subsequently increased up to 25 mg/kg/day over the week prior to radiation. VPA- and TMZ-related acute toxicities were evaluated using Common Toxicity Criteria version 3.0 (National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program) and Cancer Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme for toxicity and adverse event reporting (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment).

Results: A total of 81% of patients took VPA according to protocol. Median overall survival (OS) was 29.6 months (range: 21-63.8 months), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.5 months (range: 6.8-51.2 months). OS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 97%, 86%, and 56%, respectively. PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 70%, 43%, and 38% respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities of VPA in conjunction with RT/TMZ therapy were blood and bone marrow toxicity (32%), neurological toxicity (11%), and metabolic and laboratory toxicity (8%). Younger age and class V recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) results were significant for both OS and PFS. VPA levels were not correlated with grade 3 or 4 toxicity levels.

Conclusions: Addition of VPA to concurrent RT/TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed GBM was well tolerated. Additionally, VPA may result in improved outcomes compared to historical data and merits further study.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none.

Published by Elsevier Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Treatment schema for the study group. VPA was administered concurrently with RT. No adjuvant VPA was given. RT = radiation therapy; VPA = valproic acid.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (A) and progression-free survival (B). Dotted lines represent 95% confidence limits.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prognostic factor analysis: Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression -free survival (PFS) by RPA (A and B) and age (C and D). RPA = XXX.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Survival and toxicity versus VPA levels (according to possible or probable attribution to VPA) for patients in whom VPA levels were available. VPA = valproic acid.

Source: PubMed

3
Iratkozz fel